Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial profiling and its effects on society
Negative effects of racism
The causes and effects of racial profiling in law enforcement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Racial profiling and its effects on society
In the past few years, racial profiling has become a very prominent issue in American society. In “Racial Profiling,” “Racial Profiling is a controversial and illegal discriminatory practice in which individuals are targeted for suspicion of crimes based on their ethnicity, race, or religion rather than on evidence-based suspicious behavior” (Para. 11). Many people are wronged because of this phenomenon and effects many of them in multiple ways. Racial profiling is effecting many people and it needs to be addressed. In general, there are many different groups affected. “While African Americans have historically been the targets of racial profiling, they are not the only community affected by this practice. It affects groups such as Native …show more content…
“When officers use the color of a person’s skin without using other identifying factors, they are guilty of Racial Profiling.” (Para 11). Therefore, if a cop uses the color of a person’s skin, the way they dress, or their religious preference as a basis for that person’s arrest without good reason, the officer is at fault for any wrong doing to the person they are targeting. Since this is the case, steps are being made to enforce the end of Racial Profiling. Democratic Senator Benjamin L. Cardin of Maryland is already working on pushing a policy called the End Racial Profiling Act. “First, the bill prohibits the use of racial profiling—using a standard definition—that includes race, ethnicity, national origin, or religion. All law enforcement agencies would be prohibited from using racial profiling in criminal or routine law enforcement investigations, immigration enforcement, and national security cases” (Cardin Para 9). This bill would enforce law enforcement agencies to get rid of any practices that would encourage racial profiling and help bring in new policies to avoid it in the future. People are making a difference in how much power police have over innocent …show more content…
The consequences of racial profiling can be emotional, psychological, financial, physical, and can even lead to the loss of life. Emotionally, the person may think they did something wrong without knowing it, causing them to be wary and nervous around law enforcement in the future. While psychologically, they may be paranoid to go out and do the same things again in fear of being arrested or harassed by officers. Targets may even begin to financially falter by attempting to go out of their way to change the way they dress, the car they drive, or even by having to pay any unnecessary fines or tickets they may have acquired. Racial profiling can lead to physical altercations between law enforcement and citizens resulting in the target being charged with crimes that were brought on by consistent harassment or unnecessary violence. Sometimes these altercations even end in death. An example of this would be Eric Garner, who was put into a chokehold by an officer and died of asphyxiation soon after, despite pleading with the officer and telling him that he couldn’t breathe. He was suspected of illegally selling cigarettes. His death was ruled a homicide. (Sanchez Para 4.) Soon after the occurrence, there were riots and protests against the police. This is only one of many examples out there. There was no reason for the officer to have put Eric Garner into a choke hold. Garner’s mother was given $5.9 million in pretrial
One of the biggest reason stop-and-frisk should be abolished is in hopes to decrease such blatant racial profiling that has been going on under the name of “stop-and-frisk”. In 2007, 55% of the people stopped in New York were blacks and 30% were Hispanic (“Update: Crime and Race”). When checked again in 2011 a total of 685,000 people were stopped by the police of that 685,000, 52.9% were African Americans, 33.7% were Latino, and 9.3% were white (“Racial Profiling”). There is a story of an innocent victim of the stop-and-frisk policy, a man by the name of Robert Taylor. Police in Torrance stopped the elderly man and claimed he fit the description of a suspect that was linked to a robbery. But there was one simple problem; Taylor is a light complexioned, tall, 60 year-old man and the suspect was believed to be a short, dark complexioned, stocky man in his thirties; nothing like Taylor at all (Hutchinson). His shows that the police do not always stop people based on the right reasons, they tend to stop people based on the color of thei...
Racial profiling is a wide spread term in the American justice system today, but what does it really mean? Is racial profiling just a term cooked up by criminals looking for a way to get out of trouble and have a scapegoat for their crimes? Is it really occurring in our justice system, and if so is it done intentionally? Most importantly, if racial profiling exists what steps do we take to correct it? The answer to these questions are almost impossible to find, racial profiling is one of many things within our justice system that can be disputed from any angle and has no clear cut answers. All that can be done is to study it from different views and sources and come up with one’s own conclusion on the issue.
The key to understanding racialized profiling is to understand what systemic discrimination and profiling mean. Systemic discrimination sometimes called systemic racism is defined as, “Patterns and practices… which, although they may not be intended to disadvantage any group, can have the effect of disadvantaging or permitting discrimination against… racial minorities” (Comack, 2012, p30). Profiling in policing is defined as,
Racial Profiling can happen to anyone, anywhere such as the streets, in the airports, or even just walking home. Racial profiling and the media influence an individual’s perspective on a trial. Racial Profiling is using someone’s race or ethnic background as suspicion for committing a crime. Evidence from past trials dating back to 1920s Sacco and Vanzetti trial to George Zimmerman’s trial in 2013 prove that racial profiling has existed for nearly a century. According to the article “The Quiet Racism in the Zimmerman Trial” by Steven Mazie, he states
Racial profiling in America, as evidenced by recent events, has reached a critical breaking point. No longer can an African American, male or female, walk into a store, school, or any public place without fear of being stereotyped as a person of suspicion. Society constantly portrays the African American
Over the past centuries, Black community in Toronto have encountered and persisted violence and discriminations in many different ways. Racial profiling and carding are the two major roots of police brutality. Police officers often have biased perceptions and negative feelings about certain races. Carding can be defined as random police checks that target young African-Canadian men. Police might detain a driver for driving a specific type of vehicle or driving in certain areas that they have assumptions about. “This practice was a systematic violation of the rights of people in our communities, especially of racialized youth” (CBC ABC National, June 1, 2015). Carding results in police abusing their power which leads to assaults, shootings and death. However, police have said
There has always been racial profiling in our history. The problem here is that at some point the ones who are oppressed and discriminated sooner o later will claim why they are treated unequally. There are many examples around the world, but one only has to take a look at how the American society has been designed to realize the great difference between individuals. It was even normal and acceptable to see these differences during the creation of this nation because the ones who supposedly had the power and knowledge of conquering made sure to create a huge division between leaders and subordinates.
Law Enforcement policy is designed to help law enforcement agencies cut down on the amount of crime in communities and give structure to the agency. It also helps lessen the number of certain cases in certain areas, as well as from a certain group of people. There are several policies that I disagree with, but there is one policy I will be discussing. Law enforcement officers sometimes stop and frisk people based on gender, race, financial status, and social ranking. It is a very controversial issue because anything dealing with race and ethnicity can cause a lot of disagreement and discord. According to a New York judge on dealing with the stop and frisk laws, "If you got proof of inappropriate racial profiling in a good constitutional case, why don't you bring a lawsuit? You can certainly mark it as related . . . . I am sure I am going to get in trouble for saying it, for $65 you can bring that lawsuit" (Carter, 2013, pp.4). The stop and frisk law is one reason I do not believe in law enforcement profiling. Even though some law enforcement officers allow personal feelings and power to allow them to not follow policy, some policies are not followed morally because I do not feel that officers should be allowed to frisk someone who is innocent and has not committed a crime because it takes the focus off real criminals and onto innocent people; it causes emotional stress. I know because I have been through this several times.
Bad economic results can occur when racial profiling is accepted and urged to be used. Matthew Rothschild states, “Better to take nonviolent action and press our case with boycott”(3).Rothschild is referring to Arizona’s SB 1070 immigration law that allows local law enforcement the power to ask any suspect for proof of citizenship. This law outraged many people and city also took offense to this new law. Rothschild also goes on to state, “San Francisco is leading the way. Mayor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order that prevents city officials travelling on official business to Arizona” (3). We can see this law hurt states by losing support because of acceptance to racial profiling. Having acceptance for racial profiling can cause outrage and boycotts, but more important it can...
Racial profiling consists of innocent, those chosen because of their skin color and guilty citizens that are being unjustly targeted by law enforcement because of their race and /or ethnicity. Mainly Blacks, Hispanics, and people of color within the minority communities are targeted for such harassment by law enforcement. However, race is the key factor for racial profiling by police, which is unfair on so many levels that people of color are processed differently than white youths within the system. Racial bias, disparity, and racial profiling are considered as a violation of citizens’ rights, that started long before it was actually recognized as a violation, and taking place within the Juvenile Justice and Criminal System. Due to the
127) Racial Profiling does not only effect blacks, Middle eastern people as well as any others with a brown skin tone face the negative effects of profiling. “In a study conducted by the Toronto Star in 2002, it showed that black Torontonians are over-represented in certain charge categories, that black people are treated more harshly than whites after they are arrested, and that black offenders are much more likely to be held in custody for bail hearings than their white counterparts” (Rankin, Quinn, Shephard, Simmie, and Duncanson 2002).(Satzewich & Shaffir 2009) Profiling not only alianates people but reinforces negative stereotypes,even if for example a black man is stopped for no other reason than his skin colour , others around won 't know he has done nothing , thus making him appear to be a mennace to society. In terms of Immigration and the workplace Canada doesn 't have the greatest history of allowing immigrants here based on race . From
Racial Profiling is defined as the use of race or ethnicity as grounds for suspecting someone of having committed a crime or an offense. Sadly, Racial profiling has seem to play a factor in police traffic stops. Discretion and Racial profiling are both left up to the law enforcement officer. The practice of racial profiling by law enforcement officials is a growing concern to the public. The everyday public question is how frequently racial profiling is put into practice, as a result of discussion in national media. It is widely believed that minorities are being stop more often than whites, and that the numbers of stops are disproportionate to the representation of the population. It is also assumed that these stops are justified by minor
Racial profiling is not only demeaning to minorities, but goes against Constitutional rights given to Americans. Currently racial profiling has been discussed across the nation on whether or not police enforcement are using it for the greater good within society or using it to discrimination against certain ethics.A majority police officials are now using racial profile as an excuse to be racist. Racial profiling is not only real, however is in inhumane, and is not used as effectively as people think it is.
“Racial profiling — as well as profiling based on religion, ethnicity and national origin — continues to plague our nation despite the constitutional guarantee of equal treatment under the law. “ Police officers are accused of racial profiling so commonly because of how they react and take action towards certain races, as well as how they are so quick with assumption with their activity. Over a police officer's career, they will as some point respond to call where they will use their firearm or come in contact with a life threatening experience, it's part of the job. After coming in contact with that fear, they know how real those situations are and how dangerous they can be, which will in result treat all their calls like it will be their last one. Aggressive, forceful, and demanding is how they will react and how they respond, and the racial profiling is that kind of approach towards every other race, most commonly towards black people, even if they are innocent and and are telling the truth, a police officer will respond in a very serious manner and by simply telling the truth, listening and following their commands, and being cooperative, you can stay away from confrontation, which is very possible, and can increase the chances of something bad happening, when it could've been avoided. “When law enforcement officers target residents based on race, religion or
Racial Profiling is an issue which has affected the entire black communities globally. Great danger and mistrust have been a result of racial profiling of the black community. Racial profiling not only affects the black community but other communities alike. Either taking a part in profiling others or being profiled everyone is affected in some way or another. Law enforcement is now not being trusted as much as the black communities fear instead of trusting our men and women in blue. Racial profiling has its consequence on youngsters and adolescence and their logic of self-worth and self-assurance (Ontario Human Rights Commission, n.d.). As a consequence, a substantial distrust has advanced both between minority