Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argument about art in america
Argument about art in america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argument about art in america
Robert Mapplethorpe: Photography, Homoeroticism, and Senator Jesse Helms
No medium or arena is free from political assimilation. Perhaps this is why the term "the personal is political" is so reverberant in such a multitude of communities. In the fine arts community, every art piece reflects a personal decision or touch; what medium to best describe a subject or idea in, or the physical shape and making of art by an artist, for example, are ways in which each artist has ownership over his or her own work. When art is displayed for an audience, the very act of placing a personal piece into the public sphere creates a forum for interactive and political dialogue and judgment. To present artwork in a public arena authorizes the audience to construe interpretation and assess that art. The policies and politics that dictate the arrival of art for the public purview are not immune to the authority and judgment making that occurs once the art is on display. In order for galleries, museums, or universities to display artwork, their high level officials must approve the works. Furthermore, when the work is on display it reflects back on the institution it is in, the leaders of that institution who approve it, and ultimately the artist who made the work herself. There are foundations and organizations that are funded by the government for the promotion and distribution of fine arts, which of necessity are bound by the legal dictates of the governing bodies and the public it represents for these reasons. When artwork or an artist is controversial, it becomes a political issue due to governmental involvement in funding of --and thus universally approving-- the contentious art or art-maker. For artists who work in the photographic medium, controversies arise more readily due to the realism of the images. Homoerotic photographic art in particular is the site of political and social stigmatization, as exemplified by Robert Mapplethorpe's life and work. Mapplethorpe's photography was the catalyst from which conservative senator Jesse Helms was able to symbolize the misinterpretations of visual representation for "real" or authentic action and criticize his work as "obscene" due to its homoerotic content.
Robert Mapplethorpe (1946-1989) was a gay male artist who died at the age of 43 of AIDS. His technically brilliant and stylistically disreputable images sparked both controversy and contemplation. He was equally praised and derogated by his stark and honest appraisal of the erotic male nude, his depiction of sadomasochistic culture and practices, and his own and others' homoerotic and multiracial portraits.
The similar controversial natures of Fury’s Kissing Doesn’t Kill and Manuel Ramos Otero’s “Nobility of Blood” suggest that perhaps their intended audiences may have shared characteristics as well. Because Kissing Doesn’t Kill is a piece of poster art, it was displayed out in the public, instead of a museum or convention like usual pieces of art. The poster was plastered in large sizes to the sides of public transportation buses, billboards, and even mass mailings. People of all kinds of backgrounds came across the artwork, whether they wanted to or not. However, since the point of activist artwork like this is to create social change, the effect of this artwork on its viewers is the main focus. To people who agreed with the statements on the
When President Nixon was leaving the White House, Henry Kissinger comforted him by saying, "History will treat you kindly," to which Nixon replied, "That depends on who writes the history" (Hamburg xiv).
Yellow fever is a horrible disease for those who begin to show symptoms, and while that number is low, of those who do become ill 50% die; only after having two rounds ...
An essay exploring how important image is to society and how it leads to silence.
Seed, David. “The Flight From the Good Life: Fahrenheit 451 in the Context of Postwar American Dystopias”. Journal of American Studies Vol. 28, No. 2 (1994): 227.
As viewers, we often don’t consider the three-dimensionality of objects when evaluating their authenticity. In terms of paintings, for instance, a public portrait is seen as more authentic from the painter’s point of view, while self-portraits are seen as authentic images of the subject and the painter. Considering one more authentic than the other seems ludicrous as they each illustrate divergent types of authenticity. However, as John Berger argues in Ways of Seeing, self-portraits are less stiff and rigid, and more personal, “They are there in all their particularity and we can study them, but it is impossible to imagine them considering us in a similar way” (98). One painting in particular, Autorretrato con Pelo Corto by Frida Kahlo, manages to capture what a public portrait of Kahlo would not; it, among many things, clues in her divorce, sexual identity and orientation, and health issues.
Feminism and political issues have always been centered on in the art world and artists like to take these ideas and stretch them beyond their true meanings. Female artists such as Hannah Höch, who thrived during the Dada movement in the 1920s in Germany and Barbara Kruger who was most successful during the 1980s to 1990s in the United States, both take these issues and present them in a way that forces the public to think about what they truly mean. Many of Kruger’s works close in on issues such as the female identity and in relation to politics she focuses on consumerism and power. Höch, like Kruger, also focuses on female identity but from the 1920s when feminism was a fairly new concept and like Kruger focuses on politics but focuses more on the issues of her time such as World War I. With the technique of photomontage, these two artists take outside images and put them together in a way that displays their true views on feminism and politics even though both are from different times and parts of the world.
The role of social commentary in art and literature is an often controversial one. After the publication of Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses – a book which comments on the experience of Muslims in Britain – a fatwā calling for the author’s death was put out. While contemporary examples of commentators being beset by hardship are not uncommon, artists in the past were regularly censured for their views and artworks. Dostoyevsky, for example, was put into exile for years and nearly put to death for his views. Voltaire was banned from Paris by Louis XV. Both of these writers understood well the impact their artwork could have on society. As such, comparing their views on the role of art in humanity is beneficial.
Walter Reed discovered a preventative vaccine to prevent the occurrence of allowing oneself to get yellow fever, saving millions of people. During the Spanish American war in Havana, Cuba there was approximately one thousand six hundred deaths were from yellow fever within the three years of the war. As you have read, yellow fever took a huge toll on the world. Because of the vaccine (17D) founded by Walter Reed during 1937, the disease may still be persistent currently.
Artistic Interventions: Challenging Dominant Narratives in Postwar Society Postwar art exemplified by the Collective Actions Group’s “Ten Appearances” (1981), Betye Saar’s “The Liberation of Aunt Jemima” (1972), and Cindy Sherman’s “Untitled Film Stills” (1977-1980) actively intervened in their specific socio-political contexts by deploying formal strategies that challenged dominant narratives, reclaimed marginalized identities, and asserted individual agency within oppressive systems Through their work, these artists demonstrated a profound understanding of the political dynamics of their time and employed various tactics to achieve their political aspirations. In the Soviet Union, the official state art style remained strictly Socialist Realist
It’s interesting to note what happened to the art world after Duchamp revolutionized art into meaninglessness. Artists seem to be exempt from the moral laws that are binding to ordinary people. Everything is O.K. under art’s magic umbrella: rotting corpses with snails crawling over them, kicking little girls in the head, rape and murder recreations, women defecating. Where does it stop? What is art and what is porn? What is art and what is disgusting? Where is the line? There isn’t one anymore. The effect of Duchamp’s pranks was to point out that anything could be art. All it took was getting people to agree to call something art.
The detachment of an object from its sphere of tradition, Benjamin states, causes a lack of the “here and now” of the work of art. Meaning that the only the true piece of art contains the true history (changes in ownership and changes in physical structure of the work). In many instances, with the spread through reproduction, art is designed to show evidence of specific events and get a rise of opinion from the masses. “This constitutes their hidden political significance. They demand a specific kind of reception.” (Benjamin 27). The technologies of reproduction is directly related to the way people perceive. In fact, Benjamin states that fascist leaders attempt to organize and control the proletarian masses through the use of such technologies. This is a huge change in the value and significance of art works because now politics is heavily involved in aesthetic expression. It has an end result of the restoring of the cultic and aura values within politics (which eventually leads to war) while simultaneously fooling the proletarian masses with the supposed rights of
Examining the statement “the Personal is Political” through the works of Alice Neel. The American portrait artist Alice Neel rose from obscurity as a result of “second wave” feminism, championed by feminist art critics and historians. Since the 1920s she had built a career painting the faces and psyche of the people that surround her. Subverting portraiture’s traditional themes of wealth and power her psychological portraits explore themes of motherhood, assigned gender roles, domestic violence and issue a challenge to the voyeuristic heterosexual male gaze. Themes largely unseen in painting at the time, these themes are in line with the agenda of the feminist movement of the 1970s which fought to highlight the gender imbalance.
The development of interpersonal skills of the team members can be made possible through the management of emotional intelligences by the team members. Organizations, looking for a successful future, need to develop employees’ emotional intelligence skills to work effectively in the organization. (Bob Wall, 2008). Recent findings suggest that emotionally intelligent persons are better performers than their counterparts (Law, Song, & Wong, 2004; Van Rooy & Viswesvaran, 2004). Numerous authors have theorized that emotional intelligence contributes to people’s capacity to work effectively in teams and manage work stress (e.g. Caruso & Salovey, 2004; Goleman, 1998). Emotional intelligence may also contribute to work performance by enabling people to regulate their emotions so as to cope effectively with stress, perform well under pressure, and adjust to organizational
Wills uses a particular situation in which a photography exhibit by Robert Mapplethorpe which included some photos on the verge of kiddie pornography and sadomasochism was cancelled in order for the Corcoran Gallery to influence the government to continue its financial support. One is not expected to support that in which he/she disapproves and the choice to cancel the exhibit was the choice of the Corcoran Gallery. To naturally assume that the art will not be supported by the government shows how censor has repressed and placed limits on artistic expressions even though they may not be