Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
“the case for torture” summary
Advantages and disadvantages of torture
“the case for torture” summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: “the case for torture” summary
Intro:
In today’s society there are many issues surrounding the topic of torture. There are two sides to this argument. One side would be that torture should never be used, the other side would be that torture should be used if it is absolutely necessary. Many times when torture is used it is used to get information out of an individual. On many occasions people hear of torture being used on terrorists that have been captured. Torture is also used on Soldiers that have been captured during war. During times of war torture is often used by both sides to gain an advantage over the other side. The use of torture is a widely debated topic in today’s world.
Torture is one of the most common interrogation methods in many war torn countries. These countries include many middle eastern countries that are in turmoil. Torture however is used in many developed nations as
…show more content…
well. A common example of a developed nation using torture would be North Korea. This communist country is notorious for its mistreatment of it’s citizens. North Korea developed a very intricate version of mental torture. The communist state sends prisoner to a prison that is known as the white prison. In this prison everything is white. The walls in the prison are all painted white. The prisoners and the guards both wear white uniforms. The guards also never speak making the prison eerily silent. This form of torture causes prisoners to go insane because of the lack of color and noise. There are many different forms of torture that are used.
There is both mental and physical forms of torture. An example of physical torture would be beating a prisoner. This is physical because it inflicts pain on a particular individual. A form of mental torture would be using sounds such as a baby crying. This causes psychological trauma for the prisoner. Physical torture is the most common form of torture because it is the most readily available form. All that is required for physical torture is a person’s fists. Mental torture is less common. It is not as common because it requires much more planning and coordination. Mental torture usually requires specially designed rooms to be effective. An example of mental torture that requires special equipment is Chinese water torture. In this form of torture a person is strapped to a chair. They then put on a special mask that holds their head back exposing their forehead. Cold water then drips onto their exposed forehead every few seconds. The feeling this creates causes the prisoner to go crazy. They will usually give up any information to make the torture
stop. Background Torture can be used to get the most truthful answers. The Romans used to say “The highest form of truth”. The Roman’s believed that torture was the most effective way to get the truth. The truth is very important to the person who needs the information. There is just one problem with the use of torture. All though it can produce the desired result of truthfulness. The use of torture can also produce the exact opposite result. Some people who are being tortured would do anything to make the pain stop. In this case they might lie. This could cause problems, especially if the information is going to be used to save lives. The use of torture can be both good and bad. It can be good because the information needed could be provided. It however can be bad because of the fact that it is considered inhumane. It can also be terrible because the desired result may not be produced. Not to mention the fact that the use of torture is against the United Nations universal declaration of human rights. Analysis: Against The first side to the argument of the use of torture would be that it should not be used. Many people who hold this opinion believe it should not be used because they believe it is not humane. This viewpoint is also very valid. Many people who hold this viewpoint believe that no one should ever be tortured no matter the circumstances. Torture is argued to be inhumane. Many people disagree with the use of torture because they themselves would never want to be tortured. This is a very valid viewpoint because no normal person would ever want to be tortured. Another group of people that don't want torture to be used is people that already have been tortured. People around the world, like in kenya, were tortured and know the experience. They know how horrifying it is and how many physical and mental scars it leaves behind. They also know how much of a burden it can be to the family members of the individual. It is a burden to the family because the tortured individual is in such bad shape that they need constant supervision so nothing bad happens to them. Another reason that people are against torture is most people don't know when to stop and are ignorant. The people that are conducting the torture are looking for certain answers and information but if the individual doesn't know anything about it they torturer will keep going.This can lead to the victim just saying false or random information just to make the torturing stop. This is even worse for the victims because if they torturer finds out this will most likely lead to a more severe form of torture which can even lead to death. Lastly it can lead to an institution gettin bad rep and maybe getting shut down. For example guantanamo bay. Guantanamo bay has a bad reputation for force feeding and waterboarding its prisoners. When people found out about this they were enraged, it was a very bad time for the prison. It was protested so bad that in 2009 Barack Obama officially closed guantanamo bay and is still closed to this date. For The other side to this argument would be that torture is acceptable only if the circumstances require it’s use. This argument would be used to justify the use of torture to get information from a high value target. High value targets include terrorists and criminal who have information that a particular party uses. Torture would commonly be used to get information such as locations of other terrorists. People who usually agree with the use of torture are usually people with a position of power. This is usually the case because their position makes them responsible for the protection of the public. These people tend to be fine with the use of torture as long as it benefits the general public. The public need to be protected. This is used to justify the use of torture. They believe that harming one person is worth it if they can protect innocent people from harm. The general public must be protected from outside threats because they do not generally have access to information that they would need to protect themselves. For example torture would be used to stop a terrorist attack. The government can not inform the public of a pending terrorist attack because it would cause mass panic. When people panic they get violent causing even more people to get hurt. This causes the terrorist attack to have to be stopped before it can take place. The use of torture can get the most truthful answer to when and where the attack will take place. This would greatly increase the chances of the attack being stopped and save the most lives possible. Conclusion: The topic of is torture ever acceptable is going to go on for years to come. Now that elections are coming near politicians will be taking a side, and most of them already have. This can lead to the US being separated into two groups which is never good. Hopefully people will come to their senses and see that torture is inhumane and should never be used under ANY circumstances.
Until there is a credible way to determine whether or not torture is in fact effective, I pass judgment that the practice should be discontinued. The question as to if the torture policy is a human rights violation or if it holds crucial necessity, is not answered in the essay. Applebaum explores the reality that torture possesses negative implications on the inflictor. After presented with the compelling stance and evidence, Applebaum raises the interesting question as to why so much of society believes that torture is successful. I agree that the torture policy is wrong, a point emphasized by Applebaum, contrary to the popular attitude surrounding the topic.
What do you consider to be cruel and unusual punishment? Most people when asked this question think of medieval torture devices, burning people alive, and hard slave labor. However, cruel and unusual punishment, which is a protected against right by the eighth amendment, stretches far beyond these cliches and is still occurring in modern society. The case Miller v. Alabama and a parallel case, Jackson v. Hobbs deals with such punishments and brings up the questions of what, in current times, is to be considered cruel and unusual punishment. Miller v. Alabama addresses with the debate that arose surrounding the mandatory sentence of life without parole for a juvenile when two boys, fourteen-year-old Evan Miller and sixteen-year-old Colby Smith,
“A Death in Texas” by Steve Earle is the true-life story of a friendship that occurred over ten
The notion that fear will make a human leak information is not a novel idea. Torture has widely been used throughout the world by many groups of people. After World War II, The Geneva Convention prohibited any nation from partaking in torture. The emergence of terrorist activity on American soil brought up the question whether torture should be advocated or prohibited from a moral standpoint. The US changed the definition of torture in order to forcibly attain potentially important information from captives. Even though the new clause suggested that many of the methods the US used were now legal, other countries still had an issue in terms of honoring the Geneva Convention and basic human rights. Advocates for torture promise that countless innocent lives can be saved from the information obtained from a single torture victim. Opponents to the advocates suggest that torture often results in misleading information. Morally, torture is not justified as it degrades humans and often leaves victims scarred for life and possibly dead.
So even though the person is not in real physical danger, the panic caused by this method of interrogation causes both physical suffering and mental suffering. In the definition of torture it says it is torture whether it causes physical or mental suffering, and water boarding does both! The Fourth Geneva Convention states that any measure of such a character as to cause the physical suffering or extermination of protected persons in their hands.whether applied by civilian or military agents. In the “How to Do It” article, the author describes how to increase the suffering of the torture by putting plastic wrap over the mouth but not the eyes or nose to prevent water from escaping the throat and sinuses.
My topic is about cruel and unusual punishment. I picked this topic because I wanted to learn about cruel and unusual punishment and why people do it. The eighth amendment was started 1791 which is cruel and unusual punishment. The term cruel unusual punishment means people that committed a crime have the right to be free of cruel and unusual punishment while in prison. It means if a prison did something bad the constitution still acts to guarantee his or her personal safety and not to be tortured.
Torture is the process of inflicting pain upon other people in order to force them to say something against their own will. The word “torture” comes from the Latin word “torquere,” which means to twist. Torture can not only be psychologically but mentally painful. Before the Enlightenment, it was perfectly legal to torture individuals but nowadays, it is illegal to torture anyone under any circumstances. In this essay, I will demonstrate why torture should never acceptable, not matter the condition.
Is there a difference between someone with a terminal illness and someone that has to die under the law? Carlos Musso, a doctor who participated in state of Georgia 's execution through lethal injection, says “A death penalty patient is no different from a patient dying of cancer- except his cancer is a court order.” The underlying results is death, and Carlos Musso ethnically believes, “When we have a patients who can no longer survive his illness, we as physicians must ensure he has comfort.”, which seems to fit the idea of AMA’s standards that physicians are “healers” in the aspect of relieving a patient’s suffering. The 8th amendment supports that lethal injection is a less punishing form of execution and require doctors to carry out a this more healing procedure. However, the American Medical Association (AMA) has set one standard that bans “a physician from participating in any legally authorized execution.”, which ultimately encourages physicians to leave possible
Torture is the intentional infliction of extreme physical suffering on some non-consenting, defenseless person. Torture in any form is used to punish, coerce, or afford sadistic pleasure.
The use of torture has always been a hot topic of moral and ethical discussion. Typically, the discussion is not about whether or not torture is good, but rather if there is ever a morally acceptable situation in which torture should be allowed to occur. Does a criminal’s deeds strip him of basic human rights and make it morally okay for him to be physically and mentally abused? Do certain situations such as war make torture acceptable? It is generally agreed upon that torture is a terrible violation of a person and their rights; the common thread among moral questions such as these is if there are any times when torture could be considered morally acceptable. In order to analyze this moral dilemma, an ethical system is commonly used as a
Torture is the act of inflicting severe pain or suffering, mental or physical, on an individual to obtain information, to intimidate or for punishment. Torture is expressed in many ways, for example, rape, hard labour, electric shock, severe beatings, etc, and for this reason it is considered as cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment. Therefore, it is a violation of human rights and is strictly prohibited by international law. Michael Davis and many other individuals have stated that torture is worse than murder. He claims, “Both torture and premature death are very great evils but, if one is a greater evil than the other, it is certainly torture”. With that being said, there are three major reasons to discuss, in which, torture is not morally acceptable. However, in many cases it is considered very beneficial, but the disadvantages outweighs the benefits. Firstly, bullying is a form of torture but to a lesser extent, in which it results in an individual suffering from low self-esteem, suicidal thoughts, self-harm, etc. In addition, torture is mainly used as a means to obtain information, however, it is an ineffective interrogation tool in which, the data given could be falsified. Lastly, torture is sometimes utilized to shatter the autonomy of individual, that is, the right to their freedom and independence, forcing the victim to succumb to the torturer’s way of thinking.
The ongoing debate between torture and enhanced interrogation techniques is, has been and always will be a hot controversial topic. Whether between different political views, cultures, world leaders or the citizens and society in general, the issue will always be of great importance. Some believe the two are the same, while others feel they differ. Either way, the methods and effectiveness are the major points for concern.
One of the groups argued that torture is sometimes okay while the other group argued that under no circumstances is torture allowed. In my opinion, the group that is against torture won the debate because they had more good points than the other group did. The group that was against torture argued that torture affects innocent people and ruins people’s lives. The group that is says sometimes torture is okay said that torture is helpful when getting information from suspected terrorists. There is also always a reason for doing it. The government gets background information about these suspects before even thinking about using “enhanced interrogation” techniques on them. It helps them find about key information because there is no other way to get information from them. The no torture group fights back saying that you don’t want to stoop down to their level and that you do not necessarily know if they are terrorists. If you keep getting the wrong people, you will just keep going in circles. You could even accidently kill the person while waterboarding them and there is no justification for killing someone you don’t know. The torture that is okay with torture clarified that torture is only okay under certain circumstances because there is no other way to get information from them. If you just kept them in a prison, they would wait their whole life before giving up any information. Then, the no torture group
In conclusion, the convention against torture, has brought many people together, and has informed many people of the horrible tortures which go on everywhere from the US to Syria. It has tried to set fine lines which prohibit torture under all circumstances. However, since there is no governing body over countries, it remains difficult to enforce the human right standards sought after by the Convention against torture. The convention has therefore done a good job at identifying the torturers. This has in turn lessened the amount of those persecuted. It will remain a gradual process to eliminate torture from all countries, but nevertheless a necessity, in the quest for universal human rights. Torture will continue until all countries decide for themselves, and not from a third party convention that freedom from torture is a human right everyone deserves.
John Stuart Mill once said, “Bad men need nothing more to encompass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing”. Unfortunately, that is exactly what is happening in America today. Hundreds of terrorists are tortured every day. Some say that because of terrorists’ actions, they “deserve” their abuse. Victims of terrorist crimes, such as 9/11, are often the biggest supporters of terrorist abuse. However, torture is an inhumane and ineffective means of gaining information, because the methods are deplorable, the information gleaned is usually wrong, and the practice is against several laws.