Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of unions today
The role of unions today
Unions in the us
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Railway Labor Act is “a unique bill that was jointly crafted by labor and management” (Budd 117). It was created as a law in 1926, airlines were added to this in 1936, and they are both still regulated by this today. This act was created to help stop strikes at work that could interrupt interstate commerce, such as depriving any part of the country essential transportation services. There were decades of railroad labor unrest, where widespread work stoppages pitted federal soldiers against the workers who were striking. Two years prior to the signing of this act, President Calvin Coolidge wanted Railroads and Unions to recommend legislation for better labor and management relations that would reduce the dangers of railroad shutdowns. They …show more content…
You cannot strike over a minor dispute, but you can strike and use self-help over a major dispute after they have used the negotiation and meditation procedures. Major disputes deal with matters affecting pay rates, working conditions, rules, and modifying the collective bargaining agreement. These types of disputes rely almost completely on collective bargaining to settle them. Minor disputes deal with grievances that grow out of the interpretation of the collective bargaining agreements. Self-help is not permitted for minor disputes, the National Railroad Board Adjustment have exclusive jurisdictions. There are a few pros of the Railway Labor Act, one being that employees can sue in federal court if they feel like an employer is violating this act. Employees can receive reinstatement and backpay as seen fit by the courts. Another pro is that the railway Labor Act has few restrictions on the tactics used when unions go on strike. They do not ban secondary boycotts against other RLA-regulated carriers and they can engage in other types of strikes that could be unprotected under the National Labor Relations …show more content…
During this time, the parties have to maintain the status quo, which is a second cooling-off period of thirty days. After the reports are submitted, there is a third cooling-off period of thirty days that is required. If no agreement has been reached at this time, each side can act as they please (strikes, lockouts, etc.). Usually Congress has their own settlement that they impose, which is constitutional under Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution’s commerce clause. This is a lengthy process, which isn’t something that the parties look forward
The strike affected much of the country, and it had great influence on public opinion on the rights of workers. It showed how the roles of management and the roles of government handled this situation. The Pullman Strike of 1894 and its aftermath had a huge effect on the course of the labor movement in the United States. The use of federal troops and the labor injunction sent a message to U.S. workers that would not change until the new deal of the 1930s. George Pullman was no longer look at as the great enlightened employer who took care of his workers, but a greedy intolerant man. After the strike he was worried that people would rob him so when he was buried he had it lined in concrete so no one could. The Pullman strike ultimately was unsuccessful at the time. Workers were sent to jail and many couldn’t find any jobs after. Although, it was successful in several ways. The federal government was involved for the first time in history because of a strike, and because they all took a stand for their human rights it impacted the future and how workers are treated
Tensions between union supporters and management began mounting in the years preceding the strike. In April of 1994, the International Union led a three-week strike against major tracking companies in the freight hauling industry in attempts to stop management from creating $9 per hour part-time positions. This would only foreshadow battles to come between management and union. Later, in 1995, teamsters mounted an unprecedented national union campaign in attempts to defeat the labor-management “cooperation” scheme that UPS management tried to establish in order to weaken the union before contract talks (Witt, Wilson). This strike was distinguished from other strikes of recent years in that it was an offensive strike, not a defensive one. It was a struggle in which the union was prepared, fought over issues which it defined, and one which relied overwhelmingly on the efforts of the members themselves (http://www.igc.org/dbacon/Strikes/07ups.htm).
The Pullman Strike of 1894 was the first national strike in American history and it came about during a period of unrest with labor unions and controversy regarding the role of government in business.5 The strike officially started when employees organized and went to their supervisors to ask for a lowered rent and were refused.5 The strike had many different causes. For example, workers wanted higher wages and fewer working hours, but the companies would not give it to them; and the workers wanted better, more affordable living quarters, but the companies would not offer that to them either. These different causes created an interesting and controversial end to the Pullman strike. Because of this, questions were raised about the strike that are still important today. Was striking a proper means of getting what the workers wanted? Were there better means of petitioning their grievances? Was government intervention constitutional? All these questions were raised by the Pullman Strike.
Labor unions in the late 1800's set out to improve the lives of frequently abused workers. Volatile issues like the eight-hour workday, ridiculously low pay and unfair company town practices were often the fuses that lit explosive conflicts between unions and monopolistic industrialists. Some of the most violent and important conflicts of the time were the Haymarket Affair and the Pullman strike. Each set out to with similar goals and both ended with horrifying consequences.
The Railroad Strike of 1877 began with workers receiving a 10% cut in their wages, the angered workers, who had their wages cut twice since the previous year, decided to strike. The members of the union refused to go back to work until the pay cut had been returned. This resulted in disrupted rail service from Baltimore to St. Louis. Union tactics during the strike included rioting in the streets and destroying railway equipment. As a result of the strike, the Federal Government had to intervene. In this case, President Hayes sided with the railway company by ordering federal troops to halt union activity in West Virginia. Because of government intervention the union strike collapsed, but not before at least 100 people died in the fight. Due
The collective bargaining approach, is a system used by trade unions to regulate industrial conflict. If conflict arises, the collective bargaining approach allows the trade unions to come together in a public forum to discuss any conflicting issues. The collective barganing approach in Trade Unionism assumes that the Trade Union is bargaining for the collective group rather than individuals. The collective bargaining group is given the opportunity to resolve any conflicting issues and in some cases but not all can prevent disputes from occurring. Harbison concludes that collective bargaining
The disadvantages of union membership are viewed from the employee and employer perspective. Through the employee lens, the disadvantages manifest in the form of fees, loss of autonomy, and less collaborative work environment. As part of the union, you surrender many of your individual rights in exchange for the organized results that can potentially manifest through the collective bargaining process. Therefore, there isn’t any assurance that your individual concern will even be addressed.
Due to the labor being stranded whilst industry takes frequent flights, unionism is in stark decline. It brought the end of collective bargaining, as the capitalist found shutting operations and moving somewhere else easier than engaging with collective bargaining.
The National Labor Relations Act of 1935 is a statute enacted to guarantee the rights of private sector employees to form trade unions, engage in collective bargaining with employers, and take collective action (striking for example) if necessary. It also created the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in order to enforce the act, aid in the collective bargaining process, and investigate and remedy unfair labor practices. This came about after years of unrest amongst the working class and the negative effects unfair labor practices were having on commerce.
On the positive side, the strike sparked the FAA to reevaluate the status of the ATC system. This evaluation later lead to the development of NextGen, which was created in an attempt to further “modernize and transform the National Airspace System.” (Nolan, 2011, p. 36). On the opposite side of the spectrum, it took about 8 years longer than the FAA anticipated before staffing levels were returned to normal. This resulted in numerous delays, flow control programs, and an increased controller workload at a time when the airlines were expanding rapidly due to deregulation. Another negative outcome of the strike is that unions have lost the striking leverage that once existed and “unions have been unable to pressure employers to increase wages as productivity rises.” (McCartin, 2011,
At this point in time, our company is non-union and believes the disadvantages of unionization to be greater than those benefits which may come from it. Many of the benefits which are supposed to come from unionization are canceled by various disadvantages. Additionally there are several, negative effects brought on by joining labor unions which should make any employee think long and hard before they begin the process of joining a union.
... with the aggrieved worker and representative meeting with the supervisor involved, followed by an appeal system with strict time limits and ultimately ending in binding arbitration. When management and the union cannot resolve a grievance submitted by a union, the union must decide whether to proceed to the final step of the grievance procedure: arbitration. Arbitration is an adversary proceeding like a trial in court. An arbitrator’s function is usually to interpret the collective bargaining agreement between the parties, not to apply his or her standards of what is right in a given situation. The courts have sought to compel labour and management to a peaceful resolution of grievances through arbitration. The Supreme Court has given support to the arbitration process in a series of decisions, and judicial deferral to arbitration has become a basic tenet of national labour policy.
Collective bargaining may happen in several kinds of fields, ranging politics to sports. It allows appropriate settlement of disputes and issues that benefit both parties involved, producing a result that is not one-sided. Collective bargaining is “the negotiation of wages and other conditions of employment by an organized body of employees” (Beal, Wickersham, & Kienast 5). Four issues that are probable components of a collective bargaining agreement are:
Labor relations emerged as response towards combating the economic unrest that accompanied the 1930 Great depression. At this period, massive unemployment, decreasing salary and wages, and over competition for jobs despite poor working conditions, was being experience; especially in the US. In turn employees were aggravated and therefore resorted to labor strike that often escalated to violence. To avoid such incident that could potentially harm further an ailing economy, the US government set precedent by passing their first related Labor relationship act, also referred to as the Wagner act. This act excluded public sector and some employees in the informal sector, farm workers to be specific. However, the progressive change in business and labor environment, necessitated changes in the labor laws to ensure they are more inclusive (Haywood & Sijtsma, 2000).
When it comes to contract negotiations, labor unions may differ from one and another throughout the different industries, but they usually share the same goals when it involves contract negotiations (Sloane & Witney, 2010). During these procedures, demands are usually made by from both parties, the employer and the union; this processes main goal is to negotiate a written agreement between each other covering a multitude of issues and concerns (Sloane & Witney, 2010). These talks are typically the most confrontational part of the relationship between labor unions and management, especially when it comes to wage issues (Mayhew, n.d.). This author will take a look the wages and wage-related issues, employee benefits, institutional issues, administrative clauses, and make recommendation that will would prevent wage-related grievances from happening.