Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Democracy an american novel
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Democracy an american novel
Kurt Piehler’s Remembering War the American Way is an informative book that shows what has happened in American society, how important representative government is, and shows how regular citizens can influence public affairs. Throughout the text, Piehler gives a complete history of how American’s have gone about remembering certain conflicts when it comes to wars, or even certain battles. The main things to be covered in this paper will include the main themes, how Americans have remembered the past and how memorialization of wars evolved, different groups influencing the memory of past events, and what the book teaches citizens about their roles and duties. The first thing to cover is the main themes of Remembering War the American Way
The
…show more content…
main themes of Piehler’ book include how Americans remember past conflicts, why Americans want to make sure these conflicts are remembered, and how the remembrance and memorialization of these events have changed. The first memorials for wars the United States were involved in came after the Mexican American War, were the United States government built an obelisk to mark the graves of soldiers that had died in battle (pg.43). Memorial structures and statues have remained consistent throughout history, although the styles have changed; the idea behind memorializing the dead is consistent. American’s were very big advocates of making sure certain battlefields and gravesites were made into national memorials when it came to wars that were fought on United States soil. With different conflicts, came different reasons for why these wars needed to be remembered. During the revolutionary war, “preserving a memory of the American Revolution that emphasized the struggle for independence” (pg.18) was extremely important to our founding fathers and the nation as a whole. Citizens wanted to commemorate the war to make sure future Americans would know how America got its independence and to remember the soldiers that had fallen in order to achieve independence. That ideology of remembering why America got engaged in war goes into the belief that Americans want to have reasoning for the loss of life. For example when the largest life of life occurred during the civil war, “efforts to commemorate the Civil War and other conflicts stressed the terrible costs and the blessings of peace, war came to be seen as an acceptable option when the national interest was at stake (pg.87)”. Although the way Americans remember the wars throughout history has not stayed consistent, remembering the fallen has always been an important thing to the Citizens of America. An example of keeping the same ideology but using a different method to show it would be massive gravesites that had a memorial built to commemorate the dead, these were popular during the earlier years of America, mostly for the Revolutionary and Civil war. Later into history, wars that fell outside the borders of The United States, it was important for citizens and mothers of soldiers that making sure individual soldiers were brought home and given a proper grave, because this was seen as the correct and most honorable memorial to do after the First World War occurred. Throughout history, there have been multiple groups that have attempted to shape the memory of how Americans remember the past.
Starting with the Federalist and the Democratic Republicans, these two groups faced off for what they thought was important for Americans to remember and how they should celebrate these events or people. A big thing they faced off with was how certain monuments are used when remembering history, the Federalist believed it should too much resemblance to imperial rule instead of a republic (pg.22). In a different belief, the Democratic Republicans believed they did not need to worry about public opinion shifting into thinking the Government will become an imperial rule. Another big group that faced off were the North and South during the Civil war area. The two war torn areas of the United States had very opposite ways in remembering what happened during the war. After the war, considering the North had beat the South, the North did not believe that graves of Southern soldiers should be represented by the government due to the cause the South believed in, which essentially was keeping slavery legal. Eventually both sides put up memorials funded mostly by rich political groups in their areas, and both made traditions that honored their dead. Groups throughout history did collide quite often and that is naturally because human beings strive for some sort of conflict. These groups were successful in shaping the memory of the past, but to a certain …show more content…
extent. The way wars regarding conflicts outside of the United States are mostly the same, but when it comes to conflicts mainly affecting the United States citizens, people talk about the past differently on whichever side they believe in. Remembering War the American Way teaches us, citizens of the United States, just how important our roles and duties are, and how we can influence bringing necessary change to our country.
Previously stated in the last paragraph, there were many groups that went head on with each other to bring upon change. These groups are a large indication of how taking part in government affairs can lead to citizens voices being heard and creating change from actively participating. Piehler’s main goal was to show that citizens could bring about change without having to be a government official. Being an actively participating citizen is every Americans civil duty to make sure the citizen’s rights are protected and not tarnished. This book also teaches citizens that remembering past wars and preserving the memory of those wars is a priority not only to honor the dead, but to teach future American Citizen’s on how the United States can better it self from these past
conflicts. Kurt Piehler’s Remembering War the American Way is a great insight to what has happened in American society, how important representative government is, and shows how regular citizens can influence public affairs. War has been around for thousands of years, and is almost in its entirety never going to not be around. Educating and reminding citizens on past events will shed more light on how War was conducting and why certain conflicts happened. Remembering the past and learning from it will help nations avoid future conflicts and help build a stronger national identity.
In the book, America’s Great War: World War I and the American Experience, Robert H. Zieger discusses the events between 1914 through 1920 forever defined the United States in the Twentieth Century. When conflict broke out in Europe in 1914, the President, Woodrow Wilson, along with the American people wished to remain neutral. In the beginning of the Twentieth Century United States politics was still based on the “isolationism” ideals of the previous century. The United States did not wish to be involved in European politics or world matters. The U.S. goal was to expand trade and commerce throughout the world and protect the borders of North America.
The three narratives “Home Soil” by Irene Zabytko, “Song of Napalm” by Bruce Weigl, and “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen all have the same feelings of war and memory, although not everyone experiences the same war. Zabytko, Weigl, and Owen used shifting beats, dramatic descriptions, and intense, painful images, to convince us that the horror of war far outweighs the devoted awareness of those who fantasize war and the memories that support it.
Michael C. C. Adams' book, The Best War Ever: America and World War II, attempts to dispel the numerous misconceptions of the Second World War. As the title suggests, Americans came out of the war with a positive view of the preceding five turbulent years. This myth was born from several factors. Due to the overseas setting of both theaters of the war, intense government propaganda, Hollywood's glamorization, and widespread economic prosperity, Americans were largely sheltered form the brutal truth of World War II. Even to this day, the generation of World War II is viewed as being superior in morality and unity. The popular illusion held that 'there were no ethnic or gender problems, families were happy and united, and children worked hard in school and read a great number of books.' (115)
The strong relationship created between history and memory is one of a vexing nature due to deliberate selection and emphasis. It does however result in a confluence of different representations, that is, personal stories (memory) and public stories (history). Mark Baker’s biography and autobiography ‘The Fiftieth Gate: A Journey Through Memory’, explores his parents’ memories which are both verified and contradicted by Baker’s historical findings, as each asserts their claim through these different theories of representation drawing on such established criteria as evidence, accuracy, authenticity, authority and detail. Steven Spielberg’s horror-psychological thriller film, ‘Schindler’s List’ shows how amongst the abhorrence of the Holocaust, one man can make a difference for the better and leave a legacy of his generosity but it is also a question of what else he did that wasn’t emphasised due to the context of the film. Lastly, the poem ‘The Send-Off’ by Wilfred Owen expresses Owen’s personal feelings towards war which is enunciated through his strong emotive language.
propaganda was to rally the country to fight the war. The first step in shaping the
The reality that shapes individuals as they fight in war can lead to the resentment they have with the world and the tragedies that they had experienced in the past. Veterans are often times overwhelmed with their fears and sensations of their past that commonly disables them to transgress and live beyond the emotions and apprehensions they witness in posttraumatic experiences. This is also seen in everyday lives of people as they too experience traumatic events such as September 11th and the fall of the World Trade Center or simply by regrets of decisions that is made. Ones fears, emotions and disturbances that are embraced through the past are the only result of the unconscious reality of ones future.
...of the struggle over how the war would be remembered. Blanketed by the discourse of disability, the struggle over the memory of veterans and the country alike would be waged with such obliquity as to surpass even the most veiled operations of Nixon’s minions. While Nixon’s plumbers were wrenching together the Gainesville case against VVAW in the spring of 1972, mental health and news-media professionals were cobbling together the figure of the mentally incapacitated Vietnam veteran. More than any other, this image is the one that would stick in the minds of the American people. The psychologically damaged veteran raised a question that demanded an answer: what happened to our boys that was so traumatic that they were never the same again? As it came to be told, the story of what happened to them had less to do with the war itself than with the war against the war.
Vietnam was a highly debated war among citizens of the United States. This war was like no other with regards to how it affected people on the home front. In past war’s, the population of the United States mainly supported the war and admired soldiers for their courage. During the Vietnam War, citizens of the U.S. had a contradictory view than in the past. This dilemma of not having the support of the people originates from the culture and the time period.
Adams, Michael C. C. The "Best War Ever: America and World War II" Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD 1994. Bailey, Ronald H. The Home Front, U.S.A. Time-Life Publishing, Chicago, IL. 1978 Bard, Mitchell G.
Anderson believes that Americans are good at remembering our wars, but we only remember the major wars that threatened our liberty, our freedom, or our values. Anderson says this is because we use them to remind ourselves of what sacrifice is. ...
This book is written from a perspective foreign to most Americans. Historically, American students are taught from a single perspective, that being the American perspective. This approach to history (the single perspective) dehumanizes the enemy and glorifies the Americans. We tend to forget that those on the opposing side are also human.
In a particular instance a woman, Kathleen Cronan Wyosnick, wrote a very heartfelt letter to Abigail VanBuren [Abby] who was the first honorary member elected to the Korean War Veterans Association and previously a newspaper columnist. On November 11th, 1988, Wyosnick wrote to VanBuren pleading to consider a special group of men and women who fought in the Korean War, which is better known as the “forgotten war”. Wyosnick described in her letter how she was a former Air Force nurse who had lost her husband in the Korean War, and how the war is described in nothing more than a few paragraphs in text books. She said the only media reminder to the public of the war was a television show called “M*A*S*H”.
Although portrayed in a particularly gruesome scenario, author Shirley Jackson conveys the importance of upholding tradition in her short story, “The Lottery.” While the climactic execution-by-stoning isn’t quite a modern example, it still serves to show us that some traditions are worth upholding. In our society today, it seems as if there is a growing movement to look forward and embrace the new instead of remembering our past. But to effectively make changes and plan for the future, it is essential that we turn to our history. One of the greatest issues in the world today is that of patriotism. In the immediate wake of September 11th, nearly all residents of this country proudly proclaimed themselves “Americans,” putting aside personal bias, differences in religion, and family roots to support the rebuilding of a nation. Lately, however (since our involvement in the Iraq War), this notion of unity and brotherhood has once again taken a backseat to personal agendas.
World War II was a time in American history of patriotism. However, that patriotism came a price to the American public according to The Censored War, written by George Roeder. He discusses the impact that censorship had on the American public, and how lies and propaganda gave the citizens of America a false view of war. By portraying participation in the war as heroic, using such propaganda as posters depicting fallen GI's as Christ-like figures (Rodeder 33), the US government formed the perspective for the public, rather than allowing them to develop their own sense of reality. Photographs of dead or wounded soldiers were withheld from the public in order to keep public opinion on the side of the government. Pictures of dead or wounded American soldiers were kept in a file dubbed "the Chamber of Horrors", not to be released for public viewing until many yea...
War is such a debatable topic of whether it is just to wage a war on our neighbours or invade a country.One thing is very clear there are consequence and a cost. Martin Luther once stated,“War is the greatest plague that can afflict humanity, it destroys religion, it destroys states, it destroys families”. This was exactly what did. War was not a fun game like what Jessie Pope described it as in her poem, ‘Who’s for the game’. What war did was it changed people and society. The war caused soldiers to suffer from PTSD, it left families to face the feeling of grief and it crippled the economy.