Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Three language acquisition theories
Three language acquisition theories
Three language acquisition theories
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Three language acquisition theories
Second Language Acquisition Theories (Summarization of Cummins’ and Krashen 's Theories and Implications to ELL) According to Cummins, the first type of communication is Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills (BICS) and it pertains to the social development of a language which can normally be attained fairly quickly within the first few years of acquiring a new language. The social conversations are usually informal forms of communicating where individuals use this type of communicating when speaking or listening to another individual face to face where the vocabulary content is less difficult. The second type of communication is Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency (CALP) and it pertains to the most complex conversations that …show more content…
CUP allows the student to transfer what they already know in their native language to the concepts presented in English therefore, allowing the student to understand the input of another language while still using their native language. Educators can assist an English Language Learner by using the Quadrant model devised by Cummins’ concerning the task difficulties according to context usage. The four sections are based on context reduction or context embedded combined with demanding or undemanding cognition. The student would benefit with context-embedded assignments that include visuals or oral clues more than just a context-reduced assignment where the student would just listen to a lecture without visual clues. The purpose of the Quadrant model is for teachers to commence assignments that are less demanding so that the student can build the confidence necessary to continue with assignments that are more demanding in the …show more content…
Language Acquisition, National Order Hypothesis, Input Hypothesis, Monitoring Hypothesis, and the Affective Filter Hypothesis. According to Krashen’s, language learning refers to a conscious effort to learn a new language while language acquisition is acquired through a subconscious level. The best example I have for understanding the language learning versus the language acquisition is through my personal experience. Before I entered elementary school, my first language acquisition was speaking Spanish because I was surrounded by family members and friends who communicated in Spanish only, and then when I entered the elementary school, I learned and acquired the English language through my social school environment and academic classes in English. I acquired the Spanish language subconsciously because it was a requirement for communicating with members of my family as well as my friends and the acquirement of the English language happened while communicating socially with friends at the school environment and finally I learned the English language through the educational academic classes taken while attending school through a conscious
I think it is important to experience both ends of the communication spectrum in order to really appreciate the benefits of having good communication skills. After observing and writing this paper, it really pushes me to better my own skills, and appreciate those of others.
The aim of this essay is to explore language acquisition and compare and contrast different theories of language acquisition and language development. Language in its most basic form is used to communicate our needs and wants. It encompasses a range of modes of delivery including signing, spoken and written words, posture, eye contact, facial expressions and gestures. So how do we learn ‘language’? Are we born with the skills for communication, or is it something that we have to learn or have taught to us? Four theories are looked at in this essay to determine how children acquire and then develop language. These theories include behaviourist, nativist, cognitivist and sociocultural. This essay will highlight some similarities and differences in each theory and what impact these have on a child’s acquisition and development of language. Lastly we will look at the implications of these theories when working with children. Can a classroom teacher deliver a quality literacy program based on just one of these theories or does it need to incorporate components of all four? Sims, (2012) pp. 21 states ‘’High-quality learning experiences in the early years of life enhance children’s cognitive and language skills’’. This places a great responsibility on educators and teachers alike to provide an environment which is rich in learning opportunities that will encourage both the acquisition and development of language.
If you want to learn English, the classroom is not the best place to pick up the language. Think about when children are learning how to talk. Typically the parents or guardians of the child teach this by acquisition. James Paul Gee defines acquisition in his short story “What is Literacy” as “…a process of acquiring something subconsciously by exposure to models and a process of trial and error, without a process of formal teaching. It happens in natural settings which are meaningful and functional in the sense that the acquirer knows that he need to acquire the thing he is exposed to in order to function and the acquirer in fact want to so function. This is how people come control their first language.” (Gee, 107) Which, miraculously, is the reason why, for most children, their first word is usually Mommy or Daddy. I’m sure this wasn’t because they decided at toddler stage to pick up a book and read the word Mom or Dad. Generally parents constantly reinforce that they are Mommy or Daddy over and over. Which sets up the natural subconscious setting that Gee said is to be where most learning takes place, eventually the child picks up on it and spits out the word. Even when you grow old enough to venture off to school it is the teacher’s job to teach you how to read and write. Really though, English is so much more than strictly reading and writing. In order to fully understand the English language you need to be taught by acquisition. Not only would you learn English more efficiently you will also be introduced to social rules of English that are not talked about in the classroom.
The first of Krashen’s hypotheses is the learning-acquisition hypothesis, which differentiates the two titular terms. According to Krashen, “acquisition” refers to the implicit knowledge we have of a language, whereas “learning” refers to explicit knowledge about a language. Implicit knowledge refers to command of a language as if it were one’s native language; explicit knowledge is what we unfortunately gain in most foreign language classes. One good example of this in Spanish is the phrase “me llamo,” which literally means “I call myself” but is usually translated by Spanish teachers as “my name is....
... theories argue that general cognitive processes language acquisition and that the end result of these processes is language-specific phenomena, such as word learning and grammar acquisition. In learning grammar we learn a phoneme is the smallest part of speech, the sound letters make, syntax is how to put the words together, semantics what the words we are putting together mean and pragmatics being the rules we use when we are in a conversation. "A child's first step in acquiring a language is to take note of the sounds that are use meaningfully in that language." (Zimbardo, and Richard 314) Some language acquisition researchers believe that language acquisition is based primarily on mental structures facilitating the comprehensions and production of language. Children developing a belief as to what words mean, the same way scientist try to develop a hypotheses.
With the increasing popularity of dual immersion programs in schools and the widespread notion that language acquisition is something that needs to happen early on life, is there an ideal age to learn a second language (L2)?
According to the behaviourist theories, language learning was a question of habit formation, and this could be supported or prevented by existing habits. Therefore, the difficulty in dominating certain structures in a second language (L2) depended on the difference between the learners ' mother language (L1) and the language they were trying to learn.
Language connects human beings together by providing them a way to express ideas and thoughts to one another. The continuous growth of interaction between countries requires a need for more multilingual people in the world, and the value of acquiring a second language can provide people with numerous activities not as easily adaptable for monolingual individuals. A major component of linguistics involves grammar, which are the rules of language. Grammar can be broken down into syntax and semantics. Syntax refers to the system of rules that governs how human beings combine words in order to create sentences, and semantics refers to the context of sentences and provides meaning to what it is that a person is saying (Morris and Maisto 260-261). Jacqueline S. Johnson from the Department of Psychology at Cornell University and her research partner Elissa L. Newport from the University of Illinois provided in their case study, “Critical Period Effects in Second Language Learning: The Influence of Maturational State on the Acquisition of English as a Second Language” that, “some investigators have suggested that a critical period theory must predict that children are better than adults at learning second languages” (63). In order to prove or disprove the idea that children are able to better acquire second languages at a higher rate of proficiency than adults, numerous case studies have been conducted comparing early-language learners with late-language learners. Ultimately, what can be determined is that while second language proficiency is at its highest potential among younger children, there are too many possible variables in individual lives after puberty to accurately pinpoint how successfully an older person develops his multiling...
Language acquisition is the process by which humans get the ability to identify and understand language. It is also a process to help create communication thorough words and sentences. All over the world, every minute, every second there is adults and children communicating in different languages. Adult language differs from a child language in many ways; children must learn the process like any other type of learning activity. A question comes to mind, do all children obtain language the same way.
Children’s acquisition of language has long been considered one of the uniquely defining characteristics of human behaviour.
Over the years, many theories and approaches of language acquisition have emerged. Three language acquisition theories can be mainly identified: imitation theory, reinforcement theory, and the innateness theory. As a manner of explanation, the three theories will be briefly described subsequently. Firstly, the main idea in the reinforcement theory is that children learn to speak like adults because they are taught to do so by being praised and otherwise rewarded for doing things properly. In addition, they are helped because parents "correct" them when they make mistakes. In the second place, the imitation theory states that children learn grammar by memorizing the words and sentences of their language. And last but not least, the innateness theory declares that the brain of the human being is genetically predisposed for language. Just as we are made to have two arms and are designed to walk, we are made to talk.
The subtlety of language acquisition has been the most fundamental question in the study of linguistics and human development. From Bow-wow Theory to Yo-He-Ho Theory, the major theories on language origins and learnability emerged at mid-20th century and has been heavily debated ever since. Among them, the idea of universal grammar in which is usually credited to linguist Noam Chomsky, remains the most notable and controversial theory over time. He introduced and developed the t heory from 1950s to 1970s as he proposed and championed linguistic nativism in language acquisition. Chomsky supports that language mastery involves knowledge of linguistic rules and conventions, which he later named that as ‘cognizance’. He believes that cognizance is present in some particular regions in human’s brain where it inherently contributes to the acquisition and usage of language. Such language faculty is the initial root of all linguistic grammatical rules and principles; it is the mental archetype of all languages. To begin with, Chomsky chooses to focus on children’s acquisition of language because children have the least pre-existing knowledge of language compared to adults. Children in this case are the primal study in the innateness of language. By looking into children’s interaction in language acquisition, Chomsky reasons his arguments with “primary linguistic data” where Primary linguistic data is the first-ever language experience in childhood. This learning experience simultaneously interacts and activates the initial cognizance of children, resulting to one’s linguistic knowledge from the exposed language. It is the crucial knowledge for the comprehension of speech and language. By studying children’s language acquisition, it is irr...
Language acquisition is the processes by humans learn to perceive and communicate language as well as being able to produce words and sentences to communicate. It is one of the most essential human traits. First Language acquisition refers to the study of acquisition of first language in children. There are several theories on how children’s acquire such a complex understanding of language from young age. The theories are mainly based on two conflicting sides, namely nature (humans are born with a biological instinct for language built in them) or nurture (humans learn language through social interaction.) ("Language and Linguistics: Language Learning").
Interaction is a significant part of our daily lives. Oral communication with others is inevitable, and therefore it is crucial for us to acquire the skills to do so correctly. Aside from simply stating words or expressing ideas, oral communication serves various purposes. Oral communication allows an individual to express emotions, ideas, and feelings; it gives people the ability to empower, inspire, and motivate those who listen; and it allows people to share knowledge and traditions, as well as build their self-esteem. Oral communication is also useful in leading us to new discoveries, ideas, cultures, and perspectives (O’Neill). Thus, oral communication serves several different purposes in daily life; yet each of these purposes are connected to an even larger purpose. According to the textbook Communication: Making Connections, “Effective communication is critical to living successfully in today’s soc...
Language is the primary medium of communication that it is perceived as an entire system comprised of three parts, cognitive, material and social (Gee & Hayes, 2011). The set of rules that shape the way language is written, spoken, and interpreted are known as cognitive language. Further, material language is something physical that can be seen or heard at a later time, this includes books, writings, recordings and websites (Gee & Hayes, 2011); while diverse and standard linguistics that are spoken and understood reflect social language (Gee & Hayes, 2011). These three branches of language are viewed based on differing individual and social contexts. The standard way of using language as a means of communication is manipulated