Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on circumcision operation
Circumcision debate research paper
Circumcision debate research paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on circumcision operation
Descriptions of ritual circumcision span across cultures, and have been described in ancient Egyptian texts as well as the Old Testament. With this being said, “The American Academy of Pediatrics believes that circumcision has potential medical benefits and advantages, as well as risks. Evaluation of current evidence indicates that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks and that the procedure's benefits justify access to this procedure for families who choose it, however, existing scientific evidence is not sufficient to recommend routine circumcision.” (n.d.). Since circumcision has so many risks, I would not recommend circumcision for my patients. Some risks include bleeding, pain, infection, loss of skin/wound …show more content…
Degloving occurs when excess skin has been drawn up into the clamp and then amputated. Redundant foreskin is a complication resulting in excess foreskin, resulting in sometimes needing a secondary circumcision. It is a fairly common reason for referral to a pediatric urologist. Repair of the excess foreskin is generally scheduled electively under general anesthesia. Penile adhesions often result from inadequate lysis of natural adhesions prior to circumcision or from migration of the skin from a prominent suprapubic fat pad. “The majority of these adhesions should lyse spontaneously as the penis grows, suprapubic fat recedes, and erections become more frequent and firmer” (2011). Otherwise, lysis of penile adhesions can be performed in the doctor’s office if they don’t lyse naturally on their own. This is accomplished by gently pushing away the adhesions from the glans after administering a topical anesthetic cream such as EMLA. A urethrocutaneous fistula is an opening between the skin of the penis and the urethra. It can be congenital, but more often than not, it is a direct result of circumcision. To correct this complication, surgery is needed. Although urethrocutaneous fistulas are a rare complication, they do
In Althaus’ article, she provides in-depth information about female circumcision; a highly controversial cultural ritual that is practiced in at least 28 countries
“A Death in Texas” by Steve Earle is the true-life story of a friendship that occurred over ten
Afterwards, the parents sign a surgical consent giving the provider the approval to perform the procedure. The purpose of the circumcision is to remove the foreskin from the head of the penis, and allow the head of the penis to be exposed. The provider will use various supplies during the procedure such as an topical or injection anesthetic, a scapula to cut the foreskin, and one of three different clamps to hold the foreskin. According to Bcheraoui et al. (2014), studies have revealed that male circumcisions have an overall side effects rate of 0.5% if performed during the child’s first year of life, but increase up to 20 times that if performed after
Should euthanasia be allowed or not? It has become a very controversial issue nowadays. Velleman and Hooker have different perspectives on euthanasia, and whether there should be laws permitting voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia. Although there are well-reasoned arguments on both sides, I would strongly agree with Hooker's argument that there should be a law permitting voluntary euthanasia when it is for the wellbeing of the person and that each individual should be able to make their own decision.
This paper will examine the pros and cons of the death penalty. Is it a deterrent or is that a myth. Does it give the family of the victim peace or does it cause them to suffer waiting for appeal after appeal. What are the forms of execution and any evidence of them being cruel and usual punishment. Is the death penalty fair if there are glaring, disparities in sentencing depending on geographic location and the color of the offender and victim’s skin?
Phimosis is the inability for the foreskin to retract at the appropriate age because of how tight the skin is around the head of the penis. Phimosis is rare only affecting 1%-5% (glansie.com). Those suffering from this condition can also practice good hygiene, during urination the head of the penis is rinsed over. Urine is not sterile but it can help these individuals maintain a clean penis. If a sufferer develops complications from this disorder they can seek medical attention which results in part of the foreskin removed so that it becomes retractable. Trying to prevent a problem before it occurs can be helpful in some cases but cases such as this one it is
Certainly, in the United States (and much of the Western world), female circumcision is illegal; however, male circumcision is utterly legal. In fact, in 2007, the Center for Disease Control reported that almost eighty percent of men in the United States were circumcised (Morris): legally, zero percent were females. Yet, several nations, where the culture is absolutely polar from the West, have prohibited male circumcision (Evans). The predominant factor, of course. The ideologies of culture make the laws, including morals; thus, these laws represent each region’s civilization, morals, and culture. Again, doctors must conform—this time to the law, not the parent. So, any decision doctors make, regarding circumcision, is due to cultural restrictions and their own
Most Americans view circumcision as a solution to a problem which it is not. Circumcision has not been scientifically proven to prevent, solve, or improve any health condition or state. One of the most common reasons people circumcise infants is because they believe it will make cleaning babies easier. This is a common misconception. Parents for generations have been taught that uncircumcised babies need to have the underside of their foreskin cleaned, but this is physically impossible to do without permanently damaging the organ. When a baby is born the foreskin is fused to the head of the penis, thus no additional care is needed. The organ is very self-cleaning just like it’s female
... cause of a problem but it is the result of a situation’ (Greunbaum, 2001, pp. 177-178). There’s a need to understand the cultural and social dimension of female circumcision in order to realize and respect people for the culture; however, there is also a need for better medical environments for this procedure to be performed in.
Circumcision has been a religious practice in many different cultures, ranging from Africa to the Middle East, and to Asia. While prevalent in both Jewish and Muslim societies, the earliest known documentation of circumcision comes from Egyptian hieroglyphics discovered dating back to 2300 BC. While the reason behind circumcision is currently unknown, many theories exist as to attempt to explain it origins. One theory persists that that circumcision started as a way to release the body from sin, and purifying both the individual and the society, as sexuality was seen as dirty and impure, and the removing of the foreskin would reduce sexual pleasure. In Abrahamic faiths, Jewish and Muslim, circumcision is practiced as a way confirm one 's relationship to God, and is stated in the Torah, as the covenant between God and Abraham, “This is my covenant, which ye shall keep, between me and you and thy seed after thee: every male among you shall be circumcised. " While two of the earliest form of Christianity, Coptic Christian, and Ethiopian Orthodox
Rites of passage, specifically circumcision, are the focus of study for multiple theorists. Circumcision as a ritual of passage encompasses various theories on the function of these ritualistic passages. Arnold Van Gennep, Vincent Crapanzano, and Victor Turner each approach the ritual of circumcisions’ function differently, specifically they question whether the ritual can be considered in stages.
The documented incidence of recurrence after the Karydakis procedure is ranging from 0 to 4.6%, and there is a well-recognized incidence of recurrence of up to 4.8% after the classic Limberg flap4,14. Despite the surgical drainage of the wound is still a matter of debate, many surgeons approved its usage to decrease the incidence of postoperative complications such as fluid collection and wound dehiscence. Moreover, its recurrence rate remains unclear 15. The effect of a suction drain on the recurrence rate of SDP is conflicting. Some reports highlighted that the use of suction drain is associated with low recurrence rate16, however others reported that it has no relation at all 17,18
After reading about circumcision, I think this should be the right of the parents, since by the time the child will be able to make the decision, it would be a painful procedure. Since it differs in many different cultures on how to handle this situation. For example, religiously, it is common in Jewish and Muslim culture to have the child circumcised. If the parents are indecisive about the decision, I think the parents should have the child circumcised, because of the health benefits that are associated with it. The child is 11 times less likely to get a urinary tract infection, reduces the chance for prostate cancer, and lowers the risk of sexual transmitted diseases(Hyde, Delamater, p.79). The child shouldn’t do what the father because
The death penalty has been an issue of debate for several years. Whether or not we should murder murderer’s and basically commit the same crime that they are being killed for committing. People against the death penalty say that we should not use it because of that very reason. They also make claims that innocent people who were wrongly convicted could be killed. Other claims include it not working as a deterrent, it being morally wrong, and that it discriminates. Some even claim that it is cruel and unusual punishment. I would like to shed light on the issue and inform everyone as to why we should keep the death penalty and possibly even use it more than we do now.
The countries that still practice female circumcision have extremely high numbers of circumcised women, which tells you that it is a common occurrence ingrained in the people of these societies, and they see it as the norm. Even some cultures who find the practice barbaric at some point have practiced female circumcision. Graebaum points this out one page 60 of The Female Circumcision: An Anthropological Perspective,