Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rhetorical strategies in mlk letter to birmingham paragraphs 23-25
Rhetorical strategies in mlk letter to birmingham paragraphs 23-25
Rhetorical strategies in mlk letter to birmingham paragraphs 23-25
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Wisdom is the ability to seek out the importance in that others are too blinded to see in life. It is the very presence that allows philosophers and the world’s greatest thinkers to differentiates themselves from the majority population. Martin Luther King, Jr., leader of the African American Civil Rights Movement, was able to realize the flaws in the American society and legislation that prevented certain individual the privileges they were entitled to from the very beginning of their lives. The Letter to Birmingham is wise because of Dr. King’s logical and effective arguments with the clergymen that this was the right time to actively rally to create tension in the society, so the authorities had to review the unjust laws at the time. And with the effective usage of Christianity and the occurrence of the Holocaust, King’s firm yet gentle tone throughout the letter confirmed his peaceful campaign on the civil right movement as he points out the flaws of an unjust society. …show more content…
From the dawn of the this nation, oppression is no foreign concept to the people for over a century.
Back then, it came in the form of slavery, later on, it came in the form of segregation. “We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.” (King. 13). If there was one thing that Dr. King learn, it was that those who oppress will never willingly give up the sense of authority over the minority population, to get it, the victims must fight for it. He knew this because of the quite literal "painful experience" that he and the other freedom-fighters endured to get their equality. By summoning the power of the people, Dr. King hopes to stop the gruesome hate crime along with challenging the morality of the church’s on where their attitude towards the movement. Which unfortunately, they chose to alienate themselves from the fight for equal rights in the names for being by the “law and
order”. His strategies worked well in a country dominated by Christianity. He quoted St. Augustine saying, “an unjust law is no law at all.” Because the nature of the unjust law is against the moral law of God and the Constitution, the oppressed are moral to take active action to protest in a nonviolent way in order to wake up the consciousness of the society of which white people take control of the legislation. In fact, the First Amendment of the Constitution supports the right of peaceful assembly and protest. Like Paul the disciple who strived to proclaim God’s laws of love and interpret the true meaning of those laws in the first century, MLK decided to risk his life to protest the moral rights of the oppressed and shred light to an advanced society of the country. He pointed out that in 1954 the Supreme Court had outlawed segregation in public schools, and the rights of the colored people should be the same as the white ones in the whole society. Despite his passive reasoning of logical argumentation throughout his letter, Dr. King’s unusually harsh and direct statement about his and the people’s “disappointment” with the church has “turned into outright disgust.” (King. 39) explained his anger for these men who claims to be the follower of God. “But the judgment of God is upon the church as never before. “If the church does not recapture the sacrificial spirit of the early church”, it is no different than “[another] irrelevant social club with no meaning” to it (King. 39). Their lack of support was perceived as an act of cowardice and equally unjustifiable as those who sided with the segregation. King made it clear that although he appreciates the support of his audience, being the church and everyone else who have been listening to his voice throughout the movement, he and the people will continue to persevere and succeed even without it. Morals are not always protected by the laws. Just because something is legal, it does not mean that it is right. People “should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was "legal" and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was "illegal." It was "illegal" to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler's Germany” (King. 22). Even so, he explained that if he were to be in the time when Jews were oppressed, or when “certain principles dear to the Christian faith are suppressed” by the Communist party, and those who offers support for them are bound to be punished by the laws, he would not hesitate to defy such immoral order. Humans are born to adapt and when desperate times call for desperate measures, changes must be made in order to fix the mistakes others created. King opts for people to be brave and step up for the sake of a better nation where everyone is equal as it should be. He explains the difference between conformity and individual responsibility, where the latter allows improvements to be made that can change the world if, and only if people are willing to take actions into their own hands. A long history of race discrimination in the US shows that the segregation runs over from generation to generation, and Martin Luther King, Jr. decided to interrupt this cycle of degeneration of human personality, and he wanted to bring hope to the next generation of colored children. He envisioned a fair society without segregation in the US. It seemed that he had already prepared for this nonviolent confrontation in the white dominated community on behalf of the colored residents. He also wisely used the teachings in Bible to support his points of view against the segregation policies. He used Paul the disciple as an example of disobeying the principle of the majority were untrue doctrines were present in the ancient society of the Jews in the first century.
In his Letter from Birmingham Jail, Martin Luther King Jr. uses his personal experience to convince others of the importance of revising the segregation laws that were in place during 1960’s. In paragraphs 13 and 14 in particular, there is a lot of language used to persuade the reader’s opinions and emotions toward King’s argument. He does this not only convince his fellow clergymen, but to inform others of the reality that African Americans faced in the 60’s.
In 1963, when African-Americans were fighting for black and white equality, Martin Luther King, Jr. wrote “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” While confined in the Birmingham jail, King felt the need to respond to a letter published in the local newspaper. This letter criticized King’s intentions during his visit by saying they were untimely. As a way to defend his actions, King put together a number of arguments and beliefs that proved why taking direct action was necessary during a time of racial discrimination. Furthermore, to persuade his audience, King had to gain trust and share the emotional connection he had with his people.
In the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” (Jr., Letter from Birmingham Jail) written by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. the three artistic appeals of Aristotle are plainly apparent, especially logos. Dr. King repeatedly appeals to logos (Ruszkiewicz) throughout the entire piece; particularly when he says he was initially disappointed at being categorized as an extremist then gradually gained a matter of satisfaction from the label. He is very impassioned in his language and tone in this part of the letter, yet still makes a strong argument for logic. Despite the overwhelming emotional and personal investment involved Dr. King still allows logic to prevail thus lending him a huge amount of credibility. As a member of the community being persecuted in this case, he might have had trouble remaining objective but clearly he doesn’t let his own pathos take center stage. All in all the use of logic and concise reasoning make a strong argument for the effectiveness of the letter in general.
Recently you have received a letter from Martin Luther King Jr. entitled “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” In Dr. King’s letter he illustrates the motives and reasoning for the extremist action of the Civil Rights movement throughout the 1960’s. In the course of Dr. King’s letter to you, he uses rhetorical questioning and logistical reasoning, imagery and metaphors, and many other rhetorical devices to broaden your perspectives. I am writing this analysis in hopes you might reconsider the current stance you have taken up regarding the issues at hand.
In 1963 on April 16th, Martin Luther King Jr, who was in the Birmingham jail for non-violent protesting wrote a letter in response to a statement from eight white Clergymen, in which they stated that his recent activities were “unwise and untimely.” In this letter King proceeds to state his purpose and reasons for his timing and his protests and powerfully he does so. He most obviously directs the letter to the Clergymen but there seems to be a many different audiences he wishes to enlighten on his thoughts. From what I gather he wants public figures and everyday men to read his letter, and by doing so he hopes to raise awareness for the cruel acts that have been done to the blacks. King gets his point across, that segregation is unfair and morally not right and that man has a responsibility to act against unjust laws, by using many different strategies throughout the letter. He uses logos, pathos, and ethos to do so. While using these devices he shows emotion, gives logic to his reasoning’s and gives credibility as well.
The Letter from Birmingham Jail was written in 1963 by Martin Luther King, Jr. During this period, the African Americans were involved in a battle for white and black equality. This is evident from the vocabulary used by King including “Negro” which was common during that period but not used commonly afterwards. Moreover, the letter’s context tells it argues that King wanted was African Americans to have freedom. The letter’s purpose is that King wants to persuade the clergymen what he together with his people were demonstrating since it was extremely necessary during that period. In achieving this, King utilizes persuasive and condemnatory tones so that the reader can consent with him. King Luther King, the author of Letter from Birmingham Jail, presents a valid argument through the use of ethos, pathos, and logos in the entire piece with the intention of explaining his actions and changing the audience’s opinions.
The Letter from Birmingham Jail was written by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in April of 1963. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of several civil rights activists who were arrested in Birmingham Alabama, after protesting against racial injustices in Alabama. Dr. King wrote this letter in response to a statement titled A Call for Unity, which was published on Good Friday by eight of his fellow clergymen from Alabama. Dr. King uses his letter to eloquently refute the article. In the letter dr. king uses many vivid logos, ethos, and pathos to get his point across. Dr. King writes things in his letter that if any other person even dared to write the people would consider them crazy.
Martin Luther King, Jr. is known to be a civil rights activist, humanitarian, a father, and a clergyman. He is well known for fighting for the equal rights of colored people and ending discrimination. King’s Letter from Birmingham Jail is an important part of history that showed King’s opinion of a letter that he happened to read in the newspaper written by a group of clergyman. In this letter, the group of clergyman report that colored people, also known as black people, are being violent towards Birmingham City. Also, the clergymen believed the time that will allow segregation to be diminished was not happening anytime soon because it is not convenient. King refuted the clergymen’s argument in a variety of ways using tactics of argumentation and persuasion like appeal to emotion through real life examples, appeal to logic, and even articulating certain phrases through metaphors and word choice. Many of these different tactics of argumentation and persuasion made his letter very effective and is now seen as a great piece that is looked upon highly today.
Letter From Birmingham Jail was a thoroughly written letter by Martin Luther King Jr. It was written in response to a group of clergymen who criticized and questioned King’s actions in Birmingham. The letter explicates that people have the right to break unjust laws in a nonviolent manner just as King intended to do. King also took the central components of the criticism and addressed them separately within the letter. King used numerous rhetorical devices to structure his letter and make it appeal more to the audience.
In the touching, influential letter, Letter from Birmingham Jail, Martin Luther King Jr. responds to the white, Alabama clergymen who condemned his movement as “unwise and untimely” (1) and delineates his motives for traveling to Birmingham, where whites consider him an “outsider” (1). Hoping to express his ambition of nonviolent protest in a sympathetic, deferential manner, he implores the white clergy to join the struggle for Civil Rights. Throughout the letter, he addresses and disputes each negative argument by the whites, testifying his position unpretentiously, yet confidently. With aptitude, poise, and humility, King establishes his motives for coming to such an unwelcoming environment. In his heart-rending letter, King’s coherent logos, stimulating rhetorical questions, and accentuating parallel structure express to the white moderates who criticized his actions that nonviolent, direct protest is not only essential, but also inevitable to contain agitated hostility and to assume relative peace.
The Letter from Birmingham Jail by Martin Luther King, is a response that King uses to address the critiques about nonviolent demonstrations against segregation. He backs up each critique with reasoning of emotions which he uses to explain why each action is taking place. King doesn’t challenge the critiques being made, but instead points out the views felt by his community. In Kings essay, the rhetorical strategy of appeal to the emotions is the strongest. This can be seen when he discusses the physical and mental disrespect from the white community. Portraying to the emotions is important to his overall argument because it relates the reader with the black community by providing situations of struggle and hardship, triggering the typical
King explained that, even though the laws had granted equal rights to all black people, the white supremacy wasn’t changed just by these acts. To most white people, civil rights movements, only made them realized that how cruel they did to those black people and they should treat them with some decent, but never really led them to think that Black American was as equal as themselves. He also addressed that this dominant ideology led to many structural obstacles, which impeded the implementation of those legislations in almost every structure of life, including the economic market, educational institution and public services. In Education, even many years after the Supreme Court decision on abolishing school segregation, there only a few integration schools existed. The segregated elementary schools received fewer fund and were in the harsher condition and “one-twentieth as many African American as whites attend college, and half of these are in ill-equipped Southern institution”(Reader, p.p.186). In labor market, most of employed Black American were worked in menial jobs and received lower wages even though they did the same works. This racism had already rooted in whole social structures that cannot just be solved by
Martin Luther King, Jr. was a pastor, activist, and leader in the African-American Civil Rights Movement. Mr. King was a man of honor and respect, even in the troubling situations of serving jail time. People who were supposed to support him questioned his actions, but Dr. King still stood by what he believed in. In Birmingham, Alabama, Dr. King hoped that the white religious leaders would come to his aid but instead found reluctance and opposition. In the “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, Martin Luther King, Jr. refutes his critics claims through the use of passionate tones, metaphors, and allusions.
Dr. King notices that the clergymen are anxious over the black man’s “willingness to break laws” (King pg.218). He understands their anxiety over that issue. King then refers to the “Supreme Court’s decision of 1954 outlawing segregation in the public schools," praising it for its civil rights initiative (King pg.218). By mentioning the Supreme Court decision, he is reminding the reader that even a credible source such as the Supreme Court supports racial equality. Since most citizens are law abiding, the addition of the Supreme Court decision might convince the reader adopt the belief of racial equality. King then streamlines into a rhetorical question and answers the question. King writes, “One may well ask: ‘How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying other laws” (King 218). This question is King admitting that his intention seems paradoxical since he urges people to follow “the Supreme Court’s decision of 1954 outlawing segregation," while he is apparently willing to break laws (King pg.218). He insists that it is not a paradox, but rather an acknowledgement of the distinction between “just and unjust” laws (King pg.218). He insists that everyone has a “legal” and “moral responsibility” to follow just laws, but one equally “has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” (King pg.218). In order to further provide evidence for his claims, King alludes to St.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was the leader of a peaceful movement to end segregation in the United States this mission led him in 1963 to Birmingham, Alabama where officials and leaders in the community actively fought against desegregation. While performing sit-ins, marches and other nonviolent protests, King was imprisoned by authorities for violating the strict segregation laws. While imprisoned King wrote a letter entitled “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, in which he expresses his disappointment in the clergy, officials, and people of Birmingham. This letter employed pathos to argue that the leaders and ‘heroes’ in Birmingham during the struggle were at fault or went against their beliefs.