Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary devices of literature
Literary devices of literature
Character development introduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the short story, “Prospector’s Trail”, the author Cathy Jewison makes the characters seem like real people. This can be illustrated by some conflicts that are evident in the story; similarly in everyday life with everyday people. The characters also look authentic because the characters behave the same way the “average” human would and the reader is able to relate to them in some way.
Two dominant characters in the narrative, Norman and Jennifer, are a newlywed couple and the rigidity among them is discernible throughout the story, for example: "Jennifer shook her finger at him [Norman]...'Don't move for the rest of the night. Got it?'" This quote clearly displays acrimony between the two and it is quite normal for a husband and wife to argue since they are still getting to know
…show more content…
each other. Readers can relate to Norman after he figures where he truly resides. An example of this is: “You have a gift. You’re in your domain. Do you realize you haven’t fallen once since you’ve been out here?” (pg.30). An individual can compare to this quote because a part of being a human is finding out where you fit in or belong. Due to Norman having a “gift” with finding items at the dump, he had found where he genuinely fits in. One stereotypical character I encountered was Roy being the man who resides in the bush. For example: “Noise! Traffic! Filth! I can’t stand the commotion there, that’s why I come out of the city.” (pg.21). this displays that Roy would rather have a cabin life rather than dwelling in a city full of agitation. Roy is also construed as a grizzled old man with a creased face and a graying beard which is what I imagine a typical man who lives in a bush to view like. During the discussion, Raza made the interesting point that smoke released from the computer can be compared to a relief for Norman. It’s is like all the bad stuff getting released just like Norman now, who has gotten rid of Jennifer, as there will be no individual anymore to interfere with his life and can now reside peacefully by following what he loves (prospecting at the dump). “He slept peacefully for the first time in months”, is a great example of this. Dakota’s observation of Jennifer’s attitude and her apathetic mood towards camping reminds me of my mother.
She doesn't really care for camping; she'd rather be at home watching TV. She goes because my dad likes to once in a while. I, on the other hand, love to camp and adore being out in the nature.
How the author plays with your mind during the story is also commendable. The reader, along with the main character Norman think that they are going “prospecting”; getting gold, but what turns out is unbelievable. The irony behind Roy taking Norman to a dump to find valuable items really surprised me.
This segment of the story was emphasized by Jinal who suggested that how the hopeless Norman changes in the end when he finds out that prospecting at the dump is truly where he belongs.
Pulkit talked about symbolism in the story. He expanded that the symbolic significance can be seen on Norman’s own shirt and the other shirt which he found in the Yellowknife dump. The shirt found at the dump is a symbol because it symbolizes Norman finding a piece of himself in Yellowknife. I agree that the shirt found in the dump is a symbol because it delineates Norman finding a piece of himself in
Yellowknife. In “The Prospector’s Trail”, Roy was like an instructor to the young Norman. He had experience on how to get by in Yellowknife and informed those skills to Norman, who later used them to his advantage. He knew where the wealth was at in prospecting, not mining for gold, but mining for valuable junk at the dump. Roy helped Norman out exceedingly throughout the story, just as he said when people move to Yellowknife “some make it, some don’t”. Overall, Roy was the turning point in Norman’s life. Due to his wise and resourceful ways, he helped Norman prepare for his new life in Yellowknife. Now Norman “sleeps soundly” at night as he is fulfilled. .
I thought that the husband was just telling his story then they went to a motel and fought then went home, it was only when I saw the police get involved where I found out I missed something. I enjoyed this story the most out of all the stories we had to read, after reading it I found the feud between the two characters to be a exceptional battle of wits until they show their hand in the climax and are forced to attempt to kill one another. The other stories I read took a less subtle approach to their conflicts and I think that is where a lot of the other stories fell short to me, the climax is more satisfying when it isn't expected or revealed before that. Overall, Twins by Eric Wright takes on a very underrated approach of having the conflict be mainly in the characters heads until one chooses to make a move, I found this made the story a lot better than the other options and it will without a doubt, leave you satisfied when it is
On page 55, we have reached the climax of the story. This altercation took place under the influence of alcohol. The fight take’s place when a guy accuses the now young man of flirting with his girlfriend. The man accusing him is immediately verbally assaulted by the main character who defends himself in a manner that brings him to his feet. This is the first time in the story Aunt Greta is disappointed in him as they leave the event and return home
Sahara Special, by Esme Raji Codell, is a shining piece of adolescent nonfiction that authentically and sensitively captures the Heart-Wrenching Life Story and Amazing Adventures of a two-time inner-city fifth grader. Inspiring and empathy inducing, Sahara Special exemplifies Russel’s guidelines for culturally and socially diverse literature as outlined in our textbook in many ways.
In the short story, “The Painted Door”, John and Ann are a married couple, who have been together for seven years, and yet despite this fact, they still have trouble communicating. Ann wishes, from the very beginning of the story, that John would stay at home with her rather than go to check on his father. However, rather than expressing these sentiments exactly, she acts very cold towards him and insists that she’ll be perfectly fine, trying to guilt him into staying. Though it works, as John offers to stay with her rather than visiting his father’s farm, Ann decides to instead push away her feelings of spite and loneliness and allows him to leave, despite worrying about his safety and how she’s going to cope while John is gone. This is the
This book and the Aboriginal people described within are successful in showing how late nineteenth century ideas of authenticity can at once be complied to and challenged, which is perhaps a reflection of how the definition for authenticity was created. One example Raibmon gives is the work Aboriginal people did in the hop fields. They were an important part of an important industry on the Northwest Coast which challenges the idea that authentic Indians were not part of modern economic endeavors, but at the same time the Aboriginals were using this economic opportunity to maintain ties with their kinship network as well as to locations that were traditionally culturally important.
In the short story “Woman Hollering Creek” the conflict of the story is between the main characters Cleofilas, the protagonist, and Juan, the antagonist who are married. The conflict stems from Cleofilas’ perception of how a wife should be treated versus Juan’s idea of how to treat
Life and death, happiness and sadness, loneliness and company, frustration and understanding, guilt and content. All of these are emotions that you will experience as you walk in Toby’s footsteps through The Trail, written by Meika Hashimoto. In the story, the main characters are Toby, Lucas, Denver, Sean, and Moose. The main setting is a portion of the Appalachian Trail, along with many shelters throughout that section of the Appalachian Trail. In the beginning of the story, it introduces Toby, the protagonist, and hints at his reasoning behind why he is hiking the Appalachian Trail in the first place. It also introduces Lucas, Toby’s best friend, and some of the ways that whatever happened between them effects Toby. The overall conflict, or problem in The Trail is Toby battling guilt and the emotional aspect all together, along with the physical obstacles he has to face. The solution to the problem is Toby becoming content with who he is, what has happened between
By varying her perspectives, Carson is able to change the tones of the short stories. By using her childhood self as a narrator, she purveys a since of innocence. Meanwhile by using an unnamed wise sounding narrator in other stories, she creates a sense of tenseness and urgency. Thus, she experimentally demonstrates that the narrator can heavily determine what the reader thinks of the piece, and therefore can very precisely be used as a creative device to convey meaning.
As the story begins, the narrator's compliance with her role as a submissive woman is easily seen. She states, "John laughs at me, but one expects that in marriage" (Gilman 577). These words clearly illustrate the male's position of power in a marriage t...
He relates the story of Edward Sheriff Curtis, a photographer who went around the USA in 1900 taking pictures of various Native peoples (King, 2003, p.32). The problem with Curtis is that he was “looking for the literary Indian, the dying Indian, the imaginative construct”, so much so that he “took along boxes of 'Indian '” props to dress up people who did not fit that image (King, 2003, p.32). King compares this 'literary Indian ' to the “Indian of Fact”, which are the real Native Americans who do not fit into people 's expectations at all most of the time (King, 2003, p.32). The problem, then, is not who people are, but what others think they should be based on their own
This internal battle to transform the war mindset of a soldier to the norms of society is exemplified through Norman’s actions. First, this is displayed through the situation at the Drive Thru. Norman’s distance from society is shown when he attempts to order from Mama’s Burgers, but does it incorrectly, as the procedure has evolved. This evolution reflects the transformation of the world that occurred while Norman was in the war. Thus, when he returns he is stuck in the past, and not confident in how to proceed into the future. This disparity with time is again echoed with Norman’s compulsion of guessing the time. This symbolizes that he is mentally frozen in time, unable to adapt. In addition, while Norman drives through his town, he sees a change in the lake. “The lake had divided into two halves. One half still glistened, the other was caught in shadow.” (O’Brien, 150). This division among the lake represents the divide Norman saw among the world he lived in as he attempted to adhere to the norms of society. The glistening half of the lake represents the life outside of the war, shining and drawing attention. Meanwhile, the side caught in the shadows depicts the side of Norman that is still within the war, hidden in darkness, unpresentable. Additionally, this reflects the silence that Norman was forced into about his memories of the war. His thoughts had to be hidden in the darkness. This is reinforced as Norman imagines telling several people, such as his Dad, Sally Gustafson, and the voice over the intercom, his story about almost receiving the Silver Star award. However, he does not. “He could not talk about it and never would. The evening was smooth and warm.” (O’Brien, 153). In his suicide itself, this oath of silence is present. Norman left no note and no explanation. Overall, Norman’s death raises the issue of
Immediately, the narrator stereotypes the couple by saying “they looked unmistakably married” (1). The couple symbolizes a relationship. Because marriage is the deepest human relationship, Brush chose a married couple to underscore her message and strengthen the story. The husband’s words weaken their relationship. When the man rejects his wife’s gift with “punishing…quick, curt, and unkind” (19) words, he is being selfish. Selfishness is a matter of taking, just as love is a matter of giving. He has taken her emotional energy, and she is left “crying quietly and heartbrokenly” (21). Using unkind words, the husband drains his wife of emotional strength and damages their relationship.
To begin with, the narrator husband name is John, who shows male dominance early in the story as he picked the house they stayed in and the room he kept his wife in, even though his wife felt uneasy about the house. He is also her doctor and orders her to do nothing but rest; thinking she is just fine. John is the antagonist because he is trying to control
depictions of characters and details that capture the imagination. The plot of this novel is the
In the first chapter Gray explains that it is as if men and women are from different planets. He states, "Without the awareness that we are supposed to be different, men and women are at odds with each other" (Gray 10). By this quote Gray is saying that not knowing these differences men and women will have conflicts and frustrations in their relationships. Furthermore, most men and women do not know the differences between each other, and they end up fighting and breaking up. John Gray does a great job explaining men's and women's differences in the book Men Are From Mars, Women Are From Venus.