Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Disadvantages of emotional intelligence in leadership
Disadvantages of emotional intelligence in leadership
Why emotional intelligence in the workplace is important for employees pdf
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
2. Literature Review
According to the conventional concepts, the prime factor in the definition of professional success of an employee was exclusively his or her Intelligence Quotient (IQ). But later on, researches proved that the total intelligence of an individual is been constituted of with various perspectives of mind as well as heart. Thereafter, IQ was explained as the pure cognitive contribution to the total intelligence of an individual with a particular orientation towards the psychological aspects of a person, like memory, remembrance, recollection, etc. But for the Psychologists, Behavioral scientists and Business entrepreneurs, such an index of intelligence deemed inadequate to justify the personal and professional success of an
…show more content…
This qualitative study claimed to overcome the deficiencies in emotional functioning and regulation by showing strength in the face of fear or desire. The term “Emotional Quotient” or shortly EQ was developed and described by Reuven Bar-On (1997) through his approach to assess emotional and social competences of a person. He invented an Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i), which was the first ever introduced test for calculating the index of emotional intelligence in a scientific manner. In 1990, an article named “Emotional Intelligence” was also published by the Psychologists, John Mayer and Peter Salovey in the journal of Imagination, Cognition and Personality. However, Daniel Goleman deserves the maximum credit to bring the concept of emotional intelligence into the mainstream. He reviewed the work of John Mayer and Peter Salovey and subsequently developed his own model of emotional intelligence. Daniel Goleman (1995), defined emotional intelligence as the ability of individuals for recognizing their own and others feeling properly and also for managing these emotions for motivating their self and those people in relationship with them. (Neal M. Ashkanasy et al., …show more content…
The development of interpersonal skills of the team members can be made possible through the management of emotional intelligences by the team members. Organizations, looking for a successful future, need to develop employees’ emotional intelligence skills to work effectively in the organization. (Bob Wall, 2008). Recent findings suggest that emotionally intelligent persons are better performers than their counterparts (Law, Song, & Wong, 2004; Van Rooy & Viswesvaran, 2004). Numerous authors have theorized that emotional intelligence contributes to people’s capacity to work effectively in teams and manage work stress (e.g. Caruso & Salovey, 2004; Goleman, 1998). Emotional intelligence may also contribute to work performance by enabling people to regulate their emotions so as to cope effectively with stress, perform well under pressure, and adjust to organizational
Emotional Intelligence, or EI, has no set definition, but it does have three popular models which are accepted by audiences. Goleman (1995) states that EI is a separate intelligence from IQ, which can be much more effective than IQ, and aid a person in all aspects of life. Goleman also states that EI is not able to be measured in a standardized testing format as IQ can be, but EI can be changed and molded to better the person 's abilities, unlike IQ. Goleman wrote his book based on Mayer and Salovey 's research on EI, but formed his definition into one different from the original research. Mayer and Salovey describe EI as a developmental trajectory of a mix of related cognitive abilities and performance which are difficult to change and mold. The third model was created by Bar-on, who believed that EI was a mechanism used to cope with one 's environment for positive results. Bar-on 's model used both personality and cognitive abilities to describe EI, instead of only congitive abilities as Mayer and Salovey, and
Emotional intelligence has been defined as “the ability to monitor one’s own and others’ feelings and emotions, to discriminate among them and to use this information to guide one’s thinking and actions,” (Gantt & Slife 17). Psychologists John Mayer, Peter Salovey and David Caruso argue that some people have a greater emotional intelligence and a greater capacity than others to carry out more intelligent information when processing emotions. While on the other hand, psychologists Gerald Matthew, Moshe Zeidner, and Richard Roberts claimed that the concept of emotional intelligence, as it is defined now is flawed and has no reliable foundation in any of the models of human behavior such as biological, cognitive, coping, or personality.
Zeidner, M., Roberts, R.D., & Matthews, G. (2008). The science of emotional intelligence: Current consensus and controversies. European Psychologist, 13(1), 64-78.
As a supervisor in the military, I encountered an airman who had all the right qualifications according to the Air Force, but he was not able to complete his contracted term of six years. He survived basic training and a pretty intense two month technical school, but he only lasted two years in the Air Force before he was asked to leave. To work in the Public Affairs career field, he had to score well on the military entrance exam which means he demonstrated the cognitive abilities – a usual predictor of success. However, he was separated from the Air Force because of his poor social skills. This paper will discuss whether the airman's Emotional Intelligence (EI) could have been improved and the importance of a high EI to an organization.
A person’s EQ is an important skill that can be developed over a person’s lifetime. It is controlled by the part of the brain called the amygdala, which psychologists say is what controls emotion and then gives a person the ability to connect and communicate with others around you. Emotional intelligence branches out to all aspects of life and allows one to become better at controlling anger, making decisions, and keeping a positive attitude. Emotional Intelligence was not an official term in terms of psychology until the 1990’s. Before this, the emotions of women were viewed as a weakness by men and the rest of society and one was considered to be valuable to society if they could live without showing emotion in a situation. Stowe, having used the emotional intelligence of women as something that makes them more capable in society to determine what was right and wrong through communication with others, was ahead of her time in her advanced
Emotions are frequent companions in our lives. They come and go, and constantly change like the weather. They generate powerful chemicals that create positive and negative feelings, which have a powerful effect on leadership. Some emotions can either facilitate leadership, while others can detract from successful leadership. This course, Emotionally Intelligent Leadership, has truly opened my eyes to the affects that emotions have on being an effective leader. Peter Salovey and John Mayer defined emotional intelligence as “the ability to monitor one’s own and other’s feelings and emotions to use the information to guide one’s thinking and actions” (p. 5). This definition in itself states that emotions, whether it be ones own emotions or those of others, is the underlying factor that directs the actions of a leader. Therefore, throughout the progression (advancement) of this course, I have learned the importance of the development of emotional intelligence for being an effective leader, and because of this I plan on developing the capacities that contribute to being an emotionally intelligent leader for my own success, now and in the future.
(2013) separated emotional intelligence into four domains, self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, and relationship management (pp. 30, 38). These domains are then broken into two competencies. Self-awareness, the understanding of one 's emotions and being clear about one 's purpose, and self-management, the focused drive and emotional self-control, make up the personal competence (pp. 39, 45-46). While social awareness, or empathy and service, and relationship management, the handling of other people 's emotions, make up the social competence (pp. 39, 48, 51). These emotional intelligence competencies are not innate talents, but learned abilities, each of which contribute to making leaders more resonant and effective (p. 38). This is good news for me because I still have much to develop in regards to emotional
There are four key competencies of emotional intelligence: self-awareness, understanding one’s own emotions and their implications; social awareness, understanding other people’s emotions and the impact that they may have; self-management, controlling one’s own emotions and not acting before thinking; and relationship management, using emotions to establish and maintain relationships (Schermerhorn et al, 2012). It is important that employers actively participate and exhibit self-awareness and self-management as a role model and example to their employees. Employers could utilize informal counselling sessions with employees or anonymous detailed climate surveys, social awareness, to see exactly what strengths and weaknesses are present within the workplace. Using the data obtained from these informal counselling sessions and detailed climate surveys, relationship management, employers are provided the tools to not only make corrections, but make improvements and cultivate relationships that not only promote a healthy workplace environment but a successful workplace environment. These suggestions also fall in line with the Four Branch Model of Emotional Intelligence: perception, facilitation, understanding, and management (Mayer & Caruso, 2002). More specifically, the suggested methods for managers to effectively
In the early 80s, the concept of social intelligence resurfaces under the theory of multiple intelligences presented by Howard Gardner in which interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligences were included. Interpersonal intelligence was defined as having the ability to understand the feelings of others, whereas intrapersonal intelligence focuses on understanding one’s own emotions (Cartwri... ... middle of paper ... ... onal intelligence "debate".
In the book Emotional Intelligence by Daniel Goleman, the central thesis that he tries to point out is that emotional intelligence may be more important than I.Q. in determining a person’s well being and success in life. At first I didn’t know what Goleman was talking about when he said emotional intelligence, but after reading the book I have to say that I agree completely with Goleman. One reason for my acceptance of Goleman's theory is that academic intelligence has little to do with emotional life. To me, emotions can be just as intelligent as your I.Q. In this essay I hope to provide sufficient evidence to show why I agree with Goleman’s thesis on emotional intelligence.
Mamta, M., & Gupta, A. (2010). Relationship of Emotional Intelligence with Work Values & Internal Locus of Control: A Study of Managers in a Public Sector Organization. Vilakshan: The XIMB Journal Of Management, 7(20), 1-20.
...sults were compared with those from another 140 supervisors, peers, and Regression analyses showed that there is a positive correlation between the emotional intelligence of managers and organizational climate. The results of the analyses also show that among emotional intelligence's factors, social awareness and self-awareness have more influence on organizational climate, while among organizational climate factors, credibility is most influenced by managers' emotional intelligence.”
But, scientists began to realize that IQ was too narrow as a concept for intelligence, and that IQ won’t determine one’s success in life (Cherry, 2015). Emotional intelligence has had a big impact on people’s lives especially in the business world. According to Bressert (2007), "IQ alone is not enough; EQ also matters. In fact, psychologists generally agree that among the ingredients for success, IQ counts for roughly 10% (at best 25%); the rest depends on everything else—including EQ”. In other words, EQ can help with predicting work success and teamwork ability. Those with high EQs tend to achieve more and are successful professionals. A lot of organizations have authorized that there are EQ tests during their hiring process. They also require them to attend “coaching seminars” on emotional and social skills (Diffen, et. al., 2014). For example, "Research carried out by the Carnegie Institute of Technology shows that 85 percent of your financial success is due to skills in “human engineering,” your personality and ability to communicate, negotiate, and lead. Shockingly, only 15 percent is due to technical knowledge. Additionally, Nobel Prize winning Israeli-American psychologist, Daniel Kahneman, found that people would rather do business with a person they like and trust rather than someone they don’t, even if the likeable person is offering a lower quality product or
Sy, T., & Cote, S. (2004). Emotional intelligence: A key ability to succeed in the matrix organization. Journal of Management Development. 23(5). 437-455
The definition of emotional intelligence given by Salovey and Mayer (1990) focuses on the ability to understand one’s own and others’ emotions and also to manage one’s own emotions positively. On the other hand, Goleman’s definition (1995) covers more aspects, including 25 abilities and skills such as trustworthiness, communication and empathy. The former definition is more scientific and appropriate while the latter one is called the ‘corporate definition’ because its contents accommodate the interests of large corporations. However, the academic findings of the two professors are not widely known while Goleman’s edition is commonly accepted due to his best-seller book ‘Emotional Intelligence’ (Goleman 1995). The following essay will be mainly based on Goleman’s definition.