Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Technology's negative effect on interpersonal communication
Effect of social media on employee performance
Importance of interpersonal relationships in a workplace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction: Thoughts from the Breakroom The coffee has gotten cold, the soggy sandwich you brought for lunch is suddenly unappealing, and the conversation has run stale. The clock could not possibly be moving any slower. Your cubicle buddy is busy working on his customer reports, your boss is locked away in his office, and the creepy dude that sits that stares at you from his desk so happens to be taking his lunch break at the same time as you. Relationships in the workplace are a struggle because some of them act as positive motivators such as your favorite co-worker or maybe the nice desk manager who is always willing to greet you with a smile and hello in the morning. However, others such as the creepy dude who stares, the employee who …show more content…
The workplace is one of the various places where this theory can come into play. This paper will explore the external dialectics such as inclusion and seclusion, as well as conventionality and uniqueness of an office and the employees within it. Furthermore, internal dialectics such as connection and autonomy, and impartiality and favoritism will be examined for the close personal relationships of co-workers with their colleagues. Each of these specifics dialectical tensions play a role in how people communicate and collaborate in an office setting. Specifically looking at friendship and romantic relationships in the show The Office these tensions will be explored and compared to real life scenarios, along with the role of technology in the modern …show more content…
As previously mentioned Relational Dialectics looks at dialectical tensions. There are two different categories of dialectical tensions. Internal dialectics simply means the ongoing tension within a relationship versus external dialectics, which means the tensions between a couple and a community (Griffin, Ledbetter, & Sparks, 2015). Often times, these scholars pick a particular focus to analyze such as workplace, college, social media, or other types of settings and platforms where relationships are built and nurtured. In the article Relationships as dialogues Baxter (2004) says, “In being open to another person, one is willing to listen to him or her from that person’s perspective to display the receptivity to what the person has to say to be open to change in one’s own beliefs and attitudes” (p. 5-6). Meaning that when communicating with others an individual is willing to consider others opinions and in the workplace this can be seen happening effectively and ineffectively during team related assignments. External dialectics play a role in how businesses have to think of themselves outside of just their company they have to look at their relationship with the community. In regards to this Baxter (2004) states, “Relationship parties are also involved in ongoing negotiation with outsiders on the ways in which the relationship’s
Relational Dialectics concerns itself with trying to explain the intricacies of close interpersonal relationships such as those with a lover, close friend, or family. Written by two women, Leslie Baxter and Barbara Montgomery, it comes across a little more "touchy-feely" than other theories. This Humanist quality in the way it iw presented allows myself to critique Relational Dialectics in the following fashion. According to Griffin, there are five standards that are reliable to the critique of Humanist theories, and they are: New understanding of people; clarification of values; aestetic appeal; community agreement; reform society. Taking a closer look.
The outrageous events create a contrasting tone. The typical office orientation situation is invaded by shocking situations such as Amanda Pierce’s. Pierce’s husband “subjects her to an escalating array of painful and humiliating sex games.” Describing very personal aspects of an employee’s life creates a very uncomfortable feeling in this situation. This type of information is not supposed to be talked about in an office
In understanding Relational Cultural Theory (RCT), we will first examine its fundamental assumptions and then critically assess those assumptions. Next, we will evaluate RCT’s assumptions to determine its relevance to the core values of social work. Finally, we will determine the ways RCT can best guide social work practice.
Pluralism, on the other hand, states that the usual conflict arising from the different opinions of employees and management is not seen negative. Therefore the theory describes how the different viewpoints should be combined in order to achieve a compromise. (CIPD, 2008, p. 10-11)
There's a lot going on with the captain—we can't forget, on top of being stuck in a lifeboat, he just lost his entire ship to the sea. Since the story is told from the correspondent's perspective, we only get a glimpse at the sheer magnitude of how he has been affected by the sinking of the ship. The narrator describes his voice as being "deep with mourning, and of a quality beyond oration or tears" (1.6). Yep, you heard that right: he's in mourning for his ship. For most of these guys—psychologically, at least—their ordeal starts when they get into the lifeboat, but we have to remember, for the captain, the ship was his responsibility. And now it's sunk. Talk about a heavy load to bear.
Being a nurse and belonging to nursing society is not easy and it requires a lot of hard work and also for individuals to have some outstanding characters in order to be successful. As for me, the thing I find in common with me and nursing is that I’m compassionate, Honest, and have self-confidence; To me those are some key elements one need to have in order to fit in the nursing society and in this essay I will be explaining how those key elements relate me to the nursing society.
Discussions now turn into debates, where inflexible standpoints collide. The growing mistrust creates a sense of insecurity and loss of control. Efforts to control the counterpart belong to later escalation stages.
Relational Dialectics is defined as “ a dynamic knot of contradictions in personal relationships; a ceaseless interplay between contradictory or opposing tendencies” (Griffin, Ledbetter, & Sparks 137) such as integration-separation, stability-change, and expression-non expression. Leslie Baxter and Barbara Montgomery coined the phrase “opposites attract” to make it simple in understanding Relational Dialectics. This theory is rooted in phenomenological tradition.The theory utilizes an interpretive approach.
Work Effectively with Others Working relationships can be fragile- especially in the workplace where they are often built and destroyed by the actions we take. Building healthy, secure and harmonious relationships is important not only to us personally, but also to underpin the success of the organisation we work for. We need to build effective relationships for a number of reasons: The health of people depends on what happens in organisations and what they do. Overwork, stress, being subjected to harassment or bullying all impact on a person's health and therefore on their ability to fulfil their role within the organisation.
This activity is to understand how our conflict style can impact our relationships and to reflect on how we can improve our relationships by managing these conflicts. “Friend ship is a voluntary relationship that provides social support” (Adler, Rosenfeld & Proctor II, 2012, p. 384). Friendships we create, are managed and maintained through communication. Our level of communication depends on the level and depth of the friendship. There are different types of friendships, some last for short period, some last for years or life time. All friendships are not created equal. Gender of the friend plays a significant role in communication.
The Palestine and Israel conflict has been carrying on for the better part of the last century. This is a conflict that seemingly has no end in sight. Multiple wars between Palestine and Israel have only complicated things for the inhabitants of the land they are fighting over. Due to the second war in 1967, Israel is now in control of the West Bank and the Gaza strip. This is particularly important to the conflict and how the dialectical perspective plays a part of it because these are two areas that many Palestinians call home, leaving them under Israel rule.
sides play important roles in the long-term success of most relationships, and each deserves respect and consideration. In personal relationships, a lack of understanding about differing needs can result in distance, arguments, and break-ups. In workplace conflicts, differing needs are often at the heart of bitter disputes, sometimes resulting in broken deals, fewer profits and lost jobs. When you can recognize the legitimacy of conflicting needs and become willing to examine them in an environment of compassionate understanding, it opens pathways to creative problem solving, team building, and improved relationships.
The pattern of work over the years seems to change from one era to another. With the advent of ever-growing technologies and innovation, the workforce environment and nature is moving from the traditional ways of working, thus creating a drastic change and a new revolution in it. This paper presents a critical reflection on how the nature of the workplace has been changing over the past years. The work life today completely contrasts with that of the past. The norms and dedication towards a company have moved on and work people are now distributed in multiple companies.
With these freedoms you have choices to make. You can either continue blindly merely surviving or choose to see the workplace in a different light. By seeing everything in a different way, you are now free of everything that is fundamentally meaningless. The book is also useful in facilitating the reader’s ability to change their perceptions of normally negative aspects of life.
In the workplace, disagreement or arguments may arise due to several reasons. This can further result into a state of antagonism or opposition, resentment, avoidance, verbal assaults, and inability to work together. Such may arise due to personality clashes, differences in style, differences in leadership, interdependence conflicts and differences in the background or gender. With reference to the conflict between Norm and Norma, disagreement arose due to differences in styles. This is because Norma was after quick result from the initiated project while Norm believed he could work from home and still meet the expected standard. However, Norma expected full commitment from all the staff under her. For good working relations, conflicts should always be resolved and hence improve good working relationship among the employees both the juniors and seniors. Professionally, conflicts can be solved via two models; circle of conflict and triangle of satisfaction (Susan Holton, 1998).