Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Observation of city council meeting
Women in politics
Women in politics on the rise
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Observation of city council meeting
I attended the city council meeting for the city I reside in, Riverside. Taking the opportunity over spring break, I was able to attend the meeting on March 27, 2018 and presiding over this meeting was the Mayor, Rusty Bailey. Currently there are no women represented on the council with the caucasian male being the most prevalent demographic making up the local authority. Initially, I conducted a bit of research in the local paper the “Press Enterprise” and found the top issues for the mayoral election. In the article “Riverside: 4 city issues that matter in the mayor’s race,” author Alicia Robinson discusses the stance the incumbent and his five opponents have on them. Due to the fact that, the drive to be either elected or reelected, candidates will focus on the issues that are most pressing to the public voting constituency. Of the four issues addressed in Alicia Robinson’s new piece, the two that are of particular interest to me is what the city will do concerning marijuana dispensaries and the proposed pay raise for the council …show more content…
members. Robinson goes on to state that the incumbent Mayor is against the legalization of the dispensaries as well as the increase of pay for council members. For the reason that, the council would be discussing the cannabis industry in Colorado, I chose to attend this meeting in order to see the arguments and positions presented on the topic of recreational use and private growth of marijuana.
Unfortunately, the topic I was most interested in was going to be the last one on the docket. The meeting itself started early in the afternoon at 15:00. There was one woman who was upset that the clocks in the council room were not set properly to the internet time on her Apple phone. She even interrupted the Mayor when he was opening the meeting and had to be reminded to stay quite until her turn to speak. The familiar way that Mayor Bailey had addressed her led me to assume that she is a regular attendee of the meetings and has had similar outbursts in the past. Afterwards, there was an opportunity for public comment in which a couple people made their opinions known about the council in
general. Next, the agenda moved to an issue that needed to have the council vote. The fist thing that happened was one of the members recused himself from the proceedings due to the familiarity with the petitioners who were trying to get zoning restriction changed for constructing a storage facility. Then the council went into closed session to discuss pending legal actions and lawsuits against the city. Once the council resumed open session it was a pleasant experience to see the Mayor presenting various awards to members of the community. Public comments was opened again after the award ceremonies where the public got another chance to present their views and opinions to the council. The council didn’t comment much on the topics broached by the citizens of the the city.
After reading the case study Welcome to the new town manager, by Mary Jane Kuffner Hirt, I established three major problems the community of Opportunity needed to correct. These problems involved the water & sewer system, the balancing budget, & the pay-as-you-go method. The city manager, Jennifer Holbrook, must implement strategies that would correct these problems quickly.
The municipal restructuring in Ontario from 1996 to 1999, whether voluntary or involuntary, was the most comprehensive process of municipal reforms since the Baldwin Act of 1849 (Frisken 30). After the election of Harris’ Conservative government in 1995, municipal reform took on a life of its own as it was followed with substantial activity between 1996 and 1999 (Sancton 135-56). This research paper looks to categorize, describe and evaluate the substantial activity that took place between the province and its municipal subordinates. While other papers have argued whether the change of the fiscal relationship was to benefit the province or if the structure of local government had simply become outdated, the issues of why the reforms occurred is not the focus of this research. However, what this paper will evaluate is whether the substantial activity made any long-term changes in the system by outlining the numerous reforms and examining their impact. This paper will begin by assessing the financial reform, which was the starting point for more extensive changes, followed by functional, structural and legislative reforms during 1996 to 1999.
In January of 1990, Washington, DC, the seat of the federal government of the United States was turned upside down by scandal. While the headlines were filled with the efforts of the Bush Administration to crack down on drugs, the District's Mayor and symbol of black power against a nearly all white backdrop of authority was caught on videotape buying and than smoking crack cocaine with an exotic dancer two days before he was expected to announce an unprecedented fourth campaign for mayor. The sting was setup and carried out by a Federal Bureau of Investigation unit that had been pursing the frequent rumors of the Mayor's drug dependency.
Abramsky then goes on to discuss in the article how liberal politicians, Betty Yee and Tom Ammiano, are pushing for a bill to change the drug laws and legalize marijuana. Yee wants to excise “fees on business owners applying for marijuana licenses, impose an excise tax on sellers and charge buyers a sales tax” and if that is done the right way, she believes that the state could gain “about $1.3 billion a year” Timothy Lynch, writing in the conservative magazine the National Review, writes about how the drug war has not made very much progress and has essentially failed. Lynch writes about how voters in California, Arizona, Oregon, Washington, Nevada, Alaska, and Maine that have rejected ideas to improve the war on drugs and instead they “approved initiatives calling for the legalization of marijuana for medicinal purposes” (40). Lynch also writes that “the supply of drugs has not been hampered in any serious way by the war on drugs” (41).
One of the issues that were brought up was an upset parent who mentioned that his child suffers from narcolepsy. He was addressing that he wants the school board to help him because he feels as if the principal is penalizing his daughter. He mentioned that the principal mentioned that he will penalize the girl because of her lateness. He also mentioned that the principal refused to acknowledge his daughter’s sickness and how the principal bullied him. Following this one of the members from the board address this issue by mentioning that this issue that the parent has addressed is a personal issue that really should not be mentioned in this meeting. The school board member also mentioned that this should not be acceptable from a principal to be uninvolved. And how no child should be treated like this. He would also mention that this issue will be
Lately it seems that drug policy and the war on drugs has been in the headlines quite a lot. It is becoming increasingly apparent that the policies that the United States government takes against illegal drugs are coming into question. The mainstream media is catching on to the message of organizations and individuals who have long been considered liberal "Counter Culture" supporters. The marijuana question seems to be the most prevalent and pressed of the drugs and issues that are currently being addressed. The messages of these organizations and individuals include everything from legalization of marijuana for medical purposes, to full-unrestricted legalization of the drug. Of course, the status quo of vote seeking politicians and conservative policy makers has put up a strong resistance to this "new" reform lobby. The reasons for the resistance to the changes in drug policies are multiple and complex. The issues of marijuana’s possible negative effects, its use as a medical remedy, the criminality of distribution and usage, and the disparity in the enforcement of current drug laws have all been brought to a head and must be addressed in the near future. It is apparent that it would be irresponsible and wrong for the government to not evaluate it’s current general drug policies and perhaps most important, their marijuana policy. With the facts of racial disparity in punishment, detrimental effects, fiscal strain and most importantly, the history of the drug, the government most certainly must come to the conclusion that they must, at the very least, decriminalize marijuana use and quite probably fully legalize it.
The controversy of legalizing marijuana has been raging for quite a while in America. From some people pushing it for medical purposes to potheads just wanting to get high legally. Marijuana has been used for years as a popular drug for people who want to get a high. All this time it has been illegal and now it looks as if the drug may become legal. There has been heated debate by many sides giving there opinion in the issue. These people are not only left wing liberals either. Richard Brookhiser, a National Review Senior editor is openly supportive of medical marijuana yet extremely conservative in his writing for National Review (Brookhiser 27). He is for medical marijuana since he used it in his battle with testicular cancer. He says "I turned to [marijuana] when I got cancer because marijuana gives healthy people an appetite, and prevents people who are nauseated from throwing up. "(Brookhiser 27) Cancer patients are not the only benefactors from the appetite enhancer in marijuana, but so are any other nauseous people. Arizona and California have already passed a law allowing marijuana to be used as a medicinal drug. Fifty Six percent of the California voters voted for this law. "We've sent a message to Washington," says Dennis Peron. "They've had 25 years of this drug was, and they've only made things worse." (Simmons 111) The Arizona proposition garnished an even wider margin of separation between the fore's an against in a sixty five percent support tally. Ethan Nadelmann insists that " these propositions are not about legalization or decriminalization. They're about initiating some non radical, commonsense approaches to drug policy." General Barry McCaffery disagrees saying, "I...
middle of paper ... ... Should Marijuana Be Legalized? San Diego, CA: Reference Paint, Zoll.
...evision. I feel there are several simple things could be done that would make the meeting more accessible to not only first time attendees but also citizens in general. First of all by giving a very brief introduction to who the Council members are and why they are on the Council, as well as the who the people on the side bars are and what their purpose for being there. Just a brief background, five minutes at the tops, would give a background enough for newcomers to have a basic understanding of what is going on. Another thing that could be done to make it more accessible would be to explain the purpose of the meeting or to give out an agenda at the beginning. By attending this public meeting, I was able to see that the grandeur that is portrayed on television is very fake, but the importance is vastly downplayed.
With an estimated twenty-five million active marijuana smokers in America that consume nearly thirty-one million pounds of marijuana each year, we are missing out on extreme revenue that this country cannot afford to go without for much longer (Krulick). Specialized government funded programs such as Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) cost around $7 billion and are in danger of being defunded to save money (Whitehouse). Marijuana tax revenues exceed $6 billion and would help less fortunate women in need of assistance when they are raising a child. On the state level, Alabama has a projected profit of $8.9 million in tax revenues alone from marijuana sales (Miron). States could increase pay or set up better retirement for police, firefighters, teachers, or any other underpaid public service.
Although Desert Hot Springs mayor, Scott Matos, opposed legalization of marijuana; however, he has put aside his moral stance and focus on what economic benefits will transpire due to the cultivation in the community.
According to USC Section 7206, “Making false statements on a tax return is a felony risking fines and imprisonment for up to 3 years.” This statement, along with Press Secretary Gibbs’ own words, “I think they both (Kellifer and Daschle) recognize that you can’t set an example of responsibility but accept a different standard on who serves,” indicate a presence acknowledged across America: that a social contract exists between the governed and their government and it is being abrogated in favor of the personal interests of our top elected and appointed officials and their respective political parties.
Why is this so important? Well for one how can we improve city funded programs that could be made more cost affective, that could bring us closer together, if we don’t even take the time to see what the city offers, or what they could offer if we were more involved in bringing certain programs needed to our community. What about law enforcement, and everything that it entails for our safety, and maybe how we could be exploited by our own ignorance in being prosecuted. What about public education and the possible loop holes in curriculum being over looked by board officials and parents. The need for new technology in our schools, more schools, class room size the whole nine yards. So we can give our children the education each and every one of them deserve. How and why certain monies get distributed in all facets in taxed payer spending. All of these things effect you and I and the mass populist of Auroranites who probably don’t even know enough too care.
I would like to work as a City Planner in the state of Colorado. On the city website the job description was in full detail and expressed that the city was an equal opportunity employer. I did notice that an additional requirement was a Colorado driver license, which limits it pool base for employees. The city council had no diversity at all, there were only older white council member. This organization doesn’t show any cultural competence skills, even within the city image, there are no pics or African-American or Asians. I couldn’t find anything demonstrating Staff development or the service being
Formal meetings: Meetings can be formal or informal. Formal meetings are pre-planned which required two or more people who have assembled for the purpose of achieving a common goal through verbal interaction.