Rhetorical Analysis Of Crevecoeur

511 Words2 Pages

J. Hector St. Hon de Crevecoeur, a French aristocrat, defines what it means to be American in his collection of essays directed to the American people. By utilizing extended metaphor, rhetorical questions, and a prideful sentiment, he successfully conveys his uplifting definition of American.
Crevecoeur expresses his view of America masterfully through extended metaphor. He equates men in Europe to “many useless plants” that were devastated by “want, hunger and war...” (18-20). By describing the life of Americans before they emigrated from Europe, Crevecoeur contrasts Europe as a separate and malignant place. Henceforth, the audience visualizes the distinct appalling conditions of their birth country. Crevecoeur continues his metaphor, he projects how Americans have “taken root and flourished” in their new nation (22). This development of the metaphor further distinguishes the …show more content…

He begins by proposing whether someone who experiences constant suffering can call “any [other] kingdom his country[?]” (9). The audience is led to understand that they owe no allegiance to a government that gives them nothing. Therefore, readers realize that Americans have no bonds to their European birthplaces. Crevecoeur furthers his point by simplifying his question, and ponders the allegiance of a European emigrant who “had nothing[?]” (40). Consequently, the author communicates that Americans have no allegiance to European nations. Ergo, the rhetorical question implies that Americans have their allegiance to America. This method allows the reader to make the progression themselves and the idea becomes authentic and personal to the individual. Thus, the American audience aligns themselves with America by their own perceived choice. This development of national allegiance is a central idea that Crevecoeur communicates through use of rhetorical

Open Document