Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theories about the nature of language acquisition
Theories about the nature of language acquisition
Theories about the nature of language acquisition
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theories about the nature of language acquisition
Instead of viewing development as a consequence of only one significant factor, other theorists viewed development as a product of various properties contributing towards it. One new approach to development is the Relational Developmental Systems (RDS) approach that states that psychology is not a biological science, rather, genes and the brain are just other participants in developmental processes (Greenberg 2014). According to this approach “biological adaptations, socialization, and unique cultural experiences lead to a phase transition from protolanguage in chimpanzees and bonobos … to true language” (Greenberg 2014). In other words, development and language are the product of changes within the human genome. These changes make it possible …show more content…
According to this approach, “even if one is studying a single source of influence, one would acknowledge at some critical point that that source is not acting in isolation” (Coll 2004). To elaborate, the environment cannot be the sole factor in development because there are other things influencing an individual’s development — like their biology. For the sociocultural theory of development to definitively state that interactions with an individual’s surroundings result in their development, it would have to erase any biological involvement in development. Meaning, the theory would have to completely neglect biology’s role in development which is impossible because without a genetic makeup, a person is not a person. Furthermore, Coll illustrates this approach by giving an example of a child learning language (2004). For instance, “a child cannot learn a language well without a neural substrate that processes the input—or, equally important, without an environment that provides that input” (Coll 2004). This promotes the belief that development is the product of the environment and biology reacting with one
In conclusion, I have written about some of the greatest developmental theorists of all time. While each of these men and women hold distinct and separate views, they all share one common goal and that goal is to increase our understanding of human growth and development.
“The term “nature versus nurture” is used to refer to a long-running scientific debate. The source of debate is the question of which has a greater influence on development: someone's innate characteristics provided by genetics, or someone's environment. In fact, the nature versus nurture debate has been largely termed obsolete by many researchers, because both innate characteristics and environment play a huge role in development, and they often intersect”. (Smith, 2010 p. 1)
Nature versus nurture is an argument in psychology over whether a person’s innate qualities and behaviors are caused from their environment or if they’re born with it. Vygotsky places more emphasis on the social factors that contribute to cognitive development, in other words he is in favor of the nurture argument. He believes that everyone learns from their culture, environment, and social interactions. He talks about a few of his theories like the zone of proximal development, and a more knowledgeable other. He also expresses his thoughts on developmental tools and the importance of language to cognitive development. All of these factors together support his idea that children’s behavior is learned.
The ecological theory of development was created by a Russian American psychologist named Urie Bronfenbrenner. He developed the theory based on his belief that all children grow and develop differently based on their environmental factors and the situations surrounding those environmental factors. The theory was comprised of four levels and later a fifth level was added. The microsystem level focused on those factors that immediately surrounded the child. Those factors could include: family, school, neighborhood, and church. Mesosystem level is a connection between two different environments, like school and neighborhood. Those external environmental factors such as the media, government, and extended family and friends are referred to as exosystem. The fourth level of the theory included environmental factors that were tied to cultural beliefs and national economy. The fifth level, chronosystem, was later added by Bronfenbrenner to show that changes occur over time within each individual. In studying these different levels of ecological development, it became clear that each of these levels has influenced my life at different stages. And each level had a different environmental influence on my progress.
Developmental theories are broken up into two perspectives; Life-course, and Latent Trait. These perspectives may answer questions on why juveniles have grown to lead a destructive life-style and why others grow out of their delinquency. Latent trait explains that some tendencies we are may be born with and how important it is to be there for our children. Our parenting skills do have a profound effect on how our children may lack self control or have an impulsive behavior.
There are many types of development theories, Psychoanalytic theories, Cognitive theories, Behavioral and social cognitive theories, ethological theories and ecological theories. Development is how a person changes throughout their life, from the time they are conceived to the time they die. Everyone processes and interprets things and information differently. After researching these various developmental theories ecological theories best describe development. Urie Bronfenbrenner is the researcher that created the ecological theory. Psychoanalytic theories least describe development. Both Ecological and Psychoanalytic theories have certain aspects that I personally believe to make a valid point and certain aspects that do not make a valid point when it comes to development. Eclectic theoretical orientation takes pieces of each theory that makes the most sense when it comes to lifespan development and follows that system. Ecological theories are everyone and everything having an impact on a child’s development, even if those people and events have no direct contact with the child.
The old African proverb ‘it takes a whole village to raise a child’ (Mohamed, 1996, p. 57) rings significantly through Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory (Bronfenbrenner and Evans 2000); a theory which focuses on gaining insight into human development through identifying the circumstances and considering the environmental influences of which a child is raised not just the genetic components.
This essay is about a child’s development and learning, focusing primarily on language development. It will describe the main stages of developmental "milestones" and the key concepts involved for children to develop their language skills, discussing language acquisition and social learning theory. The essay will also look into the key theorists involved in language development, primarily Vygotsky and Chomsky, and how these theories have had an impact on the way society views language and their implementation within schools. The essay will describe the factors affecting language development, both biological and environmental. While also discussing key arguments among theorists, one being the nature vs nurture debate, and how these play a part in the teaching in schools.
I believe that a child’s growth is developmental, and each child needs a secure caring and motivating atmosphere in which to grow and developed emotionally, intellectually, physically, and socially. I believe nature and nurture are the two aspects that influence in child development. Nature and nurture are different in several ways, but they both play an important role in child development. I believe that the environment that a person grows up in has the most influence on child development because children reflect what they are taught and what they learn from the people around them.
... (p. 116). In her article, “Babies Prove Sound Learners,” Sohn (2008), states, “Such studies show that, up to about 6 months of age, babies can recognize all the sounds that make up all the languages in the world” (para.24). B.K. Skinner suggest that the materialization of language is the result of imitation and reinforcement. According to Craig and Dunn (2010), “Language development is linked to cognitive development that, in turn, depends on the development of the brain, on physical and perceptual abilities, and on experiences. Biological and social factors also jointly influence the early development of emotion and personality” (p. 117). In her article, A natural history of early language experience. Hart (2000), states, “Talking is important for children, because complexity of what children say influences the complexity of other people’s response” (para. 1).
... conclusion maturational theorist Arnold Gesell believes that a child will develop biologically and their environment has little involvement in a child’s development. Through a numerous of conducted experiments, he was able to put together and create a schedule of when milestones will occur which is known as the ‘Gesell Developmental Schedule’ where he was able to compare a child’s development to the standard norm. He also created the “Gesell Maturational Theory’, where heredity is of much more importance in their growth and development than the child’s nurturing environment. Gesell’s maturational theory is seen yet till today in a child’s everyday lives, from the time they are in the foetus till our adult life. His theory displays both strengths and weaknesses and other theorists challenging his theory but the debate between nature versus nurture will always arise.
Child growth and development is a process that consists of some building blocks, which are components that combine in an infinite number of ways (Cherry, n.d.). As a result of the variations of building blocks in a child’s development, educators, psychologists, and philosophers have been constantly engaged in the debate of nature versus nurture debate. Many researchers agree that child development is a complex interaction between his/her genetic background (nature) and his/her environment (nurture). In essence, some developmental aspects are strongly affected by biology whereas other aspects are influenced by environmental factors. From the onset of an individu...
When I went back to college last year, it was for the purpose of furthering my education. My plan was to get an associate degree in Early Childhood Education then proceed to a Bachelor’s degree. Along the way, something unexpected happened. While studying Child Growth and Development, I was struck by the biological-maturational theory of Arnold Gesell and Jean Piaget’s cognitive-developmental theory. Is development primarily the result of nature;
The theorist that I chose to give a summary on is Jean Piaget. Piaget believed that there were four stages of cognitive development that every child goes through. These include the sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational and formal operational period. The sensorimotor stage is the first stage in cognitive development. The second stage is the Pre-operational stage. The third stage in his theory is the Concrete operational stage. The fourth stage is his theory is the Formal operational stage. Every child goes through each stage. In the first stage (Birth -2yrs, “Infants and toddlers acquire knowledge through sensory experiences and manipulating objects” (Cherry, 2016, p.1). In the second stage (2-7 years), children can think about different things symbolically and they learn a lot through play. Children can make an object or word stand for something other than just itself and still have some struggles understanding logic. The third stage (7-11 years), children can work out problems within their own head, and begin to think more logically and they better understand their way of thinking through their
¨The environment is critical to the upbringing of a child and if problems exist then the child is most likely to suffer the consequences¨ (Jones). If there are problems in the home or environment of a child, then the child is going to know of them and it is going to affect them. The Social Learning Theory has explained how the social environment can influence a child's behavior (Jones). This is saying that it depends on where a child has grew up, how the child grew up, or what kind of social groups were they exposed to can determine the behavior or influences on their life. The social influences can be a good thing or a bad thing. If the individual is in a bad neighborhood and they see people doing drugs, asking if they want to do them etc. that is a bad social influence that can cause criminal behavior based on social