Rhetorical Analysis Of The Vietnam War

802 Words2 Pages

Frustration is a normal aspect of any conflicts in the political problems worldwide. During with the Vietnam War, President Nixon had to be careful because the American public was becoming more cynical based on involvement with Vietnam. President Nixon had the ability to understand the language along with content to reach his target audience with his address to the nation on the war in Vietnam on November 3rd, 1969. His viewers for his speech were his fellow Americans because they had lost hope based on past results of too many deaths of Americans in this war. His goal was to answer questions about why the wars were still taking place, and how he proposed to create peace to end the war. The United States could create propaganda and mislead the general …show more content…

President Nixon attempts to persuade the public of his nation by the methods of bandwagon, oversimplification, scapegoating, virtue words and euphoria in propaganda techniques. Specifically, Nixon takes on the bandwagon method because he is appealing to keep the concept alive and stop the division of the country and keep the idea alive of creating peace to end this war. Although he was a strong believer in the ability to turn to oversimplification, because of the military and political setting during this time based on setting up a timetable for peace. Meanwhile, he still blamed passed past presidents before him to justify the length of this war and how he planned to make changes because of scapegoating. To illustrate his ideal method of virtue words, he overstressed the word of making peace to end the war. Overall the end result of Nixon’s address was not effective, because of the leak of the Pentagon papers in 1971 when 20 newspapers printed articles about the lies of Vietnam. Based on this leak by Daniel Ellsberg who was a former military report for the Vietnam

Open Document