Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Adoption narrative essay setup
An essay on character development
An essay on character development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Adoption narrative essay setup
Rikki-Tikki-Tavi is a children’s book written by Rudyard Kipling, about a mongoose that was adopted into by an English family in India. The story begins with a little boy, Teddy, finding a mongoose washed up after a flood. The mongoose was friendly and would protect the house from venomous snakes; they named him Rikki-Tikki-Tavi because it is onomatopoeia for the sound that Rikki makes.
The story explains that mongooses are curious, so Rikki spent his time exploring everything in the house. When exploring outside, Rikki meets a bird that explains to him that one of his babies fell out of the nest and was eaten by Nag, the cobra. That night, Rikki overhears the cobras’ plans to kill the family, so that Rikki would leave and they could take over the garden. Nag sleeps in the bathroom overnight, planning to kill Teddy’s dad in the morning; Rikki attacks him, causing the father to wake up and shoot Nag, saving the family. Rikki also helps save the family by distracting Nag’s widow, Nagaina, as she was about to attack, eventually killing her as well. The family was very thankful, as he had saved all of their lives.
The story is written in a moralistic tone. After defeating the first snake, Karait, he could indulge and eat his kill or all the food offered that night as a reward, but he instead ate a light dinner because he knew there were more cobras to fight so he didn’t want to be slowed down. “That bite paralyzed Karait, and Rikki-tikki was just going to eat him up from the tail to the head, after the custom of his family, when he remembered that a big meal makes a slow mongoose” (Kippling 16). The tone of that passage suggests that this anti-gluttony attitude is one the reader should also take up when necessary. Many asp...
... middle of paper ...
...d use Rikki as a weapon to control snakes. “‘Teddy is safer with that little animal in his room than with a watchdog. If a snake came into his room-’ But Teddy’s mother wouldn’t think of anything so awful” (Kipling 5). In addition to keeping Rikki as a pet and companion for his son, he sees how it may benefit and protect his family. Teddy’s father sees Karait as a threat to Teddy so he beats the snake with a stick, and shoots Nag when he hears him fighting with Rikki. Instead of trying to rearrange the garden so the snakes can’t hide in the tall grass, he just uses his human power to remove the threat permanently.
This book could be seen as a reversal of the Garden of Eden allegory. Teddy is an innocent boy in a garden, threated by a snake. Instead of getting kicked out of the garden, the snake is defeated, his innocence is preserved, and he remains in the garden.
In the book Rikki crushes all but one egg of Nagaina’s to bribe Nagaina into staying away from the kid. Rikki said, “What’sthe price for a snake’s egg? For a young cobra? For a king cobra? For the last-the very last of the brood? The ants are eating all the others by the melon bed.” Also in the book the snake flees with the egg trying to outrun Rikki. In the book it states, “He had forgotten about the egg. It lay on the veranda and Nagaina came nearer and nearer to it, til at last, while Rikki-Tikki was drawing breath, She caught it in her mouth, turned to the veranda steps, and flew like an arrow down the path.” Also in the movie the mongoose booked it right into the snake hole where many mongooses never come out. (movie) The movie shows “Rikki chasing Nagaia down a hole where the snake lived.” Also in the movie Rikki killed Nagaina, and whatever cobra ever dared to try to threaten him or the family. In conclusion that is how the Resolution is related to the book and the
the man had to remove the snake from the farm, but can't understand why he had to kill the
This adds to the reader’s sympathy because he didn’t provoke the man’s attack and did nothing to deserve what happened to him. He was punished despite being completely innocent. Though the snake does not pose a direct threat, he is an extremely powerful creature and a great asset to the beauty of nature. He “felt no necessity of getting out of anybody’s path,” showing his confidence in himself. Though he is confident, he is not arrogant. He does not cower at the sight of the man, nor does he try to threaten him. He simply stands his ground confidently, waiting for the man to dictate his next move. This trait of the snake causes the reader to respect him and appreciate his position of power, reinforcing their sympathetic feelings. The snake’s death was slow and painful, and the author described all of the gruesome details in order to further affect the reader. The man himself admits that “it was a nasty sight”. First, he hacked about in the paper bag bush until he “dragged
The comparison of the rattlesnake to a bigger, more frightening, and yet less deadly creature makes the former seem dangerous. While a blacksnake would “flee at the sight of a man”, the rattler proved its fearlessness with the way he “held his ground”. The rattler is cocky, and for good reason, because his poison could kill the man much easier than the theoretical blacksnake could. The man is in a life-threatening situation and the reader is likely to sympathize with his fear and worry. The author uses violent diction when describing the snake to make us see him as a vicious creature, in need of killing to keep others safe. Even dead, the rattler “may still bite”. He needs to be kept as far as possible from people - especially vulnerable people, such as young children - in order to protect them. The author includes this hostile wording to bring awareness to the fact that the snake is remorseless, even in death, and that taking its life is noble and just. Finally, the snake’s “little song of death” is personified negatively by the man to show that the snake is the villain in the story. Life is, according to the rattlesnake, “dear and would be dearly sold”. It comes to light in this phrase that the snake is looking for revenge from the man’s actions. The rattler is not as innocent as he may have initially seemed. As he attempts at the man’s life to bring
The idea that man's relationship with good and evil is not predestined is a central idea in this novel. The conflict between good and evil is a universal battle. Many characters in the novel, East of Eden, struggle both internally and externally with Good versus evil.
Does being the antagonist always mean you are evil? In AELA this year, we read a short story called Rikki-Tikki-Tavi, by Rudyard Kipling. In the story, the main character, a mongoose named Rikki-Tikki-Tavi, is washed out of his home, and taken in by a family of people. In the backyard, there are two snakes, Nag, and his wife Nagaina. Rikki has to fight the snakes in order to ‘save’ himself, and the other creatures in the backyard. That is, however, only Rikki’s side of the story. This essay is about Nagaina, and how she may be more than just an evil antagonist. In the story, Nagaina is not only sly, but also intelligent and caring. Almost everything Nagaina did was for her children, still eggs at the time.
The effect the reader perceives in the passage of Rattler is attained from the usage of the author¡¯s imagery. The author describes the pre-action of the battle between the man and the snake as a ¡°furious signal, quite sportingly warning [the man] that [he] had made an unprovoked attack, attempted to take [the snake¡¯s] life... ¡± The warning signal is portrayed in order to reveal the significance of both the man¡¯s and the snake¡¯s value of life. The author sets an image of how one of their lives must end in order to keep the world in peace. In addition, the author describes how ¡°there was blood in [snake¡¯s] mouth and poison dripping from his fangs; it was all a nasty sight, pitiful now that it was done.¡± This bloody image of snake¡¯s impending death shows the significance of the man¡¯s acceptance toward the snake. In a sense, the reader can interpret the man¡¯s sympathy toward the snake because of the possibility that he should have let him go instead of killing him.
Without love there is no loyalty, and without loyalty, there is no bravery. In the book and movie of the story Rikki- Tikki- Tavi, they were neck and neck. Snake against mongoose, though one must surely die, neither will back down just yet. The book, Written By Rudyard Kipling, and the movie, produced by Julie Ross, generally both carry the same plot and main idea: After being washed out of his home, and cared for by a loving family of three, he wants to repay them, and in the process does an unforgettable act of service. Though both the mediums were exciting, there were also numerous similarities and differences between the book, and the movie, such as the banana scene, the scene where the family first found him, and the resolution.
... of Adam and Even, who did not feel ashamed of their nudity before they ate the fruit (10). And as mentioned before, Golding concludes his Eden allusion when he brings about the “beast” as the snake that sets the boys on the fast track towards evil, while stranded on the island.
The author of the short story, Rikki-tikki-tavi, is Rudyard Kipling. Rikki-tikki is a mongoose. A mongoose is like a little in in his features, but like a weasel with their habits. Throughout the story, Rikki-tikki defends the family from predators. Rikki also defends his new animal friends. He, though he was scared, fought heroically two cobras and a snakeling. Rikki had some help, but otherwise he faced the predators alone. Rikki-tikki has the right to be proud.
First, Nagaina shows great stealth when she tries to kill Rikki at the beginning of the short story, “...just under him whizzed by the head of Nagaina, Nag’s wicked wife” (19). Darzee, the foolish bird, warned Rikki Tikki just in time to jump. If he hadn’t, Nagaina probably would’ve had success with her stealthy plan. Rikki could’ve bitten her back but, “He came down almost across her back, and if he had been an old mongoose, he would have known that then was the time to break her back with one bite; but he was afraid of the terrible lashing return stroke of the cobra...” (19). After that, Nagaina and Nag slither off steaming knowing that they could have gotten rid of Rikki Tikki if it weren’t for the crazed bird.
The story of Rikki-tikki-tavi is a short fictional story by Rudyard Kipling.It is about a mongoose that is washed up from a summer flood. He is than found by a family and he is than revived. He fights two cobras that want to kill the family that saved Rikki-tikki-tavi. The two cobras are Nag and his wife Nagaina. Rikki-tikki-tavi than fights the two cobras and defeats them, saves the family. The narrators point of view influence the reader's conflict between Rikki-tikki-tavi and Nag by telling the story very descriptive.
Rikki could have tried to create a friendship with the snakes (even though his business in life was to fight and eat snakes), but he did not. He chose to go after the cobras to
Many people may or may not have heard of or read, the fictional short story called "Rikki Tikki Tavi", by Rudyard Kipling. Within this story, there are six main characters which include, Rikki Tikki Tavi, a mongoose, who is written as the protagonist. Nag, Nagaina, and Kurait, who are snakes, and the antagonists of the story. Teddy, Teddy's parents, and tailorbirds, Darzee and his wife, are all minor characters. This short story is about a small mongoose that was found by Teddy and his parents, a British family. Rikki Tikki Tavi protects his newfound family from three snakes trying to cause them harm. This story reveals Rikki Tikki Tavi's courage, wittiness, and love for this family.
Next, the mongoose has many different defenses that could be used to find food, and much more. According to Grolier Online (2015) “Mongooses are almost always victorious because of their speed, agility, and timing, and also because of their thick coat.” By being quick, and by having great timing the mongoose could easily avert the King Cobra’s strikes. Also, According to Funk and Wagnall’s (2014) “to whose poison they are not immune-by agile avoidance of their strikes.” By being agile (which means quick and well-coordinated in movement.) the mongoose can move swiftly to avoid the cobra’s