Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conditions of migrant workers essay
Harvest of Shame Essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Harvest Of Shame, an interesting and touching black and white documentary from the early 1960’s, documents and exposes the deploring lives of thousands of American migrant cultural workers narrated and dissected by one of the best and first American broadcast journalists called Edward Roscoe Murrow. The principal objective of this movie is not only to show the poor and miserable lives that all of these people live, but to let all the other Americans who are above these workers on the social and wealth scale know that the people who pick up their fruits, vegetables, and grains have no voice, no power, and no help to battle the inequities and mistreatment they receive. The movie opens up with rural images of thousands of migrant workers being transported in trucks with a short introduction by Edward Murrow and some occasional interventions of parts of an interview made to the secretary of labor after he saw the impacting images, and to the different people who have seen the lives the workers lead. Most of the secretary’s commentaries depict the exclusion that these people have since they are basically people who are silently crying out for assistance to stop harvesting the fields of their shame, or at least to hope for potential raises and better work conditions. From Florida to New Jersey, and from Mexico to Oregon, these people including women and children travel around the states following the sun and the demand from the seasonal goods while working around a hundred and thirty-six days earning and average of nine hundred dollars a year. After this short but powerful preface, the documentary continues with two shocking interviews made by David Lowe to two under-educated women who are the heads of their families; Ms. Dobey, wh... ... middle of paper ... ... to exist in our days, needs to be changed more if we ever want to achieve a true progression in our economy and society where not only the rich get the biggest piece of the pie. After researching a little and analyzing numbers and statistics from the past and present, fifty-one years have done two basic things to the harvesters of shame, their wages have improved a little bit and the ethnicity of the workers has changed from poor whites and blacks to poor Hispanics, bringing new factors into play such as the pros and cons that hiring immigrant workers bring to companies. Even though, these potential improvements appear to be substantial and beneficial shifting the views many workers and farmers had in the past, not all people receive the same treatments and benefits some companies share, thousands of immigrant workers have become the new mute slaves of America.
Steinbeck meets his standard by celebrating the migrant workers’ drive and sense of community in the face of the Great Depression. The Joad family and many others, are dedicated to conquering all odds: “[t]hus they changed their social life–changed as in the whole universe only man can change” (Steinbeck 196). There are no other options available for these tenant families than to take the trek to California in hopes of finding work. The fears they once had about droughts and floods now lingered with
John Steinbeck does not portray migrant farm worker life accurately in Of Mice and Men. Housing, daily wages, and social interaction were very different in reality. This paper will demonstrate those differences by comparing the fictional work of Steinbeck to his non-fictional account of the time, The Harvest Gypsies.
The migrants came from the midwest, in search of a job. The foreign workers came from different countries, such as China, Japan, Mexico, and the Philippines. The demand for peon workers was increasing dramatically, foreign workers were just what the farmers needed. The foreign workers were also treated much worse than the migrants. They worked for little pay, but there was not really another way they could get money. The migrants were paid more, possibly because they are foreign born. When foreign workers came to the United States, they had to adapt to the languages, traditions, wages, etc. As for the migrant workers, they were raised in the United States, so they have a better understanding of how to live. Foreign workers had a very poor standard of living and often faced discrimination. In The Harvest Gypsies, the first sentence of the sixth article is, “ The history of California’s importation and treatment of foreign labor is a disgraceful picture of greed and cruelty.” Steinbeck had a strong belief that foreign workers were treated different from migrants, which is true. Another example is when the article talks about how the whites could not compete with the foreign workers anymore. “ Mexicans were imported in large number, and the standard of living they were capable of maintaining depressed the wages for farm labor to a point where the white could not compete.” This quote is saying that the wages and standard of living got so low, that whites gave up on trying to get a job in the fields. Some may say that the migrants and foreign workers were treated very similar, but this is untrue. They both had to live in very poor conditions, but the foreign workers had it much harder than the
Since the Industrial Revolution in the United States of America, working conditions for women and minorities have not been given equal pay or top positions in the work place. Women being degraded by the men in charge, and minorities constantly at odds with one another so they will not form a Union. Such things keep those with low-status in the job in line, and not feel they are equal to the ones in charge. People from other countries are in search for a better life elsewhere, and take the risk of going to the United States illegally to seek out the American Dream. The articles Working at Bazooms by Meika Loe and At a Slaughterhouse, Some Things Never Die by Charlie LeDuff deal with the working conditions for women and minorities. Workers in both articles have to deal with having terrible working conditions, harassment in the workplace, low-status within the job, and the constant fear of job loss.
Hector St. Jean de Crevecoeur, a Frenchman living in America, wrote many letters to Europeans telling them of the great opportunities for immigrants to America and its generous, welcoming, paternal government. However, a study of the farm workers ' experiences in America does not always paint a rosy picture. In particular, John Steinbeck and Cesar Chavez portrayed the dire circumstances of farm workers during the Great Depression (1930 's) and the 1960 's. Today my interview with a farm worker shows that farm workers today still face injustices.
...They left their home traveled the hot roads of Route 66, and arrived at a place where they were underpaid but made the best of what they had. The immigrants crossing the border into the United States had to leave the majority of their family, walk through deserts, swim through rivers, and ride on trains so they could work below the minimum wage, be looked down upon and be excluded from the benefits of the country they so dearly wanted to reach. Human nature is to survive and to look for the best, and as John Steinbeck wrote on the Grapes of Wrath “Man, unlike any other thing organic or inorganic in the universe, grows beyond his work, walks up the stairs of his concepts, emerges ahead of his accomplishments” (204). This quote, like the experiences and situations, remains the same for the migrant workers of the 1930’s and the illegal immigrants of the 21st Century.
The viewer receives an abundance of information that evokes a wide range of emotions, and instead of cutting it there, Newsom calls for action from the audience. This, once again, appeals to the audience’s emotions. When watching the film it is hard not to be moved by the injustices facing women, and by providing an outlet for the audience, she creates momentum that can work to carry out real change. Much of the film discusses the many ways our society works to constantly divide the sexes, to divide individuals within each sex, and to make people feel disempowered and small. But by offering suggestions for change, and steps that can be taken at that moment, Newsom creates a sense of togetherness, community and impact. This appeal to emotions and call to action further increased the effectiveness of this
Have women made big impacts on the world? The answer is yes. Margaret Bourke-White one of the women that set a path for all women. She has raised and shattered the glass ceiling for all women desperate to make a change. Margaret Bourke-White is also a key player in the fight for women’s rights. In the article, “A Life Less Ordinary”, the author Dina Modianot-Fox progresses toward the central idea through Margaret Bourke-White’s skill, reliability, and valor.
In Fresh Fruit, Broken Bodies, Seth Holmes gives readers an inside perspective as to what life is like for migrant farmworkers living in the U.S. He looks at the health of the of these farmworkers which he believes is being undermined by factors of racial prejudice, supply and demand, and migration. The book is about Holmes journey with these migrant workers told in a way that puts these farmworkers on a personal level instead of just being seen as labor in the fields. Holmes discovers is that these farmworkers are living in harsh conditions that are detrimental to their health. This book doesn’t just tell the story of these farmworkers, it also acts a way of getting the message out that something needs to be changed in the way that farmworkers
The film I watched told the story of a rural migration family in Sichuan through the experience of railway spring transport and the family conflicts. Migrant workers are also called "farmers-turned-workers" in China. Those people were born in the rural areas in peasant origin family and most of them go to cities for works today. This film is not a drama but a documentary that reflects the real and tough life of most migrant workers and their families.
The film opens with a crowd of African-Americans looking for jobs (Harvest of Shame). As employers yell out the daily wage, men and women are tightly packed onto large trucks headed to the fields (Harvest of Shame). One farmer describes the scene, “we used to own our slaves…now we just rent them” (Harvest of Shame). This shows that even though slavery has been abolished, unfair treatment towards African-American workers still exist. Even though African-American workers existed in the 1930s, they were generally excluded in Steinbeck’s article. Their heavy presence in the film not only highlights the continued mistreatment of migrant farm laborers, especially African-Americans, but also how the Civil Rights Movement was “a black freedom movement’s fight for jobs and justices” (MacLean 4). As evident through the film, African-Americans were consistently suppressed by employers which contributed to igniting the fire for “economic citizenship” during the Civil Rights Movement (Martínez-Matsuda 10 November
For one, Steinbeck has been accused of “…exaggerating the conditions in the migrant camps”, which caused an uproar in Californians of that period (Nixon). The way the novel views the living conditions of migrant camps led to many Californians to believe that they were not portrayed fairly, which is notorious because it caused California to rethink a few of their policies toward migrants. DeMott defines the novel as “…part labor testament, part family chronicle, part partisan journalism, part environmental…” (DeMott, 13). The depiction of combining the measly pay of farmworkers and how families had to work long hours to be able to pay for a day’s meal, points out that idea that farm owners took advantage of migrant workers. All told, the novel’s ability to erupt debates over its argumentative subjects makes it out to be a
In this documentary, it provides a clear lens into a woman life that relies on government assistance.
Infrastructural issues have long impacted diverse farm working communities. Sarah Ramirez and Don Villarejo (2012) make it very clear that the same problems and issues that migrant workers of today experience, was experienced by migrant workers of the 1940s. Those communities very much like today's have historically had unsafe water, lackluster housing, very low pay and minimal healthcare.
To conclude, after reading all this, the impact of the industrialization for workers in the United States had a negative impact. It had a negative impact due to the fact that workers had low wages, long working hours, and working conditions. Which shows how since workers had a lot of work and they were not paid good. So hey tried going on strikes and they tried fighting for their rights.This topic is important to talk about still today , is because if we still talk about what they went through back then, is so we don’t have to go through it again. A connection I can give from today is how undocumented people still work hard, or they work harder than people who have papers. Iit is not as hard as it was before but we can still see that problem