Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pro's and cons of automatic traffic light camera
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pro's and cons of automatic traffic light camera
In the day to day road transportation sector activities many police officer complain about red light violators. According to a 2010 report The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration states that violating red lights causes hundreds of deaths and thousands of injury annually. In discussion of, both articles to control red light violators by installing automatic traffic light camera. After analyzing responses from both articles I have come to the conclusion that installing automatic traffic light more advantageous than not installing automatic traffic light. Article one sates that installing automatic traffic light camera can reduce the number of police officer which means saving the cost of hiring additional officers and also, it helps the police officers to focus on duties that require human attention. In addition to this automatic traffic camera has well documented benefits. For example, in a 2010 report by the insurance institute for highway safety red light camera have lower. Moreover, automatic camera discourages the behavior of red light violators. For instance, …show more content…
Because installing 10 automatic red light camera at a traffic light is the waste of money. It costs at least $60,000 per year for one camera. This money could instead pay the salary of a new officer. It also, creates unexpected costs as well. For example, in New Jersey and New York several cities have been sued over the timing of traffic lights with automatic camera. In addition, the safety benefits of automatic red-light camera are unclear. For instance, a 2005 national highway safety administration report says that some cities using the camera have seen a decrease in front-into-side accidents, but the rare-end collisions have increased. Finally, the article mentioned that traffic police officer is superior to automatic red light
Obama has already funded 50,000 cameras to be used for law enforcement. Skeptics argue that cameras would be useless and used to monitor the general population. The article is narrated by three individuals with different stands on cameras, two for the use of cameras and one against. They debate back and forth about effectiveness, trial outcomes, general public involvement and learning process related to cameras. This will help me see an argument against cameras, but also providing good information for the use of cameras.
The restrictions on lights would produce happiness because it will help people be in less accidents. Also, making the yellow light longer so there is not anybody slamming on the car breaks.“It also found that most traffic camera violations occurred within the first second after the light turned red,”[3]. The solution to this problem is to make the are which area before the light longer and when it turns yellow so people far way can see it. Also, it would make people happy if they did get a ticket that they were notified earlier rather then later.“People may not receive citations until days or sometimes weeks after the alleged violation,”[1]. Having alternative ways to find way s to give people tickets other than just sending them in the mail people rather have tickets given to them when pulled over then getting a ticket weeks after it
The study will consist of sampling of students in the criminal justice field along with any respective civilian that may come in contact with the study. The research on the subject of body-cameras and their effects on the civilians that they record seem to be mostly engaged with the idea of reducing civilian complaints and other factors involving police accountability. However, one report states that in regards to civilian opinions, “Of ...
This research paper will give a general overview of body-worn cameras with policing and how police officers respond to body-worn camera. There will be several sections that will explain more about body worn cameras. The reasons why the police use body worn cameras. The issues police officers face with the use of body worn cameras. Issues of citizen privacy will be explained. A research study of positive outcomes of body worn camera will be discussed. As well as officer’s perceptions of the use of body worn cameras.
Domestic Surveillance Elizabeth Mahan SOC 120 Introduction to Ethics & Social Responsibility Instructor: Cari Lynn Beecham-Bautista June 29, 2015. DOMESTIC SURVEILLANCE Introduction Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary defines domestic as “relating to or made in your own country”. The word surveillance is defined as “the act of carefully watching someone or something, especially in order to prevent or detect a crime”.
The concept of formal surveillance mainly includes the methods used by the police to detect and deter crimes (Michel H. Tonry, 2000 in the handbook of crime & Punishment p.382). However, it can be extended to the use of CCTV camera, police patrols and alarms system (Welsh and Farrington, 2003). For the purpose of this study, focus will be on the use of CCTV cameras.
The article by Elida S. Perez discusses the Police Union’s push back on body cameras in El Paso, Texas. Perez states the denial of El Paso Police Department to equip body cameras because they believe other funding priorities and privacy concerns must be addressed. Some of the top funding priorities that Perez states are “hiring more police officers, buying new police cars, and updating radios”(par. 5). In addition, the police union is also concerned over unfair disciplinary actions against the police officers because of any camera malfunctions. She added an example that explained El Paso Municipal Police Officers Association President Ron Martin’s statement, “sometimes emergency situations unfold so quickly that an officer may not have time to turn on the camera, which he fears may be seen as an attempt to hide what occurred” (par.
According to the Office of Justice Program about 32 percent of local police has already started to use body cameras on at least some of their officers. Although everyday we see more and more departments implementing cameras as part of daily patrol because of the very many advantages of this tool, there a few concerns about the use of body worn cameras.
Is privacy more significant compared to the potential protection provided by body-worn cameras film? Should the victim, criminal or public have the decision for publication of citizen’s record of the broadcast with the encounter with the officer for public disclosure? Furthermore, public audience raises the question of morality regarded towards law enforcement body cameras’ footage. “Should a drunken night’s… preserved in humiliating audio and visual detail… broadcast… by someone…” (Fan 412). However, body cameras may provide the necessary protection for a desirable, safe community by the modification of the officer’s and civilian’s behavior. Also, body cameras provide a tangible source of evidence compare to the eyewitness testimony. Therefore, the sacrifices of privacy are necessary for an improved
The mission of implementing a body-worn camera system is to increase police legitimacy and procedural justice through impacting police officer decision-making that will subsequently reduce police misconduct, resulting in a reduction in officer complaints and levels of excessive use of force. The program will reduce liability and distrust of the police department by enhancing police legitimacy and procedural justice. Additionally, reductions in officer complaints and levels of excessive use of force will strengthen relationships with the community. The goal of the program is to improve officer decision-making through a body-worn camera system that increases supervision capabilities. Pros and Cons of the Program Pros
“Officers wearing cameras were 25.2% more likely to perceive the devices as being helpful during their interactions with the public” (Ready, Young). This quote draws attention to a current controversial issue in the United States. This controversy revolves around the decision about if police officers should wear body cameras or have dashboard cameras in their vehicles to increase both the officer and perpetrator’s safety. The safety of police officers in the United States needs to become a priority. While some officers currently wear body cameras and have dashboard cameras, there are many who do not.
Have you ever looked up while in a public place and noticed a camera watching you? While some people may be alarmed, others feel a sense of safety and protection. Electronic surveillance consists of cameras in public places to watch over the city streets or parks. Their purpose is to allow policemen and the state government to know when crime is happening and where in the city. Cameras provide a great advantage of protection over just having police officers patrol the cities. These men and women cannot be everywhere at one time, but the cameras can. Electronic surveillance should be accepted worldwide because it can identify criminals and decrease crime in cities.
There are many benefits to having law enforcement security cameras, which people take for granted, and are quick to point out the negative. Having a network of cameras on every street in the city increases the chances of preventing a crime, along with the ability to capture a criminal on video. Some people argue that the cameras generate an overwhelming amount...
Within the battle against crime, police forces and governments are increasingly using security cameras in public places. Some people are against this, stating that it intrudes on their privacy as citizens. Though individuals have rights as citizens according to our First Amendment there is a serious need to cut down on the amount of crime commented. In this research paper I will discuss security cameras and how they play an enormous role in cracking down on law-breaking. Security cameras have become universal in many countries. Before you could only catch sight of security cameras in banks and at high-security areas, they are now entering public places such as: malls, streets, schools and airports. Most people are offended by these cameras
By having every stoplight work, it will signal drivers to have the most safe was to drive and avoid damage to a car. If a stop light went out, for example during a natural disaster like a hurricane, wrecks could come to an all time high, but as long as they work, the better life