Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The history of humanitarian intervention
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The history of humanitarian intervention
During my learning interactions, I noticed the theory behind humanitarian, humanitarianism, humanitarian action, history of humanitarianism, humanitarian ethics and the moral values underlying humanitarian principles. As I came across different reading, the act of helping others underlies a long tradition of charitable giving and national solidarity in different societies, as the social values that directly speak to the core principle of humanity. For me, the most significant aspect was how humanitarianism is as old as history. I do associate humanitarianism with compassion and I do believe religious, spiritual, and logical commitments inspired acts of compassion. Barnett (2011) has suggested the three ‘ages of humanitarianism’ in his book …show more content…
The expansion of European power, coupled with the arrival of Christian missionaries, has been linked with the spread of Western thoughts, and within such distinctive political environment, humanitarianism have interacted with Western derived concepts to inform the development of modern humanitarian action. Indeed, looking into the term “humanitarian”, it came into wide and frequent circulation lately in the last decades of the 20th century (Davies, 2012: 1).
At the same time, however, the commonality of humanitarian values and norms should not be underplayed as humanitarian actions are imposed by moral values underlying humanitarian principles. In its broadest and most fundamental form, the essence of humanitarianism can be distilled as the imperative to ‘save lives at risk’ (Barnett and Weiss, 2008: 11) and alleviates the suffering of others.
As Barnett (2011) in his book explores the differences, similarities, and tensions between faith-based and secular organizations, competition for resources become a crucial problem determining the survival or deaths of NGOs after 1990 and this ‘age’ was believed to avoid ‘human rights’ (Barnett,
…show more content…
Most importantly we witnessed there is no easy military solution to the crisis and the options being considered always risk thousands of live and there is no humanitarian space to provide aid and protections to vulnerable groups. It seems military intervention using humanitarian justification is the best example of the new humanitarianism. (Fox, F. June 2000).
After these realizations, I found it more helpful for all humanitarian agencies and humanitarian workers to keep momentum and continued commitment to fundamental humanitarian principles, ethics and value. As Humanitarian principles by which aid workers operate keep us impartial and independent.
In general, I have significantly improved my knowledge of humanitarianism and humanitarian principles and ethical foundations, moving forward this knowledge is essential for me as a practitioner because Humanitarianism is not only about providing aid to the needs of people affected by some forms of man-made or natural disaster ; truly it also is about respecting and governed by
And until we can properly properly deal with the resettlement of refugees and the maintanence of refugee camps, then another criteria should be added for the employment of humanitarian intervention. Criteria for dealing with refugees created by humanitarian intervention should be established and agreed upon, before military force is used. Or, if there are many refugees, then humanitarian intervention should be used to stop the crisis creating the
In his memoir, he invites his audience to gain insight into the need for solidarity in our world, probably now more than ever. His hope is for the reader to develop compassion and gain an understanding of unconditional love. His quest for solidarity is ultimately the main focus of this book. For Boyle,
An Imperfect Offering is a powerful personal memoir from a James Orbinski, a Canadian who has spent most of his adult life in front-line humanitarian work in the world's worst conflict zones. Despite its dark chapters, it is also a hopeful story about the emergence of Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) as a new and independent agent of civil society, and the possibilities of making the world a better place. In “An Imperfect Offering”, James Orbinski tells the story of people who have been harmed by war, and humanitarian workers who have come to heal them when possible. He engages in deep reflection on the nature of humanitarian response and the many threats to this most human activity. He has sharp criticism for governments who act to cause suffering or to prevent its relief. He asks, “How am I able to be in relation to the suffering of others?” His life as a doctor, and a humanitarian worker illustrates this answer. Accordingly, the books main thesis is that humanitarianism is about the struggle to create space to be fully human. However, he illustrates how this struggle is becoming increasingly difficult with the imperfect offering of politics, which has resulted in the blurring of boundaries between humanitarian assistance and the political objectives of military intervention.
As one grows older, certain trends begin to appear that are difficult not to notice. Naivety begins to fade and the harsh realities people are faced with every day present themselves. These realities shape how people perceive and treat others. A certain theme, or rather lack of theme, that is extremely pertinent in today’s society is the notion of humanity. Humanity is defined, by Merriam-Webster, as the quality or state of being humane or having a compassionate disposition. Just Mercy, by Bryan Stevenson, is a book that perfectly embodies the theme of humanity. In this book, the reader follows the author throughout his journey from an idealistic, young lawyer to a revered attorney in his quest for justice for those deemed unfavorable by our
Pictet, Jean. “The Fundamental Principles of the Red Cross: Commentary.” The Fundamental Principles of the Red Cross: Commentary. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 May 2014.
Carl Henry, in his “The Uneasy Conscious of Modern Fundamentalism”, describes the evangelical’s lack of social and cultural engagement in the world as an embarrassing divorce. He laments that the evangelicals has failed to challenge the injustices of the totalitarianisms, the secularisms of modern education, the evils of racial hatred, the wrongs of current labor-management relations, and the inadequate bases of international dealings, they have ceased to challenge Caesar and Rome, as though in futile resignation and submission to the triumphant Renaissance mood. 1 As a result, the Gospel message stands divorced from a passion to right the world. This divorce between the Gospel message and the passion to right the world is related to the fact that modern Fundamentalism does not explicitly articulate the social implications of its message for the non-Christian world. While identifying himself within the premillennialism camp, Carl admits that premillennial thinking regarding the kingdom of God, which holds no hope for changing within society, has induced a pervasive mood of “prophetic despair,” whereas Protestant liberalism is at least concerned to address the problems attending social evil.2 This negligence or abandonment of Christian social imperative has made Fundamentalists to be more world-resisting than world-changing; consequently, out of this mindset it is impossible for any contemporary version of Augustine’s City of God to emerge.3 But this doesn’t have to be the end of the story,
In response to the recent failure of the international community to prevent the famine crisis in the Horn of Africa since July 2011, Suzanne Dvorak the chief executive of Save the Children wrote that, “We need to provide help now. But we cannot forget that these children are wasting away in a disaster that we could - and should - have prevented” she added, “The UN estimates that every $1 spent in prevention saves $7 in emergency spending.” (Dvorak, 2011).
...arly logical examination of the writings of the Christian Church and the Holy Scripture as well as proposing that ‘careful and frequent questioning is the basic key to wisdom and by doubting we come questioning and by questioning it would be possible to perceive the truth.’ Haskin’s interpretations however stem from his historical studies of (especially medieval) institutions. His works reflect the liberal, optimistic 20th-century view of progressive governments he was exposed to during his time as advisor to President Wilson of the United States. Writing in 1927, a golden, ‘roaring’ age, a few years after the conclusion of the First World War, Haskins’ humanitarianism and hopeful ideology was reflected in his history. His bias interpretation was that humanity had always attained intellectual qualities, even before the supposed ‘European Renaissance’ occurred.
Barnett, Michael, and Thomas G. Weiss. Humanitarianism in Question: Politics, Power, Ethics. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 2008.
Thiroux, Jacques P., and Keith W. Krasemann. Ethics: Theory and Practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2009. Print.
The Anglicans and other Christian groups viewed charity differently in the nineteenth century. Each religion had and preached its own concept. We learn that the Anglicans’ views are more in opposition to charity when Cheryl Walsh indicates that, "Through this type of religion, there was very little encouragement for the development of a social conscience—of recognition of any kind of responsibility for the welfare of fellow human beings"(353). Walsh also mentions that Anglicans "Felt neither responsible for the suffering of the poor nor called on to help alleviate that suffering"(353). The belief of not being responsible for the misfortunes of the poor and not attempting to help them in any way draws the notion that Anglicans clearly didn’t favor charitable acts. On the other hand, according to St. Paul, Christianity’s view on charity was more an act of duty than the expected one of kindness.
Peter Singer said; “If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it” (Famine, Affluence, and Morality). As human beings, we have a moral compulsion to help other people, despite the verity that they may be strangers, especially when whatever type of aid we may render can in no approach have a more significant consequence on our own life.
Over the years, human beings have not made the right conclusions when it comes to benevolence. In considering when a decision should be made regarding a fellow human being in need, trivial conditions are used as excuses such as distance, magnitude, and how well you know someone. Considerably wealthy countries have given money but it amounts to a fraction of the costs of their own development of transportation and entertainment. The morality of the situation is skewed in order to coddle the conscience of the inactive. As much as people and governments would like to, they cannot deny what is happening in the world around them. The position taken by Singer is that the way people in wealthier countries respond to situations in which others around them need help due to some man made or natural disaster is unjustifiable. Singer argues that many thinks need to be redesigned—namely, what shapes and affects our definition of morality and our way of life that we tend to take for granted.
To this uncertain world, the Red Cross has been very instrumental in the lives of people. No matter what, even in the worst case scenario, they are always the first one to gives us their hand. The free assistance it renders to the deprived people in beyond any monetary value. The generous donors and volunteers exemplifies the real existence of this organization. This helps in uniting people together in difficult times. Since the first time I fully knew about the Red Cross, I have been extremely enthusiastic about working for it in near future.
The slogan “Give an man a fish…” fetishes notions of self-sufficiency and sustainable development practices in such a way to obscure the potential pitfalls and problematics of such an approach. China Scherz compares two, very different organisations operating in central Uganda . The first, Mercy House, is Franscian mission which follows an ethos of giving to the “needy” indiscriminately and providing for the direct needs of poor and orphaned children . The second, Hope Child adopts the fashionable ethos of “sustainable development” and places emphasis on providing trainings and workshops, and auditing and measuring outcomes . Hope child is popular with donors in the West because it satisfies their beliefs in the importance of empowerment,