Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Barbara fredrickson love 2.0 summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Barbara fredrickson love 2.0 summary
Love is ubiquitous and universal, and we have all encountered and relished in the power of love. Many people associate the meaning of love with feelings of strong affection and personal attachment. While this is very accurate, there are several different aspects of love that we neglect to acknowledge. Psychologist Barbara Fredrickson steps up and takes up this challenge in convergence with the magic of science. In doing so, she concludes that the things in which our brain thinks love is, are actually just the products of love. Love itself is something much greater and it is worth figuring out what this supreme emotion is all about. Fredrickson’s work primarily centered around the broaden-and-build theory, in which states “positive emotions …show more content…
A big thing that people may disagree with is that love is supposedly “conditional” (108). According to Fredrickson, “'just as our body is designed to extract oxygen from the Earth’s atmosphere, our body is designed to love” (105). If love is supposedly such an engraved ability, why would it need conditions? Well, as amazing as our brain can be, it is not able to hold huge amounts of information. It will automatically discard of unused information after a short while. So basically, if we want to maintain love, we have to keep renewing acts of love. This explains why many relationships tend to fail. It is very common for people to lose feelings for someone and it is solely because people do not know how to self-generate love. However, it is not our fault, no one has taught us how to love, we just follow our hearts and go with it. But with integration of love 2.0, we will be able to achieve that status of “relationship goals”. Fredrickson simplifies this idea by revealing that love has two preconditions, safety and connection. In maintaining a safe environment, we can continue to bless each other with the gift of positive …show more content…
We cannot physically test whether we have a real connection with someone with "loud brain scanners" (110) or biological tests. While this point is valid and even accurate, we limit love to romance and family, in which we fail to include everyone else. We associate with people every single day, so why not make it easier for everyone? Maybe it does sound like something that is too much for us to deal with on a daily basis. Love has prospered since the birth of mankind, so is there really a reason to change the way we love? Most people will say no, that we should not overcomplicate love. It comes naturally to us, so why try dissecting something that already makes us happy? It is obviously doing its job if people are still getting married and making families. However, love 2.0 is not an actual upgrade of love, it is simply just the recognition of the smaller parts in life that we overlook. “With each micro-moment of love, you climb another rung, to richer and more passionate social relationships, to greater resilience and wisdom, and to better physical health” (121). The real question is, what else in this world can result in such profound improvements in our
Sian Beilock is the author of this novel, the information written by her would be considered credible due to the fact that she is a leading expert on brain science in the psychology department at the University of Chicago. This book was also published in the year 2015 which assures readers that the information it contains is up to date and accurate. The novel is easy to understand and the author uses examples of scientific discoveries to help make the arguments more relatable. Beilock goes into depth about how love, is something more than just an emotion, it derives from the body’s anticipation. “Volunteers reported feeling
Custance, D. (2010) ‘Determined to love?’ in Brace, N. and Byford, J. (eds) Discovering Psychology, Milton Keynes, The Open University.
The article '' love: the right chemistry'' by Anastasia Toufexis efforts to explain the concept of love from a scientific aspect in which an amateur will understand. Briefly this essay explains and describe in a scientific way how people's stimulation of the body works when you're falling in love. The new scientific researches have given the answer through human physiology how genes behave when your feelings for example get swept away. The justification for this is explained by how the brain gets flooded by chemicals. The author expresses in one point that love isn't just a nonsense behavior nor a feeling that exhibits similar properties as of a narcotic drug. This is brought about by an organized chemical chain who controls different depending on the individual. A simple action such as a deep look into someone's eyes can start the simulation in the body that an increased production of hand sweat will start. The tingly feeling inside your body is a result of a scientific delineation which makes the concept of love more concretely and more factually mainly for researchers and the wide...
Robert Nozick’s Love’s Bond is a clear summary of components, goals, challenges, and limitations of romantic love. Nozick gives a description of love as having your wellbeing linked with that of someone and something you love. I agree with ideas that Nozick has explained concerning the definition of love, but individuals have their meaning of love. Every individual has a remarkable thing that will bring happiness and contentment in their lives. While sometimes it is hard to practice unconditional love, couples should love unconditionally because it is a true love that is more than infatuation and overcomes minor character flaw.
Nozick says that it is incoherent to ask how love benefits an individual person because it is through love that the individual identity is able to morph and create the we identity. He states that the jointed identity of the we relationship “enlarges and enhances your individual one.” (pg 233) Other benefits he lists in Love's Bond include how there is a form of unconditional love or total acceptance expressed by the lovers, such as disregarding or forgiving the fact that certain foibles exist. Therefore it is incoherent to ask how an individual who has not experienced love to explain or understand love's properties or receive the benefits of being in the we relationship.
Love makes you hopeful. It makes you believe in happily ever after. ”(Citation). These reasons and many others help us to understand that love completes our lives.
When people think about the world, many people think of the relationships between one another. The connection within marriages, couples dating, friendship, and family is what has brought the world into what it is today. However, would the world be able to work the same if the way people loved didn't exist? The feelings of love, both romantic and platonic, is something that has been ingrained within the human mind over the centuries. For thousands of years, the ancestors of every human alive today mated in order to survive. In addition, the feelings of passion have been exchanged due to the mating of these individuals. The form of attachment between people is present in all types of relationships today. There is no possible way that the way
Her entire article is about love and it’s meaning, yet she provides conflicting information about the topic. At one point she says “your body’s definition of love…[allows for] a clear path [to emerge],” while on the next page she writes that the reader “can think of love, or positivity resonance, as one of the more complex and recurrent scenes nested within the act of your day” (Fredrickson 108, 109). The essence of Fredrickson’s argument is about love, yet she cannot properly explain the concept in a clear way to the reader. The conflicting ideas of “clear path” and “complex and recurrent scenes” weakens the strength of her argument. On the same note, Fredrickson contradicts herself as she begins to describe how oxytocin connects you to other people. In an experiment, a brain scanner was used to show what areas of a person’s brain lit up when they were told to imagine something painful occurring to them. When these same people were told to imagine their loved ones in the same situation, the same areas of the brain would light up. The first issue with the oxytocin experiment is that her statements contradict her ideas of relating with others during times of distress. In her work she writes, “When you’re feeling bad--afraid, anxious, or angry--even your best friend can seem pretty remote or separate from you” (Fredrickson 113). This provides a conflicting idea to her statement that “your loved one’s pain is your pain” (Fredrickson 113). So one may ask: if you feel the pain your loved ones are feeling, then how can you feel more remote to those loved ones who are undergoing a painful or negative emotion? Contradicting information not only perplexes the reader, but it also makes the overall strength of an argument weaken considerably. As a writer and a psychologist, Fredrickson is responsible for putting more care in her choice of words to avoid
In “Immune to Reality”, Daniel Gilbert asserts that unexplained events have a longer lasting a stronger emotional impact. This is because unexplained events are unusual and uncommon. When events are explained, the explanations lessen the emotional impact because it makes events seem more common rather than rare. This means that giving explanations for rare events such as finding honest love lessens the emotional impact because it makes it seem frequent. Thus, an explanation to honest love can actually weaken our ability to find honest love as it will make it seem less rare and more predictable. In “Selections From Love 2.0”, Barbara Frederickson offers a scientific explanation of what love is. She explains that love is a connection with another
Barbara Fredrickson challenges many of the preconceptions we have about love in “Selections from Love 2.0” of the New Humanities Reader. Love is traditionally thought of as being the connection which is shared only with the people closest to you like, your family or your wife. Fredrickson refutes this and even says that love isn’t “exclusive lasting or unconditional” and dismisses these as wishes that people have about love. She believes that in order for all of us to truly understand love, we shouldn't equate it to these preconceived ideas. Although, it is difficult to think of relationships and commitment as separate from love, this is what Fredrickson thinks is necessary in order to have a scientific discussion.
What is the meaning of love? When we are born into this world, there are already those that love and adore us. One article defines it as “ a variety of different feelings and emotions, chemical brain states, and attitudes that ranges from interpersonal affection (“I love my mother”) to pleasure” (Lyons, “A Deeper Look”). “Love” is a unique and complicated neurological emotion which is very difficult to understand. It is just like hunger and thirst, but just more permanent. Many of us talk about love as if we have no control over it, as if it is blind, in the sense that it can’t be helped. Many artists and poets use the heart as a symbol that represents love, even though the truth is that it occurs in our brain. Unlike modern society, the older
"What Is Love: Theories on the Greatest Emotion of All Time." World News. N.p., 13 Dec. 2012. Web. 09 May 2014. .
Love is many things; it has not one description that can be pin pointed. Love can be described as the openness of a relationship, the sexual attraction between partners, or can be seen as pure attraction to each other’s personalities. In Jonathon Haidt’s book, The Happiness Hypothesis, he writes about the types of love there are and which he believes is the most important. There are two main types of love, companionate and passionate love. Haidt defines true love as companionate love, having more importance in a relationship than that of passionate love. Companionate love is perceived as a stronger love than Passionate love, because of a better understanding in companionship and passionate love will not be everlasting. The idea of companionate over passionate makes sense, but media has formed a different outlook on love that has warped the genuine imagery of love.
Ultimately, a partner who wants their significant other to fall in love with them will have succeeded after executing these steps. By putting these skills into effect and developing a plan of action, the relationship will last for eternity. This will be true when both partners cannot get enough of each other and live everyday as newlyweds. After a relationship is blessed by these tips and tricks, it will be sure to be a jubilant
By choosing to lover her child, the mother acknowledges that she doesn’t feel as if she is obligated to do so because she wants to love him or her and is prepared for the challenges that await her. Thoma Oord writes in his article “The Love Racket: Defining Love and Agape for the Love–and–Science Research Program” that the definition of love refers to the “promotion of well being of all others in an enduring, intense, effective, and pure manner” meaning that when a person loves someone, they will try to do whatever they can to their beloved’s benefit (922). The child is benefited in many ways when the mother chooses to love him or her, for example, the child’s anxiety levels and sense of fear are lowered because they have the security of the bond they possess with their mother (Tarlaci 745). In his article, “Unmasking the Neurology of Love,” Robert Weiss explains that love is a “goal-orientated motivation state rather than a specific emotion” which arises the possibility of a mother “falling out of love” with her child if neither feelings or goals are present. Tarlaci observed an experiment conducted by A. Bartels and S. Zeki in which they compared the brain activity of both a mother looking at a picture of her child to a lover looking at a picture of their beloved. In the experiment it was discovered that “just about the same regions of the brain showed activity in the same two groups except for one” the PACG, which has been confirmed to be “specific to a mother’s love” (Tarlaci 747). So the chances of a mother falling out of love with her child are there, but are different from that of a lover due to the areas of the brain involved. Therefore, explaining the bond between a mother and child as something that forms when a mother chooses to love him or her implies a greater sense of willingness and