Freedom has fallen, America now stands together as one. The Prime Minister of Great Britain, one of America's allies, has just delivered a speech to the people of America, after the death of President Ronald Reagan. The Prime Minister stands with the United States of America at this time as delivers her speech on June 11th 2004, 6 days after the president has died. Waiting this long to deliver her speech, she has hid a different meaning behind it. At this time America is beginning a war, a war of terrorists. She begins her speech saying, “We have lost a great President, a great American” by starting off the speech and using the word “we” she is able to connect with the audience; showing that she, as well as everyone, is going through this loss …show more content…
together. She is also meaning that “we” are going through a war together.The Prime Minister of Britain begins to show her friendship with the president at the end of the first sentence. She says, “and I have lost a dear friend.” She is now using emotion and credibility to connect with the audience. Now, all of America has her attention and know and knowingly speaking from the perspective of a friend, not just a colleague. Throughout her essay she points out what a great president Reagan was.
In her speech she said, “He inspired America and its’ allies with renewed faith in their mission of freedom.” When she uses the words “renewed faith” she is talking about how at this time in the world everyone has lost faith, but it will come back. Towards line 36, The Prime Minister points out a significant achievement that President Reagan portrayed. She points out how President Reagan won the Cold War by turning out enemies into friends. She uses the meaning of the Cold war to relate to the war in which America is fighting against right now, the war against terrorist. By referring to the Cold War at this time in life she is about to send a hidden meaning. We know this because the Cold War was not a war that America won. She talks about the war as if America had won the war, but we all know that no one really won the war then. However, she says in her speech that Reagan, America, won the war. By pointing this out in her speech, she is able to put a hidden meaning in her eulogy. Allowing her to send a message to America without literally saying …show more content…
it. Resuming the remainder of her speech, towards line 50 she says, “We live today..” using the word “we” again; assuring everyone she stands with them, not against them, at this vulnerable time.
The Prime Minister of Great Britain is standing with America to show why it is so important for everyone to be together at this time. Later in the story she says, “It is a very different world” At this time she is referring to a terrorist group called ISIS, who at the time and is still now, killing innocent citizens. She does this because she knows that America’s motto is to stand together, as one great Nation, which is what she is doing with them. Thatcher explains how Reagan’s strategies to innovate America were planned cautiously. She begins to explains how every single problem he solved was taken into great consideration, how he did this because he loved America so much, because he was a patriot first. She does this so she can tell America to keep going, she is telling the Americans that they need do the same as he did. Then, she goes back to talking about the cold war and how Reagan was a massive part of beating the Communist and explaining how we are free because of him. She does this to remind us how we got through a war of terrible communism and how we can get through this one. Thatcher continues to use the Cold war as a reminder of what America has done. She uses Reagan instead of saying America, she says, “he did not shriek” and while it is true that Reagan didn’t shriek, it
was truly America she was talking about. We know that The Prime Minister of Great Britain was talking about ISIS, Showing friendship, love and honor towards president Reagan, Margaret Thatcher, the Prime Minister of Great Britain stands with America. She reminds the people of America of all that they have been through together, assuring them that they can get through this. She uses the death of President Reagan to send a message to America that she knows they’re at their worst times now but will pursue. She concludes how President Reagan, America, has done nothing but make America what it is today; a free country. She proves many ways in which he, America, has changed not only America but also their allies through their bravery. She points out the enemies we’ve defeated. America will not stop, we will keep fighting until the end.
Part I: Reasoning in the Inaugural Address. President Roosevelt in his inaugural speech first realized the importance of his presidency, the speech and the US. He mentioned that the thing the US nation needs to fear is the fear itself. He further mentioned it as unreasoning, nameless and unjustified terror which constraints and paralyzes the efforts needed to make a retreat (Davis, 2014).
Ronald Reagan adeptly utilizes Ethos Pathos and Logos in his Brandenburg Gate address, he attempts to sway the audience of the importance of success of the marshal plan and western values as a whole, and convince the leader of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev, to open up the barrier which had divided West and East Berlin since 1961. Reagan begins his speech by addressing the people present and recognizing the “freedom” and “feeling of history” of the city of Berlin has. He makes his first reference to previous speakers by saying, “Twenty four years ago, President John F. Kennedy visited Berlin, and speaking to the people of this city and the world at the city hall. Well since then two other presidents have come, each in his turn to Berlin. And today, I, myself, make my second visit to your city,”( Reagan 361) His first usage of pathos is when he addresses the east berliners who were separated from the westerners by the Berlin wall and tells them, “I join your fellow countrymen in the West, in this
On a cold winter’s morning on the 28th day of January in the year 1986, America was profoundly shaken and sent to its knees as the space shuttle Challenger gruesomely exploded just seconds after launching. The seven members of its crew, including one civilian teacher, were all lost. This was a game changer, we had never lost a single astronaut in flight. The United States by this time had unfortunately grown accustomed to successful space missions, and this reality check was all too sudden, too brutal for a complacent and oblivious nation (“Space”). The outbreak of sympathy that poured from its citizens had not been seen since President John F. Kennedy’s assassination. The disturbing scenes were shown repeatedly on news networks which undeniably made it troublesome to keep it from haunting the nation’s cognizance (“Space”). The current president had more than situation to address, he had the problematic undertaking of gracefully picking America back up by its boot straps.
He triggers the feeling of patriotism while convincing them that "The war is inevitable--and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come." He believes that there is nothing that should stop the war from starting because we should be fighting for our our independence and our freedom from the British. He continues to say that “we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight!” Emphasizing the fact that the nation as a whole should fight against the British for our freedom because there is no other way to gain our independence. To continue as an independent nation we had to unite and fight against the
In the second paragraph he says, “We come to Berlin, we American Presidents, because it’s our duty to speak in this place of freedom.” By assigning speaking in places of freedom to his duties and allocating the cause for prosperity of the western world to freedom, Reagan establishes his ethos as an advocate for “good.” He continues to gain the trust of his audience by displaying his personal concern for the well-being of those in Berlin, in Germany, and in the western world as well as his sympathy for those that reside in the totalitarian state. By revealing his intentions to promote prosperity, Reagan creates a common goal between him and his audience, demonstrating his sincerity and honesty and allowing the rest of the text to be easily
Her use of this rhetorical strategy elevates the level to which one can analyze her prose and the relation it has to her claim. The reader can identify Thatcher's use of sentence arrangement when she opens with a quote stating, “We have lost a great president, a great American, and a great man, and I have lost a dear friend” (Thatcher). Throughout this sentence are several perspectives and points of view from which Thatcher interprets Reagan. Thatcher uses a manipulated phrase order, beginning with a crucial and celebrated president and then diminishes the level of impact to then an American, a man, and a friend. By ending with “friend,” Thatcher can begin to draw the reader into her eulogy by creating a depiction to which one can relate on a personal level. While on a superficial level Thatcher depicts Reagan from several points of view, her purpose of this arrangement was to build upon her claim and the reader’s understanding. Furthermore, Thatcher uses sentence structure to affirm essential points with the reader to a place beyond where the surface prose suggests. To accomplish this goal, Thatcher uses a similar construct in sentence composition to exemplify Reagan’s achievements which one can identify in lines thirty
Ronald Reagan was one of the most liked Presidents. When being elected for his second term, he won by a landslide—winning all the states minus Minnesota and Washington D.C. Reagan addresses the people of the United States of America. He wants the American people to reflect on his presidency, and as all presidents do in their farewell addresses, he wants to say goodbye to the nation that he's led for the past eight years. Ronald Reagan uses repetition, parallel structure, and allusion to reflect on his presidency and to say farewell to the American people.
He emphasizes the horror when he states, “I regret to tell you that very many American lives have been lost.” He tries to gain the confidence of the the American people by stating that other countries have been attacked, as well. He uses parallel structure and repetition to indicate that places other than the US were attacked. He repeats this framework to emphasize that many other places were attacked. He does this so that his audience can understand the greater impact of the event. FDR then concludes this section of his speech by stressing the fact that he knows what the Americans are feeling and the opinions that have been formed. Roosevelt implies that he knows their lives will change and that the people are concerned for their safety. He does this to make the listeners understand that they are not alone in their reaction to this attack and that everybody in America feels this
Ronald Reagan was the 40th president of the United States of America during the Cold War era. On January 28th, 1986, he gave a speech to discuss the tragedy of the Challenger Space Shuttle, which exploded in atmosphere. The speech was delivered in the Oval Office during his State of the Union Address. He was attempting to inform and comfort America about the disaster. The author uses multiple rhetorical devices in his speech. The importance of these devices is to convey a goal of the author to persuade the reader to a certain perspective. A speaker uses these devices to give the speech more impact. Rhetorical and persuasive devices can make a speech more effective since the devices can use emotional and logical appeal. In this speech, Reagan does not use very many complicated devices, but he does use appeal, anaphora, repetition, and allusion.
Have you ever listened to a speech after a tragedy that was so good, that it affected you and even though something traumatic happened it helped you feel better? That indeed is a style of speaking called rhetoric. Rhetoric is the study of effective speaking and writing, and the art of persuasion. Many people are not able to speak and convey that art of rhetoric that helps with grief or sentiment. Today, I will show you an example of two different speeches delivered after tragedies, by two of our nation’s presidents. The first, President Obama’s address to the nation after Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting and the other Ronald Reagan’s address after The Space shuttle “Challenger” tragedy.
On October 27th 1964, Ronald Reagan the 40th president of the United States of America gave one of his most memorable speeches In Los Angeles, CA. Reagan was born in Illinois in 1911. He won the presidential elections in 1981, and succeeded Jimmy Carter. Reagan was a politician, actor, and sports commenter. Moreover, he served in the Air Force Military from 1937 to 1945. The speech “A Time for Choosing” was given by Reagan as a ratification for Barry Goldwater campaign, who ran for presidency in 1964. This speech was an important event in Ronald’s life because it was the sparkle for his popularity in the political field.
We Shall Overcome Rhetorical Analyses Throughout the history of the United States, racial discrimination has always been around our society. Many civil rights movements and laws have helped to minimize the amount of discrimination towards every single citizen, but discrimination is something that will not ever disappear. On March 15, 1965, Lyndon Baines Johnson gave a speech that pointed out the racial injustice and human rights problems of America in Washington D.C. He wanted every citizen of the United States to support his ideas to overcome and solve the racial injustice problems as a nation. Throughout the speech, Lyndon Johnson used several rhetorical concepts to persuade the audience.
Primarily he starts out his address by speaking directly to his audience, the American people. He states: “We know we share this pain with all of the people of our country. This is truly a national loss.” By doing so he establishes who his intended audience is, which is very important in a speech like this. It helps the audience feel a greater connection to the speaker since he is addressing them directly and relating to them.
Reagan’s ethos was created throughout his two terms but solidified in his second and final one. Reagan presents his ethos throughout his rhetoric by stating facts with authority and also in a way that made him credible to the audience. One of the parts in his speech is headlined with a cold and awakening fact directed at the Soviet Union. In a 1956 speech given by Soviet Union leader Nikita Khrushchev, the statement “We will bury you,” was aimed at Western ambassadors who stood for freedom. In Reagan’s speech at the Brandenburg Gate, he specifically calls out the previously stated notion that the Soviets would essentially, “bury the free world.” Reagan profoundly proclaims this: “In the 1950s, Khrushchev predicted: "We will bury you." But in the West today, we see a free world that has achieved a level of prosperity and well-being unprecedented in all human history. In the Communist world, we see failure, technological backwardness, declining standards of health, even want of the most basic kind--too little food. Even today, the Soviet Union still cannot feed itself. After these four decades, then, there stands before the entire world one great and inescapable conclusion: Freedom leads to prosperity. Freedom replaces the ancient hatreds among the nations with comity and peace. Freedom is the victor.” The great appeal this presented to the
“If... many influential people have failed to understand, or have just forgotten, what we were up against in the Cold War and how we overcame it, they are not going to be capable of securing, let alone enlarging, the gains that liberty has made.” The Cold War was a dispute between two of the most powerful nations, the Soviet Union and the United States, during the 1950’s and the 1960’s. The Cold War originated from both the United States and the Soviet Union establishing and protecting it’s own spheres of interest around the globe. To add, the United States during the time of the Cold War noticed that the Soviets were spreading their communist beliefs across the world, so they had to find a way stop the spread of this feared ideology. During