More handpicked essays just for you.
Global warming effects on humans and animals
Global warming negative effects to the ecosystem
Effects of global warming on the human population
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Elizabeth Dowdeswell’s editorial on global climate change the issue of a global catastrophe is addressed in a way to appeal to an audience they is unfamiliar with the eminent danger. Dodwdeswell’s line of argument is effective in that it draws clear sides and essentially condemns one while pushing the reader to take the side of the other. The tactics which she employs offer the reader an opportunity to assess the situation for themselves and declare a course of action.
The logos behind Dodeswell’s is that if we do not take action against the eminent threat of global climate change, the world as we know it will suffer the consequences. It is most reasonable to assume that for most readers that who reader this article will believe that same
…show more content…
which is what makes this article effective. The pathos of the author’s article speaks to the reader’s sense of moral responsibly. The author makes it seem that if the reader does not do something to address the issue it will be too late too soon. By drawing the morality of the reader out the author effectively communicates her message.
“Now the global climate is projected to warm up a few degrees more, but this time within the space of just a few decades, promising equally profound consequences for life on Earth.
This should be rather important to us.” This passage illustrates how the author is literally telling her audience that they should care what is going on. The author’s ethos appears to be one of an educated activist whom has taken her descriptive talents to a universal understanding. She appears to be able to express her ideas through methods sophisticated enough for well read colleagues in addition to a simplicity that anyone could understand.
By appealing to a broader audience, she is able to more effectively convey her message, without bogging her readers down with words they would not be able to understand. “When the world is informed that unless greenhouse-gas emissions are significantly reduced, the Earth could, during the next century, warm almost as much as it has over the past 10,000 years, with potentially devastating consequences for people and the environment, it is business as usual.” The statement prompts immediate reaction without much thought and the brunt of the message is quickly
…show more content…
expressed. The issue which is expressed in this article can best be characterized as substantiation. Dowdeswell makes several references to research that is being done in the area and how this research has led us to the evidence used to support the claim today. Along with saying that helping out in this situation is the right thing to do, she also explains how the overwhelming amount of scientific evidence surrounding this issue is indisputable. The claims of this editorial are that the Earth is beginning a warming process due to the high levels of carbon dioxide being emitted into the atmosphere. The author also claims that this a result of humans. By developing these claims as directly connecting to the reader and suggesting that the reader has played some role in causing this discharge of carbon dioxide to occur, the author is able to greatly influence the reader’s thoughts. The Evidence that Dodwdeswell provides is a setup for a series events that befell the earth in its infancy.
She describes an ice age and how slowly over the course of 10,000 years the earth became to warm and the planet underwent a dramatic change. She then goes on to say that this series of events was taking place again, only now it was happening within the next hundred years. She also provided that according to the newly agreed community of scientists now agree that relatively 60% of Carbon emissions need to be reduced in order to avert global disaster. The enabling assumption is that polluting the earth is bad, also that the world climate changing drastically for the worse is a bad thing. It is hard to believe that many dispute these assumptions which make it hard to not accept this article and adopt it as one’s moral standard. The backing is simply demonstrated by the claims and evidence presented by scientists in the field of climate change. The article expresses that the differing views regarding the issue are not easy to come by and that those who do reject the claim are linked to some sort of petroleum company. The argument within this article is straightforward and does not allude to a larger picture. It is simple, the earth is facing cataclysmic climate change and that we must act quickly in order to remedy this
situation. The overall argument is clearly presented and effectively conveys the critical ideas to the reader. The strength of this article could perhaps have been greater had the author been more aggressive towards the reader’s moral convictions. Most people care about the earth’s well being and this issue could have more tightly revolved around this idea. Essentially this article was as effective as it could be considering the time it was written as well as the limited knowledge of the audience in general terms.
A similar message that appears in his book that appeared in the aforementioned speech was the impact of the media speculation. The book addresses this in two examples. One was presented with the news of a lawsuit that an island called Vantu would file against the EPA; yet the lawsuit would never move forward due to it only serving a purpose to launder money and raise awareness to global warming that was never proven to affect the island. The other was shown to be environmental scientist who received their funding from environmental organizations, such as NERF in the book. These scientists would often have to go against their findings and report what the organizations wanted them to, or possibly lose their funding. Additionally, the book profoundly took opposition to the claim of global warming. This is presented in the form of the main character, Peter Evans, who has been manipulated into believing everything that the media has told him about global warming. It isn’t until John Kenner is introduced, that Peter begins got learn the truth about global warming. The author uses specific evidence to back his claims, specifically he uses a wide array of resources to verify his claim that Antarctica is not in fact melting, but getting colder and thickening. Furthermore, another essential concept that that book introduces is environmental extremists, or bioterrorism. These characters in the book would stop at nothing to make sure that everyone believed in global warming, and tried to destroy parts of the world to succeed in their mission. Bioterrorists are best represented as a warning of what could happen if people continue to buy into the media’s lies without having conclusive evidence to back up their
In his piece on climate change, Richard Lindzen addresses his stance on the heated debate of global warming. He claims that there is, in fact, no ongoing catastrophic temperature increase. Lindzen, a Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a recipient of the Jule Charney award from the American Meteorological Society (Richard Lindzen), believes that the earth goes through natural phases of warming and cooling. In this piece, he examines why he believes people have a false conception of Earth’s climate shifts.
Scranton believes that human beings are killing present life by ignoring the effects of global warming on the world. He continues to warn the reader that change is coming regardless of what people do now and that they human race must prepare for what is inevitably coming, as it will be the collapse of global civilization as it is known. Scranton states that this time we are living in, the anthropocene, presents humans with multiple challenges but mostly, “what it means to be human” (page 234). How to control the inevitable
According to the World Bank’s report, climatologists predict greenhouse gases will cause temperatures to rise 7.2 degrees before the next century (par. 8). While the rise in temperature might seem trivial, Scranton elaborates on the detrimental effects this change would cause by quoting James Clapper. Mr. Clapper, the director of national intelligence, argues that extreme weather disasters will “increasingly disrupt food and energy markets, exacerbating state weakness, forcing human migrations, and triggering riots, civil disobedience, and vandalism” (par. 7). Dr. Scranton mentions these sources in order to convince the audience that an increase of only a few degrees can have a devastating impact that will inevitably leave the planet radically different during this epoch; the current epoch we live in, named the Anthropocene, is a term invented by geologist and scientists for the epoch that is “characterized by the arrival of the human species as a geological force” (par. 10). The name of the epoch inspired Scranton to title the article “Learning How to Die in the Anthropocene” since it reaffirms his claim that we must accept that the future will not be the same as the present. Furthermore, Scranton includes a book in his article written by geophysicist David Archer incase readers remain skeptical of the scientific evidence with
Bill McKibben's "The Environmental Issue from Hell" argues that climate change is a real and dire concern for humanity. His essay deals with the methods and persuasive arguments needed to spur American citizens and the government on to change to more eco-friendly choices. The arguments he proposes are based largely upon emotional appeals calling for empathy and shame, and examples of what in our daily lives is adding to the changes we're seeing in the climate.
The two essays by Michael Pollan and Curtis white talk about climate change in regards to the relationship between the environment and human beings. Although the two essays share the same topic, they take the subject and engage the readers in totally different points of views. Pollan’s essay talks about global and ecological responsibility being a personal virtue while Curtis discusses the socio-economic or political issues underlying sustainability (Pollan; White). These two essays are very different in terms of voice; however these pieces of writing are both important for people all over the world to read. Climate change and environmental disasters are a real issue. Just this year, there have been more storms, cyclones, earthquakes and typhoons all over the world. One cannot look at the state of many developing counties where the majority of the population is exposed and vulnerable to the effects of climate change. This issue on developing a viable solution for the problem of anthropogenic gases and global warming is long from being found. Not only this, many people do not want to hear about this issue since they do not think it is real. Unless people have tangible proof that their cars, thermostats and aerosol cans are contributing to climate change, they are not going to give up their lifestyles. By synthesizing the two essays, one can see that there is a need for change and that it is not an issue which should be dealt with in terms of ecological factors or even personal virtue. The social, economic and political factors affecting this problem and the move towards real sustainability should also be a topic that will raise awareness.
Climate Change has become an incredibly controversial topic because of the bid to win votes. As with any successful political party, capital and supporters are needed to fund and support campaigns and activities to secure votes. The Democratic and Republican parties have taken opposite sides of the ring regardless of scientific proof. In relation to global warming, the Democrats represent the environmentalists in the green corner and the Republicans represent the current energy tycoons in the red corner. The two opposing parties are simply trying to one up each other with each rhetorical combination thrown. The more irrational or misconstrued the rhetoric, the more the crowd rooting for each fighter reacts and the more independents rally to
In the article “Global Warming’s Terrifying New Math”, written by Bill Mckibben, he firstly opens up by saying that back in 2012, according to the statistics, we surpassed the global record high for climate temperature in our nation, destroying other previous records. Despite the research and the displaying of data, nobody is doing anything to adress the following issue. Mckibben outlines three distinctive numbers that outline the following issue., 2 degrees celsius, 565 gigations, and 2795 gigtons, which he uses to validitate and support his argument. Firstly, the ongoing problem of climate change in society is fundamentally a matter of individual moral responsibility that is inspired by the insight individuals are intentionally harming the environment. Secondly there is yet to be an effective collective state response to the issue of global warming, despite approaching two full decades of ongoing and reoccuring negotiations and the very near universal participation by states in the UNFCCC. Thirdly, because this issue has been put on hold for longer than it was innitially expected, greenhouse gases are being emitted into our atmosphere, polluting our environment. The South-North issue and an ongoing debate comes into effect as all the greenhouse gases that are created and used in the Northern hemisphere are being emmited into the southern hemisphere. Hence, my thesis is; despite the fact that global warming and climate change has been an ongoing problem globally for years, humanity has failed to resolve thiis issue as it quickly begins to escalate.
Blakemore adds informative charts about what each country has done to add to global warming and what certain countries have done in the past that could have affected the world now; each chart had much information on what country or what was happened to the world I periods of time. The charts gave more information and gave a strike of discussion on what each meant. His argument explains how no one is to blame and that no one should be pointing fingers at one another, “Who’s most to blame for global warming? Nobody meant it to happen. But it has, and there’s no debate among the world’s scientists about which country is ‘most responsible’” (354), what Blakemore was trying to point out was nobody was to blame because we all want to help the earth but do not know what has happened and do not want to be apart of what we all did. However, Blakemore did leave some holes of information about each country but, with extra graphs and other information from other countries, which summed it altogether. With his strong argument, he shows the audience his stance and backs it up with facts, “Note that, after falling out of the atmosphere quickly during the first 50 years to about a third, the ‘decay’ of the CO2, emissions slows dramatically. Twenty-seven percent of it is still up there after 100 years, 17 percent after 500
Global Warming, much of what does or does not happen forty years from now rests on our actions or inactions taken between now and then. The crucial question is whether we should pour all our resources into mitigation – reducing our carbon emissions. According to scientists who study the climate there are other environmental problems; “we now face a global crises in land use and agriculture that could undermine the health, security, and sustainability of our civilization”.
Audience members may oppose the author’s main argument because there is not enough information that can convince the audience on how global warming can be bad or good
The first part of this essay discusses what the human species has done to deal with the problem of climate change. While some improvements have been made, the problem has not been addressed aggressively enough to stop the damage. What is amazing about this is the denial of so many people that problems exist. If they do realize the risks, they are simply not taking actions to contain the damage.
“Climate change and its associated effects — rising seas, acidifying oceans, species extinction and increasingly extreme weather — can evoke strong feelings including anxiety, fear, denial and even despair,” stated Cullen. It can easily be observed in current events that an abhorrent amount of our own population, and even our leaders, are still in denial about climate change and the effects of their actions on the environment. Humans harm the planet with toxic emissions from cars and the burning of fossil fuels, and they cut down forests which in turn destroys habitats for animals causing them to become extinct. When reading “Diary of an Interesting Year” the young couple experience the consequences of these actions hands on. They must deal with “air like filthy soup, plus [they are] supposed to wear [their] face masks in bed too,” (Simpson 102).
Background and Audience Relevance: There are always conversations about our planet. We see our earths glaciers melting, weather temperature rising, and pollution affecting our resources. But for some reasons we tend to look away. We should be more aware of this potential event and I’m here to inform everyone about what actually is global warming and the effects of it.
...earing, trees keep getting cut down, and plants either grow to early or die to fast. Unfortunately, all of these new changes are making live harder for every living thing and if we continue in the same footsteps we will soon not have a planet to call “Home.” Like Eileen Claussen once said, “I don't mean to imply that we are in imminent danger of being wiped off the face of the earth - at least, not on account of global warming. But climate change does confront us with profound new realities. We face these new realities as a nation, as members of the world community, as consumers, as producers, and as investors. And unless we do a better job of adjusting to these new realities, we will pay a heavy price. We may not suffer the fate of the dinosaurs. But there will be a toll on our environment and on our economy, and the toll will rise higher with each new generation.”