More handpicked essays just for you.
Comment on civil disobedience
Non-violent civil disobedience and civil rights movement
Comment on civil disobedience
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comment on civil disobedience
We have the power to change the law, the decisions that our country makes, and the progression of our path to the future. Raphael Lemkin is a prime example of someone who has committed his life, even when he was standing alone, to make a difference and change our course in nature. He believed that “if you act in the name of conscious, you are stronger than any government in the world.” Raphael Lemkin knew that by understanding genocide, this will not only hold those in high power accountable for committing it, but also help the world prevent it. With extreme dedication, he alone was able to coin the word ‘genocide’, driven the United Nations to adopt a human rights treaty, and moved twenty countries to ratify the genocide convention. He wanted to prevent another terrible mistake before it was too late. …show more content…
We learn to respect the law but when the law is unjust, we fight for what is right, seen through civil disobedience, nonviolent resistance, and social movements. Now, it can be achieved on a higher scale with the internet world as the foundation. The millennials have a different perspective than the older generations because we do not have a geographic barrier. We have a window into the lives of people around the world, influencing our perspectives and allowing us to exchange ideas from all walks of life. As a result, we embrace diversity, support international cooperation, and we know that our current problems are not limited to our borders. It is within this beautiful technological age that we also become the voices for the forgotten and those who fell victim to
In conclusion, Carr and Gladwell’s essays have proven that the internet positive effects are outweighed by its negative effects. Carr has found he is unable to finish a full text anymore or concentrate. He thinks that the internet has taken our natural intelligence and turned it into artificial intelligence. Gladwell discusses how nowadays, social activism doesn’t have the same risk or impact as former revolutions such as the Civil Rights Movement. The internet is mostly based on weak ties based among people who do not truly know each other and would not risk their lives for their
Action is the only remedy to indifference, the most insidious danger of all.” Elie Wiesel asserts that the world community is responsible to interfere when acts such as mass murder or genocide occur. He says that “silence encourages the tormentor” and “indifference is the most insidious danger of all”. One must speak out against oppression so there can be a difference. When one remains silent and doesn’t act, they are encouraging the person responsible for the genocide, not the victim.
Stanton, Gregory H. "Genocides and Conflicts." World Without Genocide. World Without Genocide, 7 May 2013. Web. 14 Apr. 2014. .
Genocide is a pressing issue with a multitude of questions and debates surrounding it. It is the opinion of many people that the United Nations should not get involved with or try to stop ongoing genocide because of costs or impositions on the rights of a country, but what about the rights of an individual? The UN should get involved in human rights crimes that may lead to genocide to prevent millions of deaths, save money on humanitarian aid and clean up, and fulfill their responsibilities to stop such crimes. It is preferable to stop genocide before it occurs through diplomacy, but if necessary, military force may be used as a last resort. Navi Pillay, Human Rights High Commissioner, stated, “Concerted efforts by the international community at critical moments in time could prevent the escalation of violence into genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or ethnic cleansing.”
In the 2013 TIME magazine, Joel Stein has conducted an article on the Millennial generation entitled, “The New Greatest Generation.” In this article, Stein examines the perception that older generations hold to millennials. In the first couple pages of his article, his scrutinizing comments on this generation are extremely off putting to anyone who identifies with being a millennial. Stein leads the reader to think he agrees with the old get-off-my-lawn generation. That is until the last two pages of the article. Stein uses rhetorical devices like Ethos, Pathos, and Logos to re-evaluate the perceptions on the younger generations, and to say that “millennials could be a great force for positive change.” (Stein 11,)
“A new generation, well educated, connected, inspired by universal values and a global understanding, has created a new reality for us. We have found a new way to express our dreams: these young people who have now restored self-confidence… empowered us to go down to the streets.” (Khanfar 2011)
The piece also shows how millennials are fighting back against these improper perspectives, by bringing light to the hypocrisy in the previous generation’s arguments against them. As Alex Pearlman writes on the subject of millennials being unmotivated to
Millennials are often derided wrongfully for being lazy and entitled. On the contrary millennials are quite charitable and making changes in the world politically socially and economically. Despite the common narrative, Millennials are more than capable of changing the world through philanthropy, ethical consumption and politically.
My generation finds it hard to escape the flashing headlines, on television, our phones, the internet. Faster than other generations whose news was limited to the daily paper, we have matured, become more aware of the world around us, losing our innocence in the process. We can’t escape the violence and hostility occurring all over the globe, we can no longer feign ignorance and trap ourselves in a bubble. We can not simply ignore the obvious demarcation in our communities.
Many times we ask why nobody did anything to stop such horrific events from happening. Actually, many people said that this would never happen again but this is not the case. Since the Holocaust we have seen several examples of how the general public sometimes refuses to acknowledge the occurrence of events and how the government often has little political will to stop mass murders until it is too late. One example of this that occurred not too long ago is the Rwandan Genocide. In 1994, between half a million to a million Rwandan Tutsi as well as thousands of moderate Hutu, were exterminated in the clearest mass murder case since the Holocaust. The world stood back and observed as the murders took place. Samantha Power, in the book she wrote, A Problem From Hell: America and the Age of Genocide1,and her article The Atlantic Monthly, “Bystanders to Genocide: Why the United States Let the Rwandan Tragedy Happen,” Power writes “The story of U.S. policy during the genocide in Rwanda is not a story of willful complicity with evil. U.S. officials did not sit around and conspire to allow genocide to happen. But whatever their convictions about ‘never again,’ many of them did sit around, and they most certainly did allow genocide to happen.”2 Samantha Power's writing shows that the U.S. government knew enough about the genocide through early warnings but nevertheless because they lacked political will to do anything about it they passed up many opportunities to end the rain of terror.3
“This generation has also grown up with a global mind-set. Half the people in the world are currently under thirty, and through technology have always been connected to other cultures, nations and world events”. (Bordas, 146) As Bordas points out, it is the millennials who are bringing not only renewed faith, but stewardship/activism in the forefront. For the community as well as the earth.
The "Information Superhighway", or internet, is a powerful medium for today's information driven society. From it's humble beginnings as a series of networks established to help the military and government share resources, it has become a place for people to engage in commerce and also for people to interact socially in both business and personal faculties. Along with the excellent opportunities for meaningful communication in this new atmosphere, <cite>the Internet has evolved as an open, democratic cybersociety marked by free speech and volunteerism. It is a community gathering place for people to share ideas, concerns, stories and opinions, and to give help and assistance to one another.</cite> (Mills-Scofield) There has also arisen a series of problems. Whenever any major development in society is conceived, such as when telephones were introduced, problems ensue. The Internet, because of it's modern nature is not really well dealt with when it comes to existing ethical and moral issues. Being that the Internet has fostered a new class of community that requires a unique category of moral values and ethical considerations. Things are always going to be dealt with differently when it comes to any revolutionary type of medium. For instance how can interstate trade be regulated by the federal government when it is electronically transmitted information? It is a whole new category, How could the constitution have predicted? Although there are many differences, <cite>The Internet mirrors today's society to a large degree, with its blend of good and bad. Many of the issues facing the U.S. and the world, such as those related to race or gender, for example, are also issues on the Internet. And various subcultures, such as militias, GenX and philosophical movements, are represented.</cite> (Mills- Scofield) They go on further to say, <cite>Like all societies, the Internet has its unwritten rules--its"netiquette.
In his May 2013 editorial for Time Magazine, “Millennials: The Me Me Me Generation,” Joel Stein explains his viewpoint on millennials, defined as people born 1980 through 2000. Using an occasionally humorous tone, Stein summarizes the typical bleak view that older people have for the younger generation, before offering what he believes is closer to the truth. In the end, he decides that while millennials are not without their flaws and vices, a lot of the fears that older people are mostly due to the advanced technology that we are now dealing with. By the end of the article, it is my opinion that Stein makes a very fair summarization and is correct in his idea that to write off the entire generation is unfair towards younger people.
We blame the millennials for their behavior and their different characteristics compared to previous generations; however, what if we stop looking at the millennials and start looking at the reasons that they behave sensitively? Each generation contains their differences, including the way they educate the next generation. We continuously judge the millennials behavior, but we rarely judge the people who influenced this behavior. Education has changed throughout the ages, not to mention the parenting skills that vary from generation to generation, which has affected the millennials way of interacting in the world. Millennials grow up believing that they are imperative, that they are secure, that the world will conform to their generation, and that the world is a “nice” place. This teaching, causes millennials to be sensitive babies early on in life. True, millennials have the freedom to act the way they want; nevertheless, like other generations, millennials will act the way that parents and other influences taught them to behave. The millennial generation should not be liable for their
There is a generation that is 80 million strong who is the start of a new millennium. The people of this generation are called the Millennials. Many think of them as closeminded, faulty and not fit to run the major cooperation’s of the world someday, yet the true identities of this group are just starting to be revealed. Millennials can easily and thoroughly understand the new advances in technologies. They are also the most diverse and open minded generation yet. They show a lot of potential and could someday change the world for the better. A writer for Time magazine, Joel Stein, does a wonderful job describing the millennials for who they truly are in his article “The New Greatest Generation.” While Stein agrees with Twenge in that millennials show faults, he maintains that their faults have potential to make them the next greatest generation. Despite the negative connotations millennials receive, they often have the ability to be resourceful with the technology, open-minded to the diversities the world displays and have a lot of potential.