Rhetorical Analysis On Geeks

As in today's modern society, America appreciates 's, famous athletes, pop-culture, or anything related to what is now known. And what about inventions of what we use in our daily lives? How do those devices create? They surely do not establish themselves. We would not know how, but according to Leonid Fridman, "geeks" have the brains on how to create and invent new ideas and technologies. Though people find them odd and geeks are being victimized against on how they are named. Throughout Fridman’s argument takes a direct tone as he criticizes comparing modern society for honoring power instead intelligence.
As a start off, he defined the concept "geek" as he tells the definition of what a geek stands for and embodies his opening comment about discrimination against brains. Fridman demonstrates that geeks are not only geeks and many people think they are just some person behind wearing glasses and just naturally intelligent. The way Fridman contrasts with Harvard students on how their performance of study and their academics. The author mentions the University of Harvard because that school is above and beyond college. Since students are too focused on their school work, other

people are followed up, and the nerds are avoided like a weird person. The similar situation between with the Harvard students but in the U.S. elementary and high school students. He criticizes how “children prefer to read books rather play football…” whereas his thought of children and young adults should be learning.
Here, the author points out his anti-intellectual statement: "Enough is enough." Now in these two passages, he defines what geeks are meant for and believes that they are more what think they are.

Where the author stood up and had enough that nerds should also be involved in society does, not to be avoided. Mentioning a part of an industrialized country, Fridman says a kid from East Asia is more advanced same goes for other industrialized parts of the word is higher than here in the United States. Fridman's next thought about earnings of athletes and researchers everywhere here in the United States. Lastly, the author points out his last statement, where the nation itself leaves the reader., thinking about society specifying the "geeks" and look themselves the point of view of

intellectualism.
Being a person behind glasses and "naturally intelligent" does not need to be turned its back on them. Friedman's argument convinced the readers to "bring back the nerds" because, without them, there would not be many devices we use every day. Through his examples and powerful argument leaves the reader thinking to consider the geeks as a person and a friend.