Against Body Cameras Essay

389 Words1 Page

Is privacy more significant compared to the potential protection provided by body-worn cameras film? Should the victim, criminal or public have the decision for publication of citizen’s record of the broadcast with the encounter with the officer for public disclosure? Furthermore, public audience raises the question of morality regarded towards law enforcement body cameras’ footage. “Should a drunken night’s… preserved in humiliating audio and visual detail… broadcast… by someone…” (Fan 412). However, body cameras may provide the necessary protection for a desirable, safe community by the modification of the officer’s and civilian’s behavior. Also, body cameras provide a tangible source of evidence compare to the eyewitness testimony. Therefore, the sacrifices of privacy are necessary for an improved …show more content…

According to Stenzel, Carla article "Eyewitness Misidentification." “…Eyewitness misidentification occurred in seventy percent of over 300 exoneration cases where innocence was proven by DNA evidence...” (pg. 516). Unfortunately, the results from misidentification of eyewitness result to innocent civilians suffer consequences from a fine to an imprisonment or a death sentence for a false accusation a crime the citizen did not commit. An example, “…the death of Michael Brown, an unarmed teen, shot by a Ferguson …heightened risk of death that African-American men face in police encounters… Witnesses gave deeply conflicting accounts of the shooting death… “(Fan 410-413). The victim Michael Brown was shot by policeman Ferguson; many of the testimonies conflict with each other doesn’t provide the reality of the encounter with Michael Brown and Ferguson. Therefore, body-worn cameras are an opportunity to provide concrete evidence for a case involves police force encounter with a citizen; avoidance of the confliction of accounts and

Open Document