Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social class in the Victorian era
Social class in the Victorian era
Impact of industrial revolution on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social class in the Victorian era
The Working Class and its Unique Lifestyle The working class was known as the poor in the Victorian Era, struggling to stay alive as a result of their low income. This resulted in a sparse diet, ragged clothes, a limited education, and limits to what they could do in terms of literature, music, and theater. Also, as the Industrial Revolution progressed, finding work became more complicated as the working class population had increased putting many people into poverty. Consequently, the people of the working class labored constantly to not only keep their job but to pay for their family expenses. The working class of Victorian England was a group that worked hard to stay out of poverty as well as off the streets Unlike the upper class they had minimal recreational time. Many different people have tried to account for the working class conditions and what they did in their spare time: “he could attend evening courses on scientific subjects or Latin or shorthand at a Mechanics’ Institution, or at one of the Working Men’s Colleges” (Picard The Working Class and Poor). This imposes that the men could take an educational course to get a better job. Also in their spare time, people would go to street vendors as opposed to markets so they could get food for a more affordable price (Picard The Working Class and Poor). W.J. Reader, a …show more content…
renowned author explains how the working class would also spend their limited leisure time at pubs, professional football games, and music halls which required almost no cost (108-110). These leisure activities would provide a small amount of relief as the working class was busy during almost all times of the week. In conclusion, people of the working class had only a paucity of time and money limiting to what they could do, but when they did have the time they would spend it wisely. Working class members were required to work almost all days of the year, with exception to a few holiday traditions. These holiday traditions were of great importance to them as they got the chance to catch up with family and attend different activities. The Victorian Era was mostly Christian resulting in different Christian holidays being celebrated. Author, Sally Mitchell shows how Bank Holidays such as Easter and Boxing Days were important to the working class (20). The Boxing Holiday was a holiday including the working class and the upper class. On this holiday, the upper class would give gifts to the lower classes. The concept of giving was of great importance in the Victorian Era. Moreover, Christmas was also a main tradition of the working class. Mitchell points out how important Christmas was as it was a time of giving and reuniting with family and friends (153). The working class culture incorporated these traditions like which were of great significance to the working class. Also, part of the working class culture was literature. Although famous books written by authors like Charles Dickens did not reach the vendors, the working class had their own literature according to Mitchell (456). Also according to Mitchell, the most common type of reading material was a broadside which consisted of different topics. These reading materials let them read about what was going on and was considered leisure for them. The working class was a group that would participate in numerous traditions and contribute to the literature of the Victorian Era. Working class members received only twenty-thirty shillings a week resulting in a scanty portion of food and ragged clothing. First off, the amount of food for the working class was minimal resulting in the lack of protein and fat. Writers have worked on pointing out the diet of the working class: “People in the working class got most of their nutrition from bread...show purchases limited to bread, cheese, butter, sugar, tea, salt, and potatoes” ( Daily Life in Victorian England Mitchell 122). The working class could not afford food from markets so they relied highly on street vendors. The skimpy diet of the working class resulted in hunger and death. Clothing was a fashion trend that was of great significance in the Victorian Era but the working class could not afford the stylish clothes of the time and settled with ragged and trite clothes. According to W.J. Reader, men wore chiefly trousers made of cotton while women wore dresses also made of cotton (95). Furthermore, the working class would occasionally get hand me downs from the upper class but that was if they were lucky. This illustrates that people of the working class despite their low income would still be able to get clothing that was not in the best condition but would still serve its purpose. Education for the working class was available but the learning conditions were not the best.
Sally Mitchell explains how elementary schools and Sunday Schools offered low-cost instruction for the poor which were run by charitable organizations (165-167) Although these schools offered low-cost education, they were in bad conditions: “868 children taught by one master” (Mitchell 169). These schools were charitable which also meant they were “ragged”. The poor could not afford secondary school so most working class members had 2-3 years of education. Education was an aspect that was low in cost but resulted in bad conditions for the working
class. Victorian England was a time period of great prosperity but this did not affect the working class as they were forced into bad living conditions resulting from low income. Due to their low income they had a set lifestyle with almost nothing recreational. In conclusion, workers struggled in this time period and consequently left them to a bleak and work orientated lifestyle consisting of sparse diets, ragged clothing, and a small education.
The working class faced conditions in the factory that wealthier skill workers did not have deal with. These men were not in a comfortable financial situation at home, and could not find comfort in hazardous working conditions with the dangerous machines they had to operate. Workers were harmed daily and among these injured employees were children (Shi 62). Many of these children were as young as nine years old, and due to financial reasons their families sent them away to work in workshops, mines, and even in factories surrounded by dangerous machinery. Realistically, these children were doomed to working in a factory for their entire lives. They did not attended school and worked to help provide for their families. With no education, they would not be able to find a more prestigious job with higher pay. The waged for factory workers were low, but they were not always guaranteed. The Knights of Labor pushed for a federal law that would force employers to “pay employees weekly, in full, for labor performed during the preceding week” (Shi 62). These people were only working in harmful conditions to survive but were not guaranteed enough money to feed their families. Charity handouts did not necessarily help feed a poor family, but aimed to “... produce most beneficial results to [the] community” (Shi 60). This meant that the wealthy didn’t directly give citizens money, but
This class was the poor working class. According to the article “Child Labor in the United States” written by Robert Whaples, a large proportion of the labor workforce was made up of children: “In 1820 children aged 15 and under made up 23 percent of the manufacturing labor force of the industrializing Northeast.” That is a significant percent of the working population. According to the article “A History of Child Labor” reviewed by Milton Fried, a child could work as long as six days a week for up to 18 hours a day, and only make a dollar a week.
What do you think of when you hear “working-class?” One perhaps might think of a
An Analysis on the lives of the Upper, Middle, and Lower classes during the Industrial Revolution
The question above deserves many-sided comparisons. However, people’s happiness and living standard are complicated to measure because, in this period, British society was experimenting multiple transformations and some effects of the revolution had set off with others. Besides, within different time extents we may get different conclusions for this issue. Therefore, this paper will covered aspects like working and living conditions, real wage, health, mortality, freedom and rights of english workers in long run, with the objective to have a good measure of their level of life.
With this in mind, some perspective on the society of that time is vital. During this time the industrial revolution is taking place, a massive movement away from small farms, businesses operated out of homes, small shops on the corner, and so on. Instead, machines are mass-producing products in giant factories, with underpaid workers. No longer do people need to have individual skills. Now, it is only necessary that they can keep the machines going, and do small, repetitive work. The lower working class can no longer live a normal life following their own pursuits, but are lowered to working inhumane hours in these factories. This widens the gap between the upper and lower class-called bourgeois and proletariat-until they are essentially two different worlds. The bourgeois, a tiny portion of the population, has the majority of the wealth while the proletariat, t...
In Elizabethan times, education was not available to the public like it is now today. The rate of literacy back then increased, and one fifth of the population could write their name. The meaning of “public” back then meant that children were not taught at home. The meaning of public has changed throughout the years, and interpretation of the experience of being at school. Unprosperous families back then did not have the money to send their children to school, and consequently the juvenile had to work to support their family. Rich children received England’s top scholar tutors to teach them at home, which were very expensive. There was an increasing opportunity for children in the middle classes to get an education.
The ideology of Marxism, established by German philosopher Karl Marx, is a collectively known set of assumptions of a political ideology, which focuses especially on analysis of materialist interpretation of historical development, or on class struggle within the society. The primarily approach of Marxism, nonetheless, was the critique of capitalism. The strength of his inquiry lies in belief of inevitable shift from capitalism and he aims to advocate the new form of ideology and economy, the socialism. The title of this essay is provocative as in today´s world, there exist many proponents who claim, the core of Marx conception of ideology is still relevant in the 21st globalised world. However, Marxism is relevant to the extent to which is it important to examine every political and economic conception, moreover if we are able to perceive its outcomes after the concepts has been practically applied. This paper is intended to assess key ideas of Marxism with observations of positives and negatives it brought and the reasons why the concepts failed.
Throughout the Victorian Era, the standard of occupations were distinctly divided based on class. These social classes that divided the caliber of work in occupations were: the upper class, middle or working class and the lower class. Occupations that required skilled labor and unskilled labor each employed people in separate classes. Men and women within each class had different jobs in accordance with the type of work in their social class. (Victorian Web.)
Servants were imperative to the functioning of middle and upper class homes in Victorian England. Without the veritable army of servants for the upper and upper-middle classes, women would not be able to live the leisured lives they had grown accustomed, and would certainly not have the time to flaunt their status with neighbor-calling and the numerous balls and social activities. Even most lower-middle and middle-middle classes employed at least one servant, as assistance was almost a necessity in maintaining the home (Roberts 205). For the most part, these servants had an appreciation for their work, with the opportunity to live in an upper class home and have job security, as the alternative was industrial work with unexplained lay-offs and less than desirable, and often unsanitary, living conditions (Margetson 155).
Although employment did not come that easily for women, the working conditions were horrible, and women were paid significantly less than men. Another big controversy at the start-up of women working in factories and workhouses was that they were taking jobs from men, who were thought to deserve these jobs over women. In The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-century Britain, Barker-Benfield retells a story of two women being wrongfully and unreasonably punished for a simple recreational walk through the fields in their town after their church service. For their simple and peaceful walk they were sentenced to either pay a great amount of money for prophane walking or to be laid one hour in the stocks, what would be equivalent to modern day community service type work. “Women’s leisure activities were occasional and heterosocial; they had no equivalent to the daily, public, institutional, homosociality of men” (Barker-Benfield 54).
They did not have any production of capital and essentially was a class of workers that expected to look for some kind of employment, just when it financially profited the bourgeoisie. The low class experienced phases of advancement, however was as yet comprised of different gatherings competing with each other. First, they were singular laborers, then they were workpeople in manufacturing plants and inevitably went somewhere else. As indicated by Marx, it was the working class who were the progressive class, since they attempted to keep up their position and added to the entrepreneur framework.
Socialism belongs to a family of ideologies, and springs from a common impulse. It envisions a society in which everyone contributes their time, labor, and talent to a common pool, and in return receives enough goods to satisfy their needs. It condemns the exploitation of one individual or class by another that occurs, so for example “when one profits from another’s labor.” Socialism also believes that property should be to benefit the public at large, not the wealthy. Socialists tend to favor peaceful and piecemeal reforms as a way of bringing about a socialist society, in which they envision a society whose major means of production are mines, mills, factories, power plants, etc. which are either publically owned or operated to benefit the public (187). Karl Marx’s envision for socialist transformation was, “a society that is changed not through moral suasion, but by understanding the hidden structures and process of material production.” The key to this was the “materialist conception of history” this made the primary determinants of social stability and change, material production and class struggle.
England, in the eighteenth century, was driven by class distinction and wealth. In the lower class there was always a desperate struggle to survive which contrasted to the life led by the upper class, socializing with people like themselves. The servant trade, made up by the lower class, allowed the upper class to live their desired life whilst constantly maintaining superiority based on their position in society.
The technical inventions, e.g. the weaving loom and the steam engine, lead to the mechanization of work and to the need of workers who operate them. For this reason, the early capitalistic economy was in need of establishing a new class, not included in the estate-based society. According to the Marxist frame, the proletarian occurred in order to fill the gap. Mostly the bottom of the old estate-based society, viz. poor rural workers or impoverished city dwellers formed the proletarian.