In America millions of offenders including men and women leave imprisonment in hope to return to their family and friends. On an article Prisoners and Reentry: Facts and Figures by The Annie E. Casey Foundation, in the year 2001 1.5 million children were reunited with their parents as they were released from prison. Also in 2005 the number of that passed prison gates were 698,499 and the number of prisoners that were released was approximated at about 9 million. Parole and Prison reentry has been a topic that really interests not only a lot of the communities around the world but is a topic that interest me. Recidivism is not only the topic that interests people but the offenders that get off on parole and how they cope with society after they …show more content…
When prisoners are released from prison they rely on their family members as much as they can when they are first released. Supported by Annie Casey she stated “Two months after their release, a strong majority of released prisoners in Maryland (80%) and Illinois (88%) were living with a family member.” This statement can conclude that when prisoners are released from incarceration they are heavily reliable on their families for financial support. There is a difference of who the prisoner lives with when returning home and it can effect whether the prisoner returns to prison when Casey states, “Studies [conclude] that men that end up living with wives and children [happen to do] better than those who either lived alone or returned to live with a parent (Casey 1).” This statement proves that when men return home they have a better chance of staying out of trouble when they live with their wife and child compared to living alone or with a parent; but why is that? I believe that when spouses and children are present in the household the prisoner feels obligated to take care of them and support them when they return compared to living with parents the person may slip into bad habits because they are only going to have to look after themselves instead of taking care of a …show more content…
When trying to find themselves in society, jobs may be hard to come by. When prisoners find a jobs, they are usually work in jobs that one doesn’t not have to have a high-skill set, such as food service, wholesale, and maintenance and repair. The number one reason why prisoners end up back in jail is not the lack of job opportunities but perceiving that job when returning home. “Service providers and community leaders consider employment to be the primary factor in a successful reentry” (Casey 2). When the lack of job opportunities come prisoners may feel the need to break the law and return to life of crime because they cannot support themselves, so they may turn to selling drugs to make a quick buck. Selling drugs is not an alternative for not being able to find a job, especially when one has just got out of prison because if they get caught they will find themselves back in jail. Recidivism is a topic that I do not believe anyone could solve, it is hard to comprehend why people look back to crime again and again after they get caught the first time. In the article Parole and Prison Reentry in the United States author talks about how when prisoners or released they usually end up failing to finish their release sentence and out of the parolees how many return back to prison when she states, “About half of parolees fail to complete parole successfully and their returns to prison represent about a third of
When people are in prison, they cannot support their families. Inmates also can’t spend time with their family and their sons or daughters might turn towards crime. When families are split up, the offender’s family is less likely to succeed in the community. This might be because the remaining parent might not be able to handle all the pressure. The remaining parent might also not have a good job that can support the family so they will be in poverty.
The book titled Beyond Bars: Rejoining Society After Prison offers invaluable lessons of how both men and women may successfully depart prison and return to society. The book was written by Jeffrey Ross and Stephen Richards, both of whom are college professors and criminal justice experts. The population of prisons across the United States has increased dramatically in recent decades despite overall crime rates decreasing during the same time period. Approximately seven million American people are in some form of correctional custody. Between the years1980 and 2000, America’s prison population increased by 500 percent. During the same time period, the number of prisons grew by 300 percent (Ross and Richards, xii). Close to 50 percent of people admitted to confinement have previously served time, exemplifying that the criminal justice system “recycles” inmates through the system again and again (Ross and Richards, xi). Unfortunately, many convicts simply do not remember how to or are ill-equipped to return to society once their sentence ends. Ross and Richards, through their valuable lessons within their book, seek to lessen the problems that ex-prisoners may face when released from prison.
As these men re-enter the workforce they now likely have less skills than when they first entered prison. There are few, if any, programs, which train these men to effectively re-enter society. As jobs continue to move out further and further into the suburbs, these males, who are from the inner city, are left with few living wage employment options. The rates that convicts go back to jail are so high not because these men want to return to a life of crime but since few employment options are available, they tend to utilize their limited skills to get the money they need to survive. If more efforts do not make additional training available to these males that are realistically designed to help them obtain a living wage job, the rates that convicts go back to jail and black male unemployment will continue to increase.
Prisons and correctional facilities in the United States have changed from rehabilitating people to housing inmates and creating breeding grounds for more violence. Many local, state, and federal prisons and correctional facilities are becoming more and more overcrowded each year. If the Department of Corrections (DOC) wants to stop having repeat offenders and decrease the volume of inmates entering the criminal justice system, current regulations and programs need to undergo alteration. Actions pushed by attorneys and judges, in conjunction current prison life (including solitary confinement), have intertwined to result in mass incarceration. However, prisoner reentry programs haven’t fully impacted positively to help the inmate assimilate back into society. These alterations can help save the Department of Corrections (DOC) money, decrease the inmate population, and most of all, help rehabilitate them. After inmates are charged with a crime, they go through the judicial system (Due Process) and meet with the prosecutor to discuss sentencing.
Along with research on the positive affirmations of rehabilitation in prisons, there are studies that expand upon whether or not imprisonment reduces recidivism. During a time of mass incarceration, the goal is to reconstruct a prisoner’s actions so that they do not pose as a threat to society after they are released. However, some cases show that imprisonment may not be the best way to transition an offender toward a more pro-social lifestyle. Cullen, Jonson, & Nagin (2011) depict prisons as places to keep offenders away from the community to prevent crime and less about reconciliation. Prisons are a place for offenders to go so that they cannot commit any more crimes. The offenders spend a wasteful period of life secluded from society in
In “Offender Reentry”, David Allender, dives into how recidivism effects both the criminals and the community. To begin with Allender expressing how the Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons (PSAMPP) started an attempt to ameliorate the public prisons to better rehabilitate the prisoners where the goal was not to punish its' offenders, but to move them toward spiritual reflection and change. Inmates were on a 23 hour lockdown and had limited communication with any other inmates or staff. The facility restricted reading materials to the Bible since majority of the criminals confided in it and used it show them the right path and make better choices. Consequently, this backfired and led to the first changes in sentences which resulted in a high relapse ratio; as a result, this led to higher strain on the taxpayer and the communities where the crime was committed.
Employment is an important factor for ex-offenders (Rakis 7). They need a stable job to provide income, housing, and basic needs. If an ex-offender has a family to support, that income becomes even more crucial (Pannkuk). Ex-offenders need jobs that are secure, with a reasonable amount of wages and benefits. With the current state of the economy, it is not feasible to live on minimum wage, especially if trying to support a family (Pannkuk). Having a secure job will also help smooth the transition from prison to normal life. Ex-offenders with employment have lower recidivism rates t...
Sung, L. G.-e. (2011). Rethinking Corrections: Rehabilitation, Reentry, and Reintegration. Thousand Oaks : SAGE Publications.
People who have dedicated their careers to community corrections often find the growing interest in offender reentry troubling. Undoubtedly, they’re right that “reentry” is simply a new-or at least newly modern-label for an old process. They’re also right that the new interest could usefully combine around long-standing initiatives that have lost drive, such as transitional punishments. Nevertheless, community corrections specialists who have taken a longer look at the recent rebuilding of offender reentry acknowledge that it can, potentially spur important advances and opportunities. In states that have focused in the past almost exclusively on more penalties for offenders under community supervision, some policymakers have come to admit
Prior to a person being released from prison there are a number of programs available to ensure a successful reentry into society. The application of these reentry programs focusses on successful transitions from prison to the community (National Institute of Justice.(2014) Reentry programs also play a role in helping to reduce an offender’s recidivism. When given the proper assistants and upon effective completion of these programs there is the hope that the offender will in fact be rehabilitated therefore not become a statistic with rearrests followed by incarceration.
It has been hypothesized that a sizable number of released offenders with an ongoing reentry service plan are less likely to recidivate, which is an advantageous element for the criminal justice system (Jones, Brown, & Zamble, 2010). However, the effectiveness of the parole program depends on the recidivism conditions that the parolees face after their release. Some of the unfortunate consequences that the released inmates might face include homelessness, unemployment, and exposure to alcohol and drug abuse (Cole, Smith, & DeJong, 2014). These elements hinder the effectiveness of the utilization of parole programs for inmate reentry to the society after their release from prison. However, it would be essential to implement such a program for the reduction in overcrowding and cost incurred in the nation’s prisons.
Robert Rubin interviewed many inmates from the San Quentin Prison and they all said that “increasing the chance of freedom has changed the way they behave in prison” (Rubin). The change in attitude has caused many of the inmates to try and learn the skills and behaviors that will help them in life on the outside; however, the current system only gives them $200 on their release with no suitable place to live, no help finding work, and no help adjusting to life outside of the prison walls. With society already placing a stigma on ex-convicts, it is a very difficult and nearly impossible task for them to assimilate back into the American society. More than 650,000 ex-offenders are released from prison every year in hopes of freedom; however, studies completed by the U.S. Department of Justice show that roughly two-thirds will likely be rearrested within three years of release (USDOJ). Without being given a job, money, or a place to live, ex-offenders experience the same pressures and temptations that caused them to be incarcerated in the first place. There are different ways that can result in a more successful and smoother transition back into the mainstream society. First, the educational opportunities within the prisons need to be enhanced. The majority of prisons only offer some level of basic education and G.E.D. preparation,
An example of this is a drug dealer. They know that selling drugs is wrong, but have more than likely been to prison before, meaning that jobs and careers will not hire them based on their criminal past. The rate for these types of criminals re-offending is 68% while the release rates are 72%, especially for first time offenders. With no recourse left to them to make money to feed themselves and their families, money from drugs seems almost a godsend in their situation. The strain placed on them by their situation influences their decision to not only sell drugs, but to sell them repeatedly, even if 35% of them they have already been to prison for this, or unrelated crimes (Monteiro & Frost, 2015). Another background piece of recidivism is the disparity of wealth that exists in the United States, especially by those who have tried to follow the path of the American Dream. What is meant by this is that the American Dream consists of getting educated, following all the laws, and raising a family after getting married. Even while pursuing this dream, careers ask more education of an individual or try to underpay the individual even
The United States has the largest prison system in the world and the amount of mentally ill that is represented within the U.S. system is over half of all incarcerated inmates. This is dramatically more than the 11% of the general population that is shown to have mental illness. Four out of ten inmates that are released from prison are back in prison within three years. There is some data that has shown that recidivism can be a result of compounding social factors. Those that are mentally ill and released from prison often find themselves with these compounding social factors. They tend to be illicit substances, abuse and unemployment. Prison life may provide improved social situations and a rehabilitating environment, yet corrections often
Recidivism is the tendency to relapse into criminal behavior no matter if the inmate committed the same or different crime. According by the federal government’s Bureau of Justice Statistics, within five years of being released, 76.6% prisoners were rearrested. Released convicts face many struggles that are difficult to overcome due to the obstacles that inmates encounter to become active members of society. By extension, the released offenders tend to fall back into the criminal behavior because of the lack of involvement in society as they see no purpose to be part of a normal life and become pessimistic and criminals. Since released prisoners are constantly discriminated from opportunities the recidivism rate goes higher. Another cause of