In his article “Why Cold-Calling on Students Works” Gooblar elaborates on how his view of cold-calling has been altered. As Gooblar begins exploring the idea of cold-calling he states how he doesn’t teach law, therefore does not want to pressure students. Consequently, Gooblar reiterates that statement when he writes, “Calling on students is hard for me. It just doesn’t fit with the kind of teacher I want to be.” He’s is certainly clear that he’s not there to be bossy but instead to teach. Should students be forced to answer questions in the classroom? Some may say that cold-calling is intimidating. Let’s say the student wasn’t paying attention to the discussion, possibly didn’t read the material before class, or simply just does not know the correct answer. Moreover, there is a possibility that the fear of cold-calling may discourage the student’s voluntary participation in the classroom. After researching the effects of cold-calling Gooblar urges the idea of cold-calling in his classroom. …show more content…
Gooblar refers to a 2012 study done at Northeastern University that included 16 sections of an undergraduate course revealing shocking evidence that changes Gooblar’s mind drastically. The study shows how cold-calling forces the students to mature intellectually and surprisingly increases voluntary participation. Since the results of the study suggest that participating in classroom discussion in college is a skill, this needs to be practiced like any other developed skill. Cold-calling gives students the opportunity to practice at communicating and being
In her article, “Lecture Me. Really”, Molly Worthen addresses the issue college students know all too well: how to lecture properly. Published in the New York Times, Worthen writes a passionate article about lecturing but from the perspective of a professor. Worthen presents the idea that lecturing, although some may think ineffective in the classroom, is a way to truly challenge and engage students into critically thinking. Worth dictates this idea with an excellent build up logical argument but lacks the proper evidence to support her claims creating a faulty argument.
In an article written in the New England Journal of Higher Education, 2008 issue, by Dana Fleming, “Youthful Indiscretions: Should Colleges Protect Social Network Users from Themselves and Others?” Fleming poses the question of responsibility in monitoring students’ online social networking activities. Fleming’s purpose is to impress upon the readers the need for education institutions to state the guidelines and rules governing social networking, and “to treat them like any other university activity, subject to the school’s code of conduct and applicable state and federal laws” (443). She creates a dramatic tone in order to convey to her readers the idea that social networking can be sinister and their effects inescapable. Dana L. Fleming is a Boston area attorney who specializes in higher education law, with the mission of the New England Journal of Higher Education to engage and assist leaders in the assessment, development, and implementation of sound education practices and policies of regional significance. However, while Dana Fleming emphasizes the horror stories of social networking, she scatters her thoughts throughout this article springing from one idea to attempting to persuade her intended audience then juxtaposed stories about minors being hurt by poor social networking decisions contrasting the topic suggested in her title.
Worthern further advances her claim by utilizing specific experiences of different professors. For example, she states the encounters from a Math professor Mark Tomforde as well as an English professor Angela Jackson- Brown to provide different perspectives to support her claim of the exacerbated use of informal language in conversing with professors. Professor Mark Tomforde reflects a moment,“There were also the emails written like text messages. Worse than the text abbreviation was the level of informality, with no address or sign off.” Through the narration of Professor Tomforde, who has taught over twenty decades, Worthern presents a believable witness of the transformation of how students address to the professor. It highlights students’ informality has exceeded the limit of being acceptable in a college environment in addition to the gradual disappearance of the value of respect. Similarly, Professor Jackson-Brown recalls, “deference has waned ...I go out of my way to not give them [ the students] access to my
...ild, when he would hide and daydream, up until his first years of college, when he would avoid areas that were difficult, the author recognized that there was important link between challenging the student on a meaningful level and the degree to which the student eventually produced. “I felt stupid telling them I was… well – stupid.” (Rose 43) Here, Rose shows an example of how poor preparation and low standards in the classroom can make a student feel inadequate. Indeed, one can see how many things seemingly unrelated do affect a student’s ability to learn.
To be able to start and hold a conversation seems like a skill people eventually perfect as they get older. However, are lowered heads and silence becoming a trend at parties, cafes, and at our own dinner table? Sherry Turkle, the author of “Stop Googling. Let’s Talk.”, has been studying the psychology of online connectivity for more than thirty years and has taken full notice of the burning fact that people would rather text than talk (par.3). As a first-year student in college, I agree with Turkle. It is occurring in every class, dining hall, and dorm room. The quiet is deafening. The silence and the speedy thumbs have consequences. I strongly support many points Turkle made in “Stop Googling. Let’s Talk.” and relate to many of the people surveyed.
The thesis, or the main idea of the book, is that by using specific communication techniques, we can turn difficult discussions into productive learning conversations.
“Stop spacing out, Mr. Anderson,” Mrs. Sorun said, who had thrown a paper wad at my head. “Part of your grade is listening to what your peers have to say and right now you’re failing.”
..., P., & Plax, T. G. (1989). Compliance-resistance in the college classroom. Communication Education, 38, 214–229. Retrieved from
“I see you Mr. Adza, I see right through you. You think you can charm your way out of any situation with your big smile and smooth way with words, but you can’t just coast through life with this sort of arrogant, nonchalant attitude. One day its really gonna bite you in the ass,” said Mr. Jansen, as he towered over my desk. Most of the class had scurried out at the sound of the school bell. I was simply trying to explain to the man that my random outbursts in class actually did him a favor because it loosened my classmates up, freeing their mind for the learning process. In fact, Mr. Jansen and I were actually a team. We were the dream team! I was the comic relief and he was the scholar. We went hand in hand.
In the First Year Seminar (FYS) we learned a multitude of essential skills that we can use to apply for the rest of our college experience, and years down the road. Throughout the first week of class we learned about Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs), essentially they are skills that the students are suppose to know thoroughly by the end of the semester. The six major SLOs that were presented in a majority of FYS classes the first one is access to diverse information through focused research, active discussion and collaboration with peers, this skill is important for college and professional life because it is important that one is able to converse appropriately and knowledgably amongst peers. It is a great skill to have because it shows that a person can work well in a team. The second skill from the SLOs is the ability to separate facts from inferences and relevant from irrelevant information, and explain the limitations of information. This skill is essential to build upon because gaining problem-solving skills one can work through sticky situations. Problem solving skills are great for college and professional life because one can get through tough problems quickly and efficiently, without this skill time is wasted. The third skill from SLO’s is evaluating the credibility, accuracy, and reliability of conclusions drawn from information. This skill is valuable among college and professional life due to the fact that it allows a person to back up their arguments for papers with reliable sources that are credible and accurate that supports the information. Otherwise the argument doesn’t have any supporting evidence to continue their argument to get their point across, if not gained correctly the argument becomes irrelevant in the ...
I absorbed many teaching strategies and classroom management skills while observing Mr. Fauth interact with his students. One instructional strategy Mr. Fauth does well and often in his class is modeling. One way he does this is through his modeling of critical thinking skills. I have observed his students become more critical about the sources they read and are always encouraged to ask questions. Another strategy that is used often in Mr. Fauth’s classroom is reciprocal teaching. Classroom discussion is a large part of the class and Mr. Fauth creates an atmosphere in which the students feel comfortable about sharing their ideas,
Since the early 70s theorists have pondered the causes of college dropout. Generally referred to as “student attrition,” this problem has spurred numerous causal theories and theoretical models. Vincent Tinto led the research with his revolutionary 1973 study, which he later revised (1987) amid criticism from other luminaries in the field, most notably Bean, Astin, Terenzini, and Pascarella. It is on the work of these scholars (including also Tinto) that all modern research in the student attrition field is based. I found and will review in brief some of the extensive research from Tinto to the present, including the basic criticisms therein. I will further explain the steps some colleges are currently taking to counteract this increasingly important issue.
According to studies, college students are more likely to be successful in their individual subjects if they build connections between their professors. These connections ensure that any misunderstandings during class discussion can be answered by professors even after lecture times. An article by “A Matter of Degrees”, reported by the Center for Community College Students Engagement at the University
This class is really giving me insight into the different communication styles. Over the past week, I really had to set and review my friendships. At first, it was a bit difficult to answer the questions of who is least dominant and who had the lowest sociability. I really had to think, because most of my friends are alike. We are all the same with subtle differences, or so I thought.
Discussion within my tightknit class has allowed me to broaden how I look at an assignment or subject. To take my own observations and analysis