Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Characteristics of culture in international business
Organizational structure
Organizational structure
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Characteristics of culture in international business
The Radiant Spirit is one of the largest cruise ships under the Spirit Cruise line. The cruise ship’s staff is rather small, consisting of only five staff members of whom two are female and three are male. The Radiant’s management operates under bureaucratic control, meaning that the organization and its individuals are subject to systematic rules. Included in this military styled structure is the directive for the Radiant’s employees to ask questions or file complaints directly to their cruise ship director, who, in turn will contact headquarters regarding these concerns. Although this hierarchical structure is suitable for many organizations, it isn’t fitting for the Radiant’s team-based structured organization.
It is imperative that those
…show more content…
Additionally, concertive control maintains group identification by discipline. The first part of implementing concertive control would be to give everyone on the team equal importance. Once every employee has an equal voice, the team needs to meet and decide specific values and structures for the team to abide by. For example, the women of the group could ask for a guideline to help stop sexual harassment. So instead of the practice of harassment being “just the way things are,” the team decides on consequences if the offensive behavior continues. These rules will be the guiding force that allows all team members to share the same ideology. By allowing team members to cultivate these rules together, the ideology will shift to one that is more agreed …show more content…
Positive and/or negative feedback can drastically change an employee’s job performance by keeping them on task and motivating them to be more involved, and allowing them to more positively identify with the organization. The Radiant Spirit’s cruise staff currently receives employee evaluations through commentary cards that the cruise ships passengers leave. The passenger’s comment cards are then collected by the director of the Radiant to evaluate the performance of each employee. Furthermore, the director determines the possible employee promotions or demotions based on feedback left by the cruise ship’s passengers. By changing the ship’s current evaluation system to 360 feedback, using a combination of feedback from passengers and supervisors, the crew could potentially increase their job performance by 68%. By taking into account two different perspectives on the employees’ performance instead of just one, the supervisors can determine whether the employee is actually doing a poor job or if the passenger was being
Abrashoff shares the valuable management skills he developed and effectively illustrates examples of how one can translate the same success in today’s businesses. Highlighting key concepts such as: see the ship through the eyes of the crew, communicate purpose and meaning, lead by example, and build up your people. The vivid examples he uses from his naval history make the reading interesting while educational. It’s Your Ship is a great book for any manager wanting to learn more on effective ways to better manage his employees.
Son, S. (2015, January 14). The Pros And Cons Of Employee Feedback Surveys. Retrieved from
The performance assessment and appraisal forms are crucial within the performance management system (Aguinis, 2014). However, the appraisal form within the case study provided is designed for the supervisor’s use thus missing one vital factor throughout the entire process, employee participation. Thus, questioning the validity and reliability of the process. This is especially concerning as the bottom 10 per cent of employees are being fired and the top 20 per cent are being rewarded with $5,000.00 based on what their supervisor records on the form without consultation with employees. Thus, supervisors may not provide accurate scores as they do not have to justify their responses (Aguinis,
The data from the organization analysis on The Floating Design Shipbuilding demonstrates that the employees perceive that processes and procedures relating to the non-governmental employees have contributed to a culture of unfairness. Among the areas of unfairness, the employees cited includes: performance goals, performance evaluation and rewards, management favoritism, distribution of status and perks, and management’s selection and hiring practices.
In The Spirit Level, Wilkinson and Pickett’s research shows that there is a strong connection between a rich country's level of economic inequality and its social consequences. They write, “The problems in rich countries are not caused by the society not being rich enough (or even by being too rich) but by the scale of material differences between people within each society being too big. What matters is where we stand in relation to others in our own society” (pg. 25). Status is measured and symbolized by indicators of conspicuous consumption in an economically unequal society. Using the theory of the social evaluative threat to drive their analysis they show how being status-conscious in a highly unequal society produces a social anxiety
Even a casual observer who looks at the world can see that inequality exists in society. But what exactly does inequality do to a society? Is inequality a result of multi-factored social mechanisms, or does inequality itself cause the social issues? Furthermore, while people see that inequality exists, they may not know where to begin in repairing societies defects. Richard G. Wilkinson, author of The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger, rightly argues that inequality is the acting social factor that divides society. To support this claim, Wilkinson presents data from various studies which draw an inverse correlation between the level of inequality and the height of social cohesion. His analysis shows that inequality
Clear lines of responsibility and control functions are clear. Disadvantage of hierarchical Too many layers in the group, it is difficult and time consuming to communicate between employees. Decision making are not quick enough to react to the market. A role culture is adopted in Rolls Royce Group. ... ...
When we think of the word team, individually many different ideas may come to mind about what a team really is. Some may think of an NFL team (Tennessee Titans), an NBA team (Sacramento Kings), or a NASA astronaut team with such pioneers as Edwin Aldrin, Jr. and Neil Armstrong as members. You might even think of the U.S. Navy, Air Force, Army, Coast Guard, or Marines as teams. In fact they all are, and they have a great deal in common as teams. However, for the purposes of this paper I will examine the characteristics of work teams, as they apply to organizations and I will supply answers to the following questions: What is a team? Where did the team concept come from? What are the types of teams? What are the advantages and disadvantages of having teams in organizations? What does it take to make a team effective?
A team is a group of people who work in tandem to achieve a common outcome (Chatfield, 2011). A common type of team found in the workplace is self-managed teams (SMT). A self-managed team empowers employees to manage the day to day functions, operations, and tasks of a specific job area with little or no supervisory oversight or intervention. In other words, it is a self-contained unit (Williams, 2011). For example, self-managed teams handle work direction, job assignments, trouble-shoot problems, and handle all of the decision making aspects of the job (Silverman,1996). Moreover, companies that have used SMTs report an increase in productivity and quality, increased employee morale, creativity, job satisfaction, and a decrease in absenteeism (Silverman, 1996). Also, a 1990 study by Cohen (1993) found that forty-seven percent of Fortune 1000 companies used SMTs with some of their workforce. In two years the number of SMTs increased to sixty percent. Thus, the prevalence of SMTs in organizations can be contributed to its tangible outcomes.
Performance appraisal is perceived by most as a tool to reward or penalize employees for their good or bad work respectively by the end of a year. This notion is a challenge in itself to deal with. The whole exercise becomes dull for both supervisors and their subordinates and they tend to look at it as an additional responsibility which they have to finish. In the end, there is little or no value addition for either the employee or the organization. There are, however, better ways of looking at and conducting performance appraisals. It can give much needed feedback to both performers and laggards to improve upon and if done properly can even boost their motivation. More importantly, they provide a chance to employees to have a say in their goal setting and thus aligning it with the departmental and organizational goals. Also, the process itself has a value in team making.
One of the more important contributes to effective communication is feedback because without feedback, there is no certain way of knowing that what was said is received and understood. By implementing a feedback system, in which input is a required part of the job may help the communication within a workplace. Feedback can be positive or negative and both are important to the communication process because positive feedback encourages the sender to continue sending messages whereas negative feedback informs the sender that the receiver is not interested or pleased with what is being transmitted (Wallace & Roberson, 2009). Having a feedback system can ensure that everybody is given the opportunity to express opinions, concerns, or
The work community has several members, it is vital that these individuals act as a group, so that the common goal was achieved. This section describes the team, the team's importance, team building and why before-mentioned issues are important. This section also takes place through the cases and at the end of the self-evaluation.
The Importance of Group Work in Today's Organizations. It could be argued that in order to be successful, modern organisations must actively develop strong and cohesive work groups. Why do you need to be a member? Is it true that there is no room for the individual in today’s organisation? The rapid progression and improvement in information and communication technology has led to modern organisations finding new ways to work.
Although performance is a major objective at top organizations, successfully addressing poor performance is also a key focus. Although many employees feel or dread performance appraisals they are directed to enforce clarity with individual employees day-to-day work-load, performance appraisals develops responsibility while making employees accountable for performance expectations, reinforces future career planning, helps the organization with determining training needs, and provides a stem of documentation for legality purposes. Performance management in detail is much broader than many employers, and employees assume and necessitates so much more. Proficient appraisals should represent a summary of on-going dialogue. Focusing only on an annual performance evaluation leads to misrepresentation of the performance management process in its
Grubb, T. (2007). "Performance Appraisal Reappraised: It's Not All Positive." Journal of Human Resource Education. Vol. 1, (No. 1,): 1-22.