Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Exploring reliability and validity
Validity and reliability issues
Advantages and disadvantages of reliability in research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Exploring reliability and validity
Experimental Research of Reliability and Validity
Shawna Anderson
Southwestern College Professional Studies
Reliability and validity are two very important aspects of the research design. These two aspects help researchers gather and measure data in a consistent manner. Reliability is defined as the extent to which the same results over a period of time are accurate and represent the total population and if the results can be duplicated under a similar methodology, then the research is considered reliable There is internal and reliability and external reliability. Internal reliability evaluates the consistency of the results across items within a test. External reliability refers to the degree to which a measure varies
…show more content…
Measurements are only reliable to the extent that they can be repeated and that any random influence that can make measurements different is a source of error. There are many ways to measure both reliability and validity. Some of the ways to measure reliability is test-retest, parallel form, and split-half method. The test-retest measures the results given when the same test is given at different times. Once the both test are administered the results are then compared for consistency. Parallel form is when two different tests are given for measurement over the knowledge is skill level of the test. Split-half method assesses the internal consistency; this is measured to the extent in which all parts of the test contribute equally. Once all the data is measured the test can then be compared for results. Two ways in which validity can be measured is concurrent validity and construct validity. Concurrent validity is the way in which the scores of a test are related to the scores on another test that is administered at the same time. If two test were given how accurate where the test with one another. Once the test is given they can compare each measure of the criterion with each other. Construct Validity is when the construction of the measure of assessment is actually measuring what it claims to measure. This can be in consideration to performance test results. The question of trustworthiness of the research is raised in regards to the …show more content…
This can play a huge role in determining the results and comparing them to a more formal setting. If one assessment was done with a large population of people around and another assessment was done in a more private area or in isolation, would the results differ? There are many factors that can affect reliability and validity. It is very important that factors are controlled as much as possible to reduce their impact. This could be anything from a life event that affects a person’s mood or an environmental event that affects the surroundings of the particular study or research
There are two basic psychometric properties, validity and reliability that have been used to evaluate the quality of scale development. Psychometric testing used to evaluate the quality of instrument (Polit& Beck, 2010).
Another confound that may impact the results of this study could be the testing effect. Repeated testing may lead to better or worse performance. Changes in performance on the test may be due to prior experience with the test and not to the independent variable. In addition, repeated testing fatigues the subjects, and their performance declines as a result (Jackson, 2012). Because the professor is interested in determining if the implementation of weekly quizzes would improve test scores, an experimenter and/or an instrumentation effect may also affect results.
Likewise, in order to validate construct validity, Malhotra et al. (2012) recommends that in conducting research, researchers should use multi versus single-item scales to validate data from experiments, depending upon the complexity of the experiment. Malhotra et al. (2012) also recommends using a step-by-step approach ...
While psychological assessment can be useful, it is merely a tool that provides a piece of a puzzle when assessing individuals. Many things need to be considered in addition to psychological assessment to generate the most accurate results. No individual is exactly the same, therefore a standarized assessment tool will remain flawed. Cultural and linguistic differences are important to acknowledge and understand in efforts to reduce bias in assessment tools.
Replicability and generalizability are important considerations when analyzing research findings. Result replicability measures the extent to which results will remain the same when a new sample is drawn, while generalizability refers to the ability to generalize the results from one study to the population (Guan, Xiang, & Keating, 2004). If results are not replicable they will not be generalizable. Replicability is important because it determines whether results are true or a fluke. Measures of replicability can be obtained using either external or internal methods. External replicability analysis requires redrawing a completely new sample and replicating the study. Internal replicability analysis involves procedures used to investigate replicability within the current study sample (Zientek & Thompson, 2007). Although only external analysis can provide definitive answers regarding result replicability, a flawed assessment of result replicability via internal analysis is still better than conjecture (Thompson, 1994).
According to Terre Blanche, Durrheim and Painter (2006), reliability is “the degree to which results are repeatable”. It can apply to the scores achieved by the study or the study as a whole. A more reliable study will yield similar results no matter how many times the test is repeated. In order to calculate the reliability for this study Split-half reliability, Cronbach’s alpha and Spearman Brown prophecy will be used.
A researcher uses an experiment to scientifically test out a hypothesis. In an experiment there are many different factors that are involved. There is the independent variable, which is the cause, it is the one that is being manipulated, and the dependent variable, which is the effect, is the response. When conducting a experiment it is important to make sure that the only thing than can affect the dependent variable is the independent variable. This is known as internal validity. Using random assignment to separate the participants into groups helps eliminate any outside factors, and creates an equal chance for all participants to be apart of the experimental conditions. There are many pros and cons to this type of method. The experimental method creates a strong control of the variables involved in the experiment, which allows an easier determination on cause and effect. If needed, it is fairly easy to replicate an experiment and is less time consuming than other research methods. However there are many downfalls as well. When conducting an experiment the setting of where the experiment is taking place is more artificial which may cause certain behaviors that wouldn’t occur in real life. This is known as external validity, which is the measure of how much the results of a study can be generalized and used in different situations, and people. To improve external validity cover stories are created when conducting experiments so the participants are not aware of what is really going on, or experiments are done in a natural setting as opposed to in a laboratory. However, this creates less control over confounding variables that can affect the experiment, which can create bias results (Aronson,
.... Without knowledge of the reliability and validity of these two instruments we are unable to know if the instruments are consistent or if they measure what they intend to measure.
The data gathered during observation sessions are quite reliable; it is often used to confirm the data extracted using other techniques
This is the use of appropriate and used statistics to determine what the research is perceiving. Internal validity is the third form of validity. This is the validity of inferred and found information about the relationships between the elements of the chosen research design and outcomes. The final form of validity is external validity, this form of validity is used to
The fact that all scores are based on consensus between different assessors and assessment techniques at the end of each re test exercise and at the end of the assessment centre means that this form of reliability is very high. Test-retest reliability is also very high, as the competencies being assessed are complex, and the behavior patterns are well established and unlikely to change over time unless a conscious efford is made to do so.
, Parallel or alternate forms of reliability, correlation that indicates a consistency of scores of individuals within the same group on two alternate but equivalent forms of the same test taken at the same time. An example of such, is when our student body takes a test that is worth 100 points we have the same questions, but they may be two different tests. Such as, a test A and a Test B. Crombach’s alpha, internal consistency reliability statistic calculated from the pairwise correlations between items on the measure. For instance, it will always be less than 1 and the closer it is to 1, the more reliable the scale, which can work together in an effort to measure the same
Assessment is a core component in research. Clinical Psychologists use various types of assessments ...
The procedure of Psychological assessment encompasses psychological testing. Instead of relying on the results of one particular test, it incorporates data collected from other sources like interviews, present complaints, information from significant others, behavioural observations, and historical data. The psychological testing is mere administration, scoring, and interpretation of a particular test score (usually numeric) that gives us an idea of an attribute or characteristic; whereas psychological assessment is a logical problem-solving process, that can be therapeutic for the client and help them realize their potentials and achieve their goals (Cohen & Swerdlik, 2009; Hood & Johnson, 2007). The process of psychological assessment is more individualized, however psychological test involves an individual or a group administration (Cohen & Swerdlik, 2009). The process of psychological assessment is a complex procedure as compare to psychological testing (Weiner, 2003) that according to M...