Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Qualitative analysis discussion
Introduction on qualitative and quantitative research
Introduction on qualitative and quantitative research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Qualitative analysis discussion
A qualitative research is the development study of ideas that assist in understanding social phenomena in natural, not experimental, settings, influencing and affirming definitions, expertise and opinions of the participants. (Pope & Mays, 1995) Aspects of qualitative methods: • Perceiving context: understanding how social, political, economic, environmental, cultural, and organizational factors affect health. • Perceiving people: understanding how people think and are aware regarding their health and illness experiences. • Perceiving interaction: understanding how the different participants engaged in public health activities communicate and interact with each other. Data collected from a qualitative research are not always converted to numbers. …show more content…
Both qualitative and quantitative analysis needs labeling and coding of all the data to be able to recognize differences and similarities. Even the responses collected from an unstructured qualitative interview could be copied into the computer to be coded, counted and analyzed. However, the qualitative research has no system for pre-coding, so the method used for identifying and labeling data must be developed in a way that best suits the research, which is called content …show more content…
Deductive approach: This approach starts by using the research questions to group data and examine similarities and differences. This is done when time and resources are limited and sometimes is applicable when a qualitative research is a smaller component of a bigger quantitative study. A deductive approach is called a ‘top-down” approach as it works from the more general to the more specific: theory, then hypothesis, followed by observation, leading to confirmation. 2. Inductive approach: this approach is used when a qualitative research is a major part of the survey. In this approach, data collected is grouped in a developed framework and then it is investigated for relationships. The inductive approach is called “bottom up” approach as it works contrarily from the deductive approach, moving from particular observations to broader generalizations and theories: first an observation is made, then pattern between data are examined, leading to a tentative hypothesis and a theory. Deduction strategy starts with a predicted pattern that is analyzed and tested against observations, while induction strategy starts with observations and searches to discover and detect a pattern from them. (Babbie,
Esterberg’s discussion of the connection between theory and data says that in order to carry out qualitative research you need to use inductive reason. Deductive reasoning is the opposite approach inductive reasoning which correlates with quantitative research. When looking at deductive research you begin with creating a theory that you want to test by creating a hypothesis and picking a sample to study. Looking at inductive reasoning you begin with analyzing the world around you and strategize different characteristics to form a theory. To me theory means reasoning’s to test something to find answers. I believe it helps us understand the world around us better but making correlations between two different things.
Described below is a critical appraisal of a qualitative article by Lisa Booth using the frame-work suggested by Ryan, Coughlan and Cronin 2007 to establish its believability, robustness, credibility and integrity (Ryan, Coughlan & Cronin, 2007).
1. Under the Method of Induction individuals must first collect data, the facts about the world, they have to study and make observations about the world without creating a significance behind them, basically they must not create a purpose in the process of gathering information. Secondly the data collected has to be analyzed without the influence of any hypothesis, other than the ones required for logical thought, they must be unbiased in their analysis. Then we can generate the best hypothesis from our analysis. After which finally, we test this hypothesis with more observations and employ deductive reasoning in addition to the inductive.
Thematic analysis is espoused to be the foundational approach to qualitative analysis and methods (Saunders et al., 2016 as stated in Braun and Clarke, 2006: 78) and it is a useful method used to identify and analyse the order and patterns of qualitative data (Attride-Stirling, 2001). Qualitative research method depicts the correlation that exists between data and events, creating the pictorial representation of what one thinks a given data says (Saunders et al., 2016). They also opined that, qualitative data analysis is cogent, interactive and iterative. Also, Joana and Jill (2011) and Saunders et al (2016) postulate that, qualitative research brings meanings from words and images as opposed to numbers. However, despite its robustness and rigour of its application, it is skewed more to the interpretivist ideologies since researchers draw conclusion from participants and the hypothesis being forecasted (Joana and Jill, 2011; Saunders et al., 2016).
The father of quantitative analysis, Rene Descartes, thought that in order to know and understand something, you have to measure it (Kover, 2008). Quantitative research has two main types of sampling used, probabilistic and purposive. Probabilistic sampling is when there is equal chance of anyone within the studied population to be included. Purposive sampling is used when some benchmarks are used to replace the discrepancy among errors. The primary collection of data is from tests or standardized questionnaires, structured interviews, and closed-ended observational protocols. The secondary means for data collection includes official documents. In this study, the data is analyzed to test one or more expressed hypotheses. Descriptive and inferential analyses are the two types of data analysis used and advance from descriptive to inferential. The next step in the process is data interpretation, and the goal is to give meaning to the results in regards to the hypothesis the theory was derived from. Data interpretation techniques used are generalization, theory-driven, and interpretation of theory (Gelo, Braakmann, Benetka, 2008). The discussion should bring together findings and put them into context of the framework, guiding the study (Black, Gray, Airasain, Hector, Hopkins, Nenty, Ouyang, n.d.). The discussion should include an interpretation of the results; descriptions of themes, trends, and relationships; meanings of the results, and the limitations of the study. In the conclusion, one wants to end the study by providing a synopsis and final comments. It should include a summary of findings, recommendations, and future research (Black, Gray, Airasain, Hector, Hopkins, Nenty, Ouyang, n.d.). Deductive reasoning is used in studies...
Qualitative research is an approach that attempts to situate an activity that locates the observer in the world by providing the study to occur in their natural setting and by attempting to make sense of, or interpret information (Denzin and Lincoln, 2005). A characteristic of qualitative research is to use a variety of empirical materials such as personal experience, interviews, and questionnaires. It is imperative to understand the task at hand and how to fully carry out the study when using a qualitative research approach in order to find out the information needed. One view of qualitative research is it involves examining individual’s experiences and documenting those experiences in detail (Jones, 2011). By documenting these observations the researcher is ensuring validity in his or her data and giving the correct creditability to those who participated in the study.
Inductive theory is used to connect components of a study and in doing so explain or identify a phenomenon. While, deductive theory and its research approaches is used to ‘test’ a hypotheses or research question related to that the theory. The selection of theory and research approach is influenced by a number of factors not limited to and which include: the researchers world view, motivation, the cost and time needed to conduct research.
then carry out the literature review. After figuring out the necessary theories, they then formulate hypotheses to examine relationships between defined variables, such as education, family background, or social status. Subsequently, they operate data collection through surveys or questionnaires to collect numerical data and analyze it by statistical techniques, including regression models. Such process goes from theory to observation and is called deductive reasoning, which brings objective insights, yet also challenges the findings' accuracy with either omitted variables, selection, or sampling
Ulin,R.P., Robinson,E.T.,Tolle,E.E. (2005) Qualitative Methods in Public Health: A Field Guide for Applied Research. San Francisco: Family health international. in Humanities a
Quantitative research uses a deductive reasoning also known as top to bottom or (top down approach) starting with a theory, then the hypothesis, followed by observation and finally confirmation , going from the general to the more specific. Quantitative methods use numbers and statistics to show the results of the research exercise and mainly are concerned with mathematics and statistics. In quantitative research there are levels of measurement being firstly nominal which are names of things followed by ordinal sequence of things, interval where the sequence has equal distance between each item, and ratio where there is a true zero (Alston & Bowles, 2003, p. 7-9).
This essay intends to compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of the quantitative and qualitative approaches to research which addresses young people and bullying using two journal articles. The first article (quantitative) aims to “establish the relationship between recurrent peer victimisation and the onset of reported symptoms of anxiety or depression in the early teen years” (Bond et al. 2001, p. 480) while the second article (qualitative) aims to “investigate the nature of teenage girls’ indirect aggression” (Owens et al. 2000, p. 70).The two articles will be critically compared in terms of research design, methods used, approach to data analysis, reported results and the plausibility and appropriateness of the conclusions and recommendations posed. The aim of this essay is thus to evaluate and assess the methods of social science research currently undertaken in published research.
You are being invited to take part in this in-depth interview because as the investigator of this study, I want to approach and understand this topic through a professor’s lens and standpoint. In addition, your role as an arts professor, being equipped with critical thinking skills and familiarity with the social science/humanities discourse will fit perfectly for this qualitative interview. We appreciate you taking the time to participate in the interview. This interview will help to learn more about how individuals use internet, the gratifications received through its usage and our relationships and presentation of self in the digital world.
The major weaknesses of qualitative research are more focused on the individuals; researcher and research subject. Subjectivity, influence of personal biases, and connection/lack thereof to research theory are all potential issues. Numbers can tell their own story, without a supporting narrative. Lastly, because of the need for evaluation; data analysis is more time consuming, which may influence reliability and integrity of research (Johnson, 2008). Purpose statement
Another characteristic of qualitative research is that it is personal and contains very little scientific terminology. For example, the researchers seek to understand human issues and problems or why humans behave in a certain manner. This type of empathetic approach in a quantitative research is a very unique in characteristic. Also, in a qualitative research, researches interact with the participants or sample, this is very important because they need to observe their behavior. As a result, it causes the research to be more up close and personal. This type of approach is what makes a qualitative research unique or different from quantitative research. (Smith &...
Creswell (2009), states that there are three types of designs, qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. Smith and Davis (2010) states that qualitative research is a field of enquiry that is conducted in a natural setting by a researcher, who may be involved in, or may be part of the data collection process; as it utilizes the views of informants as the basis for the report. Qualitative research attempts to gain and in-depth, holistic picture of the phenomenon one wishes to study by interacting closely with the people being studied; the data collected are usually in the form of words or pictures.