Religious Argument Against Artificial Intelligence

1087 Words3 Pages

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been a contentious topic for even longer than this technology has been actively present in our lives. One of the main contributors to AI thinking and it's implications comes from Alan Turing and the paper published in 1950 on what referred to as "The Imitation Game". The simple reduction of this writing establishes and AI as successful when it is able to convince a human observer of its humanity over another human. This concept of another being reaching some semblance of humanity has offended many groups, in particular Christians. At first, I was very surprised to hear Turing's "religious argument" against Artificial Intelligence, and even more shocked to hear that this is something that has support among Christians. …show more content…

This was the primary topic of the article "Artificial Intelligence and the Soul" by Russel Bjork. Personally, I had never considered the possibility that these human creations could be offensive to God, however, I can see a parallel between Artificial Intelligence seeking to make humans creators in a similar sense to God and the tower of Babel. It is the reason behind this creation that can be problematic, more than the physical creation itself. This begs the question, what is it that makes humankind unique? In my understanding of this technology, even though we refer to it as "intelligent", there is clearly no will or soul to these creations. In this sense it seems obvious to my technologically trained brain that this is of no worry to threaten our human uniqueness. However, as technology continues to progress and we approach a "Blade Runner" or "Westworld" scenario where the created hosts are indistinguishable from divinely created humans, this distinction might not be so clear. In the same way that I am currently not threatened by AI, it might be the case that someone who has witnessed the gradual developments that leads to this level of creation might have the same argument, but it is impossible to know. So this brings me back to the question of humanity and our uniqueness before …show more content…

After a particularly insightful semester in Wheaton's Theories of Origin's class I have reached the conclusion that our uniqueness is in this sole fact: God chose us. I believe that humankind existed prior to these two chosen representatives; however without the ability to interact with God as we do today and throughout the Bible. Specifically, I believe that in the Garden, God gave Adam and Eve souls: an indescribable connection to Him that allows for us to communicate with God in a way that is unique. This connection is what separates us from animals and our own creations. The existence of our soul is needed for the redeeming Sacrifice of Christ to provide us with salvation from our sins and the ability to ascend to heaven. In other words, Christ did not come to save goldfish or microwaves, but those that are uniquely chosen by Him: humans. But if the soul is the only thing that makes us unique then it seems rather prudent to have a definition of soul so that we can assure ourselves what is and is not a

Open Document