Rhetorical Analysis Of 'How To Raise A Feminist Son'

1460 Words3 Pages

In our world today, there is a common belief amongst people that the word “feminist” only pertains to females. Growing up, my mother brought me to the Women’s March in Washington D.C. and she always said, “My hope is to raise a daughter who becomes a feminist.” Yet, after I read Claire Cain Miller’s New York Times article, How to Raise a Feminist Son, I pondered on why my brother never joined us on a trip to D.C.? Throughout her article, Miller strives to challenge traditional gender norms and advocate for a parenting approach that fosters boys’ emotional intelligence and empathy. She acknowledges that society and parents have become more inclined to teach girls to fight stereotypes, but she also insists that we are guilty of not doing the …show more content…

Altogether, Miller employs various rhetorical strategies to effectively argue that expanding boys’ choices and encouraging qualities conventionally associated with femininity are essential to achieving true gender parity. In the article, Miller argues that when parents raise their sons to have different rapports with various females, they are more inclined to act outside gender stereotypes into adulthood. Elaborating further, Miller encourages the notion that making sure that boys hold friendships with girls and have female role models while growing up is crucial. “Research at Arizona State University found that by the end of preschool, children start segregating by sex, and this reinforces gender stereotypes. But children who are encouraged to play with friends of the opposite sex learn better problem-solving and communication.” (citation). Using such credited research findings, Miller successfully argues how such rapports have a critical impact on children that aids them in …show more content…

For instance, she presents plausible evidence such as multiple different research findings and study conclusions to aid her claims. One of her tips to readers is to let boys be themselves. She examines the correlation between gender roles, expectations and toy segregation. “In studies, infants have not been shown to have strong toy preferences.” (citation). Infants are not aware of gender, which is likely why studies have produced such results. Nonetheless, as society continues to push pink and blue not only on toys, but also on other items and in other situations, Miller protests that these societal expectations end up overriding innate interests. Then, backing up that claim, she attests that, “...longitudinal studies suggest that toy segregation has long-term effects on gender gaps in academics, spatial skills, and social skills...” (citation). By utilizing this logical reasoning and framing her discussion within the context of lasting effects, Miller underscores the relevance and influence of gender role expectations

Open Document