Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Interpretations on churchills leadership
Interpretations on churchills leadership
Winston Churchill's influence on the world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Interpretations on churchills leadership
Following the collapse of France during World War II, the conditions the Allied powers faced became bleaker by the day. The United Kingdom was standing alone in the face of Germany, and under Hitler’s reign, the German “blitzkrieg” or “lightning war,” a tactic involving bombardment, tanks, and ground troops in quick offense proved too much for many countries. Winston Churchill would be the one to reignite hope in the hearts of the British people, delivering his “Their Finest Hour” speech on the 18th of June, 1940. Churchill utilized persuasive rhetoric whilst appealing to the people's logic and emotions, to raise morale and spirit in the United Kingdom to fight. Winston Churchill had an incredible background, which had earned him the respect …show more content…
of the people and the influence as the second most powerful individual in the United Kingdom. Churchill enrolled into a Military college when he was of appropriate age, and participated in many conflicts surrounding the areas of Cuba, India and Sudan. In 1908, Churchill became a politician. During his time as a member of parliament, he began the movement to support the labor class of the British, introducing the ideas of minimum wage, insurance for the unemployed and most importantly the People’s Budget, which taxed the rich to support the social departments. These achievements supported his ethos when regarding the people. During his speech Winston Churchill utilized a logical standpoint to develop his argument as for why the United Kingdom had a sensible chance for victory in the face of great despair.
He mentions that their army is not one that should be taken lightly, “…in this Island today [we have] a very large and powerful military force. This force comprises all our best-trained and our finest troops, including scores of thousands of those who have already measured their quality against the Germans and found themselves at no disadvantage.” (Churchill) Churchill references the British that have supported the effort in the French conflict, as well as those who have performed in the Battle of Dunkirk and survived, commending their strength and resolve. To further support his standing, Churchill begins listing the chances of German success in invading the United Kingdom, stating that due to “our superior naval surface forces, aided by our submarines,” (Churchill) an invasion by the sea would be a difficult task for the Germans, coupled with the strength of the British Air Force, an air attack would be unlikely to succeed in German favor. That the British, “in the fighting over Dunkirk, which was a sort of no-man’s-land, we undoubtedly beat the German Air Force, and gained the mastery of the local air, inflicting here a loss of three or four to one day after day.” (Churchill) These pieces of information pushed away the fears of air domination by the German force, and in general, …show more content…
developed this idea of a great fortress at which the United Kingdom stands upon. In tandem with his logical approach, Winston Churchill inflicted a pathos appeal upon the people, the emotions of fear and hope within such a desperate situation emphasized the meanings and points that Churchill was attempting to make.
He does so by alluding towards the efforts in the First World War, that “during the first four years of the last war the Allies experienced nothing but disaster and disappointment. That was our constant fear: one blow after another, terrible losses, frightful dangers. Everything miscarried.” (Churchill) Churchill related the direness of the situation in the past to the present, and in the past they came out as victors, and as history repeats, they will become victors in the present as well. Churchill also points out a moral right to continue fighting the Germans, referencing the suffering of those who have been conquered by Hitler, and changing the meaning of the war from a simple win or loss, but to a more global conflict that will change the history of all that is known. “Upon this battle depends the survival of Christian civilization. Upon it depends our own British life, and the long continuity of our institutions and our Empire... If we can stand up to [Hitler], all Europe may be free and the life of the world may move forward into broad, sunlit uplands. But if we fail, then the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age…” (Churchill) This
concept of light versus dark, good versus evil, is what makes the argument given by Churchill very effective. The appeal towards fear makes the situation look even worse for the British, and the inclusion of morals and religion increases the scope of people affected. That not only those today will suffer, but those that come after them, the survivors, will suffer in a Nazi-controlled world. The fashion in which Churchill ends his speech leaves a lasting impact upon the people. “Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear ourselves that if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men will still say, 'This was their finest hour.'“ (Churchill) Churchill’s use of these last few words ignite a great flame of hope and spirit in the citizens of the United Kingdom, that they should follow their duty as British to stand forth against the next coming battles. The impact of the speech had kept the morale of the army together, to give them the power to withstand the German attack, which eventually resulted intervention of the United States, and finally leading the the end of the war.
After reviewing this week’s episodes of serial, and given our topic, I found that the Rhetorical Appeals are directly linked to the court cases. These Rhetorical Appeals (Ethos, Pathos, and Logos), are used throughout both cases. From Jay’s case, it’s clear that Pathos and Ethos are two main elements supporting his defense. However in Adnan’s case, Logos was the prevalent appeal when defending his innocence.
Analyzing innocence has always been a difficult task, not only due to it’s rapid reevaluation in the face of changing societal values, but also due to the highly private and personal nature of the concept. The differences between how people prioritize different types of innocence - childhood desires, intellectual naivety, sexual purity, criminal guilt, etc. - continually obscures the definition of innocence. This can make it difficult for people to sympathize with others’ loss of purity, simply because their definition of that loss will always be dissimilar to the originally expressed idea. Innocence can never truly be adequately described, simply because another will never be able to precisely decipher the other’s words. It is this challenge, the challenge of verbally depicting the isolationism of the corruption of innocence, that Tim O’Brien attempts to endeavour in his fictionalized memoir, The
He showed real beneficial points of production which I agreed how production could change the population especially changing the variety of working, but I criticized on the disadvantages of mass production he mentioned. This is because one company could offer more money to their people which having money is the aim of most of us, so when a place offer money, it has more beneficial rather than disadvantages. However, Churchill described the main differences of WWI and previous wars which were significant points because it is true that a lot of damages were caused in WWI that destroyed most people’s lives, and the cause of the wars is not indicated in any places. Also, it told the way of how Generals and armies are not heroes which I precisely disagree his point because people fight for their families and protect them from enemies. That’s why they need to fight and are seen as heroes but not heroes of their country, heroes of their family. In addition, he also described future wars which WWI had recently ended in his time, but he predicted to have another war which will be much cruel. It was true because WWII happened and caused more damages to the world; many women and children died with it. This was an extraordinary prediction because how someone can predict the future and become reality? However, as he mentioned peace was in people’s heart and was more important than having wars as
Writing a song is certainly a difficult task, there are many techniques used in the making of songs. The artist writes a song very carefully in order to properly convey the message to the listeners. Some songs in particular use a lot of techniques to show the listener their reason for creating the song. There are so many different themes a song can portray. “The Hall of Fame” is one of those songs. The point of this song is to inspire people going through a tough time, and show them they can get through it and become something great. The Script’s song “Hall of Fame” uses rhetorical devices in a way that makes the listener understand that in order to overcome every obstacle life has, the listener has to fight for it.
Through her speech, Queen Elizabeth inspired her people to fight for the country of England against the Spaniards. Queen Elizabeth persuaded the English troops to defend their country with rhetoric devices such as diction, imagery, and sentence structure to raise their morale and gain loyalty as a woman in power.
Once actually forced to fight, Hitler still dominated and he could have very possibly won the war if not for that one fatal mistake he made by hesitating in his plans against the English. I think it is important that Lukacs makes sure to get this message across because some people choose to ignore this truth due to the devastating outcomes that would have resulted if Hitler succeeded. The major point presented by Lukacs concerning the difference between Hitler and Churchill has to do with nationalim versus patriotism. Lukacs describes Hitler as a nationalist and Churchill as a patriot. He describes Hitler as a man of ideas and Churchill as a of man principles, because Churchill's ideas changed throughout the war while Hitler tended to think that his ideas were principles.
Sir Winston Churchill’s speech, ‘We Shall Fight on the Beaches’ was a wonderful piece of moving rhetoric. The diction that Churchill uses to deliver his message is not so advanced that one cannot understand him easily, but still manages to portray a sense of Churchill’s deeply intellectual status without being condescending. It is a very inspirational piece, a moving speech, and a powerful call to action aimed to uplift the downtrodden population of Britain at the time. Churchill responded to the need for inspiration with his now-famous speech. His use of rhetoric not only inspired Britain, but was a powerful tool that brought about a final victory over the Nazis.
First of all, there were many instances that Winston Churchill stated positive things in his speech Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat that gave hope to the British citizens. A few sentences that show this the strongest are, “I take up my task in buoyancy and hope. I feel sure that our cause will not be suffered to fail among
Winston Churchill was perhaps one of the greatest public speakers in history. Some of the best speeches have come from being in life or death situations, Winston was known best for this. His small sound clips like, “this was their finest hour”, and “this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning”, encourage his troops and his people that they will win this war and will overcome the greatest odds. Although Churchill told many speeches, his speech on June 18, 1940 showed the most emotion and courage of any other speech he told. In this speech he explained that the war in France is over and the war in Britain would begin. He said that if we fail then the world sink into an abyss. This emotion that he shows would give Britain hope, courage and most of all determination.
During the early stages of the war, most of Germany’s victories were because of the success of blitzkrieg, or lightening war. Blitzkrieg tactics emphasised mobility and the concentrated use of armour and air power to overwhelm an enemy. Blitzkrieg was especially successful in flat, open countryside and was supremely suited for the Polish campaign in 1939. It was with blitzkrieg, as well as Germany’s superior tactics, effective use of armour, airpower and modern equipment, plus with the support of the USSR that the Germans used to overwhelm Poland in only 5 weeks. Two days after the German troops entered Poland, Britain and France declared war on Germany. Hitler did not want this because it was a distraction from his main aim, to attack the USSR.
As Lukas wrote, “Churchill understood something that not many people understand even now. The greatest threat to Western civilization was not Communism. It was National Socialism.” Churchill was a modern Nostradamus in his prophetic wisdom. He became a better leader because “the mind of an historian and courage of a soldier.” He understood history patterns really well and was willing to take the risk by informing people of facts they didn’t want to hear. Churchill refused repercussion or allowed euphemistic language to blind him. He led with unembellished facts.
As explained before, this speech was able to significantly restore and raise morale. It prepared Britain for its ‘Darkest Hour’ and how long of a road it would be. This is considered one of Churchill’s finest speeches to this day and how it was so effective amongst the British people. It proved that a valiant defense and an effective leadership could overcome a significantly larger army. Churchill’s speech was not in vain. The blitzkrieg on Britain was a strategic German failure and the consistent bombing of London was able to in some cases improve morale with the British people and was able to show how resilient the island nation can be. For once, Nazi Germany suffered its first major defeat blazing a war trail throughout Europe.
The Second World War marked one of the most important eras in the history of the British Empire. Never before had the British isles faced a threat quite like the Nazi menace across the English Channel. Yet, Britain’s situation could be viewed as even more precarious once one considers the state of Britain’s economy, but more importantly war machine, at the outbreak of the war. Years of austerity during the Great Depression had left her armies in serious decay, while Germany had built arguably the strongest military in the world. Yet, Winston Churchill’s famous “Their Finest Hour” speech illustrates a level of confidence in victory that many Brits carried. And, this was in no small part due to the fact that they knew that they had the rest of the British Empire supporting their cause. Through the empire’s contribution of both materials and
If you look closely at the text, you’ll notice that at the beginning of his speech, Churchill was using general words to explain the formation of the new administration and cabinet, but toward the second half Churchill was using more complex and colorful words to make the audience visualize his words. For instance in the text it says, “...all the strength God has given us, and to wage war against a monstrous tyranny never surpassed in the dark and lamentable catalogue of human crime.” this helps the audience think about their enemy, which was Germany, as a monster in the dark and grief filled part of human crime. He does this because he wants to exaggerate Germany as something of real evil and make the audience afraid of Germany, but he says that the country needs to use its strength to fight back and this makes the audience motivated to join the war and fight the Germans. Another technique Churchill uses to create urgency is rhythm. At the end of his speech, Winston Churchill uses repetition on the words victory and no survival, he does this because he wants to emphasize the thought of victory was possible and he also wanted to use fear as a way to motivate the
Darkest Hour shows a top down view of the war, with many scenes in a war room in which Churchill makes decisions featuring a large map with colored dots and arrows. One of the primary conflicts surrounding the war is the tension between striking a peace treaty and refusing to give in to Hitler’s demands. As a political move, Churchill’s opponents attempt to get him to admit that he will not even attempt to make peace with Hitler, while Churchill tries to defend staying at war. Near the end of the movie, Churchill interacts with the British citizenry directly, asking them whether or not they would like to stay at peace or go to war- the citizens strongly support defending their land. Churchill’s reasoning for staying at war is both a nationalistic sense of pride and the fear that Hitler will not stop his conquest despite a peace treaty: “You cannot reason with a tiger when your head is in its mouth!” as Churchill states. War, in this sense, is depicted in an idealistic way: fought for the defense of the homeland. Losses, while tragic, are in the form of numbers, and citizens still have the support of the war. In Dunkirk, the horrors of war are actualized. Compared to the citizens’ overwhelming will to fight in Darkest Hour, the soldiers in Dunkirk are tired of the war and are simply trying to survive. Although it seems as if they would like to be able to fight back, the