Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender inequality in the movie industry
Gender inequality in the film industry
Gender inequality in the movie industry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender inequality in the movie industry
In November of 2016, Naomi McDougall-Jones stood on a TED Talk stage and expressed her life experiences, as well as statistical information, about the reality of being a woman in Hollywood. Her aspiration is for all men and women who are involved in the film industry to receive gender parity. Naomi specifies that she is an advocate for both men and women, and that her goal is not for the female film industry to dominate the male film industry (16). She declares that her audience is all people who watch movies as well as filmmakers, businesspeople, and entrepreneurs because these are the people who have the power to enact social change (13-15). Naomi uses ethos and pathos throughout her speech in order to raise awareness for gender parity …show more content…
in the film industry. The use of logos in her speech, however, is imperative to coax her audience to participate in the revolution towards gender parity. During the entire opening of her speech, Naomi establishes her credibility, which is also known as ethos. She does this to enlighten her audience on why she is adequate to be speaking about the struggles of being a women in the film industry. She tells the audience about her life experiences in the film industry all the way up to this point in her life. She graduated from the American Academy of Dramatic Arts in New York City, ready to play “smart, willful, complicated, interesting, complex, confident female characters” in movies (3). However, it didn’t take long for Naomi to find out that Hollywood was not going to just hand her those roles. Her agent even said to her, “I don't really know what to do with you. You're too smart for the parts that are being written for women in their 20s, and you're not quite pretty enough to be the hot one, so I think you'll work when you're 35" (4). She also tells the story of how her and her actress friend made their own movie and were then told by a successful male producer that they would have to hire a male producer so that people would trust them with their money, and that people don’t really want to see movies that are about women, that is “just the way it is” (4). By telling these stories to her audience, Naomi is establishing her credibility so that the audience will know that what she is saying is trustworthy and they will become engaged with what she is speaking about. Naomi’s use of pathos, or emotion, within her speech compliments her use of ethos.
She establishes her credibility by telling personal stories that also cause the audience to feel sympathetic towards her. Her stories demonstrate the struggles that she, and other females, have experienced as being women in the film industry. Naomi also uses pathos by repeating the phrase “it’s just the way it is” throughout the first half of the speech. She repeats this phrase several times to emphasize that this phrase is how the world goes along with the already existing system, however, the world will always be that way unless someone does something about it (6). Naomi again uses pathos with her energy throughout the entire speech. Her tone is upbeat and the way that she moves on stage shows how passionate she is about what she’s saying. Her energy causes the audience to feel the same …show more content…
energy. In Naomi’s speech, the most powerful element used to persuade the audience is logos, or logic.
She declares several interesting statistics and also brings attention to the fact that the large majority of the world is affecting gender inequality in the film industry, not just Hollywood itself. She appeals to the majority of the world’s population with logos by saying that, “if you have watched mostly American movies in your lifetime, 95 percent of all the films you have ever seen were directed by men. Somewhere between 80 and 90 percent of all of the leading characters that you have ever seen were men. And even if we just talk about the last five years, 55 percent of the time that you have seen a woman in a movie, she was naked or scantily clad” (8). By making these statements, Naomi is pointing out that in reality, it isn’t just Hollywood that is causing gender inequality, it is also the people who simply just watch movies. It is safe to assume that the majority of the people in the audience watch movies and so this part of the speech is meant to be very appealing to them. Naomi also uses logos in her speech by describing her four-point plan for a revolution against gender inequality in the film industry. She does this by addressing all of the different groups of people who influence Hollywood in some way; people who watch movies, filmmakers, business people, and entreprenuers. She encourages these groups to continue to do what they are doing, but to do it in a way
that supports the female film industry until there is gender parity. Naomi was very canny when determining how to demonstrate ethos, pathos, and logos within her speech. By doing so, she is able to raise awareness about the gender inequality that takes place in the film industry. This speech helps to entice various groups of people to pursue actions that will support women in Hollywood who are discriminated against simply for being women. Naomi has taken action herself by continuing to create films, and she has also launched “The 51 Fund” which finances films that are written, directed, and produced by women (15). Despite Naomi’s success, it is still not an easy process for her, and there are many women in the film industry who have not gotten to experience the same type of success that she has. It is critical that Naomi's speech continues to be heard throughout the world. If everyone just sits back and lets it happen, then women will never know what it’s like to experience gender parity within Hollywood.
Margaret Sanger, a well known feminist and women's reproductive right activist in USA history wrote the famous speech: The Children's Era. This speech focuses on the topic of women's reproductive freedom. Sanger uses rhetorical forms of communication to persuade and modify the perspectives of the audience through the use of analogy and pathos. She uses reason, thought and emotion to lead her speech.
The speech given by Andrea Ambam created a speech illustrating the American Dream. Ambam is the National Champion of the 2014 NSDA (National Speech and Debate Association) as she explains the issues of inequality in America. Ambam uses simplistic mathematical skill to create to demonstrate methods of compatibility among Americans of differing skin tone, ethnicity, and morality. She often uses popular culture to efficiently connect with her audience, which provides additional humor or sober tones, while relating all issues back to the premise of America. Yet, her speech is riddled with diverse body language and gestures to further convey her ideologies among the audience, which must be analyzed to deduce the methods Amdam used to create an amusing, yet assuring speech about equality in America.
Ann Richards’s keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention in 1988 was extremely interesting to watch. I believe her speech was intended to be focused on the American family and also the American farmers. These two areas seemed to be very important to Mrs. Richards and she made a point to discuss both.
Kelley uses pathos to highlight the need for change and get her point across to the audience. Kelley uses pathos to stress the need for change. To show the severity of the problem Kelley writes “Tonight while we sleep, several thousand little girls will be working in textile mills, all the night through, in the deafening noise of the spindles and the looms spinning and weaving cotton and wool, silks and ribbons for us to buy. ”(18-22) This demonstrates pathos by using “little girls” for the readers imagine a fragile small child doing laborious work in a factory for hours to come.
I chose Emma Watson’s speech at the UN about feminism because I had previously watched a clip on facebook and it stuck with me. Watson uses arguments to inform and to inspire as well as using all three of pathos, logos, and ethos. In the speech, Watson asks men to understand that gender inequality is their issue as well.
...ue to the fact that she is so concerned with the gender aspect that she overlooks the reasons for keeping the categories separate. By having separate categories a male and female staring in the same film are both eligible to win an award, something that would be impossible if the categories were merged. She also disregards the fact that merging the two categories would lead to fewer nominees, which would force both male and female actors to be left out of the nominations. Her background in Women’s studies further impacts the overall effectiveness of this argument. Many readers may disregard the entire article because they feel that she is just using it as a means to promote Women’s rights. On the other hand, people who firmly believe in gender equality may be more inclined to accept her argument, even if they could care less about having separate categories.
The search for equality within the film industry has been very much a subject of contention over the years, and even now, is still a source struggle for all women within the industry. Whether women are actors or producers, directors or screenwriter, behind-the-scenes or talent, they knew that their dream of making it in the world of filmmaking will come with many obstacles. They would have to work twice as hard as men, only to be payed less than the majority of them.
Hollywood has evolved and women begin to be placed inside of boxes. In film and television, women’s
In films, female characters ‘reflect and perpetuate the status and options of women in today’s society’ and play
She broadens peoples understanding of the struggles being faced in the industry, persuading us to feel as though we have a responsibility to humanity to ensure that everyone including minority actresses are seen as equal to other actresses. She then shares gratitude for those who have done their part to make a change and those who are now the face of this change. This persuades the audience to look for guidance in the role models of writers and actresses working hard to bring diversity to networks in order to understand and support the change. Her speech was so persuasive because in addition to the issues she argues, she accepts an award given to a black actress for the first time in history adding to the moment and showing the audience that the industry is capable of
Oprah Winfrey adequately delivers her speech at the 75th Golden Globes when she reels in the audience with inspirational stories. As she argued for, "equitable race and gender representation in Hollywood, the fundamental need for a free press, and the importance of speaking out against harassment and assault", she sufficiently strategizes her arguments (Winfrey 1). Oprah's reason of argument is due to the events that had occurred prior to this day as a child. She was able to grab the attention of her audience by including logic, emotion, and persuasion in her speech.
In Johnston’s manifesto, Women’s Cinema As Counter-Cinema, she states, “In order to counter our objectification in the cinema, our collective fantasies must be released: women’s cinema must embody the working through of desire: such an objective demands the use of entertainment film.”1 What Johnston states is there needs to be a strategy to fit the political agenda of women’s cinema while also maintaining its essence as a film.
This story, know known to all, shifts the standards of gender roles in modern movies. “Hidden Figures” empowers audiences, specifically young women, everywhere. Their message of overcoming the impossible inspires society to break traditions. Audiences are left with a message in their hearts that “once you [take] the first step, anything [is] possible” (Hidden Figures
The basic concept of feminism is that females deserve to have equal rights and opportunities as their male counterparts do. It seems to be of a somewhat popular belief that because America is a first-world country that feminism is simply not needed here and that women always get the same opportunities as men do; however recent studies have shown just how unequally represented women in the Hollywood industry specifically are. In particular, women in the industry are consistently outnumbered by men for film leads 2:1, for cable news broadcasters 2:1, and for film directors at a staggering 12:1 (“2016 Hollywood Diversity Report”). There have even been lawsuits over the years over the evident favoritism of men in the industry, with a recent one in the works of being filed just this year by The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, a Federal branch of the US (“Hollywood Could Be Sued For Discrimination Against Female Directors”). This lawsuit points out that only seven percent of last year’s films were directed by women, which is actually a decrease from 2015’s nine percent. As more and more women and entering and growing in the industry, it is appalling that they seem to be making less and less progress each year and even lost some of the ground they worked hard to obtain and pave. If the lawsuit were to be settled in favor of the EEOC, producers would likely have to adopt a rule where they
The film industry has always had the reputation of depicting society in a erroneous matter. Just like anything else, the film industry is a business. What that really means is that many things exposed to the public have been catered to what audiences are expected to admire. The media isn’t for illustrating real problems, it is for presenting pictures that the public will receive well. So if americans want to see young successful male athletes, that is what hollywood will create. It’s the simple notion of supply and demand that the media works around. This continues to work because men and women have such short attention spans that they always want something new. All forms of media (besides news) have the ability to adapt to their audiences, showing them want they want to see. It wasn’t until 1976 that a woman (Barbara Walters) was allowed to co-anchor a nightly news show. About twenty years later, the WNBA (Women’s National Basketball Association) had its inaugural season starting a movement for women’s sports in America.