Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An explanation of the relationship between motivation and performance management with reference to at least 2 motivational theories
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Rob Parson Management Case Study
1 Case Overview
The internal environment at Morgan Stanley was one of teamwork, employee development, dignity and respect. Morgan Stanley had developed a way of building consensus rather that individualism. Rob Parson was thrust into this environment – not sure of what was expected of him and with only one objective in mind – improving the performance of the Capital Markets division. He went about doing this ruthlessly without much care about the organization and its existing practices. While his performance was stellar, he developed a hostile environment around him. On joining there was a tacit agreement with him and his boss that he would be given the position of Managing Director, something that didn’t happen because of his poor inter – personal skills. After two years, he demands the position of Managing Director in return for his stellar performance. It is now up to Gary Stuart, his boss to decide whether to promote him or not. In the pages that follow we take up the role of Gary Stuart and suggest possible solutions to help put an end to this dilemma.
2 Strategy Or Culture?
The decision, whether to promote Rob Parson to the position of Managing Director or not, ultimately boils down to a single question: What is more important to Morgan Stanley: the firm’s culture or the performance of its divisions?
Morgan Stanley’s mission statement clearly states that they “aim to be the world’s best investment bank” and that “they have a commitment to add maximum value which will be characterized by extraordinary effort and innovation”. They aim to “distinguish themselves by creating an environment that fosters teamwork and innovation”. Our interpretation of this statement is that, the focus/strate...
... middle of paper ...
...nization. He found some aspects of working in the firm extremely frustrating. We believe that we should get him to move in a direction where he appreciates Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Others within his department also need to display OCB if efficiencies are to be achieved. They must display sportsmanship by achieving the exacting standards that Parson demands. They must display conscientiousness by treating their work seriously and go well beyond the stated levels of performance. This will give Parson more confidence in his team and he will reciprocate with OCB.
6 Conclusion
We have adopted an extremely scientific and logical approach to the problem facing Gary Stuart today and with the help of tried and tested motivational theories identified what could be done to motivate Rob Parson in his new role as Managing Director. We wish him the very best of luck.
Registered Nurse Pausits, a defendant out of the many involved with Parson’s case, has failed to provide Randy Parson with the correct prescription drug during his stay at Standish. The Plaintiff wanted to prove that she unsuccessfully administered medication to Randy Parsons and that a reasonable jury can conclude the fact Pausits was aware of the risks to Parsons. The court has reversed the grant of summary judgment to Nurse Pausits, because this case would rise to the level of deliberate indifference. Plaintiff Parsons revealed that Pausits perceived facts to infer substantial risk to Randy Parsons and drew the inference. She had to state she was aware, which she did, of a substantial risk. Evidence has shown that Nurse Pausits could have gotten Dilantian for Randy Parson if she viewed the situation as an emergency. Pausit’s case has discovered confirmation that she administered 100mg of Dilantin to Randy Parsons August 27, at 6:00 p.m. However, in Randy’s toxicology report, no Dilantin was shown in his body for 3 days before his death, which was August 28. Wellbutrin was shown in Randy’s body instead of Dilantin, which is a form of an anti-depressant that helps people suffering from seizures and can prevent causing a seizure. Displayed that Pausits signed Randy’s Medication Administration Record (MAR), when the prison log showed that Registered Nurse Alexander performed the medication August 27, raises a red flag as to who performed the medication and what prescription was given. The Plaintiff provided enough evidence towards Pausits in that she has unsuccessfully administered the medication to Randy and that Pausits was aware of a substantial risk to Randy Parsons. Because of this, a jury can place more significance on the t...
General Motors became a “centralized organization, so decision-making authority is concentrated in the hands of top-level managers, and little authority is delegated to lower levels” (Ferrell et al., 2015, p. 199). Centralized organizations have little upward communication and top-level manager may not be aware of problems and unethical activities. According to Ferrell et al., (2015), it has been noted that “centralized organization may exert influence on their employees because they have a central core of policies and codes of ethical conduct” (p. 201). Conversely, to survive at GM employees praised the CEO intelligence and carried out their orders by keeping a low profile, and never made waves. GM rewarded employees who followed the old traditional ways and those that challenged their thinking lost promotion opportunities or their jobs. However, General Motors experienced conflict between corporate management responsibility and social responsibility. Consequently, General Motors “attempted to implement a new mentality upon its management in a short period of time” (Goussak, Webber, & Ser, 2012, p. 49) by changing the company’s environment, but
CEO Johnston also has plans to bolster the company’s leadership with the best minds available and also use motivational techniques to invigorate his employees. These ideas show the character of the CEO in enhancing productivity from his work force.
John Mackey has a core belief in “Conscious Capitalism” and uses McGregor’s Theory Y to get the most out of his employees. He thinks that if the employees are in charge of their own careers that they will work that much harder. He believes that someone who wants to be at work will positively impact all customer relations which helps the brand maintain its high level of customer satisfaction. The core belief is that happier people doing their jobs will lead to a much higher degree of service for the customers. Happy customers tend to have repeat business and helps the brand grow or maintain their level of business. Mackey also wants employees that have a high degree of ingenuity and creativity. The next great idea will not come from a board meeting but often come from those that work directly in the field. Essentially he wants to make use of eve...
Staying true to them will guide us toward continued growth and success for decades to come. As you read more about our vision and values, you will learn about who we are, where we’re headed and how every Wells Fargo team member can help us get there.”(Wells Fargo, 1999). The low accountability Wells Fargo has behind their statement makes them look worse after their 2017 scandal. They have a clear indication of how Wells Fargo is supposed to be running the company, but the company has acted in a different manner. It makes you ponder how reliable statements of those at the top of the company are when they speak to the public. Even though Wells Fargo has made vast changes to their management team, one must wonder if they’re way of improving the company has changed over time. Wells Fargo’s replacement CEO for John Stumpf, Tim Sloan, told the Senate Banking Committee that, “[Wells Fargo] is a better bank today than it was a year ago” (White, 2017). A year later, 2017, Wells Fargo has made no significant positive progress toward turning the company back into what it used to be before the
Through out his tenure at Sunbeam,Al Dunlap’s advocated profit by firing many employees and shutting down many factories.If we look at it in the short term ,this approach seems very attractive as it brings in quick short term gains.In the long term ,however, such a decision would not ensure the sustainability of the company. Profitability and responsibility can and should be combined in an ideal world, however it is clear that they are at least partially contradictory. Shareholder pressure should not force a company to make short-term decisions that might be detrimental to the long-term profitability of the company.
David Fletcher is a portfolio manager with many years of experience and success under his belt. He currently is a limited partner managing an Emerging Growth Fund for Jenkins Fletcher Partnership or JFP. The company was small when David started and consisted of a CEO, Paul Jenkins, CFO, 2 financial assistance, 4 research analyses, 1 research assistant and a receptionist. David first started with JFP he hired an Administrative Assistance, Whitney to help organize his calendar, contact companies and take messages, etc. Whitney proved to be capable and eager to learn. Under David’s guidance she received her MBA and was promoted to a Portfolio Manager in training. One of her primary areas was Healthcare but she also had retail and environment. In addition, Whitney developed a solid network of contacts and was very good at annualizing the financial statements of potential business. However, David was still holding her hand and had not allowed her to invest completely without his input. Also, she was just starting to attend conferences solo. Although Whitney was helpful, David felt he needed to form a team to help with the labor intensive job of processing all the information for managing the fund. His typically day was consumed by meetings, phone calls and conferences and he could not keep this pace for the long haul. Therefore, he discussed the possible of forming a team with Paul Jenkins and several of investment firms before proceeding with the concept of a team at JFP.
However, during the 1990s, Philips and Matsushita both faced major challenges to sustain their position in the market. Changing profile of the industry and globalization forces made Philips and Matsushita’s organizational models and competitive advantages obsolete, and brought up the need for drastic actions. At the brink of a new century, the battle of two giants unraveled with CEOs from both sides implementing another round of strategic initiatives and restructurings. The pressure put on new CEOs was enormous – wrong st...
Several employees have witnessed varied offensive conduct by Mazey but have kept opinions to themselves until recently (Yemen & Clawson, 2007). Senior management at Hudson is aware of his behavior via 360o reviews; however, Mazey’s ability to produce revenue secured his promotion to vice president (Yemen & Clawson, 2007). Mazey acquiesces to upper management and believes employees of lower stature should do the same for him, while also accepting his unprofessional, degrading and condescending habits (Yemen & Clawson, 2007).
...ork ethics will serve as his example for this leadership mentoring. His actions must speak louder than his work. He must not act differently with his vision to the company and in contrast with his promises to his employees. While for the organic organization where employees were given the options to work at their advantage to employ their maximum performance for the benefit of the company, I recommend participative leadership style. Encouraging a participative style to share ideas, and create a sense of purpose, is one of the tactics that supervisors should develop as part of their Talent Management program. This will reinforce employee’s motivation and engagement, thus increasing individual productivity. Staff has to be oriented with a culture that encourages communication, teamwork, personal creativity, innovation, and a supportive workplace environment.
Furthermore, he engaged the customer with an optimistic attitude and stated how the stock could affect him or her in the best way possible. Jordan could immediately hook any client into believing what he had to offer by providing the customer with the success stories others have had under his instruction.... ... middle of paper ... ... Works Cited Belfort, Jordan. The Wolf of Wall Street.
Several concerns were raised. One was the difference between AT Kearney’s individualistic, entrepreneurial style and the more bureaucratic approach of EDS. Another concern was the alignment of incentives when combining the high-rewards culture of a partnership with the bottom-line-focused mentality of a big publicly quoted company.
Organizational citizenship behavior is a term that encompasses anything positive and constructive the employees do, of their own volition, which supports their co-workers as well as the organization. Employees who are engaged in OCB may not always be the top performers, but they are the ones who are known to ‘go the extra mile’ or ‘go above and beyond’ the minimum efforts required to do a merely satisfactory job. Organizations will benefit from encouraging employees into OCB because it is linked to many advantages such as, increased productivity, higher customer satisfaction and much more.
Not all strategies “fit” within the companies activities, some are hit and misses such as when Stewart placed Charles Koppelman to the board, where “he became chairman of the board in 2005, where he negotiated a paid consulting arrangement for himself. He was viewed as enabling Stewart’s self-regard as much as tending to th...
Peters, T. J. & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies. New York: Harper &