Effects Of The French And Indian War

719 Words2 Pages

The French and Indian war, also known as the Seven Years’ War, began 1756 and ended in 1763. It was the largest, the most expensive, and the most destructive war in Europe between the Thirty Years’ War, which ended in 1648, and the Napoleonic War of the early nineteenth century. This war involved all the great empires of Europe, plus the Indian population in the New World.
The major problem of the French and Indian War was that the population of the Indians was decreasing more rapidly than expected, because the spread of epidemics from the colonists started killing them off quicker, rather than the fighting from the war itself. Since their numbers were decreasing and the British had more power than before the war, this led to the Indians fearing for their freedom – they did not want to be controlled or overpowered by the British or any major European empire.
Each major empire of Europe wanted the award for winning the war, which was a large portion of the eastern, half of North America. The French and Indian War resulted with the collapse of the French’s two hundred year old empire in North America and decreased the French’s influence upon the Indians. Since the colonists were very upset that the Indians had played each side against each other, they pronounced that no war in North America after 1763 was ever going to be decided by the Indians. As the prime minister of Great Britain during the time of the war, Winston Churchill believed that the French and Indian War was the First World War.
Anderson believes that Americans are good at remembering our wars, but we only remember the major wars that threatened our liberty, our freedom, or our values. Anderson says this is because we use them to remind ourselves of what sacrifice is. ...

... middle of paper ...

...hem, it resulted in a major uproar. Later they would realize that this attitude towards Great Britain is what put them on the path to revolution.
I found Anderson’s lecture enticing and very interesting. I liked how he spoke about some famous people that were involved in the war, such as George Washington, who also had a major impact on the war. Anderson considers Washington the founder of the successful American empire. At the end of his lecture, when Anderson allowed questions I thought that was really cool because you were able to think about his lecture from other people’s perspective. Anderson could have looked up and made eye contact with the audience more often instead of looking down and reading from his paper the entire time. If Anderson had moved around the room and interacted with the audience, it would have made his lecture more exciting and interactive.

Open Document