Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Changing gender roles
Problems faced by women at work-gender inequality
Problems faced by women at work-gender inequality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Changing gender roles
The search for equality within the film industry has been very much a subject of contention over the years, and even now, is still a source struggle for all women within the industry. Whether women are actors or producers, directors or screenwriter, behind-the-scenes or talent, they knew that their dream of making it in the world of filmmaking will come with many obstacles. They would have to work twice as hard as men, only to be payed less than the majority of them.
In her book, Women Who Run The Show: How a Brilliant and Creative New Generation of Women Stormed Hollywood, Mollie Gregory tells the story of women, who, despite the knowledge that their path would be an arduous one, did everything in their power to accomplish their dreams, fought
…show more content…
to get what they deserved, and helped each other along the way rather than tear each other down. This is a series of interviews between Gregory herself, and women holding various positions within the entertainment business, from the producer of Pretty Woman, Laura Ziskin, to Paramount Pictures chairman Sherry Lansing, to Barbra Streisand. With this truthful coverage of female experience of the film and television industry, organized chronologically by decade, Mollie Gregory offers her reader a comprehensive, if not encyclopedic, account of the struggle women wen through. Before talking about the content of the book, it is important to shine some light as to who the writer is. Mollie Gregory, as the inside of the dust jacket informs the reader, is "a writer and producer of documentary films [who] has written a variety of novels, and nonfiction books" about the world of filmmaking, and the business of the movie industry. Gregory is also a "member of the Writers Guild of America, and a past President of both PEN Center USA West" and WIFTI, Women In Film & Television International. Mollie Gregory is a writer, a producer, a film consultant, and a frequent lecturer who guides her book Women Who Run The Show around the very first sentence of the introduction: "What we failed to say yesterday, no one will know tomorrow." Gregory here reflects on the past, the accomplishments made by female trailblazers of the film industry in the early twentieth century, and wonders how the industry has changed since women were considered pioneers. Through the compilation of interviews and anecdotes, Mollie Gregory creates a book resembling an oral history of the condition of women within the entertainment industry, and the changes that have occurred over the past decades. She introduces the concept of "the long desert" that she refers to throughout her book, which is the period Gregory defines as that in which the influence of women in the industry began to diminish. In fact, Mollie Gregory started to compile interviews back in 1997. These stories are about life struggles, achievements, deceptions, fights, recognition, paths taken or discarded, those of nearly one hundred and thirty women put together to create a first person narrative of the influence of women in Hollywood, and their individual and societal hardships. Mollie Gregory, not the first to write a book about women's developing influence in the entertainment business, decided to take a new approach to its structure.
She decided to organize the accounts and observation, not by area of influence or the various work positions of the women, but rather by decade, in a chronological order, to highlight and emphasize the changes made, or not made, through the years. Every single account is told honestly, and from a voice, conscious that they'd never been truly ask to share their experience. The idea that these incredible women have paved the way for generations to come, suffered though sexual harassment, pay inequality, lack of recognition, false reputations, erroneous perceptions and expectations, and overall obstacles in their paths, only to find that they are their stories are not worth sharing was shocking to the writer of Women Who Run The Show, as it most likely was for every reader. She therefore set out to remedy this, and give these women back their voices, and the recognition they deserve. Mollie Gregory did so by highlighting both the strength and the weakness of these women, making the telling of the stories at time unsettling, and at times hopeful and …show more content…
inspiring. "Back then, it was catch-twenty-two: you wanted women to do well because if they messed up, they messed up for everybody.
But if they did well, it as an exception" (Gregory 136). Brianne Murphy was a cinematographer, in the 1980s, becoming the first female director of photography to work for a major studio motion picture, the film Fatso, which came out in 1980. She went on to be the first woman admitted to the local cameraman's union in 1975, the first woman to be a member of the American Society of Cinematographers (ASC) in 1983. In 1982, Murphy won an Academy Award for Scientific and Engineering Achievement, and was nominated for four Emmys for cinematography. And Brianne Murphy was on the women interviewed by Mollie Gregory, a woman who's name is unknown by most of the people actively working in the industry, or taught to film students who are hoping to join
it. And the issue of anonymity within the industry is not so much a question of knowledge, but rather that of gender. Such an incredible figure is remembered by the people who strive to remember, and give these women all the respect they deserve. Nowadays, women still strive to find a place within a world that is categorically male, and therefore find a way to celebrate themselves and each other. The Women In Film and Television International corporation has a long history of trying to advance the professional achievements of women in all types of media, and celebrate their accomplishments. They therefore present annual awards at their Women in Film Crystal + Lucy Award, Dorothy Arzner Directors Award MAXMARA Face of the Future Award and Kodak Vision Award ceremonies, where deservingly outstanding women in communications and media are honored for their endurance and the excellence of their work, and their part in expanding the role of women in the entertainment industry, whether as filmmakers, actors, directors, cinematographers, talent agents, or others. Mollie Gregory, who once was President of this corporation, knows the importance of such work as women are often discarded in more mainstream award ceremonies. Mollie Gregory therefore explains in Women Who Run The Show, that Martha Lauren, PhD, dedicated her life to bringing to light the discrepancies and inequalities in terms of number "women's employment on the top grossing films for the [past] 18 years" (Lauzen 1). As Lauzen's recent statistical studies, which were published in 2015, show, out of the 250 top-grossing films that came out in 2015, only 9% of the directors were women. And while this number has increased by two percent from 2014's statistical studies, the 2015 figure is sill no better than the one achieved in 1998. In addition, over a third of the films released that year employed zero or just one woman in the writer, cinematographer, director, executive producer, producer, or editor positions. In contrast the number of film which only employed zero or one man was 1%. As Mollie Gregory states, "Changing Hollywood is going to be like turning around a battleship" (Gregory 362). In fact, the reluctance to do more to change these shocking numbers it palpable within the industry, and very little amount of people are pushing to encourage these changes. Even when, this year, the Directors Guild of America and Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences both responded to controversies about the lack of diversity within their corporations, they are not taking actual steps towards increasing these numbers, but rather encouraging their members to hire, mentor, and promote talent." In the same manner, major studios try to use the small amount of women who succeeded in making a name for themselves within the patriarchal world of filmmaking as example that it is possible and that there is no "woman problem" and most importantly, that it is not their fault. But in addition to the lack of opportunity comes with a bigger problem: the condition of women once they are within the sacred walls of the entertainment world. In fact, sexual harassment is a problem that comes back throughout the book, and throughout the decades. In the 1970s, Mary Ledding, a former senior VP in motion pictures business affairs at MGM, and at the time the book was written, a senior VP in legal affairs at Universal Pictures, recounts tales told to her and her own experiences: I never went through anything like that. […] I was very lucky. I got my break from a woman, and second, I was always chubby. Overweight women are treated differently. Third, I was married. Married women are treated differently. I know single women really, really had problems. One woman in business affairs told me about being accosted by a star when she too him a contract to sign. In seconds, he had her against the wall. That's what many women went through every day. […] Being married protected me. (Gregory 78-79) Unfortunately, the fact is that not much as changed in terms of the perception of women, within in industry, and outside of it. Women are put in situations they did not ask for, and where they have no recourse. Recently, in the entertainment industry, a major American singer, Kesha, came out as a survivor of years of rape at the hands of her producer. When she sued her studio to finally be freed of her contract with her aggressor. Unfortunately, the courts did not grant her her freedom and forced her to continue her work with him. This brave declaration lead many other actors and artists to come out as rape survivors, such as Lady Gaga, Jaime King, or AnnaLyne McCord. But the public can be harsh at times, and these types of declaration are often followed by public shaming. Hypersexualization of women through the means of media have lead the entire industry, and the world to raise and raise their intentions and expectations of women, to the point where women are scared to be themselves, and actresses are forced to become the most sexualized versions of themselves. In an interview for the What's Underneath Project, a documentary series meant to brings to light the stories of men and women who felt objectified and sexualized to the point that they were not comfortable in their own skin. By interviewing them as they take off pieces of clothing one by one until they are in their underwear, the creators of the What's Underneath Project hope to give their audience, and their interviewees, the empowerment that they deserve. "By featuring the diverse stories of unapologetic individuals who are true to themselves and comfortable in their skin, you will be empowered to discover that same sense of freedom and comfort in your own skin." Caitlin Stasey, actress in Hollywood, recognizable for her roles in the TV series Reign (2013-2015), or Tomorrow When the War Began (2010), took part in the project and shared stories of objectification and hypersexualization she experienced since she started acting at age 13. She recounts how her manager controls her image, and forces her to send her pictures of her outfits before she steps into an audition, all because she dared to wear high-waisted jeans at an audition, and was deemed "not sexy enough." "I kind of, maybe foolishly felt like, 'I'm that good. It won't matter.' [But] this town considers women to be nebulous things that can be sanded down until they resemble everyone else" (What's Underneath Project). The systematic sexism of the film and television industries made her into a force of uncensored activism and feminism, rebelling against an industry where women "have to be cool with anything" such as objectification, sexual harassment, daily humiliation, and complete loss of freedom over their bodies. She has begun her own project where women are immortalized through nude photographs, where their beauty is reveals, and where their experiences are shared with the world. "Herself is […] a chance to witness the female form in all its honesty without the burden of the male gaze, without the burden of appealing to anyone […] in the hopes of encouraging solidarity – that maybe we as women will take comfort in the triumphs of others rather than revelling in each other’s defeats.” And the story of Caitlin Stasey or Kesha are just examples of how such a patriarchal industry, and much of the time, community, has betrayed women to a point where they feel cornered. The stories in Mollie Gregory's book resemble that of Caitlin Stasey and all the other participants of such forward-thinking projects. The main difference here is the means of communications used to push back the boundaries set by the men who control the industry. In the twenty-first century, women who feel exploited can come out and share their experience, unlike the women in Mollie Gregory's book. Not necessarily accepted or publicly acclaimed for such bravery yet, the women who stand up for all those who feel their voices are drowned in a sea of voices, are able to support one another, and continue to walk the path taken by Mollie Gregory's interviewees.
Elizabeth Fernea entered El Nahra, Iraq as an innocent bystander. However, through her stay in the small Muslim village, she gained cultural insight to be passed on about not only El Nahra, but all foreign culture. As Fernea entered the village, she was viewed with a critical eye, ?It seemed to me that many times the women were talking about me, and not in a particularly friendly manner'; (70). The women of El Nahra could not understand why she was not with her entire family, and just her husband Bob. The women did not recognize her American lifestyle as proper. Conversely, BJ, as named by the village, and Bob did not view the El Nahra lifestyle as particularly proper either. They were viewing each other through their own cultural lenses. However, through their constant interaction, both sides began to recognize some benefits each culture possessed. It takes time, immersed in a particular community to understand the cultural ethos and eventually the community as a whole. Through Elizabeth Fernea?s ethnography on Iraq?s El Nahra village, we learn that all cultures have unique and equally important aspects.
The fourth Chapter of Estella Blackburn’s non fiction novel Broken lives “A Fathers Influence”, exposes readers to Eric Edgar Cooke and John Button’s time of adolescence. The chapter juxtaposes the two main characters too provide the reader with character analyses so later they may make judgment on the verdict. The chapter includes accounts of the crimes and punishments that Cooke contended with from 1948 to 1958. Cooke’s psychiatric assessment that he received during one of his first convictions and his life after conviction, marring Sally Lavin. It also exposes John Button’s crime of truancy, and his move from the UK to Australia.
Full Body Burden by Kristen Iversen is a book about a family living near a nuclear
Summary and Response to Barbara Kingsolver’s “Called Home” In “Called Home”, the first chapter of the book Animal, Vegetable, Miracle: A Year in Food Life, Barbara Kingsolver presents her concerns about America's lack of food knowledge, sustainable practices, and food culture. Kingsolver introduces her argument for the benefits of adopting a local food culture by using statistics, witty anecdotal evidence, and logic to appeal to a wide casual reading audience. Her friendly tone and trenchant criticism of America's current food practices combine to deliver a convincing argument that a food culture would improve conditions concerning health and sustainability.
The title of this book comes from the inspiring words spoken by Sojourner Truth at the 1851, nine years prior to the Civil War at a Women’s Rights Convention in Akron, Ohio. In Deborah Grays White, Ar’n’t I a woman her aim was to enrich the knowledge of antebellum black women and culture to show an unwritten side of history of the American black woman. Being an African- American and being a woman, these are the two principle struggles thrown at the black woman during and after slavery in the United States. Efforts were made by White scholars in 1985 to have a focus on the female slave experience. Deborah Gray White explains her view by categorizing the hardships and interactions between the female slave and the environment in which the slave was born. She starts with the mythology of the female slave by using mythologies such as Jezebel or Mammy, a picture that was painted of false images created by whites in the south. She then moves to differences between male and female slavery the harsh life cycle, the created network among the female community, customs for slave families and the trip from slavery to freedom, as well as differences between the female slave and the white woman, showing that there is more history than myth. (White, 5) Thus, bringing forth the light to the hardships and harassment that the black woman faced in the Antebellum South.
Common sense seems to dictate that commercials just advertise products. But in reality, advertising is a multi-headed beast that targets specific genders, races, ages, etc. In “Men’s Men & Women’s Women”, author Steve Craig focuses on one head of the beast: gender. Craig suggests that, “Advertisers . . . portray different images to men and women in order to exploit the different deep seated motivations and anxieties connected to gender identity.” In other words, advertisers manipulate consumers’ fantasies to sell their product. In this essay, I will be analyzing four different commercials that focuses on appealing to specific genders.
Traditions, heritage and culture are three of the most important aspects of Chinese culture. Passed down from mother to daughter, these traditions are expected to carry on for years to come. In Amy Tan’s The Joy Luck Club, daughters Waverly, Lena, Rose and June thoughts about their culture are congested by Americanization while on their quests towards self-actualization. Each daughter struggles to find balance between Chinese heritage and American values through marriage and professional careers.
In Josefina Lopez’s play Real Women Have Curves, a group of Hispanic women discuss their sex appeal in terms of their body image. They judge their psychological aspect of sex appeal based on how well their physiological aspect of body image agrees with society’s ideals. In Michel Foucault’s Discipline and Punish, he explains that society is an amplified Panopticon that causes its members to observe one another and themselves. This theory explains these women’s compulsion to peruse their bodies to make sure that they fit within society’s standards of sexiness. Although these women are described in a collective manner, Lopez delineates each woman’s character distinctively. Their differing characters are greatly influenced by the opposing cultural values of Latinas working in sweatshops and that of White-American feminists. According to Patricia Hill Collins’ Black Feminist Thought, these conflicting cultural values develop oppositional knowledge in these women, which alters their perception of the female sex appeal. Hill Collins also explains that when individuals communicate their diverse ideas in a unified manner, it precipitates a unanimous definition to a society. This theory supports why the Latinas in Lopez’s play demonstrate a progression towards similar ideologies. In summary, using Foucault to explain the idea of self-surveillance, and Hill Collins to explain oppositional knowledge developed by contrasting the cultural values of White-American feminists and Latinas working in sweatshops, it is possible to describe the social phenomena of defining female sex appeal in terms of body image in Lopez’s play.
Led by Laura Mulvey, feminist film critics have discussed the difficulty presented to female spectators by the controlling male gaze and narrative generally found in mainstream film, creating for female spectators a position that forces them into limited choices: "bisexual" identification with active male characters; identification with the passive, often victimized, female characters; or on occasion, identification with a "masculinized" active female character, who is generally punished for her unhealthy behavior. Before discussing recent improvements, it is important to note that a group of Classic Hollywood films regularly offered female spectators positive, female characters who were active in controlling narrative, gazing and desiring: the screwball comedy.
Stereotypes. Something that many women are subjected to in society and are forced to accept it like it is something that should happen. “What do women want”(Addonizio) examines the stereotypes most women face when wearing certain clothing, and the objectification of women, that is frowned upon but all women secretly want. It points out the objectification and stereotypes that women are subjected to, challenges them, and connects them to everyday life.
Women in Film as Portrayed in the Movie, Double Indemnity. Introduction American commercial cinema currently fuels many aspects of society. In the twenty-first century, it has become available, active force in the perception of gender relations in the United States. In the earlier part of this century filmmakers, as well as the public, did not necessarily view the female “media image” as an infrastructure of sex inequality.
After this short but powerful preface, the documentary continues with two shocking interviews made by David Lowe to two under-educated women who are the heads of their families; Ms. Dobey, wh...
The documentary Miss Representation describes the struggle of female leadership. It is based on the way the women look, the way they carry themselves, and the way they brutalize themselves to fit in with others. This documentation allow different women to tell their ways that the media have slashed them, and allow others to stand up for women. Women portray themselves to fit as the image that has been altered with to get it to look that way. Margaret Cho explains that her show All American Girl was cancelled because she had problems with the network who aired the show because they constantly said was not thin enough. That is a prime example of today's problems with pursuing your dreams as an actor or pursuing your dreams as a model. You have to change your physical features to fit in, and if you do not you won’t get in.
Noted in Yvonne Tasker’s Working Girls: Gender and Sexuality in Popular Cinema, Goldie Hawn says this about women's role in the film business “There are only thee ages for women in Hollywood: Babe, District Attorney and Driving Miss Daisy” (1998, p. 3). While Haw...
Women have made progress in the film industry in terms of the type of role they play in action films, although they are still portrayed as sex objects. The beginning of “a new type of female character” (Hirschman, 1993, pg. 1). 41-47) in the world of action films began in 1976 with Sigourney Weaver, who played the leading role in the blockbuster film ‘Aliens’ as Lt. Ellen Ripley. She was the captain of her own spaceship, plus she was the one who gave out all the orders. Until then, men had always been the ones giving the orders; to see a woman in that type of role was outlandish.