Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of reward and punishment
Moral decision making in religion
Impact of reward and punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of reward and punishment
Rewards and punishment are powerful hegemonies of human behavior. The effects of rewards and punishment are undeniably known to modulate people’s mind every time a person wants to make a decision. Psychologically, human mostly make their decisions based on the consequences of a decision through what their minds show of a motivation of being rewarded, or a fear of being punished. Put differently, rewards and punishment are what control and form our lives’ choices by honoring the choices that we will be rewarded for and working hard to achieve them, and avoiding the choices that cause us to be punished. While rewards help us to do our best to follow our interests and work hard to achieve them, punishment can also help us to learn discipline …show more content…
This kind of concept actually motivate religious people to do well in life and work hard to achieve rewords from their god. Also, to keep them away from immoral choices that causes sins and get punished. In my religion -Islam-, working hard to attain our lives’ goals such as having good education and good jobs are good deeds that we will be reworded for in this life by getting blessed and in the afterlife by going to haven. Therefore, sometimes when I get discomfort and tired of studying, I just remember that I will be rewarded for that. It’s a way to keep me going forward and motivated to reach my goals in life. However, one of my good friends who isn’t religious, told me - after a long debate about what govern our choices in life- that he’s always does what he wants to do, to achieve a certain rewards, such as charity. He believes that if he did well for a homeless person, he isn’t after a reward from anyone. However, I totally disagreed with him because even though he thinks that he is not doing charity to be rewarded, he’s actually doing it to feel good and self-satisfaction of helping someone, which is kind of a spiritual reward. In short, the concept of sins (punishment) and good deeds (rewards) is a way to
You shouldn’t be doing things just to get rewarded for it. This trains us to think that we only should do the things that would make us look good rather than do things all the time to help out the world. We could probably make a much bigger difference in the world if we change our
Punishment has been a topic known to interest people, from famous philosophers such as Jeremy Bentham and Adolphe Quetelet to just about anyone. The topic of punishment will continue to demand a better understanding. Punishment has been around since the beginning of civilization. Inevitably, with time the forms of punishment considered acceptable today are going to change. Without punishment would our criminal justice system cease to exist? Or would a functioning society cease to exist for that matter? Society will probably always rely on one form of punishment or another. Punishment is one of the main facets of the criminal justice system. It holds such significance that it even reflects the beliefs and values of a particular society.
There are several types of punishment that can be inflicted upon an offender including, fines, community sanctions and imprisonment (The Judicial Conference of Australia, 2007). Punishment is described as a sanction which inflicts a certain amount of pain and loss on the offender, used for payback and deter (The Judicial Conference of Australia, 2007; Carlsmith, Darley, & Robinson, 2002). There are three ways society justifies punishing offenders, through the
Throughout the process of growing up, punishments and rewards clearly mark what we should and should not do. Whether it is being sent to time out for pushing a classmate or earning an allowance for cleaning the dishes, we are programmed to know the difference between good and bad. When
Being punished should never be a torture method, no one should have to suffer for making mistakes. A punishment should be a learning experience. A time to think about the reasons why the mistake was made and come to the decision to not make them again. Accept the fact wrong and want to change for the better.
For example, disciplinary punishment is used for reviewing our own actions by committing to personal change and training According to Foucault (1995), “The mechanics of training are to punish. Punish is to exercise because it produces a change and corrects an error” (180). The disciplinary power created a mechanism of control in institutions and can punish and reward in hierarchies. The penalties are used to normalize the behavior. For example, in school’s children are rewarded for their hard work and are disciplined. They are penalties when children do not do their homework. The students are able to learn from the penalties by completing all tasks on
It is important for us humans to know that we must take full responsibility for our actions and maturely deal with any consequences that those actions may lead to. According to Ryon and Gleason (2013), “the first conceptualization of control was developed in 1966 by Rotter,” which is currently referred to as locus of control. Rotter defined locus of control as “the degree to which an individual expects that a contingent relationship exists between one’s behaviors and outcomes” (Ryon & Gleason, 2013). Fournier and Jeanrie reference Rotter’s study by explaining the two types of locus of control: “external control” and “internal control” (as cited in Rotter, 1966, p. 1). The purpose of Rotter’s theory was to examine “what causes reinforcement” whether it be an intrinsic or extrinsic factor (Kormanik & Rocco, 2009). Rotter measured “people’s general control expectancies” by using what is known as the “Internal-External Locus of Control Scale” (Fournier & Jeanrie, 2003).
penalty punishes them not for what they may or may not do in the future but what
What is the purpose of punishment? They say we lead from one major source, our
Punishment is reserved to those who have committed a transgression, a dominant and common response to injustices upon a victim (Okimoto and Weznzel 2008 p.346). It is a sense of retribution against immoral behavior, not solely for the purpose of punishment against the offender, but
Punishment has changed a lot in today’s world compared to the ancient and medieval times. Some might say that the punishment that is
Provide the justifications for punishment in modern society. Punishment functions as a form of social control and is geared towards “imposing some unwanted burden such as fines, probations, imprisonment, or even death” on a convicted person in return for the crimes they committed (Stohr, Walsh, & Hemmens, 2013, p.6). There are four main justifications for punishment and they are: retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and incapacitation. There is also said to be a fifth justification of reintegration as well.
The learning theory was described by Tarde as “something learned by normal people as they adapted to other people and the conditions of their environment” (Bohm & Haley, 73) this was set to be called imitation. But, further studies of this theory by Sutherland developed that “persons become criminal do so because of contacts with criminal definitions and isolation from anti-criminal definitions” (Bohm & Haley, 73). In other words, crimes varied in how the community was structured. Advancements to the theory followed and divided the learning theory into four sections positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, extinction and punishment. The idea of positive reinforcement meant that people did something for the reward such as stealing. The negative reinforcement is something that takes away and increases response, such as drug addicts to relieve pain. Further research of the theory led to criminals can experience extinction which is “behavior that previously was positively reinforced is no longer reinforced” and punishment which is “aversive stimulus to reduce a response”. These ideas emerged and advanced the learning theory. The learning theory was then seen as a theory to punish criminals for their actions, in order to cause extinction. Since Tarde’s explanation to now the learning theory has drastically advanced and provided many answers as to find ways to why one commits crimes and why
Why punish? Is the use of punishment ever Justified? In Punishment: The Supposed Justifications Revisited, Ted Honderich aim to answer these questions. Society needs to establish a well thought-out moral explanation as to why we punish and what we strive to achieve with the use of punishment as it is at the core of our punitive system. Honderich set out to analyze the supposed moral claims that justify the use of punishment and to determine if they are reasonable enough for the intentional infliction of suffering and deprivation.
It states that a person’s behavior can be changed by using reward and punishment. Reward can be used to make a person behave in a way that the other person wants. Where as you can use punishment to prevent a person from behaving in a way that is unacceptable or not according to your standards.