Question 1: Llewellyn Moss is a hard-working veteran who’s good with guns and remarkably resourceful and cunning. He’s not a schmuck. He understands that stealing 2.4 million dollars is serious business, and tries to make the best moves—making Carla Jean move to Odessa immediately, hiding the money deep in a vent when staying at a motel, preparing himself for every inevitability. He is paranoid because he understands he needs to be. However, though he’s smart and self-reliant, it’s not enough to prevent casualties. He is compassionate, and it’s this compassion that simultaneously makes him human and likeable but ultimately gets him and others around him killed. For example, early on he goes back with water for the remaining survivor and therefore …show more content…
exposes his identity, which is what leads to his death. Additionally, he picks up a hitchhiker, and she dies as a result of her association with him. The final blow is when he fails to take Anton Chigurh seriously enough, and that gets not only him killed, but his wife as well. We will always root for people like Moss, who are skilled and smart and good people. But in this story Moss dies anyway—and he dies offscreen, in a section break, in the most senseless way possible. Though we, as readers, knew him well, and though we he was loved, and liked, he was still just a man caught up in something much bigger than him, and who died, inevitably. Chigurh is a hired killer who is very good at his job. He’s well-trained, cold, smart, and incredibly scary. He kills dozens of people over the course of the book. He seems to be almost immune to pain, and performs amateur surgery on himself without batting an eye. Chigurh is, in a word, a psychopath. Human lives are disposable to him. Oftentimes he kills people without even knowing who they are and with an almost casual air. Near the end of a gunfight in chapter four, Chigurh, about to kill the last gunman, tells him, “Don’t look away. Look at me.” Then he shoots him, and watches the light fade from his eyes. This is similar to how he strangled a deputy, and after the blood had stopped spurting and the deputy was dead, Chigurh lay there, only breathing quietly. There is no violence or passion in the way he kills, only cold calculation, and perhaps some kind of twisted compassion. He is, as Bell put it, a prophet of destruction, in possession of incredible killing power and able to employ it with absolutely no hesitation. He is also, strangely, a man of his word. He makes a promise to Moss that he’ll kill his wife if Moss doesn’t give up the money, and even after Moss’ death, even though killing her couldn’t possibly benefit him, he sticks to this promise and kills Carla Jean. Additionally, when toying with a man behind the counter at the gas station, Chigurh makes him toss a coin with the implication that what’s at stake is the man’s life. When the man successfully calls it, Chigurh keeps his word, and doesn’t do anything to him. In this story, Chigurh is the walking personification of evil, everything terrible about the drug trade and crime coalesced into one person. As Sheriff Bell puts it in the beginning of the book, there are terrible people in the world, like the man who murdered a young girl, and the people he reads about in the paper. They are a breed separate from the rest of humanity. They might be going to hell, if it exists, and it doesn’t trouble them. And Chigurh is a breed separate from this breed. Despite this, he “looks like just anybody.” This fact is scarier than anything else about him. Sheriff Bell is not a man who pushes his chips forward.
He is traditional, nonviolent; he thinks wistfully of the past, when sheriffs didn’t carry guns and knew the phone number of everybody in the county, when people were less awful and didn’t commit terrible crimes every day. He doesn’t pursue the men who shoot through his windshield, he doesn’t go after Chigurh, he doesn’t risk his skin or his soul, because he recognizes that there are forces much stronger than him at play and that fighting is futile. He is completely useless at mitigating anything about the terrible situation at hand. This is illustrated by the fact that the most he can do is speculate at home with his wife about Moss’s whereabouts, or ruminate on his past or the state of the world at large in the italicized …show more content…
portions. However, this is ultimately what saves him from worse fates. He doesn’t prevail against evil, and he fails to save Carla Jean or Llewellyn, but manages to come out on the other side just fine—just as he did during World War Two, when he survived only by leaving the rest of his men behind. He is a survivor and spectator, but this is the only way that he can achieve happiness, with a soul unscathed, and with a wife he loves. He is no hero, but he is the only one with a happy ending. This small fact especially—that Bell is happily married—says something about this story where the evil is great and the casualties immense. It says that there will be people who get killed, even people who don’t deserve it, and there will be prophets of destruction, and there will be tragedies in the paper every day, but it’s possible to have something good among all of that. Question 2: There are three main players in this story, and it’s hard to determine which is the protagonist.
Chigurh is successful in meeting his objectives and sticking to his ideals; Bell is one the last men left standing, a spectator that seems to talk directly to the viewer; and Moss follows the classic hero arc most closely, in addition to setting the plot in motion initially. Using the criteria of being successful in meeting objectives and staying true to ideals, Chigurh indisputably fulfills both requirements. Despite that, most people wouldn’t see him as the protagonist, likely because he murders several people, never makes himself likeable or open, and kills the character everybody was rooting for, along with his innocent wife. On paper, he’s protagonist material; however, there’s more to it than that. Similarly, in terms of likeability, and in driving the plot forward, Moss is meant to be the protagonist. Though he’s not particularly on the side of good—he’s only trying to save his life—we root for him and hope he succeeds. But he doesn’t. He dies, and he dies without us seeing. He’s a protagonist, in a sense, but not the true one. Sheriff Bell
is. He is the protagonist not because he moves the plot forward—he doesn’t—but because he is us. He refuses to walk in front of a prophet of destruction because he doesn’t want to “put his soul at hazard.” He watches the story much in the same way we do, and periodically his narration seems to speak directly to the reader, commiserating with them over how awful the world is and how this particular conflict is a game none of us have, or want to have, any stakes in. By the end of the story, we transition out of this story full of gunfights and drug money and great evil, and instead watch Bell talk about an old guilt with his uncle, retire, talk to his wife, and quietly remember a dream about his dad. He’s the true protagonist because even though he didn’t manage to save anybody, he didn’t die, and he didn’t become a monster like Chigurh. He’s the last one standing with a happy ending. Extra credit 1: I think the answer lies in Sheriff Bell’s italiscized portions, when he reminicises about how evil used to be smaller and easier to handle—Bell gets older, but criminals stay the same age. Bell feels as though he can no longer keep up with the young modern atrocities of today. He remembers that the old sheriffs sometimes didn’t even have guns; it seems to him that as time goes on, he gets older, things advance, and higher tech falls into the hands of the police and criminals alike, and the bloodier and worse everything gets. Extra credit 2: The idea that the world will always be full of bloodshed and no one can do anything to stop it is clearly reflected in the way Bell looks at but cannot do anything about Llewellyn and Carla Jean’s situation. He understands that there is no point in fighting for the force of good when there is such overwhelming evil, always. In fact, there is no one in this story who puts themselves out there and fights for the force of good at all. Even the good guys are only trying to survive. The overall story is one of futility—Moss dies in a scene break, Bell doesn’t save anybody, and Chigurh escapes completely scot-free.
He always makes people feel special and important, and he puts his life in harm to help/save others. In this book, Gondoleery Rattrap, a person who used to do good things for Artíme, but she all the sudden starting hating them, takes over being high priest of Quill when Aaron gets kidnapped. She is really evil and
These experiences have stripped his love for humanity from him and left him in a mentality of near hatred for anyone willing to cause unnecessary death of animals. The two characters have both lost their personal wars purely through having things done to them that no man or woman should be forced to go through.
...and has to fight down his emotions, so we can relate to him. Ultimately, though, he keeps his self-control and wins out in the end, making him a true hero and a fine character.
...shocked or afraid to get involved. The narration is meant to make his audience feel uncomfortable or inadequate, so that they will agree with him that they need help dealing with these types of problems. He has already spelled out the solution for them in the preceding paragraph by saying that giving the power to the state is the civilized thing to do (324). He is hoping that this last burst of pathos will close the deal and that his audience will be bound to agree that the death penalty is necessary to deter crime and mete out justice.
I chose to write about the narrator and his friends because I found there was more to them than just the bad guy persona they wanted everyone to see. I find the narrator and his friends are dynamic characters because in the end of the story they lets go of all his childish pretending and changes into the en they are supposed to be. “We were bad. We read Andre Gide and stuck elaborate poses to show we didn’t give a shit about anything.” (Boyle 529) This quote sums up that they have to...
He has one task to perform - to kill the soldiers of the Free States. However, the most important line is that catches the attention of the reader is “.the eyes of a man who is used to look at death.” This is very ironic as he was earlier compared. to a student who is like a symbol of innocence where now he is spoken of a murderer as a child. He is engrossed in fulfilling his duty and is now a student of the violence of the.... ...
Staples figures there is not anything he can do to solve this issue and his conclusion was to change the way he acts around people so they are no longer afraid. This shows that society fears him and do not want anything to do with him. The ones around him try to get away from him as quick as possible that shows that they think of him as a threat and want to keep their distance. This helps readers understand the text by showing them that they fear him because they run away and keep their distance because they see him as a nuisance and someone to
After seeing through his eyes how he was planning on using the pain and hurt from some of the people to try and win his case, he no longer seems like such a hero, but not quite the villain. “But anytime I hear about a case like that school bus disaster up there, I turn into a heat-seeking missal, homing in on a target that I know in my bones is
Everyone has their own perception on what defines a hero; some may argue that they exhibit characteristics such as honesty or courage, while others may think that heroes have special power. Our society may have changed the values in which we associate heroes with, but one thing seems to have never changed: the main character of the book turns out as the hero. In my analyst, Holden Caulfield, the protagonist in The Catcher in the Rye, is put on trial as we see through our own eyes how Caulfield can not be considered a hero in modern society.
If he writes something, he says he cannot read it. The writing is unclear.” However, he is a static character due to him being stubborn throughout the story and always questioning others. He never develops a change throughout the story, even though he accepts that he was wrong, he remains authoritative yet stubborn throughout the end. The central idea is of cultural shock is supported by him having an authoritative
It is easily identifiable that Malron is the protagonist through his actions within the play. An example being when Malron stops himself from killing Marilyn. Rather than shooting her in the head, he pulls away the gun and begs his parents to allow Marilyn to stay aboard the Octagon. The reason that this shows he is the protagonist is because He states specifically to his parents, “Wait! I mean, she isn't really doing any harm, we could always just let her work on our spacecraft. You said we needed a new cook anyway! And…And…What if she was meant to come here for a reason?” (1.4). This quote shows his courageous act for Marilyn, making him the identifiable protagonist. As for the antagonist within our play, it is Malron’s mother and father. The reason that they are the antagonist is because of his disapproval of Malron wanting to save Marilyn’s life. The father directly states to Malron, “Look at her! She is already passed out, just make it easy and kill her. Besides, are you insane? A human? Working on my spacecraft! I couldn't have it!” (1.4). After this statement Malron’s mother agrees and questions why Malron wants to save Marilyn. These comments made by Malron’s parents are what make them the antagonists because of their opposition of what Malron is doing. . However, as the story proceeds we decided to make the parents accepting of Malron’s decision to save Marilyn because they care about their son's happiness. The protagonist and antagonist and are what made the story enjoyable for the
kill.”” (Page 55) This is showing how he lets his primal side take over his thoughts when he is hunting. He forgets about everything he had ever been told about what’s right
The protagonist is a character central to the story. James Baldwin's “Sonny’s Blues” has two central characters but only one protagonist. Although this narrative is told from the narrator’s point of view, Sonny is the protagonist. The narrator is less empathetic, therefore, it is harder the reader to make an connection with him. He is very passive and distant; he is just reacts to events in Sonny’s life. Also, Sonny is in constant conflict with an antagonist-his drug addiction, and Sonny grow over the course of the story. He is a dynamic character. We can see him develop from an angry rebellious young teen to a young man weather by life.
While there is a definitive, singular villain of the story, Anton Chigurh, a gun for hire referred to as “a true and living prophet of destruction” (4) even he has more complexity and reality to him than most are willing to admit. A psychopath who seems to kill without a care, Chigurh is often described as impossibly inhuman. However, those claims ignore the reality of serial killers in the real world, such as Luis Garavito, Pedro Lopez, and Daniel Camargo-Barbosa who each raped and murdered hundreds of boys and girls as young as six years old. Also ignored are those who caused death and destruction for a cause or country which history has deemed acceptable, such as Sgt Dillard Johnson, Simo Hӓyhӓ, and Klaudia Kalugina, who collectively have killed over 3,500 people. However, even Chigurh is shown to display restraint and change by the end of the novel, and while not explicitly stated, he even has deeper motivations for his actions than violence for violence’s sake or for the money. Another character who could easily fall into tropes is the investigating officer of all the destruction Chigurh leaves in his wake, Sheriff Bell. Bell could have easily been written as a hero, brave and strong, and the moral compass of the novel. Instead, Bell is uncertain about the world around him, about what is right and wrong, and afraid of Chigurh. This fear of having to continue hunting Chigurh leads Bell to resign as sheriff, along with a a number of other morally and bravery deficient decisions. The third major character is McCarthy’s story, Llewellyn Moss, is neither hero nor villain, but a regular man who makes dubious decisions which ignite and drive the plot of the
There are several quotes throughout the movie that lean toward the vigilante side of heroism. " I'm gonna do what I do best, kill em" "You're talking a bout a war, Creasy" "Exactly" "Forgiveness is between them and God, It's my job to arrange a meeting" "Creasy's art is death, he's about to paint his masterpiece" (Man on Fire).