Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King's I Have A Dream '

959 Words2 Pages

Racial equality is one of the great challenges to the United States. Throughout its history, there have been not only unequal and unfair opportunities for African Americans, but straight out violence. In mass protests, African Americans took this abuse in stride, never degrading themselves to similar acts of violence. In one of the most famous and largest civil rights protests of all time, involving more than 200,000 demonstrators, and is credited with helping pass the civil rights bill in 1964, a very strong one, at that (STANFOED). It is also here that Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his now famous civil rights speech. It single handedly forwarded King’s ultimate goal of racial equality and tolerance more, perhaps, than anything before it, …show more content…

In “I Have a Dream,” Martin Luther King Jr. uses metaphors, allusions, and juxtaposition to convince his opponents that racial equality and tolerance is the only just path. Probably a majority of the speech as a whole contain analogies. King frequently provides comparisons for a number of reasons. First, it helps to more effectively communicate his ideas. By referencing things that are perhaps more commonly known, or better imagined, he is able to paint a more accurate picture in his audience's heads. In a passage, he compares the guarantee of freedom, as outlined in the constitution, as a check, but asserts that, “Instead of honoring this sacred obligation, America has given the Negro people a bad check, a check which has come back marked ‘insufficient funds’” (King). He doesn't simply rely on empathy, but instead convinces by creating more personal comparisons. Instead of hoping that the people will extend sympathy towards him, he creates a situation where they feel it themselves. The idea of attempting to cash a bad check is a universal experience, and an apt metaphor to convey the betrayal that African …show more content…

In doing this, he makes his argument more rational. It provides solid background and reasoning as to why he is correct, and convinces his opponents of such. In one instance, king is describing the ideals supposedly guaranteed to all Americans in the constitution. King remarks “This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the ‘unalienable Rights’ of ‘Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness’” (King). This is an allusion to the basic governing document of the entire country. It is incredibly difficult for one to argue against the foundation of a country, when they are attempting to work for said country. It creates a fallacy that traps. If the basis of the country is in favor of civil rights, to not be would go against the country. To be against civil rights is to be against America. There is little argument to be done, as King has directly used the document is his argument. Further to the reference of American documents, King, as a minister himself, frequently called upon religion. A vast majority of both his opponents and his followers were fellow Christians, so biblical references are doubly effective. In a passage where King lists the conditions necessary for African Americans to be satisfied, he asserts that, “No, no, we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until ‘justice rolls down like waters, and

Open Document