Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Researchers need to apply ethical principles to their studies
Five principles of research ethics
Five principles of research ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Quantitative Article Critique
In order to be able to critique a research article there are certain guidelines to follow. The ethical aspect of the study, the problem statement or purpose statement, the literature review, the study framework, and the hypothesis and research questions of the article must be critiqued. This is done in order to find the strength and limitations to the research. Therefore, determining if it can be used as evidence-based practice. This quantitative research article will be critique using some pre-design guidelines in Foundations of Nursing Research 6th edition by Rose Marie Nieswiadomy (2011). This guideline will help answer questions such as, if the study is ethical? What is the framework? What is the research question? And is the significance to nursing apparent? (Nieswiadomy, 2011).
Ethical Aspects of a Study
In this
It should be apparent that the study was either quantitative or qualitative’ (Nieswiadomy, 2011 Kindle location 2692-2694). The reader can clearly see the purpose statement, “major purpose of this study was to test the effect of the cardiac educational program on the level of knowledge and adherence to healthy lifestyle among patients with CAD in Jordan” (Tawalbeh, L.I., Ahmad, M.M., 2014, p.246) where the population is mentioned. However, the variables and the type of study is not mentioned in the statement. After reading the paper and noting how they gathered the information using a “one group pretest-posttest study design” (Tawalbeh, L.I., Ahmad, M.M., 2014, p248), and what data analysis was used the reader can determine that the study was a quantitative study. The data for this research was gather as a pretest and then one month after the cardiac education program a posttest was given. Prior to the posttest the participants with CAD were taught
In response to the question set, I will go into detail of the study, consisting of the background, main hypotheses, as well the aims, procedure and results gathered from the study; explaining the four research methods chosen to investigate, furthering into the three methods actually tested.
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C. T. (2012). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (9th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
The potential disadvantages of the proceduralist or the CASP approach is that using a specific tool and set of guidelines for every research article may not consistently be applicable. It may be difficult to categorize an article as not having any merit if does not pass the screening questions. It may preclude articles that have value and the ability to depict different topics well since they are not in accordance with the CASP tool. The merits of the substantive approach include concentrating on the analytical rather than the research process. It looks beyond the research process used or the researcher’s assessment of validity with regards to the conclusions of the study. There is emphasis on the dissemination of the findings rather than assessing if the research process was problematic. Having a less rigid approach of the research appraisal can create diverse and more comprehensive ideas (Eakin, & Mykhalovskiy,
Loiselle, C. G., Profetto-McGrath, J., Polit, D. F., Beck C. T., (2007). Canadian essentials of nursing research (2nd ed.) Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2014). Nursing Research: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier, Inc.
The purpose of this report is to compare and contrast two different nursing research articles. The report will critique and evaluate two qualitative studies, one being an original research report and the second being a review paper. The scope of comparison and contrast will include research design, theories or conceptual models, how the research was conducted, analysis and reporting of research data, usefulness of the research, and a conclusion.
Describe the differences in the results between the groups in the study and support your description with examples from the study
Nursing research is a systematic enquiry that seeks to add new nursing knowledge to benefit patients, families and communities. It encompasses all aspects of health that are of interest to nursing, including promotion of health, prevention of illness, care of people of all ages during illness and recovery (or) towards a peaceful and dignified death (ICN 2009)
Ryan, F., Couglan, M. & Cronin, P. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: qualitative research. British Journal of Nursing, 16(12), 738-744.
Quantitative Research Article Critique This paper is an academic critique of an article written by Lautrette, et al. (2007) titled: “A Communication Strategy and Brochure for Relatives of Patients Dying in the ICU” and accurately reflected the content of the article and the research study itself. The abstract explains the article in more detail, while remaining concise.
This essay aims to demonstrate an understanding of the research process and use of evidence in nursing practice. The research article by Rostami et al. (2014) titled “Supporting adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: A qualitative study” will critically examine using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) tool. With the guide of this tool, the chosen study will be assessed in terms of strengths and limitations, the validity and reliability of its findings as well as established an insight of the research method and its relevance to nursing practice.
The purpose of this paper is to analyze a concept on order to identify an inconsistency and area for practical research. A clinical experience will be used to illustrate a core curriculum concept. Consistency with our text will be explored. Next inconsistencies will be identified to provide the basis for a relevant research question in PICO format. The process of conducting research using the hierarchy of evidence will be discussed. A summary of research findings will be provided and used to support modifications in future nursing practice.
For nursing, research has played a major role in the way clinical practice is done. Research has allowed nurses to provide appropriate care to patients. It allows them to perform their job by providing them the tools and information they need in order to make the decisions on the concerns for caring the patient (Polit & Beck, 2006). Moreover, research can also take focus on the workers themselves in order to improve the practice both on a professional and personal level. An example of a study conducted by King, Vidourek, and Schweibert of University of Cincinnati created a study to determine if there is a correlation between ...
Thorne, S. (2010). Theoretical Foundation of Nursing Practice. In P.A, Potter, A.G. Perry, J.C, Ross-Kerr, & M.J. Wood (Eds.). Canadian fundamentals of nursing (Revised 4th ed.). (pp.63-73). Toronto, ON: Elsevier.
One of the goals of nursing is to respect the human rights, values and costumes of a patient and his or her family and with the community as a whole. The International Council of Nurses states that nursing practice can be defined generally as a dynamic, caring, helping relationship in which the nurse assists the client to achieve and maintain optimal health. As health care providers, we have some fundamental responsibilities such as to promote health, to prevent illnes...