Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What changes did wwii bring to the people in the us during the war
What impact did the Vietnam War have on the American economy and people
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Sixties and Seventies were among the most important decades in American history in terms of massive social upheaval. With practically the entire world in a state of unbalance and with the wild relationship of the United States to the rest of the world, it is unsurprising that the States faced a state of unrest and social change. The United States was involved in two vastly different wars at the time that created a massive feeling of unrest inside its own walls, especially among groups of young people who worked in massive numbers to bring about heavy societal change in many different areas aiming for the top and moving down. These decades included some of the most hotly debated and controversial events in American history. The United states …show more content…
faced a state of massive uneasiness internally with the nervousness brought about by the Cold War. There was also a state of triumphant upheaval among the younger generation of the time through their mass protest of the Vietnam War. There was also a massive shift in the eye of the American public from support to vehement protest of the Vietnam War causing a large shift in American politics. These many issues gave way to both the Civil Rights and Women’s Rights movements which worked towards creating a change in the way that society had operated for practically the entirety of the United State’s existence. Terry Anderson in his book The Sixties aptly states that this is “the Decade of Tumult and Change” (Anderson 22). The 1960s and 1970s showed massive shifts in social and political climates through war, protest, and social action taken by the people of the time. These shifts are strongly portrayed in the book The Sixties by Terry Anderson and these shifts can be seen firsthand through the music of the decades. The Cold War was one of the biggest provocateurs of the shift in political climate of the twentieth century with a monumental impact on the social climate of the decade. The mass fear of communism in the fifties and sixties prompted a mass feeling of uneasiness that was further amplified by the fiasco that was the Bay of Pigs. As described by the Anderson text, the Bay of Pigs consisted of “1,500 Cuban émigrés invaded Cuba at the Bay of Pigs. The invasion force had been conceived during the Eisenhower years, trained by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and aimed at ending the rule of Fidel Castro” (Anderson 28). The Bay of Pigs was one of the most absolute blunders of the Kennedy administration and it did nothing but increase conflict between the United States and Russia. This complete failing of a plan to diffuse the communism in Cuba under Fidel Castro created a mockery of American foreign policy, however it aided in the ratings of President Kennedy. This invasion prompted not only the arms race between Russia and the United States, but the allyship between Russia and Cuba that lead to a further dissonance in foreign policy for America. The arms race between the Soviets and the United States was a massive one with armies being built that could launch the largest war in history. This international relationship was a pot that was on the brink of boiling over and could do so at any moment. Kennedy “increased the defense budget, tripled draft calls, extended enlistments, enlarged the armed forces by 300,000, and sent 40,000 additional troops to defend Europe” (Anderson 32). On the Soviet side, large missiles and troops were being sent by the Soviets to their new ally, Cuba. On October 22, President Kennedy publicly informed the public of the United States of the imminent threat of nuclear war, thus sending its citizens into a frenzy. In their song The Dawn of Correction, The Spokesman have an oddly optimistic take on the situation as a whole, saying that “There are buttons to push in two mighty nations//But who's crazy enough to risk annihilation?//The buttons are there to ensure negotiation//So don't be afraid, boy, it's our only salvation” These lyrics tap into the fear held by the American people in an almost self reassuring way. They tell the tale of a nuclear war that nearly came to be, but that no reasonable leaders would blow everyone up. These lyrics help the listener tell themselves that they are safe in a time of such massive political upheaval. Those listeners were right. The United States and the Soviets negotiated and the missiles were brought home once more, thus taking the pot of the heat just before it boiled over. While this was not the end of the Cold War, these incidents, which were massive crises of the Sixties themselves, helped to create the state of massive unrest that was necessary for some of the biggest social events of the Sixties. The second war of the Sixties which prompted massive cultural change in a multitude of ways was the Vietnam War.
The Vietnam war was essentially a surrogate war for the Cold War with the Communist Russians supporting North Vietnam with the anti-Communist United States supporting the South Vietnamese. The war in Vietnam was initially widely supported by the people of the United States. The overwhelming support or apathy of the American people can be seen as Anderson writes “opinion polls demonstrated that about 80 percent supported bombing the North, and the same percentage thought it was “very important” to prevent a Communist South Vietnam” (Anderson 59). Initially there was what appeared to be great support for the war, but this great support was more likely a stronger sense of American apathy towards the United State’s foreign policy. Anderson’s book goes on to mention that “surveys also revealed that two-thirds of the public either had not followed or had no opinion of LBJ’s policy, and a fourth did not even know U.S. troops were in Vietnam” (Anderson 59). It was abundantly clear that there was a lack of awareness on the part of the American people regarding this war, and the appearance of support was not due to an actual approval of policy, but a blindness to what that policy actually was. This support would not be long lasting, however, as people would slowly become aware of what the United States was actually taking part in within this war. The start of this war was …show more content…
met with what seemed like gargantuan approval, but was, in actuality, mammoth unawareness. In 1965, those in colleges began noticing the fact that there were heavy bombings on the part of the United States in Vietnam.
The peace movement began popping up around college campuses in which people began holding “teach-ins” in which professors and students would spend large chunks of time discussing ways to improve the Nation’s policies in Vietnam. Consequently, the peace movement spread throughout college campuses. Teach-ins were happening at schools throughout the country and more and more students were becoming involved in the protest against the Vietnam war. The movement for international peace moved forward with strength, surging its way to the White House. Anderson describes this in saying “some 20,000 appeared on a warm, beautiful Sunday. They picketed the White House and then began marching to the Washington Monument. Students sang with folksingers Judy Collins, Joan Baez, and Phil Ochs. SDS president Paul Potter called for a “massive social movement” to change America”(Anderson 60). Barry McGuire’s song Eve of Destruction powerfully describes the attitudes of those searching for peace, and for the often held sentiment that we should move out of Vietnam and into discussion regarding Civil Rights. McGuire sings “You don't believe in war, but what's that gun you’re totin’” describing the unpopularity of the draft and the fact that millions of people, including those fighting, are against this war. McGuire also echoes the ideas that we should focus on our own
civil rights before attacking others when he sings “Think of all the hate there is in Red China//Then take a look around to Selma, Alabama.” The draft began making bigger waves in the civil rights community with primarily low income African American men being drafted, and college students continued to become further and further involved in anti-war protests. Families were losing their children to this war and college students were noticing the mass injustice and deciding that “If you weren’t part of the solution, you were part of the problem” (Anderson 78). Peter, Paul, and Mary’s hit song Jet Plane could be heard by those whose loved ones had been sent to war saying “I'm leavin' on a jet plane//Don't know when I'll be back again.” Those leaving to go to war were never certain that they would be back again, which provided their loved ones with even stronger motivation to stop this war. Thusly, anti-war protests became stronger and more extreme among the population of students that were the primary source of heavy protest against the war. The anti-war movement continued to gain momentum and people were actively moving against the draft. The President at the time, Lyndon Johnson, felt as though backing out was not an option, he could not lose a war. As a result Johnson “attempted to change opinion in America instead of changing policy in Vietnam”(Anderson 87). Johnson was trying to, instead of altering the goingson of the war itself, alter the opinion of the public towards the war and the policies of which they were not in favor. There was mass confusion in American politics at the time and a huge uncertainty in what were were even doing, in fact, “a New York Times poll discovered nearly half of the respondents had no clear idea why their nation was fighting a war in Vietnam”(Anderson 88). The once overwhelmingly unaware support had evolved into an unaware distaste. When Walter Cronkite denounced the war following the Tet Offensive, he took the rest of the United States with him. The Vietnam war launched protests throughout the country and prompted a social movement, and it crumbled a once powerful presidency. President Johnson became “the most notable casualty by declaring, ‘I shall not seek, and I will not accept, the nomination of my party for another term as your president’”(Anderson 92). There were many events of the sixties and seventies that shaped, shattered, and reconstructed society as a whole, and the Vietnam did so on every possible level.
The reports in this novel are prefaced with a quote by Robert Shaplen, which sums up the feelings of those Americans involved in the Vietnam conflict. He states, "Vietnam, Vietnam . . .. There are no sure answers." In this novel, the author gives a detailed historical account of the happenings in Vietnam between 1950 and 1975. He successfully reports the confusing nature, proximity to the present and the emotions that still surround the conflict in Vietnam. In his journey through the years that America was involved in the Vietnam conflict, Herring "seeks to integrate military, diplomatic, and political factors in such a way as to clarify America's involvement and ultimate failure in Vietnam."
i. Difficulties faced by soldiers due to the nature of fighting in the Vietnam War - Personnel had difficulties with transportation supplied with adapted vehicles back seat faced rear to provide additional fire power (Source A) – It appears as if the government didn't worry enough to supply men with safe and capable equipment - Threat of traps led to fear as vehicles had to be parked on street at night (Source A) o Check for traps each morning became a daily ritual particularly in fuel tanks (Source A) o A request for a locking fuel cap was denied because weren’t entitled to one” (Source A) • What circumstances would have needed to arise for them to be entitled to one? The Offensive full guard was set up (24hrs a day), personnel got no sleep and were constantly on alert (Source A) – How significant would this have been in the personnel’s mental frame of mind?
During the 1960’s, there was a rising tide of protests that were taking place. College students began to stand up for their rights and protest for a stronger voice in society. The United States was going through a tough period marked by the Cold War against communism and also the war in Vietnam. From Truman to Nixon the United States government involved the country more and more in Vietnam. Nixon announced a new policy in 1968 called Vietnamization. (Foner, 4th edition, pg.1028) This policy would bring American troops back home, but it neither limited the war nor ended the antiwar movements.
The 1960’s was a time society fantasized of a better world. However, the horrors of the Vietnam War soon became evident; the mass amounts of death occurring because of the war became a reality. It created a “movement”, especially in American colleges, in order to stand up for what they believed to be “right”. By 1970, many Americans believed sending troops to Vietnam was a mistake, however there were also various individuals becoming increasingly critical of the student antiwar movement
The 1960s were turbulent years. The United States was unpopularly involved in the war in Vietnam, and political unrest ran high at colleges and universities across the country.
The Vietnam War was a vicious conflict predominately between the United States and Australia against The Viet Cong and The North Vietnamese. Initially the public supported the war, however the American president of the time, Lyndon B. Johnson, exaggerated how easy and worldwide the war was to attract further support. When he called for “more flags” to be represented in South Vietnam only the Philippines, the Republic of South Korea, Thailand, Australia, and New Zealand indicated a willingness to contribute some form of military aid. By doing this “it enabled Johnson to portray the developing war as international to show it must be dealt with and gain support,” (Hastings, 2003). The outcome of the Vietnam War was ensured because the governments of the United States and Australia could not maintain their publics’ support due to the popular culture of the time. This was because much of the war was shown on television or other popular culture, so events like the Battle of Long Tan could be seen by families and people of all ages in their living rooms; this was the first time they could see how bad a war can actually be.
The Vietnam War took place in between 1947- 1975. It consisted of North Vietnam trying to make South Vietnam a communism government. The United States later joined this conflict because of the stress North Vietnam was putting to South Vietnam to become a government that America did not want. The main reason why America joined was because of a theory called the Domino Effect. America and Russia were going through what has been dubbed the Cold War. The Domino Effect is the theory that communism will spread form one country to another. United states does not want this because our government is a democracy and communism opposes everything we stand for. America fearing communism was growing, stepped into Vietnam with America’s interest in mind, instead of Vietnam’s. There are several reason why American should have not gotten involved with this war. The most important reason was that America government officials made to much of a big deal about communism. This might sound cynical, but America to a certain degree did over react. Let it be said that it is much easier to say this after the fact. By looking back at McCarthyism, we can see the silliness of this fear. There is a serious side though. Thousands of people dies for a government that has no impact of their daily life. What regime Vietnam was going to change over to had no effect on the every day cycle of the United States. So truly, one can say, this can not one thing to do with America, its government and people.
The Sixties, by Terry H. Anderson, takes the reader on a journey through one of the most turbulent decades in American life. Beginning with the crew-cut conformity of 1950s Cold War culture and ending with the transition into the uneasy '70s, Anderson notes the rise of an idealistic generation of baby boomers, widespread social activism, and revolutionary counterculture. Anderson explores the rapidly shifting mood of the country with the optimism during the Kennedy years, the liberal advances of Johnson's "Great Society," and the growing conflict over Vietnam that nearly tore America apart. The book also navigates through different themes regarding the decade's different currents of social change; including the anti-war movement, the civil rights struggle, and the liberation movements. From the lunch counter sit-in of Greensboro, N.C. in 1960 and the rise of Martin Luther King, Jr. to the Black Power movement at the decade's end, Anderson illustrates the brutality involved in the reaction against civil rights, the radicalization of some of the movement's youth, and the eventual triumphs that would change America forever. He also discusses women's liberation and the feminist movement, as well as the students' rights, gay rights, and environmental movements.
In the duration of one year, 1968, the American national mood shifted from general confidence and optimism to chaotic confusion. Certainly the most turbulent twelve months of the post-WWII period and arguably one of the most disturbing episodes the country has endured since the Civil War, 1968 offers the world a glimpse into the tumultuous workings of a revolution. Although the entire epoch of the 1960's remains significant in US history, 1968 stands alone as the pivotal year of the decade; it was the moment when all of the nation's urges toward violence, sublimity, diversity, and disorder peaked to produce a transformation great enough to blanket an entire society. While some may superficially disagree, the evidence found in the Tet Offensive, race relations, and the counterculture's music of the period undeniably affirm 1968 as a turning point in American history.
It is understandable that some Americans strongly opposed the United States getting involved in the Vietnam War. It had not been a long time since the end of World War II and simply put, most Americans were tired of fighting. Mark Atwood Lawrence is one of the people who opposed our involvement in the Vietnam War. In his essay, “Vietnam: A Mistake of Western Alliance”, Lawrence argues that the Vietnam War was unnecessary and that it went against our democratic policies, but that there were a lot of things that influenced our involvement.
The late sixties was a time of turmoil in the United States. It was a transition period between the psychedelic sixties and the revolutionary seventies. The youth of the United States was becoming increasingly aware of the politics of war, the draft and other general misuses of governmental power. With the Democratic National Convention being held in Chicago during 1968, political tensions were running high throughout the city. Numerous protests were held during the time surrounding the convention in protest of President Lyndon B. Johnson’s policies on the Vietnam War. Most notably, the group of Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, Tom Hayden, Rennie Davis, David Dillinger, John Froines, Lee Weiner and Bobby Seale...
The 1960’s and early 1970’s were a time that eternally changed the culture and humanity of America. It was a time widely known for peace and love when in reality; many minorities were struggling to gain a modicum of equality and freedom. It was a time, in which a younger generation rebelled against the conventional norms, questioning power and government, and insisting on more freedoms for minorities. In addition, an enormous movement began rising in opposition to the Vietnam War. It was a time of brutal altercations, with the civil rights movement and the youth culture demanding equality and the war in Vietnam put public loyalty to the test. Countless African-Americans, Native-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, women, and college students became frustrated, angry, and disillusioned by the turmoil around them.
During the sixties and seventies there was an influx of social change movements, from civil rights, gay rights, student’s rights and feminism. In the early sixties the US was experiencing
Although the sixties were a decade in which the United States became a more open, more tolerant, and a freer country, in some ways it became less of these things. During the sixties, America intervened in other nations and efforts were made to stop the progress of the civil rights movement. Because of America’s foreign policy and Americans fight against the civil rights movement, it is clear that the sixties in America were not purely a decade of openness, tolerance, and freedom in the United States.
Vietnam was a struggle which, in all honesty, the United States should never have been involved in. North Vietnam was battling for ownership of South Vietnam, so that they would be a unified communist nation. To prevent the domino effect and the further spread of communism, the U.S. held on to the Truman Doctrine and stood behind the South Vietnamese leader, Diem.