Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Homophobia in society
Homophobia effects on individuals
Homophobia in our society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Homophobia in society
Recognition of same-sex relationships
Same-sex relationships have always been a controversial legal issue, and there has been a variety of legal and non-legal responses, coming from a range of different viewpoints regarding the issue. In recent years, there has been many law reforms recognising same sex relationships, which include changes to Medicare, tax, social security, superannuation, worker’s compensation, child support, and allowing people in same-sex relationships to adopt children. These legal reforms come about as a result of extensive lobbying by non-government groups and organisations designed to promote the recognition of same-sex relationships in Australia.
Traditionally, people involved in homosexual relationships have suffered social persecution in Australia, and there was no legal recognition of their relationship. In recent decades however, these social views have changed, and the law has adapted to reflect societies changing opinion of same-sex relationships. While there has been progress in the recognition of same-sex relationships, the ultimate goal of advocates for same-sex relationships is for them to be seen as equal to opposite-sex relationships, in all regards. The main focus point of this aim for equality is the legalisation of same-sex marriage, which is a highly controversial issue, and has proven difficult for supporters of same-sex relationships to achieve.
One of the major problems that same-sex couples fighting for recognition of their relationship faced, was that the modern definition of marriage was derived from the case Hyde v. Hyde and Woodmansee [1866], which states marriage must be:
Between a man and a woman.
Voluntarily entered into.
To the exclusion of all others.
For life...
... middle of paper ...
...get equal legal & financial rights for same-sex couples as opposite-sex couples. It states that while it will not allow same-sex marriage, it provides homosexual de facto couples the same rights that heterosexual de facto couples have.
Article:
Same-sex couples wary of changes to benefits The Sydney Morning Herald, Stephanie Peatling – June 20th, 2009.
Description of article:
This article explains the concerns which people in homosexual relationships have over the change in laws which would make them equal to heterosexual couples. The main concern is that they may be publicly outed as being part of a homosexual couple when they want to keep it secret, otherwise they wouldn't be able to receive the benefits.
Bibliography
www.coalitionforequality.org.au
www.australianmarriageequality.com
The Sydney Morning Herald
Legal Briefs volume 15, Edition 1.
He continues to support the main claim by showing his knowledge of married couples’ legal rights. He explains that homosexual couples that are not allowed to marry are denied tax breaks, group insurance, and pension programs (Stoddard, 1988, p. 551). These are important grounds,...
For some background, this case escalated to the Supreme Court since several groups of same-sex couples from different states, sued state agencies when their marriage was refused to be recognized. As it escalated through appeals, the plaintiffs argued that the states were violating the Equal Protection clause and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Equal Protection, according to the Constitution refers to the fact that, “any State [shall not] deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law…” (23). The opposition of this case was that, 1) The Constitution does not address same-sex marriage as a policy, and 2) The sovereignty of states regarding the decision. Ultimately, and according to the Oyez project, the Court held that “[the Amendment] guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, and that analysis applies to same-sex couples,” and therefore, same-sex marriage is a fundamental liberty.
While the gay rights movement has been around for some time, the things that they fight for is forever changing. Currently it is fighting for the right to marry, and receive all the rights straight people get when they marry. Married privilege is like white privilege; married people have more rights then non-married people, no matter what sex a person is married to. These benefits include insurance coverage’s under a spouse policy, social security benefit inheritance, receiving pension and personal assets without taxation, visitation rights at the hospital without question and making health care decisions (LaSala, 2007). In addition to all that, there is a social benefit to being married; it represents a healthy, developed and normal relationship (LaSala, 2007). Before reading this article, I never thought about why married people are given all of these rights. I never thought about where they came from, who made them up, or why they were even made. Why are we fighting for legalizing same-sex marriage a...
Same-sex couples are not the only couples changing. Heterosexual marriages are undergoing large transformations due to gender roles and expectations. In 1981, 90% of women by the age of 50 were involved in a marriage (Canadian Social Trends, 2007). What is more astonishing is, in 1981, 1 out of 1000 marriages ended in divorce and in 2006 the census recorded out of 1000 marriages 120 resulted in divorce (Canadian S...
In today’s society, the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) community has been more accepted then in years prior, especially in the 1960’s and years prior to that, when anyone in the LGBT community would be horribly ridiculed, if not tortured. However, there still lies a long road for the LGBT community, as it pertains to human rights, equality, and particularly, marriage equality. Each individual has their own perception on marriage equality, whether it is based on moral basis, or on a humanistic (humane) basis, which is the belief of not denying anyone the right to be who they are, and therefore love who they love. However, as a society, we must examine the facts, as well as ourselves, as we address the debate for marriage equality for the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender community.
It is a step forward in being a more free country than before. It means being able to do the same things as heterosexual married couples. To many same-sex couples, it isn’t fair to have to use another term (civil union or domestic partnership) for the same legal union as heterosexual couples or to have to call their spouse a “partner” rather than “husband” or “wife.” It’s seen as a form of segregating or discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Like with the “separate but equal” doctrine that segregated people on the basis of race, same-sex couples are given a separate and supposedly equal alternative. These alternatives are not completely equal though so that creates an
Gay marriage is currently legal in a small percentage of counties worldwide. For many, marriage is seen as a unique relation between a man and woman, with the purpose of having and raising a family. In the past, interracial couples faced complications when they attempted to marry. However, nowadays some same sex couples are on the same path to legal and social acceptance of gay marriage, that interracial couples face. However, gay marriages need to be recognized by the government in order for the couples to enjoy all of the rights and responsibilities generally given to marriages of the opposite sex couples. There are no significant restrictions of marriage that include race or religion. Gender is currently the only defining characteristic required for couples to be legally married in most pl...
Heteronormativity is the representation and perpetuation of heterosexuality as being the only ‘normal’ and ‘natural’ form of sexual expression (robinson). In Australia this was the dominant mode of thinking up until recent times and, this had a profound affect on how the Australian family was structured. The nuclear family, as an ideal model had the representation of heterosexual marriage as the backbone of the true and affective family (changing face). Over recent years the stigma surrounding homosexuality has been lifted through a process of insight and interaction and, has seen the various forms of sexual expression be, on the whole accepted as just as valid as heterosexuality. This social progression has been reflected in Australian families and their structures.
Marriage Equality in Australia is surrounded by a lot of controversy and raises human rights and federal law issues, as well as social, religious, moral and political questions. The LGBTI community in Australia has been fighting for years for equal rights for their community but are continuously faced with stiff opposition from the government and religious institutions. To understand the issue of Marriage Equality it is important to understand the varying viewpoints, the current situation for the LGBTI community in Australia and why marriage is so important for this community and Australia. I believe that there is no argument powerful enough to deny the LGBTI community the right to marry who they love, and once one takes a close look into the situation you can see how having the same rights and protections of marriage affect the physical and emotional lives of these people.
In addition to this, we are now more accepting of the same sex relationships as a result of the recent introduction and legalisation of the same sex marriages. However, there ...
This presentation was about the ongoing state of LGBT+ rights in Australia. This country is considered first world; however, the gay population suffer a lot of discrimination. Usually, most traditional families do not recognize their gay sons, and this is one of the reasons why they hide their sexuality. In addition, this minority is not allowed either to have a legal marriage or adopt a child. Consequently, the LGBT+ people do not receive benefits from the government and they have a high rate of suicide and depression.
This public policy was mainly disputed in the judicial branch, as marriage is already natural right given to the people. However, same sex marriage was never included in the original terms of marriage. Same sex marriage became a big debate for a great number of years until it was finally legalized all over the US following the Obergefell vs. Hodges case in 2015. Conservatives who were against its legality argued; “It’s been traditionally defined as between a man and a woman” “the purpose of marriage is for procreation, same sex couples can’t create children” or even “Children need both a mother and a father.”
... the past several years is the same-sex family. Since the sexual revolution of the 1960’s, changing attitudes have brought more tolerance to the gay and lesbian community. This has somewhat loosened the stigma previously associated with this segment of the population. Along with evolving public attitudes, economic and legal changes in the United States have also reduced barriers previously facing same-sex couples making it more likely for them to form families (Butler, 2004). On the other hand, continued strong institutional ties to marriage between one man and one woman continue to pose problem for this group and shape social agendas (Glenn, 2004; Lind, 2004). While several states and many employers have given recognition and benefits to homosexual partners, there is still no uniform policy in place which addresses their familial rights in the United States.
Furthermore, the word "equal" in section 1 of the 14th amendment implies that everyone should have the right to get married no matter what his or her sexual preference. Marriage is the legal and public documentation of the love and trust two people share for each other. This means that anyone should be able to marry whomever he or she wishes.
...same-sex marriage often argue, everyone has the equal right to marry any consenting adult of the opposite sex. In a state that has not legalized same-sex marriage, homosexuals have equal rights in marriage as heterosexuals, but such a law is still discriminatory based on sex. These are just a couple of many ways in which men and women might be treated differently, but equally in modern Western society.