Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Vietnam War's effect on public opinion
The Vietnam War's effect on public opinion
The Vietnam War's effect on public opinion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Vietnam War's effect on public opinion
Frustration is a normal aspect of any conflicts in the political problems worldwide. During with the Vietnam War, President Nixon had to be careful because the American public was becoming more cynical based on involvement with Vietnam. President Nixon had the ability to understand the language along with content to reach his target audience with his address to the nation on the war in Vietnam on November 3rd, 1969. His viewers for his speech were his fellow Americans because they had lost hope based on past results of too many deaths of Americans in this war. His goal was to answer questions about why the wars were still taking place, and how he proposed to create peace to end the war. The United States could create propaganda and mislead the general …show more content…
public since they applied a basis about military information. President Nixon had to restore the trust of the entire nation in the United States of America because of unresolved conflict that caused division within the USA. The mission was to find the best way to end this war and prevent future problems of war, based on a change in military plans with a flexible timetable in regards to the Paris talks. A mood is an essential tool for any type of politics to create a controlled atmosphere within the nation that they govern. New ideas to create peace in Vietnam, were the best plans to change the public feelings on what was really taking place over there at this time. The timeline created an opportunity to bring their boys home and plan an election to fix the problem in Vietnam. The end goal was to be realistic about ending this, along with different thinking being applied to the topic. Each nation has a very different perspective based on individual beliefs on one’s cultural values on images. During his speech, he had no images or symbolism about the Vietnam War on November 3rd, 1969. Leaders worldwide have the intellectual insight to send subliminal messages that aid in any type of propaganda that takes place. The direction that was planned for this address was meant to be a very obvious message to the people that he governed over at the time. Strong viewpoints that the states felt that they knew better, over any other country around. He saw the ability to have control based on the level of being impatient based on their reputation worldwide, and how they preferred to do the job themselves. Deep down decide to only help when requested, or when it was vital to security and make this war less Americanized. Along with the main message of having fewer attacks, deaths, and no division to meet his reasonability’s. Every person who listens to music on the radio or a speech is being impacted to sway their own options based on emotions of propaganda techniques.
President Nixon attempts to persuade the public of his nation by the methods of bandwagon, oversimplification, scapegoating, virtue words and euphoria in propaganda techniques. Specifically, Nixon takes on the bandwagon method because he is appealing to keep the concept alive and stop the division of the country and keep the idea alive of creating peace to end this war. Although he was a strong believer in the ability to turn to oversimplification, because of the military and political setting during this time based on setting up a timetable for peace. Meanwhile, he still blamed passed past presidents before him to justify the length of this war and how he planned to make changes because of scapegoating. To illustrate his ideal method of virtue words, he overstressed the word of making peace to end the war. Overall the end result of Nixon’s address was not effective, because of the leak of the Pentagon papers in 1971 when 20 newspapers printed articles about the lies of Vietnam. Based on this leak by Daniel Ellsberg who was a former military report for the Vietnam
War. He first let The New York Times know and then The Washington Post reported the government secrets. “On Friday, June 25th 1971, the supreme court agreed to hear the case. It was argued the next day and, on June 30, less than three weeks after The Times published its first story on the Pentagon Papers, the court ruled in favor of The Times and The Post, allowing them to continue publishing the material. “In revealing the workings of government that led to the Vietnam War, the newspapers nobly did that which the Founders hoped and trusted they would,” Hugo L. Black, one of the justices, wrote in an opinion supporting the publications. The ruling was a landmark decision for press freedom.” (Chokshi, 2017), Throughout history, all of the American presidents have dealt with systematic problems, that have involved some form of political conflict.
In Kirby Dick’s influential documentary “The Invisible War,” filmmaker Kirby Dick uses pathos, ethos and logos to gain information and supplementary details to make his point that there is an epidemic of rape in throughout the DOD (Department of Defense) and the fact that military sexual trauma (MST) in the United States military goes unheard, mostly unpunished and needs to be addressed at a higher level.
i. Difficulties faced by soldiers due to the nature of fighting in the Vietnam War - Personnel had difficulties with transportation supplied with adapted vehicles back seat faced rear to provide additional fire power (Source A) – It appears as if the government didn't worry enough to supply men with safe and capable equipment - Threat of traps led to fear as vehicles had to be parked on street at night (Source A) o Check for traps each morning became a daily ritual particularly in fuel tanks (Source A) o A request for a locking fuel cap was denied because weren’t entitled to one” (Source A) • What circumstances would have needed to arise for them to be entitled to one? The Offensive full guard was set up (24hrs a day), personnel got no sleep and were constantly on alert (Source A) – How significant would this have been in the personnel’s mental frame of mind?
Mark Atwood Lawrence’s The Vietnam War: A Concise International History shows readers an international affair involving many nations and how the conflict progressed throughout its rather large existence. Lawrence starts his book in a time before America was involved in the war. It starts out with the French trying to colonize the nation of Vietnam. Soon the United States gets involved and struggles to get its point across in the jungles of Indo-China. Much of the book focuses on the American participation in helping South Vietnam vie for freedom to combine the country as a whole not under Communist rule. Without seeing many results, the war drug on for quite some time with neither side giving up. This resulted in problems in Vietnam and the U.S.
In 1968 Richard Nixon was elected President. One of the promises he made was to end the Vietnam War. When the My Lai massacre was exposed in November of 1969 there was worldwide outrage and reduced public support for the war. Then a month later the first draft lottery was instituted since WWII. In April 1970, Nixon told the public he was going to withdraw large numbers of U.S. troops from Vietnam. So when he made his television address on April 30 to say we had invaded Cambodia the American people reacted strongly. In the speech Nixon addressed not only Cambodia but also the unrest on college campuses. Many young people, including college students, were concerned about the risk of being drafted, and the expansion of the war into another country appeared to increase that risk. Across the country protests on campuses became what Time magazine called "a nation-wide student strike."
On April 30, 1970, when Nixon gave a speech announcing his invasion of Cambodia, anti-war factions rose up across the United States. In the speech he stated that, “If, when the chips are down…the world’s most powerful nation, the United States of America, acts like a pitiful, helpless giant, the forces of totalitarianism and anarchy will threaten free nations and institutions around the world. I would rather be a one term president and do what I believe is right than to be a two term president at the cost of seeing America become a second rate power.” Students did not agree with Nixon and protests cropped up on university campuses in the days that followed his speech. Amongst these protesters were students of Kent State University, “The Cambodian invasion defined a watershed in the attitude of Kent students toward American policy in the Indochina War.” At this point, the first two days of May, the students were protesting Nixon’s actions. While the cou...
In the 1968 election Nixon made Vietnam a campaign issue promising to win the war, but he also planned to expand the war by bombing neutral Cambodia to cut off the North supply lines along the Ho Chi Minh trail. He wanted to show North Vietnam that the United States was willing to purse “peace with honor”. Nixon went public with the bombings and sent troops into Cambodia, NVA invaded
At first, he was a strong supporter of the Vietnam War but then became a strong opponent. The Department of Defense continued to lie to the people about the hype about the war. The government continued to say that the war was under control. The Pentagon Papers already have statistics on the Vietnam War. As soon as Nixon saw the paper, he went to his Attorney General right away to stop the printing of the New York Times newspaper. Daniel Ellsberg knew that he would get arrested for making copies of the papers.
was the first time that the media were able to get a glimpse of it. As
Richard Milhous Nixon, the 37th president, gave his “Resignation Address to the Nation (1974)” speech explaining that he wasn’t going to be the president any more. Through his speech, Nixon demonstrates logos, pathos, ethos, repetition and anaphora to the citizens of the United States. Nixon’s goal is to suggest that the Watergate issue was not his fault, and also to resign from his presidency profoundly in order to avoid impeachment by the people. The tone of his voice was apologetic as he addressed the nation on his resignation.
out of Vietnam. All share a common theme of Vietnamization, triangular diplomacy, and threat of force to coerce the North Vietnamese to accept terms favorable to Nixon’s administration. Vietnamization was a carryover from LBJ’s presidency. Simply put, it was a program to set conditions where the South Vietnamese could stand on their own with minimal or no U.S. support. Triangular diplomacy involved public and secret peace negotiations with Hanoi. Central to these negotiations is the involvement of the Soviets and Chinese in the peace deals. Added initiatives were linkages, or carrots and sticks for trade negations and arms control in exchange for help from the Soviets or Chinese to get Hanoi to the peace table (p 75). Force was used to compel the North Vietnamese into accepting U.S. terms. Unlike LBJ’s use of gradual escalation of force, Nixon intended for this force to be overwhelming. Nixon also needed to demonstrate to America that he was ending the war. To this end he gradually withdraws U.S. military ground forces throughout the remainder of the
In the movie, Apocalypse Now, based on the Vietnam War, the director portrays the reality of war, a very traumatic place, and leads viewers through the painful reality that left many warriors with everlasting nightmares and disturbing memories. As is most great war-related films, the overarching message is pointed towards viewer understanding of the Vietnam War. The director did this by exemplifying the positives and negatives of the war, so that all viewers can learn from these historical events and prevent similar wars in the future. The director uses many literary elements in Apocalypse Now such as setting, characterization, and theme to further the understanding of the message.
After President Johnson intensified violence in Vietnam, President Richard Nixon took on the role of presidency with the impending pressure of recalibrating American foreign policy. In particular, Nixon implemented Vietnamization which was the process in which Americans transferred battle tactics and strategies to Vietnamese soldiers so that they would be able to fight the war on their own. He wanted to make the Vietnamese fight their own battles in order to relieve the pressures on American soldiers. While this was a theoretically digestible idea, Nixon still upheld ideas of deception and imperialism.
However, it contradicts his own promise during the campaign. He promised that he wanted to end the war peacefully. As a result, his credibility in the future can be questioned because President Nixon did not keep his own promise. Moreover, in his speech he stated that it could be disastrous to draw the American forces from Vietnam. This also shows that he is not a consistent person and change his views easily. Citizens are mad because he does not fulfill his promises and decided to
The Sixties and Seventies were among the most important decades in American history in terms of massive social upheaval. With practically the entire world in a state of unbalance and with the wild relationship of the United States to the rest of the world, it is unsurprising that the States faced a state of unrest and social change. The United States was involved in two vastly different wars at the time that created a massive feeling of unrest inside its own walls, especially among groups of young people who worked in massive numbers to bring about heavy societal change in many different areas aiming for the top and moving down. These decades included some of the most hotly debated and controversial events in American history. The United states
I sat on my front porch steps, eating my lunch and watching the cars zoom by. I was beginning to become upset by sitting on the couch with my family, watching television. There was no more family game show night; it was now only news coverage of the Vietnam War. From news teams on the front lines to news anchors talking about the war, like it was an overview of sports game. I outraged that my parents found this entertaining and continued to watch the reportage, even though all of the coverage was gruesome and disgusting. I hated war, and I hate the Vietnam War even more. It was pointless, and I have a feeling that the United States will not be triumphant this time.