Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Equality for black Americans and discrimination
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Washington believes that reconstruction is doomed for failure since the beginning of the period because the people looked to the government on how to act, people being not educated so they wouldn’t be ready for the duties of citizen ship, and the ignorance of the African Americans and their dependence on the government for everything. It was also because of how early it was after the age of slavery but Washington still attempted many different ways to help promote the reconstruction in hopes that one day that African Americans would be considered equals and not just the lower tier of the spectrum. There were too many factors that would hinder the reconstruction as a whole so that it would never be successful. Due to being born a slave, Washington …show more content…
was doomed to being in a resistance state where he doesn’t believe that things can change so fast. Most of his early life was being a slave and working every day. “I was asked not long ago to tell something about the sports and pastimes that I engaged in during my youth. Until that question was asked it had never occurred to me that there was no period of my life that was devoted to play. From the time that I can remember anything, almost every day of my life had been occupied in some kind of labour;” (Up From Slavery) From going to be treated as a slave for years to becoming accommodated to now being considered equals to former slave owners was too big of a jump. Washington believed that education of the masses was important.
He truly wanted for the better good of all of the African Americans in the South because of the knowledge of his past life and how horrible it was. He spoke about it through his Atlanta Compromise which talked about the communities in the South who were switching the focus from the political activities to economic activities, namely land ownership, education, and self-sufficiency. (B T Washington 41) While it’s too early for reconstruction to be perfect, it’s a good start to attempt to make segregation a thing of the past. He urged blacks to stay in the south which is the opposite of what Ida B. Wells suggested. She suggest that if blacks were to face segregation, then they should move to the North to boycott any segregated processes, jobs, and just places in general for being a segregated zone. Washington attempted to have blacks stay in the South and become a mandatory part of the economy. This would mean that if blacks were suddenly gone, the economy would collapse. He believed by staying long enough, they would eventually earn their constitutional rights. He believed that African Americans should eventually be …show more content…
equal. Even though Washington did many things “over the table”, he also secretly helped with racism under the table with his money.
He mentioned that the masses should earn themselves the respect that they deserve if they deserve it. However, he gave money to individuals and organizations that were fighting against discrimination at the time. Washington helped to advance the rights of African Americans with 4000 dollars of his own money which is a fortune back then compared to today’s money. He helped pay against the legislations laws that were intended to degrade African Americans and show inferiority. An example of this would be in the disenfranchisement legislations in Georgia, Louisiana, and Alabama. Washington failed those cases however. He funded lawyers that were fighting against racial exclusion from the juries in Alabama and Texas. He also paid ex-senator Henry W. Blake of New Hampshire to fight against the amendment to the Hepburn railway that supported segregation in interstate travel through the railroads. Washington helped WEB Du Bois’ case against the Southern Railway before the Interstate Commerce for its refusal to sell him a sleeping berth because of his race which is a directly illegal due to the 15th amendment. His biggest success would be the hard-fought and infamous case involving Alonzo Baily. They were a poor farmer that was forced to return to their landowner’s farm after leaving while owing 20 dollars. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that it was
unconstitutional to enslave people by contract and was absolutely a huge victory. (Washington v Du Bois 14-21) That is also directly related to the 14th amendment. Washington firmly believed that for blacks to establish themselves, they had to be informed and educated. Lewis Adams, a black political leader at the time in Macom County, agreed to help two Democratic Party candidates win a local election in return for the building of the Tuskegee institute. After both men were elected, they used their influence to secure approval for the building of the school. (B T Washington 32) “But Tuskegee is, nevertheless, a brand-new chapter in the history of the Negro, and in the history of the knottiest problem we have ever faced. It not only makes “a carpenter of a man; it makes a man of a carpenter.” In one sense, therefore, it is of greater value than any other institution for the training of men and women that we have, from Cambridge to Palo Alto. It is almost the only one of which it may be said that it points the way to a new epoch in a large area of our national life.” (Up From Slavery Introduction) Tuskegee was a good place to start a school. “Tuskegee seemed an ideal place for the school. It was in the midst of the great bulk of the Negro population” (Up From Slavery Chapter 7) Samuel Armstrong, principal of the Hampton Normal and Agricultural Institute, was asked to recommend a white teacher to take charge of the institute. However, he suggested that it’d be a better idea to employ one of his African American teachers instead. That teacher was Washington. Washington truly believed that Tuskegee was a great step in the right direction. Washington’s conserved leadership of the school made it acceptable to the white-controlled Macon County Alabama. ( B T Washington 33-35) He wanted Du Bois, whom Washington thought of as an intellectual individual, to teach at his school. Du Bois denied this offer though and it wasn’t the first time he had to decline either. WEB E. Du Bois was another individual who was growing up in the time of Washington. Du Bois and Washington had conflicting views on many different things. On the subject of education, both Washington and Du Bois thought that education was important. Du Bois on the other hand hasn’t experience racial prejudice to its fullest since he was born in the North after the Civil War had already happened. Du Bois does talk about double-consciousness though. He attempted to view himself through the eyes of a white man and see what other people see in him and through their eyes. This is important in seeing how white people would view him. This unfortunately doesn’t allow him to experience the true harshness of things like the Ku Klux Klan which is very hard to experience through double conciseness. Du Bois was an individual that knew of play at a young age. People encouraged him and to do well in school. This was the opposite of Washington who was born in slavery. Du Bois didn’t know of the African Americans in the South that were entrapped by the new method of slavery named sharecropping. Oblivious to this fact, he thought that African Americans were on an equal footing. They both did believe in education that was important however. Du Bois thought that economically that if blacks were to try their best and work hard, they would earn recognition. He thought this about political rights also. He believed that working hard will earn recognition and places higher up on the system. He wanted to show that African Americans were equal in creativity to Europeans and their creativity could enrich American culture and complement the aggressive commercialism of the twentieth century America. (Washington v Du Bois 79) “The Negro farmer started behind,--started in debt. This was not his choosing, but the crime of this happy-go-lucky nation which goes blundering along with its Reconstruction tragedies” (Souls of Black Folk Chapter 8) That was just relating to the tragedies of the Reconstruction though. Du Bois felt that had Reconstruction continued, it might have formed a school of progressive citizenship for blacks. The Freemen’s Bureau, with a national system of Negro schools, expenditure of money and brains might have formed a great school of progressive black citizenship which would have solved most of the roots of the problems of blacks. Because of the reluctance of Northern Republicans to continue financing the Bureau and Southern Whites continued fierce opposition, it was terminated. (Washington v Du Bois 109) It was a good way to start things off however. Washington believed that due to no education of the his people, the reconstruction period would be a failure. In terms of education, Du Bois believes that Reconstruction was a good thing though and that if it had kept going for a bit longer, then blacks would’ve seen change. Overall, Washing and Du bois have similar ideas regarding educational, economic, and political rights with similar views on leadership in the African American communities. “While Washington’s compromise was attractive to rural African Americans, sharecroppers, and former slaves, it was not attractive to the small number of mostly northern, urban and college educated men and women who at first were willing to see it as a temporary strategy due to the dramatic increase in violence directed against southern rural blacks via bulldozing or lynching. In a public appearance of Washington in Boston, William Monroe Trotter publicly denounced Washington for failing to face segregation. He proposed that since “the policy of compromise has failed…the policy of resistance and aggressions and deserves a trial.” This episode became known as the Boston Riot and Washington had Trotter arrested. At this point, Du Bois gave his support to Trotter who is forced to serve a 30 day jail sentence. (Washington v Du Bois 30-32) After that, Du Bois stopped supporting Washington. In response, Washington said “Dubois is a snob. He favors the “talented tenth” at the expense of the Negro masses. He does not know about the sharecroppers. Nor does he know about the fears of the Negroes in the South where the majority of Negroes live. However, this (the south) is my land. These are my people. “” (Washington v Du Bois 34-36) The general opinion of the middle class negro simply didn’t agree with the views of Washington. Washington’s beliefs were mostly only closely related to the blacks of the South who lived a different life than the blacks of the north and middle class Negroes in the South. In 1905, Du Bois and 58 other black men started the Niagara Movement to oppose Washington’s approach and confront discrimination head on. “Mr. Washington leading the way backward,” Du Bois wrote adding that vocational training meant “every energy is being used to put black men back into slavery.” Washington had a spy in the Niagara movement however and punished its members. His retaliation to the movement was so effective that blacks were afraid to join. The movement died in a few years but it established relationships between important militants. Du Bois and Washington continued to oppose each other until Washington’s death in 1915 when Du Bois would become the most respected African American. Du Bois went on to help find the NAACP for National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. The cause of this finding was during the August of 14 and 15 of 1908 in which whites burned and rioted, killing and injuring many blacks. The town was Springfield that was also the hometown of Lincoln, the person who made the Emancipation Proclamation. Another person in the NAACP was Mary White Ovington. She grew up in a family of abolitionists and a settlement worker among African Americans in New York. The riots in Springfield led to a change in her life convincing her to fight racism. Ovington, William English Walling whom was a millionaire and many other sympathetic whites led to the formation of the NAACP, The person funding the organization was William English Walling. This person, through the connections of Du Bois, was able to fund such a big organization with Du Bois as a leader. (Washington v Du Bois 152-158) Overall, Washington predicted that the Reconstruction was doomed from the start and it’s true because Reconstruction ended before race relations become better. It’s almost a century before race relations become better for African Americans and Washington was right. Both Du Bois and Washington were right in that education, hard work, and generations of time had to go by before race relations would finally become equal.
The North’s neglect and greediness caused the reconstruction to be a failure.The corrupt government, terrorist organizations, unfocused president, and ignorance were also part of the ending of the reconstruction. President Lincoln didn’t want the civil war he wanted to keep the nation together. When Lincoln went into office he wasn't planning on getting rid of slavery nor starting a civil war. Before the reconstruction era was the civil war. Many good things and bad things came from the civil war. The civil war was a war between the North and the South. The war for the north was to end slavery, but for the south it was about rights and liberty. It wasn’t until afterwards that Americans started to notice the good and the bad. Not as many people
Washington was a prominent public figure from 1890 to 1915; many even considered him as a spokesman for the African American Community, especially after the Atlanta Compromise speech in 1895. In his speech, he asked white Americans to help blacks find employment and gain knowledge in the agricultural and technological fields. He did not experience the harsh conditions of slavery. Dubois was raised in a majority white community, and at Harvard University became the first African American to attain a doctorate degree.
“The best way to predict your future is to create it” (Lincoln). President states the principal of Reconstruction, where to unite the United States, there must be an authoritative action to carry it out. The Reconstruction Era (1863-1877) is a period where Lincoln sought to restore the divided nation by uniting the confederates and the union and to involve the freedmen into the American society. The main objectives were to initially restore the union, to rebuild the South and to enact progressive legislation for the rights of the freed slaves. Thus, the executive and legislature branches had enacted a series of polices to “create the future” for the United States. Although the policies tied down to the Reconstructive motive, there was controversy
Born the son of a slave, Booker Taliaferro Washington was considered during his time to be the spokesman of the African American race. Washington believed that if African Americans focused their attention on striving economically, they would eventually be given the rights they were owed. With this in mind, he encouraged blacks to attend trade schools where they could learn to work either industrially or agriculturally. At his famous Atlanta Exposition Address in Atlanta he declared, "Our greatest danger is that, in the great leap from slavery to freedom, we may overlook the fact that the masses of us are to live by the productions of our hands and fail to keep in mind that we shall prosper in the proportion as we learn to dignify and glorify common labor, and put brains and skill into the common occupations of life" (Humanities Washington).
He seemed to have “supported segregation and the disenfranchisement of Blacks,” despite being “involved in politics” while speaking on the “prevention of disenfranchisement” (Seaton 55). Washington did what he believed was best for the helpless Americans, but in doing so, the perception he gave to them and DuBois was that “the white stereotype holds over Blacks and how they are positioned to be aware of it” (Seaton 55). In “The Souls of Black Folk,” DuBois even states about the “distinct status of civil inferiority for the Negro” under Washington’s policy (DuBois 1331). In Washington’s Atlanta speech, his motive was “to show whites that Blacks were making incremental progress and to ease the tension that was building all throughout the country” (Seaton 55). It can be said that Washington was publicly working under the ideology of white-supremacists, compensating them instead of the Black community. On the other hand, DuBois wanted to “integrate the African-American people into the modern affairs of America and allow for them to forge lives and gain inclusion into American society” (Seaton 56). He wanted to include minorities in the “American social body,” whereas Washington didn’t strongly oppose segregation, but only wanted to ease tensions with white-supremacists (Seaton
It was a goal of President Abraham Lincoln’s for Reconstruction to be a very smooth and successful period of time. “With malice toward none, with charity to all,” Lincoln said in his second inauguration speech. He was referring to not only the conflict between black men and white men, but also the hard feelings between the north and south. The southern states had entered the Civil War with such confidence and dreams of independence that many were now humiliated at the idea of having to receive aid from the federal government. President Lincoln’s assassination also put in the country in further turmoil.
Washington should have pursued helping others to get an education by building a school is because it would help people work together. During this time of the school being built there was segregation between races, and Mr. Washington helped both races work together to build this school. Also he would have the chance of both races to work together to raise money for the school to be built. Then he would be able to have both White and blacks to work together to retrieve, build, and fund for supplies for the school.
Washington’s life story was told during the mid to late 1800’s into the early 1900’s, in the time when the Emancipation Proclamation had gone into effect. The Emancipation Proclamation was one major event in history that forever changed our country. All slaves were free and had to go find a new place to live and a new place to work. When the slaves were first freed there was alot ofhostile feelings from the whites towards the newly freed slaves. To blacks living within post- Reconstruction South, Washington offered industrial education as the means of escape from sharecropping and allowed blacks to become self-employed, while owning their own land, or small business.
Washington 's programme naturally takes an economic cast” (Du Bois). Du Bois believed that Washington’s theory was a gospel of Work and Money that ultimately overshadowed the higher aims of life” Later he makes another statement so powerful that should have made all African Americans want to stand up and fight for a better social status and rights for both the South and North. He goes on stating “The growing spirit of kindliness and reconciliation between the North and South after the frightful differences of a generation ago ought to be a source of deep congratulation to all, and especially to those whose mistreatment caused the war; but if that reconciliation is to be marked by the industrial slavery and civic death of those same black men, with permanent legislation into a position of inferiority, then those black men, if they are really men, are called upon by every consideration of patriotism and loyalty to oppose such a course by all civilized methods, even though such opposition involves disagreement with Mr. Booker T. Washington.” (Du
Du Bois, was the competing ideology at the time. Du Bois rose to prominence and became a great African-American leader in his own right around the time Washington was at his peak. Du Bois respected Washington but largely disagreed with his vision of black society and progression. Du Bois was a leader in several radical (at the time) organizations such as the Conference of Negro Problems and the Niagara Movement. (Lecture 9/27). With a background steeped in education, Du Bois also has a significantly different up-bringing than Washington. In part, this may explain some of the differences in their ideologies. In his book, The Souls of Black Folk, Du Bois addresses Washington and his vision directly. Although Du Bois recognizes Washington’s successes and the caution in which Washington has had to employ in the South, Du Bois is still critical of him. “But aside from this, there is among educated and thoughtful colored men in all parts of the land a feeling of deep regret, sorrow, and apprehension at the wide currency and ascendency which some of Mr. Washington’s theories have gained.” (Du Bois, Souls of Black Folk, pg.36). Washington’s Atlanta Compromise received acclaim but the submissive tone and ideology is what Du Bois is critical of. This quote expresses the emotions felt by not just Du Bois but other educated black men and women throughout the country realizing the errors made in the speech. The acclaim the speech received is also an issue here
Dubois provides more details on the whole idea behind the thinking of this scholar and his vision for his people. Per this document, Washington’s speech seems to have shocked the nation to hear a Negro man encouraging his community to work together with the whites with goals of financial security. A first, many Negros struggled with supporting Booker’s vision of the black community not focusing on racial equality but working to gain financial freedoms but eventually it won “the admiration of the North and silenced the Negroes themselves.” Race relations amongst the blacks and whites were filled with a lot of tension which was all related to the little rights afforded to the blacks and the racial inequalities/injustices faced by blacks in
Considering the time, I would have been a Du Bois supporter. Washington’s passive patient approach wouldn’t have satisfied me. Blacks had been oppressed for quite some time and wanted to see change immediately. I’m sure the last thing they wanted to hear was that they should continue doing manual labor, being submissive to Whites, and wait for change. However, Washington was very clever in his “Atlanta Compromise” speech to compare the thirsty sailors in the tale of a lost ship to Blacks as a way of persuading them to better their conditions. Quite the opposite, Du Bois’s character and approach was more in line with my personality. I am a person who likes to see quick results or at least some signs of change along the way to completing my goal. Again, Blacks had been patient long enough. It was time to fight back, and the way to do it was through higher education and the demand for equal rights. Du Bois said it best, “The problem of the twentieth century is the problem of the color
Washington believed that blacks could promote their constitutional rights by impressing Southern whites with their economic and moral progress. He wanted them to forget about political power and concentrate on their farming skills and learning industrial trades.
Madison Washington is completely aware of his placement as a slave in this story, but is in no way letting that hold him back from obtaining his everlasting goal; freedom. He says “I am a slave,-- born a slave, an abject slave, -- even before I was made part of this breathing world, the scourge was plated for my back; the fetters we forged for my limbs. How mean a thing am I” (Part I). However, Douglass communicates Washington's inner feelings, by later writing “But here I am, a man,-- yes, a man!” (Part I). Here it is acknowledged that Washington knows he should be just as equal as everyone else, although the white slave owner is his “superior, and scorns to own him as his master” (Part I).
Though the North won the civil war, the African Americans may not have all seen it as a victory, and rather a loss as their expense. The war seemed to be fought for, or against, slavery. The antislavery party may have won the war but not the slave’s rights that they fought for. Many African Americans felt that the peace had been lost and they had gained no permanent political or economic rights in the postwar period.