Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Offender reentry programs
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
People who have dedicated their careers to community corrections often find the growing interest in offender reentry troubling. Undoubtedly, they’re right that “reentry” is simply a new-or at least newly modern-label for an old process. They’re also right that the new interest could usefully combine around long-standing initiatives that have lost drive, such as transitional punishments. Nevertheless, community corrections specialists who have taken a longer look at the recent rebuilding of offender reentry acknowledge that it can, potentially spur important advances and opportunities. In states that have focused in the past almost exclusively on more penalties for offenders under community supervision, some policymakers have come to admit
Zhang, S. X., Roberts, R. E. L., & Callanan, V. J. (2006). Preventing parolees from returning to prison through community-based reintegration. Crime & Delinquency, 52(4), 551-571.
In America millions of offenders including men and women leave imprisonment in hope to return to their family and friends. On an article Prisoners and Reentry: Facts and Figures by The Annie E. Casey Foundation, in the year 2001 1.5 million children were reunited with their parents as they were released from prison. Also in 2005 the number of that passed prison gates were 698,499 and the number of prisoners that were released was approximated at about 9 million. Parole and Prison reentry has been a topic that really interests not only a lot of the communities around the world but is a topic that interest me. Recidivism is not only the topic that interests people but the offenders that get off on parole and how they cope with society after they
Policymakers on the national, state, and local levels are always finding ways to improve the nature of the reentry process. The reentry process starts in correctional facilities and helps inmates prepare themselves for release and proceeds with their transition back into society as law-abiding citizens. In comparison to the average American, ex-offenders tend to be less educated, less likely to gain employment, suffer from substance abuse, or have been diagnosed with a mental illness. All of these aspects discussed are shown to be risk factors for recidivism, which is the tendency that causes criminals to re-offend. Generally, the offender reintegration process needs to be improved by properly monitoring the outcomes for reentry programs in order to return prisoners back to society safely.
The book titled Beyond Bars: Rejoining Society After Prison offers invaluable lessons of how both men and women may successfully depart prison and return to society. The book was written by Jeffrey Ross and Stephen Richards, both of whom are college professors and criminal justice experts. The population of prisons across the United States has increased dramatically in recent decades despite overall crime rates decreasing during the same time period. Approximately seven million American people are in some form of correctional custody. Between the years1980 and 2000, America’s prison population increased by 500 percent. During the same time period, the number of prisons grew by 300 percent (Ross and Richards, xii). Close to 50 percent of people admitted to confinement have previously served time, exemplifying that the criminal justice system “recycles” inmates through the system again and again (Ross and Richards, xi). Unfortunately, many convicts simply do not remember how to or are ill-equipped to return to society once their sentence ends. Ross and Richards, through their valuable lessons within their book, seek to lessen the problems that ex-prisoners may face when released from prison.
Prisons and correctional facilities in the United States have changed from rehabilitating people to housing inmates and creating breeding grounds for more violence. Many local, state, and federal prisons and correctional facilities are becoming more and more overcrowded each year. If the Department of Corrections (DOC) wants to stop having repeat offenders and decrease the volume of inmates entering the criminal justice system, current regulations and programs need to undergo alteration. Actions pushed by attorneys and judges, in conjunction current prison life (including solitary confinement), have intertwined to result in mass incarceration. However, prisoner reentry programs haven’t fully impacted positively to help the inmate assimilate back into society. These alterations can help save the Department of Corrections (DOC) money, decrease the inmate population, and most of all, help rehabilitate them. After inmates are charged with a crime, they go through the judicial system (Due Process) and meet with the prosecutor to discuss sentencing.
Reentry programs have been developed nationwide to address offender needs and smooth the transition from prison into the community. Reentry programs are initiatives taken to ensure that ex-offenders successfully transition into law-abiding members of their communities. Studies have revealed that ex-offender reentry is a process that all individuals transitioning from prison to the community experience. Ex-offender reentry program is a precursor to successful community reintegration, hoewever, there are few interventions that have demonstrated success to meet the overwhelming needs of individuals leaving correctional facilities during their
“Doing projects really gives people self-confidence. Nothing is better than taking the pie out of the oven. What it does for you personally, and for your family 's idea of you, is something you can 't buy." - Martha Stewart. Rehabilitated prisoners programs, for example, in the prisons are one of the most important programs in prison to address the causes of criminality and restore criminal’s self-confidence. Therefore, many governments are still taking advantage of their prisoners while they are in prison. However, some people believe that prison programs ' can improve and develop the criminals to be more professionals in their crimes. In addition, rehabilitated programs help inmates in the character building, ethical behavior, and develop
The last two goals were set in place to directly assist with anticipating and planning for problems that arose during a prisoners’ reentry process. By implementing the Second Chance Act, the corrections system had begun helping prepare an offender for reentry. More research the corrections system conducted to assist reentry involves the Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative (SVORI) that redirected research attention to coordinated approaches for offenders returning to communities like job training and substance abuse programs ("Offender Reentry | National Institute of Justice," n.d.). Communities should embrace ex-inmates back into society.
A felon is a person who commits serious, sometimes violent crimes that are punishable by several years of imprisonment or death. Once they have finished serving their sentence, ex-felons return to the world under a set of regulations designed to limit their interaction with certain parts of society, which aims toward keeping the public safe. Recently, many individuals have begun questioning the constitutionality of some of these rules, such as the taking away the right to vote. Those in favor of letting ex-felons regain this right argue that they have already served a long enough sentence, and returning this privilege may help them become more involved in society and prevent relapsing behavior.
Sung, L. G.-e. (2011). Rethinking Corrections: Rehabilitation, Reentry, and Reintegration. Thousand Oaks : SAGE Publications.
To support reintegration, correctional workers are to serve as advocates for offenders in dealing with government agencies assisting with employment counseling services, medical treatment, and financial assistance. They argued that corrections focal point should be increasing opportunities for the offenders, to become law abiding citizens and on providing psychological treatment. This model of corrections advocates avoiding imprisonment if possible for the offender and also in favor of probation, therefore offenders can obtain an education and vocational training that would help their adjustment in the community. In the community model corrections advocated for inmates incarcerated to spend very limited time in prison before been granted parole.
Prisons were initially created to deter criminals from committing crimes and with the hope that one would learn to reflect on his/her mistakes during incarceration. Since the 1900s, the incarceration rate of the United States has outnumbered that of every other nation in the world, with rates being as many as four to eight times that of other nations (Haney, 2001; Visher, 2013). In the past, prisons focused on rehabilitation, which is a place to prepare convicts for proper reentry; support such as education, vocational, and counseling programs were readily given to those that needed it. However, today, there has been a large de-emphasis placed on reintegration, and the focus shifted from rehabilitation to incapacitation. And because of a society who has opted for the incapacitation of offenders, alongside reduced funding, there is a lack of “willingness to assist ex-offenders” (Seiter & Kadela, 2003). Moreover, not much has been put into place to address issues offenders face post-release, with only a scattered few numbers of rehabilitation programs to aid them (Petersilia, 2001). At the same time, not only are ex-offenders not being helped, but during the inmate’s incarceration, families take on more burdens especially if they are already struggling. Extended lengths of incarceration are leaving ex-offenders with traumatic psychological effects that follow them into post imprisonment and without the right skills necessary upon their return to society. As they reintegrate into society, ex-offenders must learn to cope with the complications that they will experience in their daily lives.
Reintegrating offenders into society is an important part of incarceration. Within the United States justice system, we are often more concerned with the punishment of the offender and neglect to assist them in reentering society. By developing programs that are different from the formal control agencies which offender’s encounter upon release, we can hopefully begin to see a decrease in offender recidivism across the United States. When reintegrating an offender back into a community, it is important to involve the community (Young, Taxman & Byrne, 2002). Research has shown that when there are more control agents, rather than just the formal ones of the state, holding the offender accountable, their chances of successful reentry is higher
All over America, crime is on the rise. Every day, every minute, and even every second someone will commit a crime. Now, I invite you to consider that a crime is taking place as you read this paper. "The fraction of the population in the State and Federal prison has increased in every single year for the last 34 years and the rate for imprisonment today is now five times higher than in 1972"(Russell, 2009). Considering that rate along crime is a serious act. These crimes range from robbery, rape, kidnapping, identity theft, abuse, trafficking, assault, and murder. Crime is a major social problem in the United States. While the correctional system was designed to protect society from offenders it also serves two specific functions. First it can serve as a tool for punishing the offender. This involves making the offender pay for his/her crime while serving time in a correctional facility. On the other hand it can serve as a place to rehabilitate the offender as preparation to be successful as they renter society. The U.S correctional system is a quite controversial subject that leads to questions such as how does our correctional system punish offenders? How does our correctional system rehabilitate offenders? Which method is more effective in reducing crime punishment or rehabilitation? Our correctional system has several ways to punish and rehabilitate offenders.
Former offenders commit crimes at higher rates than the general population, so in combination with technical parole violations, many ex-offenders recidivate and return to prison within the few years of release. As of 1994, more than two-thirds of state prisoners were rearrested for one or more serious crimes within three yean of release. Almost half of those released returned to prison during that time frame for parole violations or new convictions (Langan & Levin, 2002). As I stated in my proposal, the government will have full supervision of all inmates who go through our program. Even though release rates will be higher, crime rates will be drastically lower. Return rates will also be lower because inmates will have the fear of being redeployed into