Quevedo's 'Poderoso Caballero Es Don Dinero'

858 Words2 Pages

In another poem, “Poderoso Caballero es Don Dinero”, Francisco de Quevedo describes the increasing materialistic nature of the Spanish people as it is becoming in the 17th century. As the world-market expanded and capitalism rose in the wake of colonialism, Spain was becoming increasingly attracted to the lure of monetary richness. Quevedo shows this growing sense of greed through his description of money as someone’s lover: “Madre, yo al oro me humillo; él es mi amante y mi amado, pues, de puro enamorado… (Quevedo)” In her, “When Money Talks: Material Culture and the Creation of Meaning in Quevedo Author(s)”, Patricia Marshall analyzes Quevedo’s poem as a criticism of this increasing emphasis on money, and the near fetishization of it within …show more content…

With many of Spain’s citizens living below the poverty line, the appeal of materialism only fully reached those privileged enough to experience the benefits that it could bring. The dehesa remained free of this materialistic greed because of the nature of the land and the products that it produced. Dan Barber notes, “Unlike American settlers, who were spoiled by our country’s natural abundance, Spaniards couldn’t simply drop their plow and move on to better land. Agribusiness never capitalized on the dehesa wealth because the land isn’t quite good enough (Barber, 176).” So, as capitalism spread out across Europe and into the Americas, the dehesa system remained outside of world of capital because there simply was not enough capital to be gained. The land was only meant to give what it could give, and could not be exploited for extra resources. The livestock acted as fertilizers, the trees fed the livestock, and natural processes were always valued over production. ““It’s very much a question of values, not just value,” Miguel explained to me. “That’s what explains how the traditional farmers and producers have behaved for generations, and why still today they put tradition, nature, or instinct before technology, choosing to produce better, not just more,” (Barber, 178).” So, while the rest of Europe’s energy went towards increasing productivity in all sectors in order to increase their …show more content…

Although the production rate of a dehesa is nothing in comparison to an industrial farmland, that low production rate is what makes the dehesa so special. With less emphasis on churning out large quantities of food and a larger emphasis on quality, the dehesa was able to produce a country-wide, and eventually, world-wide favorite: jamón. Barber writes, “Extremaduran food is unadorned and simple, reflecting its peasant origins and the poverty of the land. Start with ham (The Spanish always do.) As Miguel explained, jamón is, in essence, a poor product. The meat is sliced paper thin. It is served sparingly (Barber, 179).” Even though jamón has origins of poverty, scarce resources and infertile land, it has become a food that is loved by all. It is produced in a way that is dependent on the ecosystem: the grass and acorns that feed the pigs, the pigs which fertilize the trees and grass. The self-dependent cycle of the dehesa may not be economically viable, but it creates a product that is delicious and rich, and one that can feed many with so little. The humble origins of this delicious food are praised in modern Spanish poetry. In Baltasar del Alcázar’s “Tres cosas”, he describes the three things that he loves: Inés (a woman), jamón (ham), and berenjenas con queso (eggplant with cheese). In one stanza, he says that of the three, he cannot decide which

Open Document