Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rhetorical analysis for hillary campaign
Rhetorical analysis of hillary clinton
Rhetorical analysis on hillary womens speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rhetorical analysis for hillary campaign
Lorena Vicuna
SPC 3542 (Rhetorical Theories of Persuasion)
Dr. Poole Nov 23, 2015
Theory of Identification and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Campaign Video
The theory of identification is one of the rhetorical theories of persuasion. Under the theory of identifications, there are several key assumptions. One assumption is that the speaker has at least one quality that is similar to one of the qualities of the audience. At the least, the speaker must have the ability to make it appear to the audience that they have one similar characteristic. Another assumption is that being able to identify with the traits of the speaker can persuade the audience to agree with the speaker’s argument. This means that the audience is receptive to the speaker’s portrayals
…show more content…
For one, it may be conceded that there is a clear and convincing similarity between Clinton’s decision to run for president and the decision of average Americans to enter into a new chapter in their lives. As a result, it is not difficult to see that many Americans will be able to identify with Clinton’s message on that score. Indeed, the effect is not confined to Americans alone. Anyone in the world who is able to watch the video will most likely agree that, like Clinton’s decision, every attempt to change for the better is almost always a necessary and indispensable necessity. In that sense, the video appeals to a universal human tendency or need: the indispensable inclination to become a better person by choosing the new and better path. In the end, the results of the campaign video’s actual appeal can transcend the concept of nationality. The good thing about this as far as Clinton’s campaign video is concerned is that it reaches to a broader demographic. Thus, the video does not limit itself to the voters in America since it can also engage non-voters such as the youth as well as foreign nationals who may be in America or in other parts of the world. The fact that the video is uploaded in YouTube readily indicates that Clinton aims to reach the broadest audience …show more content…
The least that can be said is that the video can be explained from the lens of the theory of identification. Through this lens, it may be said that the video seeks to convince the viewers in America and in other parts of the world that Clinton’s decision to run for the presidency in the upcoming national elections is similar in many ways to the everyday changes that ordinary individuals face. On the basis of that similar experience, the video attempts to rally support for Clinton by equating her decision to run as president with the decision of the people to bring positive change in their lives. Symbolisms in the campaign video, especially the symbolism of happiness, also help accentuate that call. What remains to be seen, however, is whether, in the end, the video shall be convincing enough to help translate persuasion into votes. Indeed, it is difficult to say at this point. The theory of identification only allows us to assess whether the campaign video is successful in helping viewers identify with Clinton’s message. Identifying with Clinton herself is another thing
Summary – It is quite difficult to avoid any persuasive acts while resisting them at the same time. Being prepared with knowledge of how easy it is to be manipulated, controlled, seduced, etc. allows us to open up to the use of rhetoric.
...an is capable of persuading his audience into accepting his simplistic views of the world. He makes it easier to rationalize with his stance by his strategic use of sentence structure and word choice. When analyzing a past speech or interpreting a speech as it is given, upmost priority should be given to analytical tools for analyzing persuasive symbols and language. Whether the topic at hand is motivated by great emotions as it is here or not, the audience can easily be swayed in one direction surprisingly based only on universal comprehension.
In response to his alleged affair with Ms. Monica Lewinsky, who at the time was an intern at the White House, President Clinton took to a national broadcast to clear his name. In his testimony, Clinton begins with a formal and slightly apologetic tone, and then subtly shifts the blame from his actions to the nosiness of the American public, victimizing himself. There were four different tone shifts in this particular speech, and he uses this to his advantage in turning the spotlight away from his private life, and to national issues. In his address, President Clinton uses a wide variety of rhetorical devices to convince his audience, the American people, that his stance on the matter is the most valid, and to reestablish his credibility,
George Bush intentionally generates this emotion at the end to leave viewers feeling slightly better on the situation at hand. In his conclusion, the then president merges viewers in saying, “This is a day when all Americans from every walk of life unite in our resolve for justice and peace. America has stood down enemies before, and we will do so this time. None of us will ever forget this day, yet we go forward to defend freedom and all that is good and just in our world.” His conclusions strike different chords in raising hope amongst viewers. He ultimately depicts a unified country and reminds viewers that something similar to this tragedy has happened before, proving that our country has overcome similar challenges. In addition, his reminds viewers of “all that is good and just in our world” evoking more hopeful thinking from Americans. At the end of his address, Bush uses many positive images that cancel out the tragic ones from his introduction and thusly ends his address portray great amounts of hope, comforting
To summarize this analysis, Hillary Clinton shows us how as we unite, the stronger our bond is. She uses clever ways to show this action. Though she did not win this presidential election, she is still loved by many. She helped herself because of the way she wrote and persuaded people to join her. Using rhetorical appeals
Persuasion is a natural method many people use to influence a person's beliefs, attitudes, intentions, motivations, or behaviors in a situation. Many include, bribing parents to buy clothes to even lending someone money. Either way, people all over the world use words or phrases to convince or sway a person into believing them. Just as many people have used rhetorical appeals to persuade someone, Anthony also uses the rhetorical appeals; heartfelt pathos, questionable logos and evident ethos in William Shakespeare’s play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar to convince his audience that Caesar was not ambitious and that Caesar was innocent
The best way to examine this speech is through a speech-act methodology. Speaker-setting and speaker-audience relationships are key in the analysis of this situation. Before answering the proposed research question we can ask another important question. Why did former President Bill Clinton choose to give this address? According to the Hart text several things must be true. 1. The speaker feels something is wrong. After several rounds of questioning the American public was growing ti...
The goal of Hillary’s speech is to persuade her audience that her ideas are valid, by using ethos, pathos, and logos. Hillary is the First Lady and Senator, she shows credibility as an influential activist for woman rights. “Over the past 25 years, I have worked persistently on issues relating to women, children, and families. Over the past two and a half years, I’ve had the opportunity to learn more about the challenges facing women in my country and around the world” (Clinton 2).
Still, as one Republican official described her, Clinton is often viewed as “‘grating, abrasive and boastful’” (236). Generally, female candidates are expected to be “more caring, compassionate, and emotional than their male counterparts, who tend to be seen as tough, assertive, and decisive” (Bauer). This issue is common among female candidates, and this expectation has certainly impacted Clinton’s campaign. Despite her background as Secretary of State, Clinton is continually questioned by her opponents about her strength.
This discussion brings about an interesting view on similarity in relation to persuasion as expressed by O’Keefe (200), “The belief that greater similarity means greater effectiveness is an attractive one and is commonly reflected in recommendations that persuaders emphasize commonalities between themselves and the audience.” O’Keefe concludes
In his essay “Rhetoric,” he states “to reason logically, to understand human character and goodness, and to understand the emotions”(182). The audience should always be one of the top concerns for the speaker. When a speaker is trying to convince their audience to accept a different perspective, they should keep in mind that not everyone will accept it. The audience should not feel like they are forced to accept something instead they should feel a sense of willingness for the different perspective that the speaker discussed. Furthermore, Aristotle concludes “persuasion is achieved by the speaker’s personal character”(181). In other words, the way a speaker portrays themselves during a speech will make an impact on the audience. The audience will be more convinced if the speaker has integrity because that will result in a built trust and respect between the two. If the speaker lies about something to the audience, not only is the interest lost but so is the willingness to believe anything that they
Clinton has become popular with my generation, and her name has certainly gotten more recognition as she gains a stronger hold in politics. I chose Clinton because she is a very active enthusiast for human rights, more specifically those of children and women. Two groups that often get overlooked, and in many countries they are the ones who suffer the most. I identify with Clinton because I have experienced gender prejudice, and obstacles that stand in my way simply because I am not male. When I found her speech given at the United Nations fourth World Conference on Women, I knew it would be the perfect piece to analyze because of her broad background on supporting women’s rights, leading to her having a strong ethos and logos to support her speech. And of course her pathos resonated with the first-hand experience she’s had in countries where women and even children are oppressed. The speech Clinton gives is one that not only compliments women’s accomplishments in history, it also sheds light on the areas of human rights that still need to be improved upon.
On July 27, 2004, Barack Obama made arguably his most important speech, “The Audacity of Hope”, at the Democratic National Convention Keynote Address. These conventions are for political parties to announce a winner for nomination. All the way through his piece, Obama focuses on connecting Americans and himself to the audience. In fact, at the time, Barack Obama was a US Senate candidate for the United States president, and in making this speech, was offered a window for raising his popularity. Throughout “The Audacity of Hope” speech, Barack Obama implements three main devices to raise his political popularity: repetition, abstract language, and structure.
In the most advantageous of cases this model suggests that a receiver “considers the content of the persuasive message carefully and has favorable thoughts about the content” (Enfante, Rancer & Avtgis, 2010, p. 172). When receivers engage in cognitive thinking, they participate in the type of persuasion the authors call the “central route” (Enfante, Rancer & Avtgis, 2010, p. 172). Under the central route, the receiver employs positive feelings towards whatever the source is saying and then in turn acts or forms attitudes based off of the positive thoughts. Thus they interact thoughtfully with the information the source is attempting to get across.
The video that has been going around social media shows how Clinton has changed her mind on a variety of issues. This video systematically presents these issues by first showing a clip or two of Clinton affirming one view and then immediately showing a clip of her affirming the exact opposite. Some of the segments in the video are of someone accusing Clinton on lying, but, for the majority of the video, the clips are primarily just her stating