Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Debate on female circumcision
Debate on female circumcision
Essays on circumcision
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Debate on female circumcision
After reading about circumcision, I think this should be the right of the parents, since by the time the child will be able to make the decision, it would be a painful procedure. Since it differs in many different cultures on how to handle this situation. For example, religiously, it is common in Jewish and Muslim culture to have the child circumcised. If the parents are indecisive about the decision, I think the parents should have the child circumcised, because of the health benefits that are associated with it. The child is 11 times less likely to get a urinary tract infection, reduces the chance for prostate cancer, and lowers the risk of sexual transmitted diseases(Hyde, Delamater, p.79). The child shouldn’t do what the father because
their parents may have not had the right reasons for the choice especially since the parents might have not done the circumcision because of the culture in the United States at the time, for example, in 59% in 1986 compared to 90% in 1970(Hyde, Delamater, p.79). If I had a newborn, I would get the new born circumcised due to the health benefits that are associated with it. I also believe that the child will not remember the pain, since it will be done a couple days after birth, compared to having the child wait, and remembering the pain.
Some fear that the removal of the healthy part of an organ is a purely
When parents first discover they are having a baby, there are so many aspects to consider. Who is going to be their doctor, which hospital are they going to deliver at, what are they going to name the baby, and what color should they paint the nursery. Parents that are expecting a male newborn have to decide if they want their baby to be circumcised. For many families, this is an easy decision based on their cultural or religious beliefs. However, for others the right option is not as clear. Over the years, the topic of circumcision has been debated and views have swayed for and against the procedure. Ultimately, the parents must evaluate all the pros and cons and make the decision that aligns best with their thoughts and beliefs. The parent’s decision about the procedure will be influenced by various factors. It is vital that they are educated on the accurate information surrounding the advantages and disadvantages of the circumcision. This paper will evaluate both sides of this controversial issue.
Freedom of choice is a desire for most, but as we are young we depend on the decision of our parents. With this dependent nature of a child the freedom of choice is limited, for males this can lead to a life long consequence. Male circumcision is the surgical removal of the foreskin; the skin covering the head of the penis. Circumcision is practiced for religious purposes in Jewish and Muslim communities. Normally, the boy’s age varies from 4 to 11 years old. In the United States, this procedure is also done but without a religious purpose. The boys in this case are commonly newborn. This practice became popular after medical groups claimed that there were many health benefits that came with circumcision. Though it has been proven otherwise, it is still a common practice in the U.S. fueled by ignorance. Circumcision is an unnecessary surgery that leads to psychological problems, issues with sexual activities and lasting physical damage.
Certainly, in the United States (and much of the Western world), female circumcision is illegal; however, male circumcision is utterly legal. In fact, in 2007, the Center for Disease Control reported that almost eighty percent of men in the United States were circumcised (Morris): legally, zero percent were females. Yet, several nations, where the culture is absolutely polar from the West, have prohibited male circumcision (Evans). The predominant factor, of course. The ideologies of culture make the laws, including morals; thus, these laws represent each region’s civilization, morals, and culture. Again, doctors must conform—this time to the law, not the parent. So, any decision doctors make, regarding circumcision, is due to cultural restrictions and their own
Most Americans view circumcision as a solution to a problem which it is not. Circumcision has not been scientifically proven to prevent, solve, or improve any health condition or state. One of the most common reasons people circumcise infants is because they believe it will make cleaning babies easier. This is a common misconception. Parents for generations have been taught that uncircumcised babies need to have the underside of their foreskin cleaned, but this is physically impossible to do without permanently damaging the organ. When a baby is born the foreskin is fused to the head of the penis, thus no additional care is needed. The organ is very self-cleaning just like it’s female
Neonatal circumcision is one of the most often executed surgeries in the United States. (1:130) In my clinical practice thus far, the question whether to circumcise male neonates or not is frequently asked in the postpartum period. Midwives play an important role in providing informed choice discussions for their clients, it is thus our role to present the research evidence available in order to help women make the right choice for them and their families. This paper aims to describe the different incentives of male circumcision and the benefits and risks involved.
Repealing Roe Vs Wade is a decision that has been controversial for over forty years. Since it was passed in nineteen seventy three, Roe Vs Wade has made its mark on Americans’ lives in a very spine-chilling way. It has constantly had an impact on society by depriving it of the intelligence of the unborn children, and it has also robbed America of a ginormous amount of income. It is unconstitutional because it ruins the right of life to all people which includes the unborn, and finally it is religiously wrong because not one human being is righteous enough to decide who gets life. Roe vs Wade has done nothing but lacerate and contaminate the American way of life, and for the sake of the United States Roe vs Wade needs to be abrogated.
Female genital mutilation (FGM) is an ancient traditional non-therapeutic surgical procedure that involves total or partial removal of the external parts of female genitalia. This paper aimed to define and classify FGM, identifies the prevalence, describes reasons for performing the practice, and concentrates on the problems associated to this practice with regard to women’s health, religious beliefs, and socio-cultural, behavioral and moral consequences. Researches and survey reports that the global actions have been taken to reduce or abolish the prevalence of the practice will be assessed.
Little, Cindy M. "FEMALE GENITAL CIRCUMCISION: MEDICAL AND CULTURAL CONSIDERATIONS." Journal of Cultural Diversity 10.1 (2003): 30-34. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 18 Apr. 2011.
Abortion is one of America’s most controversial subjects. The participants in this debate have fixed beliefs on the matter at hand. On one side of the debate are people who believe in pro- choice. They argue that choice of a woman is more important than an unborn fetus. They point out that an unborn child is not on the same level of importance as the mother. Also, the pro-life group declares that choice is the sole purpose behind their argument. They believe that if a woman cannot chose to abolish a pregnancy, then she looses one of her basic human rights. The other side of the debate is the pro-life group. Their main concern is that the fetus is a person; therefore, having the same human rights as the mother. As a result, when states pass laws that enable abortions, these states are legalizing murder. When considering an individual’s ethics and values, killing is morally wrong. Therefore, the termination of unborn children is wrong, as well. Abortion, the unethical expulsion of an embryo or fetus, in order to purposely end a pregnancy, should be forbidden because human life begins at conception, economics is not a justification for abortion, and an unwanted child does not justify abortion.
In my argumentative coursework I am arguing that abortion is wrong and not to be mistaken with 'Abortion should be made illegal.' I will explain later why I have made this statement. Abortion is the termination of an unborn child in its mother's womb for up to twenty four weeks of the pregnancy or in special circumstances e.g. Disability diagnosis a termination right up until the mother goes in to labour. I think the above definition is an easier and less harsh way of saying that abortion is the murdering of a human being. There are several reasons why abortion is legal and several reasons why it shouldn?t be.
“In the USA, where nearly half of pregnancies are unintended and four in ten of these are terminated by abortion, there are over 3,000 abortions per day (Finer).” Twenty-two percent of all pregnancies in the USA (excluding miscarriages) end in abortion (Jones).” Imagine being a mother of a one-year old-child and you are pregnant again. You go to a gynaecologist for help as you don't want children so close together in age. The physician then asks you what you want him to do, and you tell him that you want to end your pregnancy. He then tells you he has a better solution for your problem and it's less dangerous for your body. You then think the doctor is going to accept your request, but he continues and says that in order for you not to have
The story Circumcision by Pramoedya Ananta Toer shows that you can be hyped for something but in the end it all be meaningless. This story, written in 1969 shows how religious faith might be a way some people think they can find meaning in life, it is ultimately pointless. This story follows the path of a young boy who wants to be a good Muslim and goes through a major trial just to discover that it was pointless. The boy lets readers reflect on the meaning of religion and how meaningless it feels even after they do something religious. Also in the time leading up to a major religious event the narrator thinks more about the materialistic goods he will receive rather the spiritualistic side.
The second reason why newborn circumcision should not be banned is that it decreases the risk of penile cancer. Being uncircumcised alone is considered a risk factor for penile cancer since it can lead to many penile problems that cause irritation and inflammation of the penis, thereby increasing the risk of penile cancer (“What Are the Risk Factors for Penile Cancer?”). In an article entitled “What Are the Risk Factors for Penile Cancer?” the writers state that “Men who were circumcised as children may have a lower chance of getting penile cancer than those who were not, but the same protective effect is not seen if the foreskin is removed as an adult.” As previously stated, it is unclear why men who are uncircumcised are at increased risk of penile cancer, but it is thought to be related to the accumulation of smegma beneath the foreskin (“What Are the Risk Factors for Penile Cancer?”). Smegma is defined as “a thick, cheesy
an embryo or of a fetus that is incapable of survival." However, if only the