Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effects of racial profiling
Negative effects of racial profiling
Modern society with racial profiling
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative effects of racial profiling
Racial Profiling: The Truth
Racial profiling is not only demeaning to minorities, but goes against Constitutional rights given to Americans. Currently racial profiling has been discussed across the nation on whether or not police enforcement are using it for the greater good within society or using it to discrimination against certain ethics.A majority police officials are now using racial profile as an excuse to be racist. Racial profiling is not only real, however is in inhumane, and is not used as effectively as people think it is.
To begin, what society is often blindsided by is that racial profiling is real, and is used in unfair manners by police officials. According to the article, “Jim Crow Policing” published on The New York Times,
…show more content…
author Bob Herbert's, addresses the issue of how in the city of New York, the New York Police Department needs to stop the prejudiced treatment of black and Hispanic New Yorkers who are treated immorally by police officials just simply for the color of their skin. Black and Hispanics are often stopped and frisked by police officers for any case of suspicious, by clothing, or ethnicity. For example, Hebert mentions, “An overwhelming 84 percent of the stops in the first three-quarters of 2009 were of black or Hispanic New Yorkers,” (Hebert 3). People often stopped by police enforcement are then questioned, searched, and frisked without any question asked. “Contraband, which usually means drugs, was found in only 1,6 percent of the stops of black New Yorkers. For Hispanics, it was just 1,5 percent. For whites, who are stopped far less frequently, contraband was found 2.2 percent of the time,” (Hebert 3). The studies clearly show black and Hispanics are the main target and is is not right for someone to be stopped simply by the color of their skin. In the Los Angeles Crimes article,”Racial profiling in L.A: the numbers don’t lie”, author Ian Ayres brings attention to how radical disparities,and whether or not law enforcement could be using it for biased reasons. Ayres mentions,over 76 percent of blacks and 16 percent are likely to be pulled over rather than a white person. Ayres also mentions how Police Chief William J Bratton saw the results inaccurate because they are outdated. However, I see him using this as an excuse to ignore the fact that more blacks and latinos are being pulled over just for their ethnicity and color. People should only be pulled over by showing of suspicious and illegal behavior not by radical disparities or by bias police officers Ayres adds, “The department has not released the more recent stop data that it has been collecting, nor has it analyzed the more recent data to test for radical disparities,(Ayres 12).This shows if Chief William J Bratton was fairly against radical disparities he would release new results on it. To add, racial profiling is also used inhumane ways which in my opinion, labels certain ethnic group simply by the actions of others with the same skin color for their wrong doing with society. Individuals shouldn’t be judged by not what they wear, their background, or the color of their skin, instead by their character and the actions they take. In the article, “ 4 wrongfully arrested men blame racial profiling”, author Andrew Wolfson discusses how four young black men who were falsely accused of committing crimes they didn’t do. The four young men arrested claim that their arrest may have to do with their race.Wolfson states,” [Shaquazz Allen, 19; Tyrone Booker Jr., 20; Craig Dean, 21; and Jerron Bush, 22]- on charges that they robbed a woman at gunpoint on March 22, the night of mob violence in downtown Louisville,(Wolfson 9). The four men were falsely identified as the suspect because they fit the description of the attackers by simpling being black and by their clothing which was black hoodies. Police enforcements just saw a group of guys who fit the description, and arrested them without even questioning if it was the right group of suspects. Wolfson adds, “Booker and Allen were locked up for 70 days while Bush and Dean served five days, plus time on home incarceration,”(Wolfson 11). These four innocent men had spend time in jail for a crime they didn't commit. It took over a year for the four young men to settle this $1.5 million lawsuit. This clearly shows that racial profiling is labeling and targeting certain races just for the reputation they have.Police enforcements wrongfully arrested four young black men just because they fit the description of the attackers, and were not even questioned till later. Lastly.
racial profiling has no positive impact on society only a negative one. It is only breaking society apart, and creating a gap of trust between law enforcement and civilians.In the Los Angeles Times article, “L.A’s newst poilce commisoner calls for a deep analysis of racial profiling accusations,” writer Kate Mather how L.A’s police commisoner wants to break down racial profiling for residents and members of the police enforements. Mather states, “McClain-Hill emphasized that she did not believe most LAPD officers are inherently biased or show up to work for any reason other than to do the very best job they can protecting this city,”(Mather 5). In today’s society its very difficult for civilians to be able to have a trusting relationship with police enforcements because what is broadcasted on the news or online. With certain group of races constantly being targeted by police and being falsely accused of doing a crime they never even did; its not easy to be able to trust or know what intentions police enforcements have. There are so many racist bias and racist police officers out there so it almost inevitable to trust ALL enforcements. Racial profiling has no should in society, and only tears people apart because of how we are treated and
saw. All in all, racial profiling is real, immoral behavior, and only has an negative impacted in America. It allows police enforcements to not be only racist but to make certain races feel degraded for the color of their skin. It allows for people of certain ethics to be pulled over and be bullied on by police officers, and to be frisked for no reason. Racial profiling also allows racial disparities to exist, and label certain races.It also allows for people to fasely be accuseed of crimes they did’nt comitt just because of how they look,how they dress, or the color of their skin.It is tearing American apart and forcing us to lost trust in law enforement when they should make us feel protected, and not be the ones to attack us.
Our criminal justice book defines racial profiling as "any police initiated action that relies on the race, ethnicity, or national origin rather than the behavior of an individual, or on information that leads the police to a particular individual who has been identified as being, or having been, engaged in criminal activity” (Schmalleger 757). I think it is best summed up as the practice of using race, ethnicity, national origin, or religion as the primary factor in deciding who to subject to law enforcement investigations. Racial profiling can be used as a basis for racist police officers to arrest more minorities and this is documented very often. In the article Jim Crow policing, Bob Herbert talks about the unnecessary frisking and racism connected to searching for potential criminals. Herbert makes several points as to why police are harassing the black and Latino population and how it is wrong.
First of all, racial profiling is unfair to its victims . Racial profiling is seen through the police in “Hounding the Innocent”, which is unfair since a person shouldn’t be pulled over more because of their race and that many of these stops have little to no connection to an actual crime. “Young black and Hispanic males are being stopped, frisked, and harassed in breathtaking numbers” (Herbert, 29) This is unfair to all victims of racial
The justice system is in place in America to protect its citizens, however in the case of blacks and some other minorities there are some practices that promote unfairness or wrongful doing towards these groups. Racial profiling is amongst these practices. In cases such as drug trafficking and other criminal acts, minorities have been picked out as the main culprits based off of skin color. In the article “Counterpoint: The Case Against Profiling” it recognizes racial profiling as a problem in America and states, “[In order to maintain national security] law-enforcement officers have detained members of minority groups in vehicles more than whites”…. “these officers assume that minorities commit more drug offenses, which is not the case” (Fauchon). In relationship to law enforcement there has also been many cases of police brutality leaving young blacks brutally injured, and even dead in recent years, cases such as Michael Brown, Dontre Hamilton, Eric Garner, Tamir Rice, and Freddy Gray just to name a few. Many of these young men were unarmed, and the police involved had no good justification for such excess force. They were seen as threats primarily because of their skin color. Despite the fact this nation is trying to attain security, inversely they are weakening bonds between many of its
Racial profiling is the tactic of stopping someone because of the color of his or her skin and a fleeting suspicion that the person is engaging in criminal behavior (Meeks, p. 4-5). This practice can be conducted with routine traffic stops, or can be completely random based on the car that is driven, the number of people in the car and the race of the driver and passengers. The practice of racial profiling may seem more prevalent in today’s society, but in reality has been a part of American culture since the days of slavery. According to Tracey Maclin, a professor at the Boston University School of Law, racial profiling is an old concept. The historical roots “can be traced to a time in early American society when court officials permitted constables and ordinary citizens the right to ‘take up’ all black persons seen ‘gadding abroad’ without their master’s permission” (Meeks, p. 5). Although slavery is long since gone, the frequency in which racial profiling takes place remains the same. However, because of our advanced electronic media, this issue has been brought to the American public’s attention.
Racial profiling is a wide spread term in the American justice system today, but what does it really mean? Is racial profiling just a term cooked up by criminals looking for a way to get out of trouble and have a scapegoat for their crimes? Is it really occurring in our justice system, and if so is it done intentionally? Most importantly, if racial profiling exists what steps do we take to correct it? The answer to these questions are almost impossible to find, racial profiling is one of many things within our justice system that can be disputed from any angle and has no clear cut answers. All that can be done is to study it from different views and sources and come up with one’s own conclusion on the issue.
For the past few years there has been an ongoing debate surrounding the issue of racial profiling. The act of racial profiling may rest on the assumption that African Americans and Hispanics are more likely to commit crimes than any individual of other races or ethnicities. Both David Cole in the article "The Color of Justice" and William in the article "Road Rage" take stance on this issue and argue against it in order to make humanity aware of how erroneous it is to judge people without evidence. Although Cole and William were very successful in matters of showing situations and qualitative information about racial profiling in their articles, both of them fail at some points.
Racial profiling in the dictionary is “the assumption of criminality among ethnic groups: the alleged policy of some police to attribute criminal intentions to members of some ethnic groups and to stop and question them in disproportionate numbers without probable cause (“Racial Profiling”).” In other words racial profiling is making assumptions that certain individuals are more likely to be involved in misconduct or criminal activity based on that individual’s race or ethnicity. Racial profiling propels a brutalizing message to citizens of the United States that they are pre-judged by the color of their skin rather than who they are and this then leads to assumptions of ruthlessness inside the American criminal justice system. With race-based assumptions in the law enforcement system a “lose-lose” situation is created due to America’s diverse democracy and destroys the ability to keep the criminal justice system just and fair. Although most police officers perform their duties with fairness, honor, and dedication, the few officers who portray to be biased then harm the whole justice system resulting in the general public stereotyping every law enforcement officer as a racial profiler (Fact Sheet Racial Profiling). When thinking about racial profiling many people automatically think it happens only to blacks but sadly this is mistaken for far more ethnic groups and races such as Jews, Muslims, Mexicans, Native Americans, and many more are racially profiled on a day to day basis. Many people believe racial profiling to be a myth because they see it as police officers merely taking precautions of preventing a crime before it happens, but in reality racial profiling has just become an approved term for discrimination and unjust actio...
Racial Profiling can happen to anyone, anywhere such as the streets, in the airports, or even just walking home. Racial profiling and the media influence an individual’s perspective on a trial. Racial Profiling is using someone’s race or ethnic background as suspicion for committing a crime. Evidence from past trials dating back to 1920s Sacco and Vanzetti trial to George Zimmerman’s trial in 2013 prove that racial profiling has existed for nearly a century. According to the article “The Quiet Racism in the Zimmerman Trial” by Steven Mazie, he states
Racial profiling does indeed exist in America. This practice is especially damaging to African Americans, who are frequently shamed by society as criminals, drug addicts, or welfare abusers. This societal flaw is evidenced by recent injustices to both Mike Brown and Trayvon Martin. Years of abuse of power have brought this issue blazing to the forefront of hot topics in America.
Despite the fact racism has been around for hundreds of years, upcoming generations are becoming more open minded and less likely to publicly berate minorities; racial profiling, however, is the one loophole of racism America overlooks. Police officials often use the practices of racial profiling to discretely single out minority races. A common approach to this is through traffic patrols. According to a statistic based in San Jose, CA, nearly 100,000 drivers were stopped; during the year ending in June 2000; and of these drivers less than 32% were white, the remaining 68% of drivers were a...
Over the past centuries, Black community in Toronto have encountered and persisted violence and discriminations in many different ways. Racial profiling and carding are the two major roots of police brutality. Police officers often have biased perceptions and negative feelings about certain races. Carding can be defined as random police checks that target young African-Canadian men. Police might detain a driver for driving a specific type of vehicle or driving in certain areas that they have assumptions about. “This practice was a systematic violation of the rights of people in our communities, especially of racialized youth” (CBC ABC National, June 1, 2015). Carding results in police abusing their power which leads to assaults, shootings and death. However, police have said
Before any argument can be made against racial profiling, it is important to understand what racial profiling is. The American Civil Liberties Union, defines racial profiling as "the discriminatory practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual's race, ethnicity, religion or national origin"(Racial Profiling: Definition). Using this definition we can determine that racial profiling excludes any evidence of wrong-doing and relies solely on the characteristics listed above. We can also see that racial profiling is different from criminal profiling, which uses evidence of wrong-doing and facts which can include information obtained from outside sources and evidence gathered from investigation. Based on these definitions, I will show that racial profiling is unfair and ineffective because it relies on stereotyping, encourages discrimination, and in many cases can be circumvented.
Every day you see and hear about minorities groups complain about cops and their tactics against them stopping them while in traffic taking them in to custody or even getting kill over nothing. Racial Profiling is a common thing in this community and it is causing a lot of trouble. According to Minnesota House of Representatives analyst Jim Cleary, "there appear to be at least two clearly distinguishable definitions of the term 'racial profiling ': a narrow definition and a broad definition... Under the narrow definition, racial profiling occurs when a police officer stops, questions, arrests, and/or searches someone solely on the basis of the person 's race or ethnicity... Some ways to stop it is find out who is guilty of it, look at their
Racial tension has been a part of America ever since the Civil War. Today we have a different issue with race, which is called racial profiling. Over the years, the relationship between the police and community of color has gone bitterly racial profiling. America’s society today tends to be tainted by racial profiling and stereotypes. These issues can have great effects on our society.
Have you ever been followed by store officials or security while shopping in a department store? At first, all of the attention can be flattering but quickly becomes insulting once you realize they’re not following you to offer any assistance. Instead because of how you look you fit a certain profile that causes store officials to think you’ve come to their store to steal. This type of behavior is called racial profiling. According to the American Civil Liberties Union, racial profiling refers to the discrimination practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual’s race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin. Citizens need to be more aware of racial profiling and make laws that racial profiling should be illegal. Racial profiling is carried out by law enforcement airport security, and other security personnel that look to profile the minorities for no reason. Heather Sally Newton Driscoll ebscohost.com stated “The practice of profiling is rooted in centuries of discrimination and is based on stereotypes that have long been disproved. Profiling holds on entire population accountable for the committed by a small minority”.